What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Torrent Talk (1 Viewer)

Is downloading a CD or DVD via torrent stealing?

  • Absolutely stealing.

    Votes: 40 45.5%
  • Sort of stealing but ok.

    Votes: 16 18.2%
  • On the fence.

    Votes: 10 11.4%
  • Sort of stealing but not ok.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Absolutely not stealing.

    Votes: 22 25.0%

  • Total voters
    88
I see lots of people talking about downloading dvds via torrents. Please stop doing that. I guess I'm more sensitive to that as I have several friends that are struggling to get music careers off the ground and this kind of thing directly impacts them.So please stop the posts about how to do it and please stop the advertising for PMs for people to send you copied disks.But I'm open to discussing the bigger picture here. For you guys that do the torrent thing, how do you justify it that it's not stealing from the music artist or the creator of the DVD?J
I don't diagree with you but $1.29 for an MP3 is stealing in my book.
If you download a song you love for $1.29, I think that's a bargain. A bottle of Coke is about $1.29. Would you say that one bottle of Coke gives you more pleasure than a song you can listen to 100 times?
 
Whatya gonna do when they're coming for you?

Producers of "The Hurt Locker" suing people that downloaded the movie off of BitTorrent

Even ["Hurt Locker" production entity] Voltage doesn't know the names of the defendants, who have been identified only by their IP addresses. It plans to subpoena ISPs this week to get the users' names.

Once it's identified these people, they'll be sent letters inviting them to cough up $1,500 to settle - and warning them that it'll be ten times as much if they don't pay up and the case goes all the way to court.
 
Producers of "The Hurt Locker" suing people that downloaded the movie off of BitTorrent
Yeah, not sure what this all means. There's some more discussion of this in the Hurt Locker specific thread. TimeWarner isn't helping them much with their claim, but it'll be interesting to see how it all shakes out.
 
Whatya gonna do when they're coming for you?

Producers of "The Hurt Locker" suing people that downloaded the movie off of BitTorrent

Even ["Hurt Locker" production entity] Voltage doesn't know the names of the defendants, who have been identified only by their IP addresses. It plans to subpoena ISPs this week to get the users' names.

Once it's identified these people, they'll be sent letters inviting them to cough up $1,500 to settle - and warning them that it'll be ten times as much if they don't pay up and the case goes all the way to court.
Just say you don't lock your wireless internet.

 
From the Yale Law School Information Society Project blog:

Glee and copyright. The whole thing is worth reading, but here's an excerpt:

The fictional high school chorus at the center of the show has a huge problem, you see — nearly a million dollars in potential legal liability....

In one recent episode, the AV Club helps cheerleading coach Sue Sylvester film a near-exact copy of Madonna’s Vogue music video (the real-life fine for copying Madonna’s original? up to $150,000). Just a few episodes later, a video of Sue dancing to Olivia Newton-John’s 1981 hit Physical is posted online (damages for recording the entirety of Physical on Sue’s camcorder: up to $300,000). And let’s not forget the glee club’s many mash-ups — songs created by mixing together two other musical pieces. Each mash-up is a “preparation of a derivative work” of the original two songs’ compositions – an action for which there is no compulsory license available, meaning (in plain English) that if the Glee kids were a real group of teenagers, they could not feasibly ask for — or hope to get — the copyright permissions they would need to make their songs, and their actions, legal under copyright law. Punishment for making each mash-up? Up to another $150,000 — times two.

The absence of any mention of copyright law in Glee illustrates a painful tension in American culture. While copyright holders assert that copyright violators are “stealing” their “property,” people everywhere are remixing and recreating artistic works for the very same reasons the Glee kids do — to learn about themselves, to become better musicians, to build relationships with friends, and to pay homage to the artists who came before them. Glee’s protagonists — and the writers who created them — see so little wrong with this behavior that the word ‘copyright’ is never even uttered.

