What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Tom Brady MVP? (1 Viewer)

The point of all this? Quality of receivers means everything to QB stats, there may have been other factors but when you upgrade the weapons at his disposal you elevate his game and what he can accomplish.
Actually it seems like the point you're making is that the Patriots offense was really bad without Gronk, but good with Gronk. That seems to be more an argument for Gronk for MVP than Brady.
receivers plural, you fail again
Who are all these other receivers? Amendola? Because Amendola played 3 games without Gronk and Brady's QB Rating in those games was 68.

Gronk for MVP.
Can you troll any worse? What happened to your GENO FOR MVP rant?

All you are doing is proving my point, Peyton wouldn't be putting up the stats he has so far without his tier 1 cast of receivers and when going head-to-head against Brady he choked under pressure.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The point of all this? Quality of receivers means everything to QB stats, there may have been other factors but when you upgrade the weapons at his disposal you elevate his game and what he can accomplish.
Actually it seems like the point you're making is that the Patriots offense was really bad without Gronk, but good with Gronk. That seems to be more an argument for Gronk for MVP than Brady.
Patriots are 3-2 since gronk returned. The offensive stats might be better, but the argument for brady as mvp is what he was able to do in a situation that didn't lend itself to putting up big numbers. When your receivers are dropping balls left and right, running the wrong routes and unable to run the hurryup, your numbers are going to suffer. When vereen gets hurt week 1, ridley fumbles himself onto the pine, and blount and bolden are getting significant work, and your entire receiving corps is turned over, your presumed numbed one gets hurt week 1, your last experienced receiver is averaging 5 to 6 yards per catch, and you lose two games after controversial officiating decisions, and you hurt your hand, yet you can start the season with four straight wins and lead the team into position to get a first round bye, you're doing something right, even if you aren't putting up eye popping stats. I know its not exciting for fantasy football owners, and there are plenty of people who would rather not give brady credit unless they absolutely have to, but it really is pretty incredible that they're in the position they're in,

 
Ghost Rider said:
If Manning has more games like he did the past couple games andif Brady has more games like he did on Sunday, andif NE ends up with the #1 seed, he probably deserves it.

If Broncos win out and keep the #1 seed andif Manning ends up with >45 TD passes, it's Mannings without a doubt.
I don't know, man. You could argue that this past weekend show how valuable Manning is to the Broncos, since they got a great running game and a bunch of turnovers and still couldn't win. The Broncos need Manning to play great to win. The Patriots have shown that they can win games this year even if Brady doesn't play well (see: the Jets and Dolphins games). That alone makes Manning far more valuable, even his far better numbers notwithstanding.
Holy Mother of God Man, are you serious? This is schtick, right? I almost feel like I'm going to get a bunch of "Your sarcasm meter is broken" comments after I post this.

This game shows how valuable Manning is to the Broncos because they were fortunate to have a 24 point half time lead, and were able to run the ball for almost 300 yards, yet Manning still couldn't find a way to hold onto the lead?

 
I'm not a fan of either team and have enjoyed watching both Peyton and Tom over the years. Both are having impressive seasons, for different reasons. However, emotions aside there's very little question who I would want leading my team deep into the post season... Brady all day. As if Jerry could put together a playoff team.

 
BB for coach of the year

For his excellent adjustments at half time and for having an 8-3 record with the new receiver corps and a patchwork defense

 
Broncos at Chiefs should be interesting this weekend

MVP Odds

Odds as of 11/12/13 by docsports

-600 Manning

+300 Brees

+2000 Brady

+2000 Calvin Johnson

+2500 Jamaal Charles

+2500 Andrew Luck

Odds as of 11/28/13 by Bovada

-275 Manning

+300 Brees

+1200 Newton

+1200 Brady

+3300 Russell Wilson

+3300 Calvin Johnson

+5000 Nick Foles

 
MVP awards never go to players who get hurt, but I can't imagine the Broncos or the Patriots completely going in the toilet the way the Packers have since Aaron Rodgers got hurt, so in that respect, I would say that Rodgers is the most valuable QB to his team, but again, the award is never looked at that way.

 
MVP awards never go to players who get hurt, but I can't imagine the Broncos or the Patriots completely going in the toilet the way the Packers have since Aaron Rodgers got hurt, so in that respect, I would say that Rodgers is the most valuable QB to his team, but again, the award is never looked at that way.
You have to play to qualify for an award with "player" in the name.

 
MVP awards never go to players who get hurt, but I can't imagine the Broncos or the Patriots completely going in the toilet the way the Packers have since Aaron Rodgers got hurt, so in that respect, I would say that Rodgers is the most valuable QB to his team, but again, the award is never looked at that way.
You have to play to qualify for an award with "player" in the name.
Not only that, but the Packers were already taking on water by losing Cobb, Jones, and Finley. Rodgers was just the final straw.
 
MVP awards never go to players who get hurt, but I can't imagine the Broncos or the Patriots completely going in the toilet the way the Packers have since Aaron Rodgers got hurt, so in that respect, I would say that Rodgers is the most valuable QB to his team, but again, the award is never looked at that way.
You have to play to qualify for an award with "player" in the name.
Not only that, but the Packers were already taking on water by losing Cobb, Jones, and Finley. Rodgers was just the final straw.
And not only that......but you can't really say "hey they fell apart after Rodgers got hurt" when the backup was Wallace, then Tolzien (or whatever his name is), and now Flynn.

