What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Tolbert vs. Matthews (1 Viewer)

He hasnt lol, Tolbert has been a spitting image of Michael Turner this year and the reason he hasnt been getting the proper respect is because of the hurrderp Mathews owners that took him in the first round that every week try to make an excuse for why he will be the back in SD. He will be the back at some point, probably not next year and definitely not this year. Its obvious the Chargers want Mathews to be worth his draft pick and want Tolbert to be a great change of pace back but it didnt work out that way.

Threads lacking stats:

Tolbert:

Attempts - 161

Avg YPC - 4.3

Touchdowns - 10

Fumbles - 3

Games played - 13 (limited in 4 games, TD in 3 of those games limited to 3 carries or less.)

Positional Rank - 19th

Mathews:

Attempts - 103

Avg YPC - 4.3

Touchdowns - 3

Fumbles - 3

Games played - 9 (outright missed 4 games due to injury)

Positional Rank - 47
I wonder if this is how Norv Turner decides who his feature back should be... cruises FF sites, dredges up some nerdy stats, and then bases his decision 100% on the past. Or if he just says, "Matthews is my guy... and he's gonna play." :pickle:

 
Running game bump at all with Floyd and Gates out?
This has to be a huge bump for Sproles. 3rd down checkdowns all night.Damn I have Mathews and don't have the guts to start him over PThomas given Ivory news but maybe should rethink (also have Lynch and RBrown).
 
49ers linebackers Patrick Willis and Takeo Spikes will play, although both have broken right arms, a source with knowledge of the situation told NFL.com senior writer Steve Wyche. Spikes and Willis have had their arms casted and are expected to have them reinforced with padding and tape in order to play. Both were listed as questionable.

 
Ryan Mathews is expected to draw a second straight start for the Chargers Thursday night."But look for a heavy dose of Mike Tolbert," says NFL Network's Jason LaCanfora. We suspect the Chargers will continue to split touches down the middle after their success in doing so against the Chiefs last week. Tolbert is the better bet for touchdowns as the goal-line back.
 
49ers linebackers Patrick Willis and Takeo Spikes will play, although both have broken right arms, a source with knowledge of the situation told NFL.com senior writer Steve Wyche. Spikes and Willis have had their arms casted and are expected to have them reinforced with padding and tape in order to play. Both were listed as questionable.
Good luck tackling Tolbert with a broken arm.
 
49ers linebackers Patrick Willis and Takeo Spikes will play, although both have broken right arms, a source with knowledge of the situation told NFL.com senior writer Steve Wyche. Spikes and Willis have had their arms casted and are expected to have them reinforced with padding and tape in order to play. Both were listed as questionable.
Good luck tackling Tolbert with a broken arm.
Good luck tackling Tolbert with less than 3 people.
 
So would you guys say Matthews is a fairly safe flex play this week in ppr?
I'm starting him, as I seethis game notbeing close in the 4th qtr, and hopefully Mathews will get a bulk of the carries in the 2nd half.
Sure hope you are right, because I'm not liking what I'm seeing so far.
I like Tolbert but I don't understand what the Chargers are doing. Mathews gets 5 yards on his first carry and hasn't seen the field since. Instead, it's Tolbert for 1 and 2 yards a carry. You'd think they'd want to go back to Mathews.
 
So would you guys say Matthews is a fairly safe flex play this week in ppr?
I'm starting him, as I seethis game notbeing close in the 4th qtr, and hopefully Mathews will get a bulk of the carries in the 2nd half.
Sure hope you are right, because I'm not liking what I'm seeing so far.
I like Tolbert but I don't understand what the Chargers are doing. Mathews gets 5 yards on his first carry and hasn't seen the field since. Instead, it's Tolbert for 1 and 2 yards a carry. You'd think they'd want to go back to Mathews.
Yeah, I'm not sure what the point is of "starting" a rookie and giving him 1 carry in the first quarter and a half.
 
