First of all, I would like to say that I am a huge Eagles fan, and have always been a supporter of Owens, and have given him the benefit of the doubt. Last year he clearly showed that he wanted to go to a team with an extreme talent at QB, get a chance at winning a championship, and get a large contract with a signing bonus reflective of his status as a top 3 receiver. The Philadelphia Eagles granted him all of these wishes. He showed guts in the Superbowl, and showed he was willing to risk his career for a chance to win a superbowl. He also showed that he was worth the contract that they gave him.
Now let's take a look at his recent behavior. He first said he was unhappy with his contract, despite signing it less than one year ago. Then, he criticized the heart and soul of his team (McNabb), and made it clear that he was willing to do whatever it takes to get what he wants. He will be a distraction every chance he gets, which is consistent with how he always has always handled himself. TO has shown this offseason that he will never be happy with his situation or his contract.
After reading several of the previous posts, I find myself surprised that anyone is actually trying to defend TO's actions, or comparing them to such a different situation. JAA's arguments are rather absurd. As a fellow fan, how are you actually defending someone who is in the exact situation he requested, got to a superbowl, criticized the best leader in football, and clearly cares about no one but himself. It is actually pretty sad that someone can be that clueless about what is really important in the game of football and in life.
Now that I have stated this, I will try to give my perspective on the difference between these contract situations. I think we can all agree that both of these WR are elite, and are complete players on the field. They block and are dominant receivers. Having said that, here are some of the differences:
1. One player is in year 2 of a 7 year contract, the other is going into the last year.
2. One player is already getting paid fair market value, the other is not.
3. One player is not respected by either his QB or other teammates, the other is.
4. One player has publicly criticized teammates to better his financial situation, the other has not.
5. One player is hated by the majority of fans, the other is respected by the majority.
6. One player has said one thing and done the opposite throughout contract negotiations, the other has stayed true to his word and has not received what he was promised.
7. One player is replaceable both on the field and in the locker room (unless some of you forgot that the Eagles got to the championship game 4 times without TO, and won it without him), the other is not.
8. One player has no leverage in negotiations, the other has an abundance.
Honestly, as an Eagle's fan, I think they are one of the few teams that has enough leadership to control TO's ego. They will just be quiet and play football, and not respond to TO's antics. I hope they can salvage the relationship and win it all this year. But I don't think the Eagles would win fewer superbowls if they get rid of TO. Their offense may not score quite as many TDs, or gain as many yards, but they have shown that they can win big games without TO. I think one of the true differences in these situations is that the Steelers would be severely affected if they did not have Ward in the huddle, and the Eagles have already planned around TO's absence.
Lastly, I simply cannot understand how someone can fail to grasp the difference between these situations. People who state that they both want more money, and the discussion ends there, are seriously lacking some critical thinking skills.