If they had any halfway realistic QB option behind Rodgers they might have actually won a game since his injury.

Also..............part of the value of the player would also be to actually play. If the packers were 8-0 and winning every game 50-20, and then go 0-8 and lose every game 20-0, you can't say Rodgers was the MVP for the season because his injury took away any possibility of that. If you cant stay healthy, then you aren't as valuable as the other studs who did stay healthy.

 
Slightly off topic, but congrats to anyone that bought Brady low in redraft. You have a top 5 quarterback for the rest of the season.

 
If you think anyone but Peyton Manning should be MVP, you are wrong

By Frank Schwab
December 10, 2013 1:50 PM

On the first day of the NFL season, Peyton Manning threw seven touchdowns against the Ravens.

He became the NFL MVP favorite that day, and there hasn't been a moment since when he hasn't led the field in that race.

But I get it. It's boring to repeat the same thing for four months. It doesn't draw any attention to yourself to state the obvious. So we have this ridiculous "debate" brewing that anyone but Manning could be the MVP this season. It's maddening to anyone who understands logic.

Manning has 45 touchdowns, already tied for fifth most in NFL history with three games to go. You know who has 44 touchdowns this season? Tom Brady and Russell Wilson combined. Manning also has 400 more passing yards than anyone in the NFL. Saying he shouldn't win the MVP is like predicting the sky will be pink tomorrow. Bet on the sky being blue – you'll probably be right.


Yet, there are those who want to stand out in the crowd. Those arguing for anyone but Manning for MVP generally fall under one of these categories:

1. The illogical homer

"@Pats4EVERANDEVER: When you look at how clutch he is, Tom Brady is the REAL ... "

No he's not. It's Peyton Manning.

2. The contrarian

"I know everyone is saying Manning is a MVP lock, but if you look at it, Russell Wilson is .... "

No he's not. It's Peyton Manning.

3. The person who can't give Manning any credit

"Did you see that one bad half Manning had at New England? That's why Drew Brees is ... "

No he's not. It's Peyton Manning.

4. The person wanting attention

"I'M HERE TO TELL YOU THAT NICK FOLES IS ... "

No he's not. It's Peyton Manning.

5. Close friends and relatives

"I just want to let you know that my Jamaal is ... "

No he's not. It's Peyton Manning.

6. People using terrible arguments

"If you look at the definition, Most VALUABLE, then Calvin Johnson is ... "

No he's not. It's Peyton Manning

7. Those who don't understand "stats" are a tangible thing earned by performance

"Manning's STATS are good but that means nothing because Cam Newton is ... "

No he's not. It's Peyton Manning.

8. People who know absolutely nothing about football

"Who's Peyton Manning?"

Don't worry about it. Just know that he's the MVP of the 2013 season.

This should be the easiest MVP vote of all time. Anything other than a unanimous vote for Manning is a attention-baiting travesty. The only thing Manning is competing against is history. Is he the greatest MVP of all time? Aaron Rodgers of 2011 might argue, or maybe Tom Brady 2007 or O.J. Simpson from 1973 has a case. But nobody from 2013 is even in the same zip code.

You want to go by the tedious "valuable" definition? Fine. The Broncos are 11-2 despite giving up the eighth most points in the NFL this season. They're tied for the best record in the league because the offense is going to destroy the 2007 Patriots' record for points in a season. They're that dominant first and foremost because of Manning. If you've paid any attention to Manning's career, you understand his impact on an offense and a locker room. He is a master of calling the game on the field, and getting his teammates up to his level. The Broncos are 24-5 since Manning signed with them. And they would have won a playoff game last season had safety Rahim Moore not fallen asleep in the final minute. Valuable? If Brock Osweiler was Denver's quarterback the Broncos would be planning January vacations.

Manning has checked every single box, from the first day of the 2013 season until now, to win the MVP award in the easiest vote ever. Russell Wilson is a future star having a great year. Tom Brady is an all-time great who overcame his early-season struggles to carry the Patriots. Drew Brees is unbelievable. Calvin Johnson has solidified his spot as one of the top three receivers of all-time. They're all great. None of them should harbor the slightest bit of hope for winning the MVP award this season, because there's only one candidate. Those guys are on mile 21 of a marathon. Manning finished the race an hour ago.

So, please, let's just stop the madness. The 2013 NFL MVP is Peyton Manning. There is no other choice.

There is a lot of airtime to be filled, a lot of posts to be written and a lot of tweets to be sent over the course of a NFL season. Trust me, I know. But let's find something else to debate other than the NFL MVP.

Because if you are pitching anyone but Manning and his 4,522 yards, 45 touchdowns and 114.5 rating for the award, you're just wrong.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Agree with this 100%. Peyton manning should be the unanimous MVP winner this year. Not even close.

 
Agree with this 100%. Peyton manning should be the unanimous MVP winner this year. Not even close.
Even if the Patriots win out and get the #1 seed?
I'd have to see exactly how that transpired. I mean, if Manning has a horrendous last few games and Brady is fantastic - maybe you could make the case. But that's not likely to happen.

 
Agree with this 100%. Peyton manning should be the unanimous MVP winner this year. Not even close.
Even if the Patriots win out and get the #1 seed?
I'd have to see exactly how that transpired. I mean, if Manning has a horrendous last few games and Brady is fantastic - maybe you could make the case. But that's not likely to happen.
Manning only has to lose 1 game and Brady to win 3.