So would you guys say Matthews is a fairly safe flex play this week in ppr?
I'm starting him, as I seethis game notbeing close in the 4th qtr, and hopefully Mathews will get a bulk of the carries in the 2nd half.
Sure hope you are right, because I'm not liking what I'm seeing so far.
I like Tolbert but I don't understand what the Chargers are doing. Mathews gets 5 yards on his first carry and hasn't seen the field since. Instead, it's Tolbert for 1 and 2 yards a carry. You'd think they'd want to go back to Mathews.
Yeah, I'm not sure what the point is of "starting" a rookie and giving him 1 carry in the first quarter and a half.
You sure he's not hurt?ETA: No. But with a carry for 0 yards, he might as well be! :wall: :wall:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So would you guys say Matthews is a fairly safe flex play this week in ppr?
I'm starting him, as I seethis game notbeing close in the 4th qtr, and hopefully Mathews will get a bulk of the carries in the 2nd half.
Sure hope you are right, because I'm not liking what I'm seeing so far.
I like Tolbert but I don't understand what the Chargers are doing. Mathews gets 5 yards on his first carry and hasn't seen the field since. Instead, it's Tolbert for 1 and 2 yards a carry. You'd think they'd want to go back to Mathews.
Yeah, I'm not sure what the point is of "starting" a rookie and giving him 1 carry in the first quarter and a half.
So an idiot like me after the news that Gates and Floyd were out and that he drew the start would make a late move and put him in there. So much for the championship :wall:
 
He's back and I'm guessing he stays there the rest of the game
I doubt we've seen the last of Tolbert. But with the Chargers up 14-0, you'd think we'll see plenty of running in the second half. And the last two games when the 49ers were down big (Tampa Bay and Green Bay), they got gashed by opposing RBs.
 
He's back and I'm guessing he stays there the rest of the game
I doubt we've seen the last of Tolbert. But with the Chargers up 14-0, you'd think we'll see plenty of running in the second half. And the last two games when the 49ers were down big (Tampa Bay and Green Bay), they got gashed by opposing RBs.
Doesn't it seem like this is San Diego's coming out party with the way that VJAX is going? Hopefully they have a second half Mathews party!! 1st Half RB comparison:Mathews 4 for 22 yardsTolbert 8 for 18 yardsEdge Mathews
 
Turner only wants to use Tolbert. Worse, time is flying by in this game with little opportunity to make it up. Any of us stupid enough to start Mathews is f'd.

<<THIS GUY>>

 
Two runs for 0 yards in the red zone and Turner still gives him the score.

He's officially worse than Shanahan on his worst day. F@#$!

 
Two runs for 0 yards in the red zone and Turner still gives him the score.He's officially worse than Shanahan on his worst day. F@#$!
Yeah b/c it's not like there as been ANY indication over the last, I don't 13 or 14 weeks, that Tolbert gets most of the goaline work.
 
The change (to Mathews as their feature back) is coming sooner rather than later (not sure about this season). While Tolbert is a nice RB, Mathews can be special. The more you watch Mathews, the more you realize he's one of the most electric backs in the NFL. He runs with a lot of power, as well. That combination is devastating.

Don't think Mathews getting the start these last 2 weeks doesn't have meaning. Tolbert is covering punts, LOL. That said, you have to hand it to Tolbert. He's taken advantage of playing in that offense, but he's simply nowhere near as talented as Mathews, IMO.

Patience. You just have to realize it may not happen this year.

 
The whole reason I bought into Mathews this year was based on Norv's history in the past to not use a RBBC and really feature his main guy. Maybe that was the plan originally and Mathews getting hurt derailed it, but man the way it has played out over the year has surprised me. Hopefully it opens a window to get Mathews on the cheap next year, but for this year it's pretty obvious he's the between the 20s RB and not in for the goal line or passing downs. In other words, pretty useless

 
The change (to Mathews as their feature back) is coming sooner rather than later (not sure about this season). While Tolbert is a nice RB, Mathews can be special. The more you watch Mathews, the more you realize he's one of the most electric backs in the NFL. He runs with a lot of power, as well. That combination is devastating.Don't think Mathews getting the start these last 2 weeks doesn't have meaning. Tolbert is covering punts, LOL. That said, you have to hand it to Tolbert. He's taken advantage of playing in that offense, but he's simply nowhere near as talented as Mathews, IMO. Patience. You just have to realize it may not happen this year.
Right here guys :rolleyes: How many of you wrote off McFadden after his rookie season? Pretty much everybody...Keep him this offseason. Tolbert is lucky that Mathews has been hurt all year. He's a short, fat FB who still plays on special teams. First round draft picks just don't go away after an injury plagued season. Mathews will be a steal next year, just like McFadden was this year.
 