You might be tempted to assume that this tension isn’t a big deal because copyright holders won’t go after creative kids or amateurs. But they do: In the 1990s, the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (ASCAP) asked members of the American Camping Association, including Girl Scout troops, to pay royalties for singing copyrighted songs at camp. In 2004, the Beatles’ copyright holders tried to prevent the release of The Grey Album – a mash-up of Jay-Z’s Black Album and the Beatles’ White Album — and only gave up after massive civil disobedience resulted in the album’s widespread distribution. Copyright holders even routinely demand that YouTube remove videos of kids dancing to popular music. While few copyright cases go to trial, copyright holders like the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) don’t hesitate to seek stratospheric damage awards when they do, as in the Jammie Thomas-Rasset filesharing case....

Defenders of modern copyright law will argue Congress has struck “the right balance” between copyright holders’ interests and the public good. They’ll suggest the current law is an appropriate compromise among interest groups. But by claiming the law strikes “the right balance,” what they’re really saying is that the Glee kids deserve to be on the losing side of a lawsuit. Does that sound like the right balance to you?
 
From the Yale Law School Information Society Project blog:

Glee and copyright. The whole thing is worth reading, but here's an excerpt:

...Defenders of modern copyright law will argue Congress has struck “the right balance” between copyright holders’ interests and the public good. They’ll suggest the current law is an appropriate compromise among interest groups. ....
Maybe at the Law school level defenders claim this, but as this thread pretty clearly demonstrates those that defend modern copyright law have been conditioned to believe that any of this is simply stealing. There are no competing interest to be compromised, merely the property rights of the copyright holder. And the masses on the other side of the debate aren't usually worried about any of the interest of the copyright holder either. So the debate to find the proper balance is largely absent in all of this.
 
My ISP shut down my service two days ago. Apparently, my wife still had UTorrent on her computer and there was one movie in the client list and it was downloaded by someone else off my IP.

 
My ISP shut down my service two days ago. Apparently, my wife still had UTorrent on her computer and there was one movie in the client list and it was downloaded by someone else off my IP.
They can do that? :lmao: I thought your IP was unique to your computer?
 
Joe -

Just get Tremendous Upside interested in your buddy's bands. He'll then travel the earth buying tickets to every show they have and spend hours and hours telling ifriends about them.

He can single handedly make them rich with his fandom.

 
So what's the best current torrent program to download?

[i'm not religious]

Oops, never mind. Just read Joe's OP. I have no "big picture" issues to discuss.

 
I see lots of people talking about downloading dvds via torrents. Please stop doing that. I guess I'm more sensitive to that as I have several friends that are struggling to get music careers off the ground and this kind of thing directly impacts them.So please stop the posts about how to do it and please stop the advertising for PMs for people to send you copied disks.But I'm open to discussing the bigger picture here. For you guys that do the torrent thing, how do you justify it that it's not stealing from the music artist or the creator of the DVD?J
Actually, for musicians struggling to get their careers off the ground, I'd think torrents would be a good thing. It gets your name out there and people can listen to you for free without purchasing. These days no one wants to take a chance on a CD without knowing that they'll like it. If they can't hear you on the radio, it's the next best thing.
 
I see lots of people talking about downloading dvds via torrents. Please stop doing that. I guess I'm more sensitive to that as I have several friends that are struggling to get music careers off the ground and this kind of thing directly impacts them.So please stop the posts about how to do it and please stop the advertising for PMs for people to send you copied disks.But I'm open to discussing the bigger picture here. For you guys that do the torrent thing, how do you justify it that it's not stealing from the music artist or the creator of the DVD?J
Actually, for musicians struggling to get their careers off the ground, I'd think torrents would be a good thing. It gets your name out there and people can listen to you for free without purchasing. These days no one wants to take a chance on a CD without knowing that they'll like it. If they can't hear you on the radio, it's the next best thing.
If the artist consents to this, hey, that's cool. But if they don't, then it's nothing more than self-justification on the downloader's part.Truthfully, the whole "sampling" thing is a bit of a myth (imho) - really, how many downloaders really just look to sample, then run out to iTunes to legally purchase something they just downloaded? I'm sure there's one or two, but I'll guess it's far from the norm.
 