I'm not rooting for Brady to be even a co-winner but I can see how voters could want that.

 
Agree with this 100%. Peyton manning should be the unanimous MVP winner this year. Not even close.
Even if the Patriots win out and get the #1 seed?
Ask yourself this.... How many games has Denver's defense/special teams won them a game?

Now ask this.... How many games did NE defense/special teams won them the game?

- Cleveland there is zero chance if not for an unlikely onsides kick, biggest factor in the game. Special teams, not Brady

- Saints game, Brady blew chances for his comeback drive and the defense bailed him out to give him a shot.

- NYJ game Geno had multiple chances for the go ahead score and the defense held them, Brady stumbled and the defense held them again, and yet again.

- Denver, Brady matched Manning getting hot in the second half, taken to overtime and Brady couldn't put the game away, his special teams had to come up with a big play to give them a win.

This is just off the top of my head. I don't recall a game where Denver's Defense came close to helping.

 
Agree with this 100%. Peyton manning should be the unanimous MVP winner this year. Not even close.
Even if the Patriots win out and get the #1 seed?
Ask yourself this.... How many games has Denver's defense/special teams won them a game?

Now ask this.... How many games did NE defense/special teams won them the game?

- Cleveland there is zero chance if not for an unlikely onsides kick, biggest factor in the game. Special teams, not Brady

- Saints game, Brady blew chances for his comeback drive and the defense bailed him out to give him a shot.

- NYJ game Geno had multiple chances for the go ahead score and the defense held them, Brady stumbled and the defense held them again, and yet again.

- Denver, Brady matched Manning getting hot in the second half, taken to overtime and Brady couldn't put the game away, his special teams had to come up with a big play to give them a win.

This is just off the top of my head. I don't recall a game where Denver's Defense came close to helping.
I'm not sure how you can say defense/special teams "won" them games in which Brady lead a last second scoring drive. Yes, Brady only had that drive because of defense/ST, but to say that they "won" the game just by putting the ball in Brady's hands with <120 seconds left on the clock, well...you've kinda touched upon why people are putting Brady's name up for MVP in the first place.

 
Agree with this 100%. Peyton manning should be the unanimous MVP winner this year. Not even close.
Even if the Patriots win out and get the #1 seed?
Ask yourself this.... How many games has Denver's defense/special teams won them a game?

Now ask this.... How many games did NE defense/special teams won them the game?

- Cleveland there is zero chance if not for an unlikely onsides kick, biggest factor in the game. Special teams, not Brady

- Saints game, Brady blew chances for his comeback drive and the defense bailed him out to give him a shot.

- NYJ game Geno had multiple chances for the go ahead score and the defense held them, Brady stumbled and the defense held them again, and yet again.

- Denver, Brady matched Manning getting hot in the second half, taken to overtime and Brady couldn't put the game away, his special teams had to come up with a big play to give them a win.

This is just off the top of my head. I don't recall a game where Denver's Defense came close to helping.
I'm not sure how you can say defense/special teams "won" them games in which Brady lead a last second scoring drive. Yes, Brady only had that drive because of defense/ST, but to say that they "won" the game just by putting the ball in Brady's hands with <120 seconds left on the clock, well...you've kinda touched upon why people are putting Brady's name up for MVP in the first place.
If Im not mistaken Brady had 2 shots before that final drive to win the game. One of which should have been his " final" game winning drive. If NO gets a first down, like the high powered offense they are then Brady would have officially blown his opportunity for the game winning drive.

So in your case, if a QB blows a game winning drive and the defense strips the running back and gets the ball back to the offense and the offense scores, that credit goes to the QB? The same QB who would have already blown his shot at a win if not for a great defensive play?

Let me guess, it was Brady who got the onsides kick, and it was Brady that forced the bull interference call. Give credit where credit is due man. Brady had no business in getting a third chance at a "game winning" drive but the defense bailed him out.

I would hope a good QB could get a score with 3 chances at a game winning drive.

He couldn't put away the Jets and kept giving them shots to win but the defense held.

He couldn't come up with his big win against Cin, Car, or NYJ, all of which he had a shot at the game winning drive. One of those games where his DEFENSE allowed 13, that's right 13! points and he couldn't even muster up a TD. Lets just say it how it is, he had a ok year, maybe cause lack of talent, but the defense has really helped out.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Agree with this 100%. Peyton manning should be the unanimous MVP winner this year. Not even close.
Even if the Patriots win out and get the #1 seed?
Ask yourself this.... How many games has Denver's defense/special teams won them a game?

Now ask this.... How many games did NE defense/special teams won them the game?

- Cleveland there is zero chance if not for an unlikely onsides kick, biggest factor in the game. Special teams, not Brady

- Saints game, Brady blew chances for his comeback drive and the defense bailed him out to give him a shot.

- NYJ game Geno had multiple chances for the go ahead score and the defense held them, Brady stumbled and the defense held them again, and yet again.

- Denver, Brady matched Manning getting hot in the second half, taken to overtime and Brady couldn't put the game away, his special teams had to come up with a big play to give them a win.