Anybody happy with Tolbert's 10.6 points tonight ? He's my RB2 and only weak spot behind a stacked team. 10.6, not great, but could be worse imo. His TD saved him.

 
Football Jones said:
The change (to Mathews as their feature back) is coming sooner rather than later (not sure about this season). While Tolbert is a nice RB, Mathews can be special. The more you watch Mathews, the more you realize he's one of the most electric backs in the NFL. He runs with a lot of power, as well. That combination is devastating.

Don't think Mathews getting the start these last 2 weeks doesn't have meaning. Tolbert is covering punts, LOL. That said, you have to hand it to Tolbert. He's taken advantage of playing in that offense, but he's simply nowhere near as talented as Mathews, IMO.

Patience. You just have to realize it may not happen this year.
agree, esp with bolded. i am enamored by mathews from what ive seen. that cut he made today was pretty slick. he runs a bit like arian foster but seems to have more power and lower cog. i didnt draft him on any teams so i have no bias. in fact i am hoping he continues to be underutilized so i can snag him on the cheap next draft.
 
Football Jones said:
The change (to Mathews as their feature back) is coming sooner rather than later (not sure about this season). While Tolbert is a nice RB, Mathews can be special. The more you watch Mathews, the more you realize he's one of the most electric backs in the NFL. He runs with a lot of power, as well. That combination is devastating.

Don't think Mathews getting the start these last 2 weeks doesn't have meaning. Tolbert is covering punts, LOL. That said, you have to hand it to Tolbert. He's taken advantage of playing in that offense, but he's simply nowhere near as talented as Mathews, IMO.

Patience. You just have to realize it may not happen this year.
agree, esp with bolded. i am enamored by mathews from what ive seen. that cut he made today was pretty slick. he runs a bit like arian foster but seems to have more power and lower cog. i didnt draft him on any teams so i have no bias. in fact i am hoping he continues to be underutilized so i can snag him on the cheap next draft.
You know who else is really impressive and is having very little success? Jahvid Best.
 
im a jahvid owner so perhaps i am biased (i mean, thats the general accusation of this forum) but ya, i subjectively dont see similar talent.

 
im a jahvid owner so perhaps i am biased (i mean, thats the general accusation of this forum) but ya, i subjectively dont see similar talent.
:blackdot: I don't know what Mathews some of these people have been watching, but it can't be the Ryan who has shown no vision whatsoever this season. Perhaps he'll come back a better player next year, but this season he has looked like a classic bust draft pick who must have looked a lot better in the combine than he looks as a football player. Pretty funny to hear the argument that Mathews is really awesome and can't possibly be denied greatness by the slow, fat, crummy Mike Tolbert. Funny because he has already been beaten out by the slow, fat, crummy Tolbert! :goodposting: :yes:
 
Just to make it clear, IMO Best is gonna be a top 5 back as early as next year but realistically a couple years. Mathews was very good in college, everyone knows that doesnt necessarily translate to the NFL level. Hes been dealt a bad hand (being injured early, being ineffective when given a shot, being stuck behind another up and coming back) Its unclear whether he will be able to help himself.

 
Right now, Mathews has shown excellent vision in running up the backs of his o linemen. He does it so consistently, it must be on purpose.

His situation is great though, and he will be given every chance to succeed. The next LT2 however...he is not. Top 10-15 fantasy back next year.... sure.

 
Oh well, hope that call (Mathews) at flex doesn't cost me a spot in the championship game. 5.6 points...could have been worse, I guess.

 
im a jahvid owner so perhaps i am biased (i mean, thats the general accusation of this forum) but ya, i subjectively dont see similar talent.
;) I don't know what Mathews some of these people have been watching, but it can't be the Ryan who has shown no vision whatsoever this season. Perhaps he'll come back a better player next year, but this season he has looked like a classic bust draft pick who must have looked a lot better in the combine than he looks as a football player. Pretty funny to hear the argument that Mathews is really awesome and can't possibly be denied greatness by the slow, fat, crummy Mike Tolbert. Funny because he has already been beaten out by the slow, fat, crummy Tolbert! :bag: :loco:
i think you misinterpreted my position. i think mathews' talent dwarfs jahvids.
 