I see lots of people talking about downloading dvds via torrents. Please stop doing that. I guess I'm more sensitive to that as I have several friends that are struggling to get music careers off the ground and this kind of thing directly impacts them.So please stop the posts about how to do it and please stop the advertising for PMs for people to send you copied disks.But I'm open to discussing the bigger picture here. For you guys that do the torrent thing, how do you justify it that it's not stealing from the music artist or the creator of the DVD?J
Actually, for musicians struggling to get their careers off the ground, I'd think torrents would be a good thing. It gets your name out there and people can listen to you for free without purchasing. These days no one wants to take a chance on a CD without knowing that they'll like it. If they can't hear you on the radio, it's the next best thing.
If the artist consents to this, hey, that's cool. But if they don't, then it's nothing more than self-justification on the downloader's part.Truthfully, the whole "sampling" thing is a bit of a myth (imho) - really, how many downloaders really just look to sample, then run out to iTunes to legally purchase something they just downloaded? I'm sure there's one or two, but I'll guess it's far from the norm.
They probably don't run out to buy the album they just downloaded but it probably makes a huge difference when it comes to making the decision to attend live shows.
 
I see lots of people talking about downloading dvds via torrents. Please stop doing that. I guess I'm more sensitive to that as I have several friends that are struggling to get music careers off the ground and this kind of thing directly impacts them.So please stop the posts about how to do it and please stop the advertising for PMs for people to send you copied disks.But I'm open to discussing the bigger picture here. For you guys that do the torrent thing, how do you justify it that it's not stealing from the music artist or the creator of the DVD?J
Actually, for musicians struggling to get their careers off the ground, I'd think torrents would be a good thing. It gets your name out there and people can listen to you for free without purchasing. These days no one wants to take a chance on a CD without knowing that they'll like it. If they can't hear you on the radio, it's the next best thing.
If the artist consents to this, hey, that's cool. But if they don't, then it's nothing more than self-justification on the downloader's part.Truthfully, the whole "sampling" thing is a bit of a myth (imho) - really, how many downloaders really just look to sample, then run out to iTunes to legally purchase something they just downloaded? I'm sure there's one or two, but I'll guess it's far from the norm.
In my "Do you steal music/are you religious" thread, someone posted a link that showed those who 'steal' music are actually more likely to buy a lot more music than the average consumer. And most musicians make their $ from live shows...I'm not going to a show if I or someone I know hasn't heard them. And I'm not going to buy a cd if I haven't heard the song. To be fair, I *never* buy cd's anymore. I honestly cannot recall the last time I bought one. And between torrents and free sites like grooveshark I download or stream all my music (though I do buy an occasional song via itunes). But I go to a LOT of shows. My record is 23 in 1 month. And it's not unusual for me to hit 1-3 shows a week. Whether it's right or wrong to download music is irrelevant. It happens. So to stick your head in the sand and say it's not fair doesn't accomplish a damned thing. Musicians need to figure out how to get with the times or get out of the music business.
 
I see lots of people talking about downloading dvds via torrents. Please stop doing that. I guess I'm more sensitive to that as I have several friends that are struggling to get music careers off the ground and this kind of thing directly impacts them.So please stop the posts about how to do it and please stop the advertising for PMs for people to send you copied disks.But I'm open to discussing the bigger picture here. For you guys that do the torrent thing, how do you justify it that it's not stealing from the music artist or the creator of the DVD?J
Actually, for musicians struggling to get their careers off the ground, I'd think torrents would be a good thing. It gets your name out there and people can listen to you for free without purchasing. These days no one wants to take a chance on a CD without knowing that they'll like it. If they can't hear you on the radio, it's the next best thing.
If the artist consents to this, hey, that's cool. But if they don't, then it's nothing more than self-justification on the downloader's part.Truthfully, the whole "sampling" thing is a bit of a myth (imho) - really, how many downloaders really just look to sample, then run out to iTunes to legally purchase something they just downloaded? I'm sure there's one or two, but I'll guess it's far from the norm.
They probably don't run out to buy the album they just downloaded but it probably makes a huge difference when it comes to making the decision to attend live shows.
assuming these young, struggling bands can do a national tour and come to your area, of course. But otherwise, that's really just more self-justification.Again, if the artist is cool w/ releasing their stuff on torrent, great - I'm all for it for the reasons you guys are talking about. They are indeed good reasons, too.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bands don't struggle because people are stealing their albums they struggle because they're just not very good in the first place. If a band is good enough that everyone is stealing their music, they're making money. There's popular bands out there losing some money from the downloaders but a lot of albums that are downloaded would never have been bought in the first place.
that's how I justify it. I never would've bought the stuff to begin with...they make no $ off me. I torrent something...they make no $ off me.