This is just off the top of my head. I don't recall a game where Denver's Defense came close to helping.
I'm not sure how you can say defense/special teams "won" them games in which Brady lead a last second scoring drive. Yes, Brady only had that drive because of defense/ST, but to say that they "won" the game just by putting the ball in Brady's hands with <120 seconds left on the clock, well...you've kinda touched upon why people are putting Brady's name up for MVP in the first place.
If Im not mistaken Brady had 2 shots before that final drive to win the game. One of which should have been his " final" game winning drive. If NO gets a first down, like the high powered offense they are then Brady would have officially blown his opportunity for the game winning drive.

So in your case, if a QB blows a game winning drive and the defense strips the running back and gets the ball back to the offense and the offense scores, that credit goes to the QB? The same QB who would have already blown his shot at a win if not for a great defensive play?

Let me guess, it was Brady who got the onsides kick, and it was Brady that forced the bull interference call. Give credit where credit is due man. Brady had no business in getting a third chance at a "game winning" drive but the defense bailed him out.

I would hope a good QB could get a score with 3 chances at a game winning drive.

He couldn't put away the Jets and kept giving them shots to win but the defense held.

He couldn't come up with his big win against Cin, Car, or NYJ, all of which he had a shot at the game winning drive. One of those games where his DEFENSE allowed 13, that's right 13! points and he couldn't even muster up a TD. Lets just say it how it is, he had a ok year, maybe cause lack of talent, but the defense has really helped out.
I can give credit where it's due. You're the one that said the game was "won" because a defense made a stop, or because an onside kick was recovered when in fact those things occurred when the Patriots were still behind...which means in order to win, the offense had to score a touchdown. Which was done by Brady.

I'm not dismissing the defense or special teams - you're the one completely dismissing Brady. You simply can't say that a defense or special teams play "won them the game," which are your words, when what "won the game" as the offensive touchdown that followed them.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
There are a few games this year where Brady was awful but the team won because their defense pulled them through. If Brady rips it up the rest of the season, I still think he deserves consideration for MVP. Gronk really deserves it though.

 
Agree with this 100%. Peyton manning should be the unanimous MVP winner this year. Not even close.
Even if the Patriots win out and get the #1 seed?
Ask yourself this.... How many games has Denver's defense/special teams won them a game?

Now ask this.... How many games did NE defense/special teams won them the game?

- Cleveland there is zero chance if not for an unlikely onsides kick, biggest factor in the game. Special teams, not Brady

- Saints game, Brady blew chances for his comeback drive and the defense bailed him out to give him a shot.

- NYJ game Geno had multiple chances for the go ahead score and the defense held them, Brady stumbled and the defense held them again, and yet again.

- Denver, Brady matched Manning getting hot in the second half, taken to overtime and Brady couldn't put the game away, his special teams had to come up with a big play to give them a win.

This is just off the top of my head. I don't recall a game where Denver's Defense came close to helping.
I'm not sure how you can say defense/special teams "won" them games in which Brady lead a last second scoring drive. Yes, Brady only had that drive because of defense/ST, but to say that they "won" the game just by putting the ball in Brady's hands with <120 seconds left on the clock, well...you've kinda touched upon why people are putting Brady's name up for MVP in the first place.
If Im not mistaken Brady had 2 shots before that final drive to win the game. One of which should have been his " final" game winning drive. If NO gets a first down, like the high powered offense they are then Brady would have officially blown his opportunity for the game winning drive.

So in your case, if a QB blows a game winning drive and the defense strips the running back and gets the ball back to the offense and the offense scores, that credit goes to the QB? The same QB who would have already blown his shot at a win if not for a great defensive play?

Let me guess, it was Brady who got the onsides kick, and it was Brady that forced the bull interference call. Give credit where credit is due man. Brady had no business in getting a third chance at a "game winning" drive but the defense bailed him out.

I would hope a good QB could get a score with 3 chances at a game winning drive.

He couldn't put away the Jets and kept giving them shots to win but the defense held.

He couldn't come up with his big win against Cin, Car, or NYJ, all of which he had a shot at the game winning drive. One of those games where his DEFENSE allowed 13, that's right 13! points and he couldn't even muster up a TD. Lets just say it how it is, he had a ok year, maybe cause lack of talent, but the defense has really helped out.
I can give credit where it's due. You're the one that said the game was "won" because a defense made a stop, or because an onside kick was recovered when in fact those things occurred when the Patriots were still behind...which means in order to win, the offense had to score a touchdown. Which was done by Brady.

I'm not dismissing the defense or special teams - you're the one completely dismissing Brady. You simply can't say that a defense or special teams play "won them the game," which are your words, when what "won the game" as the offensive touchdown that followed them.
sorry, didn't win them the game but they stopped them from losing, which Brady would have done if not for the defense.

If a defender picks off a pass last minute and gets tackled at the one, and the running back pushes it in for the touchdown who do you give the credit to? The RB won them the game because technically it was his TD that put them ahead? Just wondering by your standards who you would say won the game.

In that case Brady doesn't have half the comeback wins because the kicker won the game for them with a fg

 
There are a few games this year where Brady was awful but the team won because their defense pulled them through. If Brady rips it up the rest of the season, I still think he deserves consideration for MVP. Gronk really deserves it though.
I can see where youre coming from but MVP isn't for best team. Its a combination of value to the team, team record, and individual success to some extent. I know statistics could be inflated but in Manning's case they aren't. Manning has barely had more attempts than Brady passing, he's just done way better with his attempts. And one way to measure a QB's total success is passer rating and its not close.