Right now, Mathews has shown excellent vision in running up the backs of his o linemen. He does it so consistently, it must be on purpose.His situation is great though, and he will be given every chance to succeed. The next LT2 however...he is not. Top 10-15 fantasy back next year.... sure.
LT averaged 3.6 his rookie season & lost 5 fumbles. I don't particularly like to use raw stats like that, but it just goes to show even the best RBs can have a learning curve in their rookie season. I see nothing that tells me Mathews isn't going to be an absolute FF monster in that offense. Mathews has missed a lot of time & is just now starting to get some touches, but he's getting the starts which is no small thing. I'm not sure when Mathews will become their feature back, but I believe it's going to happen sooner rather than later (likely in 2011). Tolbert simply isn't talented enough to keep Mathews on the bench or in a RBBC, IMO.I'm confident I'm right, but we'll see. It might not happen for Mathews this season. Patience.
 
BTW, Mathews has a slightly higher YPC than Tolbert. Again, it's a raw stat, but it just goes to show the potential Mathews has despite missing valuable time. Some people think the RB position is all natural, but that's not true. There's a learning curve like all positions.

Tolbert is a great story, but he just doesn't have the kind of natural talent Mathews has, IMO. The coaches have said Mathews is getting better & better. I believe it's just a matter of time.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
BTW, Mathews has a slightly higher YPC than Tolbert. Again, it's a raw stat, but it just goes to show the potential Mathews has despite missing valuable time. Some people think the RB position is all natural, but that's not true. There's a learning curve like all positions.Tolbert is a great story, but he just doesn't have the kind of natural talent Mathews has, IMO. The coaches have said Mathews is getting better & better. I believe it's just a matter of time.
What makes you say Tolbert doenst have the kind of natural talent? He stepped in to a crappy situation and has done more than what they expected anyone to do? Im just curious.
 
BTW, Mathews has a slightly higher YPC than Tolbert. Again, it's a raw stat, but it just goes to show the potential Mathews has despite missing valuable time. Some people think the RB position is all natural, but that's not true. There's a learning curve like all positions.Tolbert is a great story, but he just doesn't have the kind of natural talent Mathews has, IMO. The coaches have said Mathews is getting better & better. I believe it's just a matter of time.
What makes you say Tolbert doenst have the kind of natural talent? He stepped in to a crappy situation and has done more than what they expected anyone to do? Im just curious.
Tolbert is a nice RB, but he's somewhat limited as far as quickness & speed. You can excel without having speed, but you've got to have quickness to be a feature back. Look at the top RBs. You'll find guys with good lateral quickness or at least quick feet. You can't just be a guy who runs over people. It won't work over the longhaul. But you can't just be a guy who tries to juke everyone, either.Mathews has all the tools to be an NFL feature back. He's got the quickness/power/speed combo that's so effective in today's game. I believe Tolbert will eventually be the backup to Matthews. That said, it'll be interesting to see how it plays out the rest of the way this season.
 
BTW, Mathews has a slightly higher YPC than Tolbert. Again, it's a raw stat, but it just goes to show the potential Mathews has despite missing valuable time. Some people think the RB position is all natural, but that's not true. There's a learning curve like all positions.Tolbert is a great story, but he just doesn't have the kind of natural talent Mathews has, IMO. The coaches have said Mathews is getting better & better. I believe it's just a matter of time.
What makes you say Tolbert doenst have the kind of natural talent? He stepped in to a crappy situation and has done more than what they expected anyone to do? Im just curious.
Tolbert is a nice RB, but he's somewhat limited as far as quickness & speed. You can excel without having speed, but you've got to have quickness to be a feature back. Look at the top RBs. You'll find guys with good lateral quickness or at least quick feet. You can't just be a guy who runs over people. It won't work over the longhaul. But you can't just be a guy who tries to juke everyone, either.Mathews has all the tools to be an NFL feature back. He's got the quickness/power/speed combo that's so effective in today's game. I believe Tolbert will eventually be the backup to Matthews. That said, it'll be interesting to see how it plays out the rest of the way this season.
It doesn't seem like Hillis is especially fast or quick, but he sure looks good plowing LBs who get in his way, which is pretty much what Tolbert does. I don't think Tolbert will ever be the lead RB for the Chargers in any other situation than right now when their desired #1 has been hurt, but I also don't think they shelve him completely when they know what he can do inside the 5. 11 TDs most likely won't be forgotten and he might turn Mathews into the next Ray Rice, which is death in TD heavy formats.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top