 
assuming these young, struggling bands can do a national tour and come to your area, of course. But otherwise, that's really just more self-justification.Again, if the artist is cool w/ releasing their stuff on torrent, great - I'm all for it for the reasons you guys are talking about. They are indeed good reasons, too.
I think if you're going to go into the business of making music you cannot look at anyone with a straight face and pretend to be shocked with illegal downloads. It's part of the business.
 
If the artist consents to this, hey, that's cool. But if they don't, then it's nothing more than self-justification on the downloader's part.

Truthfully, the whole "sampling" thing is a bit of a myth (imho) - really, how many downloaders really just look to sample, then run out to iTunes to legally purchase something they just downloaded? I'm sure there's one or two, but I'll guess it's far from the norm.
There have been numerous independent studies done that show that people do exactly this. In fact, studies show that people who download purchase more music than people who don't.
 
I see lots of people talking about downloading dvds via torrents. Please stop doing that. I guess I'm more sensitive to that as I have several friends that are struggling to get music careers off the ground and this kind of thing directly impacts them.So please stop the posts about how to do it and please stop the advertising for PMs for people to send you copied disks.But I'm open to discussing the bigger picture here. For you guys that do the torrent thing, how do you justify it that it's not stealing from the music artist or the creator of the DVD?J
I don't diagree with you but $1.29 for an MP3 is stealing in my book.
If you download a song you love for $1.29, I think that's a bargain. A bottle of Coke is about $1.29. Would you say that one bottle of Coke gives you more pleasure than a song you can listen to 100 times?
Aren't you the clever and informed consumer!Coke did not raise their prices 30% in January 09 when the country was facing "the worst recession in the history of the universe". Coke prices are controlled by "supply and demand" while MP3’s fall under the category of "what the market will bear". There is an infinite supply of MP3's with no added cost. I hope you keep buying because my Apple stock has quadrupled since early 09. With savvy consumers like you expect to pay much more in the future.
 
I see lots of people talking about downloading dvds via torrents. Please stop doing that. I guess I'm more sensitive to that as I have several friends that are struggling to get music careers off the ground and this kind of thing directly impacts them.So please stop the posts about how to do it and please stop the advertising for PMs for people to send you copied disks.But I'm open to discussing the bigger picture here. For you guys that do the torrent thing, how do you justify it that it's not stealing from the music artist or the creator of the DVD?J
I don't diagree with you but $1.29 for an MP3 is stealing in my book.
If you download a song you love for $1.29, I think that's a bargain. A bottle of Coke is about $1.29. Would you say that one bottle of Coke gives you more pleasure than a song you can listen to 100 times?
Aren't you the clever and informed consumer!Coke did not raise their prices 30% in January 09 when the country was facing "the worst recession in the history of the universe". Coke prices are controlled by "supply and demand" while MP3’s fall under the category of "what the market will bear". There is an infinite supply of MP3's with no added cost. I hope you keep buying because my Apple stock has quadrupled since early 09. With savvy consumers like you expect to pay much more in the future.
WTF are you talking about?
 
I think of it kinda like this: remember how in olden times the baseball games were played in stadiums such that people outside of the stadiums could watch the games and avoid the entrance fees? Sure, they were much further away from the game, but they were seeing for free what the others paid to see it, and by doing so, they were not taking away anything from those who wanted the better seats, to watch the game.