Manning 114

Brady 88

I just don't get why if Brady is even considered then why isn't Russell Wilson?? Wilson>>>Brady in terms of being named MVP. This guy has had almost a perfect QBR in the last 3 weeks. He has had good stats, esp for the amount of throws made. The WR core around him would be considered worse or on par with Brady. AND he has the best record in football in the toughest division in football. He doesn't play the Bills, Jets and Dolphins twice a year.

 
Agree with this 100%. Peyton manning should be the unanimous MVP winner this year. Not even close.
Even if the Patriots win out and get the #1 seed?
Ask yourself this.... How many games has Denver's defense/special teams won them a game?

Now ask this.... How many games did NE defense/special teams won them the game?

- Cleveland there is zero chance if not for an unlikely onsides kick, biggest factor in the game. Special teams, not Brady

- Saints game, Brady blew chances for his comeback drive and the defense bailed him out to give him a shot.

- NYJ game Geno had multiple chances for the go ahead score and the defense held them, Brady stumbled and the defense held them again, and yet again.

- Denver, Brady matched Manning getting hot in the second half, taken to overtime and Brady couldn't put the game away, his special teams had to come up with a big play to give them a win.

This is just off the top of my head. I don't recall a game where Denver's Defense came close to helping.
I'm not sure how you can say defense/special teams "won" them games in which Brady lead a last second scoring drive. Yes, Brady only had that drive because of defense/ST, but to say that they "won" the game just by putting the ball in Brady's hands with <120 seconds left on the clock, well...you've kinda touched upon why people are putting Brady's name up for MVP in the first place.
If Im not mistaken Brady had 2 shots before that final drive to win the game. One of which should have been his " final" game winning drive. If NO gets a first down, like the high powered offense they are then Brady would have officially blown his opportunity for the game winning drive.

So in your case, if a QB blows a game winning drive and the defense strips the running back and gets the ball back to the offense and the offense scores, that credit goes to the QB? The same QB who would have already blown his shot at a win if not for a great defensive play?

Let me guess, it was Brady who got the onsides kick, and it was Brady that forced the bull interference call. Give credit where credit is due man. Brady had no business in getting a third chance at a "game winning" drive but the defense bailed him out.

I would hope a good QB could get a score with 3 chances at a game winning drive.

He couldn't put away the Jets and kept giving them shots to win but the defense held.

He couldn't come up with his big win against Cin, Car, or NYJ, all of which he had a shot at the game winning drive. One of those games where his DEFENSE allowed 13, that's right 13! points and he couldn't even muster up a TD. Lets just say it how it is, he had a ok year, maybe cause lack of talent, but the defense has really helped out.
I can give credit where it's due. You're the one that said the game was "won" because a defense made a stop, or because an onside kick was recovered when in fact those things occurred when the Patriots were still behind...which means in order to win, the offense had to score a touchdown. Which was done by Brady.

I'm not dismissing the defense or special teams - you're the one completely dismissing Brady. You simply can't say that a defense or special teams play "won them the game," which are your words, when what "won the game" as the offensive touchdown that followed them.
sorry, didn't win them the game but they stopped them from losing, which Brady would have done if not for the defense.

If a defender picks off a pass last minute and gets tackled at the one, and the running back pushes it in for the touchdown who do you give the credit to? The RB won them the game because technically it was his TD that put them ahead? Just wondering by your standards who you would say won the game.

In that case Brady doesn't have half the comeback wins because the kicker won the game for them with a fg
If the defense gave Brady the ball at the 1 and he score a game winning TD, I would say that the defense won them that game. I don't think it's too difficult to draw a line between that and an actual game winning drive, of which Brady has had several this year.

 
There are a few games this year where Brady was awful but the team won because their defense pulled them through. If Brady rips it up the rest of the season, I still think he deserves consideration for MVP. Gronk really deserves it though.
I can see where youre coming from but MVP isn't for best team. Its a combination of value to the team, team record, and individual success to some extent. I know statistics could be inflated but in Manning's case they aren't. Manning has barely had more attempts than Brady passing, he's just done way better with his attempts. And one way to measure a QB's total success is passer rating and its not close.

Manning 114

Brady 88

I just don't get why if Brady is even considered then why isn't Russell Wilson?? Wilson>>>Brady in terms of being named MVP. This guy has had almost a perfect QBR in the last 3 weeks. He has had good stats, esp for the amount of throws made. The WR core around him would be considered worse or on par with Brady. AND he has the best record in football in the toughest division in football. He doesn't play the Bills, Jets and Dolphins twice a year.
I think most people don't just look at QB rating because Manning has has the best offensive supporting cast in the NFL, by far, and Brady lead the team to one of the best records in the NFL while throwing to nobodies.

 
Agree with this 100%. Peyton manning should be the unanimous MVP winner this year. Not even close.
Even if the Patriots win out and get the #1 seed?
Ask yourself this.... How many games has Denver's defense/special teams won them a game?

Now ask this.... How many games did NE defense/special teams won them the game?

- Cleveland there is zero chance if not for an unlikely onsides kick, biggest factor in the game. Special teams, not Brady

- Saints game, Brady blew chances for his comeback drive and the defense bailed him out to give him a shot.

- NYJ game Geno had multiple chances for the go ahead score and the defense held them, Brady stumbled and the defense held them again, and yet again.

- Denver, Brady matched Manning getting hot in the second half, taken to overtime and Brady couldn't put the game away, his special teams had to come up with a big play to give them a win.