The game was going on, and some additional eyes outside of the stadium didn't take anything away from the game being played, or the enjoyment of those who paid to see it.

That's not exactly the same as downloading a song, but it's similar to me. People who do it, generally, are not the same people who would've paid for the music to begin with, and by downloading it, they're taking nothing away that diminishes from the product or stock of things being sold.

Now, I'm not condoning it at all, I'm just saying that to me, downloading music and/or Dvd's is similar to watching a baseball game from the outside of the stadium...nothing taken from those who pay, but still getting to enjoy a game you wouldn't have paid to see otherwise.

 
File-sharing/the internet is the best possible thing to happen to an aspiring musician.
Let's say someone got a new iPod. Let's say that person loves club music but has no idea what the names of the songs are.How might that person find out the names of those hot club hits?
 
File-sharing/the internet is the best possible thing to happen to an aspiring musician.
Let's say someone got a new iPod. Let's say that person loves club music but has no idea what the names of the songs are.How might that person find out the names of those hot club hits?
PM LHUCKS
:shock: That's the only music that gets me going on the treadmill/elliptical machine.
I like club music :shrug: ;)
 
I think of it kinda like this: remember how in olden times the baseball games were played in stadiums such that people outside of the stadiums could watch the games and avoid the entrance fees? Sure, they were much further away from the game, but they were seeing for free what the others paid to see it, and by doing so, they were not taking away anything from those who wanted the better seats, to watch the game.The game was going on, and some additional eyes outside of the stadium didn't take anything away from the game being played, or the enjoyment of those who paid to see it.That's not exactly the same as downloading a song, but it's similar to me. People who do it, generally, are not the same people who would've paid for the music to begin with, and by downloading it, they're taking nothing away that diminishes from the product or stock of things being sold.Now, I'm not condoning it at all, I'm just saying that to me, downloading music and/or Dvd's is similar to watching a baseball game from the outside of the stadium...nothing taken from those who pay, but still getting to enjoy a game you wouldn't have paid to see otherwise.
The people in the Wrigley rooftops are thieves!
 
My ISP shut down my service two days ago. Apparently, my wife still had UTorrent on her computer and there was one movie in the client list and it was downloaded by someone else off my IP.
They can do that? :crazy: I thought your IP was unique to your computer?
I guess I should have said that it was leeched from my IP.
If it makes you feel any better, LHUCKS found the movie fascinating.
 
Any updates?
still stealing. the people doing it don't care what the moral high horse brigade thinks about it.
My initial reaction was to agree with this. But after reading through the first few pages and thinking about my own experiences, I'm split. The whole discussion about Youtube and Pandora for instance. At one time I was able to record audio from my computer to a wav. If I let Pandora play for several hours and recorded it to listen later, is that stealing? I've recorded movies on my DVR and left it there for months, watching it several times opting to not buy the DVD or Blu Ray.

What about iTunes - I have 1000s of songs synced to my ipod. Would it be wrong for me to give the ipod to my son (we do like a lot of the same music) and I just use my iTunes library? Or upload those same files to a cloud service and listen on multiple devices at my convenience? Can I share my log in info with my wife? Or should we buy multiple versions so we can each listen at our jobs? What if I upload my library from home, go to work and download those files to my office network so others can copy them? Is it stealing even if those coworkers have no intention of ever buying that music but listen anyway at their convenience?

I listen to mostly live music I've acquired from torrent sites that operate with bands' permission. A lot of the bands I like, I found from live music torrenting. Some I've never bought any of their commercial products - but do go to their live shows, something I never would have done if not for live music sharing.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I suppose when us old folks used to record songs from our boom boxes onto cassette tapes that was stealing, too....at least these days you can steal a whole song - back then the songs ususlly had the DJ talking up until just before the first lyrics....and we were okay with that.

Typo edit

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I suppose when us old folks used to record songs from our boom boxes onto cassette tapes was sealing, too....at least these days you can steal a whole song - back then the songs ususlly had the DJ talking up until just before the first lyrics....and we were okay with that.
DVRing must be stealing too, or is it only if you fast forward the commercials?