This is just off the top of my head. I don't recall a game where Denver's Defense came close to helping.
I'm not sure how you can say defense/special teams "won" them games in which Brady lead a last second scoring drive. Yes, Brady only had that drive because of defense/ST, but to say that they "won" the game just by putting the ball in Brady's hands with <120 seconds left on the clock, well...you've kinda touched upon why people are putting Brady's name up for MVP in the first place.
If Im not mistaken Brady had 2 shots before that final drive to win the game. One of which should have been his " final" game winning drive. If NO gets a first down, like the high powered offense they are then Brady would have officially blown his opportunity for the game winning drive.

So in your case, if a QB blows a game winning drive and the defense strips the running back and gets the ball back to the offense and the offense scores, that credit goes to the QB? The same QB who would have already blown his shot at a win if not for a great defensive play?

Let me guess, it was Brady who got the onsides kick, and it was Brady that forced the bull interference call. Give credit where credit is due man. Brady had no business in getting a third chance at a "game winning" drive but the defense bailed him out.

I would hope a good QB could get a score with 3 chances at a game winning drive.

He couldn't put away the Jets and kept giving them shots to win but the defense held.

He couldn't come up with his big win against Cin, Car, or NYJ, all of which he had a shot at the game winning drive. One of those games where his DEFENSE allowed 13, that's right 13! points and he couldn't even muster up a TD. Lets just say it how it is, he had a ok year, maybe cause lack of talent, but the defense has really helped out.
I can give credit where it's due. You're the one that said the game was "won" because a defense made a stop, or because an onside kick was recovered when in fact those things occurred when the Patriots were still behind...which means in order to win, the offense had to score a touchdown. Which was done by Brady.

I'm not dismissing the defense or special teams - you're the one completely dismissing Brady. You simply can't say that a defense or special teams play "won them the game," which are your words, when what "won the game" as the offensive touchdown that followed them.
sorry, didn't win them the game but they stopped them from losing, which Brady would have done if not for the defense.

If a defender picks off a pass last minute and gets tackled at the one, and the running back pushes it in for the touchdown who do you give the credit to? The RB won them the game because technically it was his TD that put them ahead? Just wondering by your standards who you would say won the game.

In that case Brady doesn't have half the comeback wins because the kicker won the game for them with a fg
If the defense gave Brady the ball at the 1 and he score a game winning TD, I would say that the defense won them that game. I don't think it's too difficult to draw a line between that and an actual game winning drive, of which Brady has had several this year.
If that's the threshhold, I suppose one could claim the Denver D won the Dallas game when Danny Trevathan intercepted Tony Romo at the 24 with 2 minutes left in the game. Manning completed a couple passes but really was playing for the game ending FG.

On the other hand, not sure how much credit goes to a defense that gave up 48.

 
There are a few games this year where Brady was awful but the team won because their defense pulled them through. If Brady rips it up the rest of the season, I still think he deserves consideration for MVP. Gronk really deserves it though.
I can see where youre coming from but MVP isn't for best team. Its a combination of value to the team, team record, and individual success to some extent. I know statistics could be inflated but in Manning's case they aren't. Manning has barely had more attempts than Brady passing, he's just done way better with his attempts. And one way to measure a QB's total success is passer rating and its not close.

Manning 114

Brady 88

I just don't get why if Brady is even considered then why isn't Russell Wilson?? Wilson>>>Brady in terms of being named MVP. This guy has had almost a perfect QBR in the last 3 weeks. He has had good stats, esp for the amount of throws made. The WR core around him would be considered worse or on par with Brady. AND he has the best record in football in the toughest division in football. He doesn't play the Bills, Jets and Dolphins twice a year.
I think most people don't just look at QB rating because Manning has has the best offensive supporting cast in the NFL, by far, and Brady lead the team to one of the best records in the NFL while throwing to nobodies.
who won MVP in 2007 when Brady was setting all kinds of records (which are about to be broken) with the best offensive supporting cast in the NFL by far?

 
Look, I'm a Patriots homer, and I would vote for Manning. The reason is in the discussion, if he actually is, is because of what he had to deal witth this year with respect to the players he lost, and how successful they were while those players were lost. I think there'd be a pretty good case to be made that Brady was more valuable than Manning since Manning is basically driving a Cadillac of an offensive cast...if it weren't for one thing: Brady didn't play very well in several of those games. Even taking into consideration that he was throwing to Dobson/Thompkins/etc., he had some really, really off games. So I wouldn't say that he "carried" them to 7-2 or whatever it was; the defense carried them in some games, Brady was great at key moments in others, but otherwise more or less inconsistent.

I'm not sure Manning has had one bad game other than the dump he took at Gillette.

The only way I can see myself deciding that Brady deserves it is if the Broncos somehow collapse down the stretch, and Brady carries, truly "carries" the Patriots to the #1 seed. That would be impressive now that Gronk is gone and the defense that carried them earlier in the season but a distant memory.

I don't really expect that to happen though.

 
There are a few games this year where Brady was awful but the team won because their defense pulled them through. If Brady rips it up the rest of the season, I still think he deserves consideration for MVP. Gronk really deserves it though.
I can see where youre coming from but MVP isn't for best team. Its a combination of value to the team, team record, and individual success to some extent. I know statistics could be inflated but in Manning's case they aren't. Manning has barely had more attempts than Brady passing, he's just done way better with his attempts. And one way to measure a QB's total success is passer rating and its not close.

Manning 114

Brady 88

I just don't get why if Brady is even considered then why isn't Russell Wilson?? Wilson>>>Brady in terms of being named MVP. This guy has had almost a perfect QBR in the last 3 weeks. He has had good stats, esp for the amount of throws made. The WR core around him would be considered worse or on par with Brady. AND he has the best record in football in the toughest division in football. He doesn't play the Bills, Jets and Dolphins twice a year.
I think most people don't just look at QB rating because Manning has has the best offensive supporting cast in the NFL, by far, and Brady lead the team to one of the best records in the NFL while throwing to nobodies.
who won MVP in 2007 when Brady was setting all kinds of records (which are about to be broken) with the best offensive supporting cast in the NFL by far?
Brady. I'm not saying Manning should be ineligible, I'm saying it's a factor. Is there someone you think got screwed over in 2007 for MVP?

 
There are a few games this year where Brady was awful but the team won because their defense pulled them through. If Brady rips it up the rest of the season, I still think he deserves consideration for MVP. Gronk really deserves it though.
I can see where youre coming from but MVP isn't for best team. Its a combination of value to the team, team record, and individual success to some extent. I know statistics could be inflated but in Manning's case they aren't. Manning has barely had more attempts than Brady passing, he's just done way better with his attempts. And one way to measure a QB's total success is passer rating and its not close.

Manning 114

Brady 88

I just don't get why if Brady is even considered then why isn't Russell Wilson?? Wilson>>>Brady in terms of being named MVP. This guy has had almost a perfect QBR in the last 3 weeks. He has had good stats, esp for the amount of throws made. The WR core around him would be considered worse or on par with Brady. AND he has the best record in football in the toughest division in football. He doesn't play the Bills, Jets and Dolphins twice a year.
I think most people don't just look at QB rating because Manning has has the best offensive supporting cast in the NFL, by far, and Brady lead the team to one of the best records in the NFL while throwing to nobodies.
who won MVP in 2007 when Brady was setting all kinds of records (which are about to be broken) with the best offensive supporting cast in the NFL by far?
Brady. I'm not saying Manning should be ineligible, I'm saying it's a factor. Is there someone you think got screwed over in 2007 for MVP?
not at all. just pointing out that Manning is having a similar season to Brady's MVP campaign with a similarly stacked supporting cast, that's all.

 
Agree with this 100%. Peyton manning should be the unanimous MVP winner this year. Not even close.
Even if the Patriots win out and get the #1 seed?
Ask yourself this.... How many games has Denver's defense/special teams won them a game?

Now ask this.... How many games did NE defense/special teams won them the game?

- Cleveland there is zero chance if not for an unlikely onsides kick, biggest factor in the game. Special teams, not Brady

- Saints game, Brady blew chances for his comeback drive and the defense bailed him out to give him a shot.

- NYJ game Geno had multiple chances for the go ahead score and the defense held them, Brady stumbled and the defense held them again, and yet again.

- Denver, Brady matched Manning getting hot in the second half, taken to overtime and Brady couldn't put the game away, his special teams had to come up with a big play to give them a win.

This is just off the top of my head. I don't recall a game where Denver's Defense came close to helping.
I'm not sure how you can say defense/special teams "won" them games in which Brady lead a last second scoring drive. Yes, Brady only had that drive because of defense/ST, but to say that they "won" the game just by putting the ball in Brady's hands with <120 seconds left on the clock, well...you've kinda touched upon why people are putting Brady's name up for MVP in the first place.
If Im not mistaken Brady had 2 shots before that final drive to win the game. One of which should have been his " final" game winning drive. If NO gets a first down, like the high powered offense they are then Brady would have officially blown his opportunity for the game winning drive.

So in your case, if a QB blows a game winning drive and the defense strips the running back and gets the ball back to the offense and the offense scores, that credit goes to the QB? The same QB who would have already blown his shot at a win if not for a great defensive play?

Let me guess, it was Brady who got the onsides kick, and it was Brady that forced the bull interference call. Give credit where credit is due man. Brady had no business in getting a third chance at a "game winning" drive but the defense bailed him out.

I would hope a good QB could get a score with 3 chances at a game winning drive.

He couldn't put away the Jets and kept giving them shots to win but the defense held.

He couldn't come up with his big win against Cin, Car, or NYJ, all of which he had a shot at the game winning drive. One of those games where his DEFENSE allowed 13, that's right 13! points and he couldn't even muster up a TD. Lets just say it how it is, he had a ok year, maybe cause lack of talent, but the defense has really helped out.
I can give credit where it's due. You're the one that said the game was "won" because a defense made a stop, or because an onside kick was recovered when in fact those things occurred when the Patriots were still behind...which means in order to win, the offense had to score a touchdown. Which was done by Brady.

I'm not dismissing the defense or special teams - you're the one completely dismissing Brady. You simply can't say that a defense or special teams play "won them the game," which are your words, when what "won the game" as the offensive touchdown that followed them.
sorry, didn't win them the game but they stopped them from losing, which Brady would have done if not for the defense.

If a defender picks off a pass last minute and gets tackled at the one, and the running back pushes it in for the touchdown who do you give the credit to? The RB won them the game because technically it was his TD that put them ahead? Just wondering by your standards who you would say won the game.