 
I suppose when us old folks used to record songs from our boom boxes onto cassette tapes was sealing, too....at least these days you can steal a whole song - back then the songs ususlly had the DJ talking up until just before the first lyrics....and we were okay with that.
DVRing must be stealing too, or is it only if you fast forward the commercials?
Or is it only stealing if you don't delete from your DVR? Is there a time limit on keeping DVR'd movies? What if I DVR a movie, unsubscribe from the channel I recorded it from, and then watch it multiple times over the course of a year and never buy the DVD?

So many nits to pick.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I suppose when us old folks used to record songs from our boom boxes onto cassette tapes was sealing, too....at least these days you can steal a whole song - back then the songs ususlly had the DJ talking up until just before the first lyrics....and we were okay with that.
DVRing must be stealing too, or is it only if you fast forward the commercials?
Or is it only stealing if you don't delete from your DVR? Is there a time limit on keeping DVR'd movies? What if I DVR a movie, unsubscribe from the channel I recorded it from, and then watch it multiple times over the course of a year and never buy the DVD?

So many nits to pick.
In both of those scenarios you were listening/watching the media through a distribution channel with business relationships that enabled royalties for the artist.

artist<->distribution company<->radio/tv<->consumer

radio/tv enabled the artist to get paid with subscription money or ad revenue

 
I suppose when us old folks used to record songs from our boom boxes onto cassette tapes was sealing, too....at least these days you can steal a whole song - back then the songs ususlly had the DJ talking up until just before the first lyrics....and we were okay with that.
DVRing must be stealing too, or is it only if you fast forward the commercials?
Or is it only stealing if you don't delete from your DVR? Is there a time limit on keeping DVR'd movies? What if I DVR a movie, unsubscribe from the channel I recorded it from, and then watch it multiple times over the course of a year and never buy the DVD?

So many nits to pick.
In both of those scenarios you were listening/watching the media through a distribution channel with business relationships that enabled royalties for the artist.

artist<->distribution company<->radio/tv<->consumer

radio/tv enabled the artist to get paid with subscription money or ad revenue
What if I could subscribe to HBO (maybe even a free 1-month trial), record round the clock for a day to a large hard drive, unsubscribe, and keep my recordings? I'll now have 12 movies I'll never buy. Then my neighbors come over and we watch a few of them.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I suppose when us old folks used to record songs from our boom boxes onto cassette tapes was sealing, too....at least these days you can steal a whole song - back then the songs ususlly had the DJ talking up until just before the first lyrics....and we were okay with that.
DVRing must be stealing too, or is it only if you fast forward the commercials?
Or is it only stealing if you don't delete from your DVR? Is there a time limit on keeping DVR'd movies? What if I DVR a movie, unsubscribe from the channel I recorded it from, and then watch it multiple times over the course of a year and never buy the DVD?

So many nits to pick.
In both of those scenarios you were listening/watching the media through a distribution channel with business relationships that enabled royalties for the artist.

artist<->distribution company<->radio/tv<->consumer

radio/tv enabled the artist to get paid with subscription money or ad revenue
What if I could subscribe to HBO (maybe even a free 1-month trial), record round the clock for a day to a large hard drive, unsubscribe, and keep my recordings? I'll now have 12 movies I'll never buy. Then my neighbors come over and we watch a few of them.
If you subscribed to HBO you paid for the movies through HBO.

If you circumvent paying by doing a free trial, cancelling, or yelling at a billing supervisor it's simply product fallout. You still went through their system. You could say that for any product.

If a supermarket has a promotion where you get a free gallon of milk that's not the same as going in and grabbing a free milk whenever you feel like it.

 
If you subscribed to HBO you paid for the movies through HBO.

If you circumvent paying by doing a free trial, cancelling, or yelling at a billing supervisor it's simply product fallout. You still went through their system. You could say that for any product.

If a supermarket has a promotion where you get a free gallon of milk that's not the same as going in and grabbing a free milk whenever you feel like it.
Oh good, I can take my video camera into the theatre with me then, I mean I went through their system.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top