In that case Brady doesn't have half the comeback wins because the kicker won the game for them with a fg
If the defense gave Brady the ball at the 1 and he score a game winning TD, I would say that the defense won them that game. I don't think it's too difficult to draw a line between that and an actual game winning drive, of which Brady has had several this year.
If that's the threshhold, I suppose one could claim the Denver D won the Dallas game when Danny Trevathan intercepted Tony Romo at the 24 with 2 minutes left in the game. Manning completed a couple passes but really was playing for the game ending FG.

On the other hand, not sure how much credit goes to a defense that gave up 48.
Yeah, Manning up up 50+ points, and got them in FG position. Of course the problem we're running into is that it's a little hard to point to one play/person (usually) and say he/it "won them the game." I just think it's a little stupid to say that a defensive stop or special teams play "won a game" when it had to be followed by a last second, game-winning drive.

 
Look, I'm a Patriots homer, and I would vote for Manning. The reason is in the discussion, if he actually is, is because of what he had to deal witth this year with respect to the players he lost, and how successful they were while those players were lost. I think there'd be a pretty good case to be made that Brady was more valuable than Manning since Manning is basically driving a Cadillac of an offensive cast...if it weren't for one thing: Brady didn't play very well in several of those games. Even taking into consideration that he was throwing to Dobson/Thompkins/etc., he had some really, really off games. So I wouldn't say that he "carried" them to 7-2 or whatever it was; the defense carried them in some games, Brady was great at key moments in others, but otherwise more or less inconsistent.

I'm not sure Manning has had one bad game other than the dump he took at Gillette.

The only way I can see myself deciding that Brady deserves it is if the Broncos somehow collapse down the stretch, and Brady carries, truly "carries" the Patriots to the #1 seed. That would be impressive now that Gronk is gone and the defense that carried them earlier in the season but a distant memory.

I don't really expect that to happen though.
I respect your take, I do. I just think it's a little one-sided though to assume the Broncos have been free of any turmoil and the Cadillac is humming along, no problems.

Consider:

1. lost starting center in pre-season. Brought in an aged vet out of retirement who was the starting center last year, but he got hurt and is out for the season too. Broncos have been starting the 3rd string center all season, a man who has never played center at the NFL level before.

2. lost all-pro LT in Ryan Clady a few games into the season. This, just a month or so after tying up a ton of cap room to get him under contract. Replaced with journeyman Chris Clark, a guy with 6 career starts.

3. Mannings injuries. If it's not his neck and the nerve thing, its two sprained ankles.

4. A head coach have a damn open heart surgery just before the toughest stretch of the season.

5. a defense that has allowed the 25th most points and yards in the league. I suppose one could argue that this porous defense helps drive all of the offensive stats by forcing the O to keep pressure, but it's up to Manning to respond to that pressure. 11-2 record with a defense giving up that many points is pretty remarkable, IMO.

 
Well said, moleculo. It is easy to look at the Broncos receivers (the 3 WRs and Julius Thomas) and say, "how hard is it to put up numbers with those guys," but putting up numbers is not the same as winning like they are and putting up what might go down as the best season any quarterback has ever had. Doing that while missing your stud left tackle and playing behind a 3rd string center makes it even more impressive.

Honestly, even though he has had some great comebacks at the end of games, I wouldn't call Brady 2nd in the MVP discussion at this rate. We can't look at just the two touchdowns in the last two minutes last week and ignore his poor play in the first half. Brady has had too many stretches like that this year. Hell, some of those stretches lasted entire games. This is not one of his better years, although I know some act like it is because of the fact that the Patriots are 10-3, but if you have watched Tom Brady play this year, not just looking at the handful of 4th quarters where he was lights out, it is pretty apparent that he has struggled a lot. Hell, even when Gronk was back, he was struggling badly at times (see: the first half of literally five of their last six games).

 
Lots of QBs have struggled without weapons and kept their teams competitive, but they don't win MVPs. And there's really no reason that the MVP voters are going to revisit how MVPs get selected just to make a bunch of Boston homers feel better.

Brady isn't in any serious discussion about MVP.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Pats chances for the #1 seed looking good if the Chargers can finish this off.
Pats got a tough game coming up this week at Miami, where they always struggle. And then next week at Baltimore.
If they win the next 3 they'll get the #1 seed. This team is hungry and with the loss of Gronk I can see them really stepping up and playing their best football yet. Miami and the Ravens will be tough but it's certainly possible.

 
Pats chances for the #1 seed looking good if the Chargers can finish this off.
Pats got a tough game coming up this week at Miami, where they always struggle. And then next week at Baltimore.
If they win the next 3 they'll get the #1 seed. This team is hungry and with the loss of Gronk I can see them really stepping up and playing their best football yet. Miami and the Ravens will be tough but it's certainly possible.
It's possible, definitely. But I think the odds are against them going 3-0. I'm a Pats fan but I just can't see them winning at Miami and at Baltimore given all the players they have lost. I hope I am wrong.
 
Also - this just in from ESPN. Brady hasn't practiced the last 2 days, and Vegas has taken the Miami/Pats game off the board.

 
Also - this just in from ESPN. Brady hasn't practiced the last 2 days, and Vegas has taken the Miami/Pats game off the board.
He was limited both days, he did practice - Skips talking out his ### :shocked:

He will likely be limited a day or two every week for the rest of the season, hes an old man.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top