If he's a bust waiting to happen, then why didn't you take the 1.10?i was offered the 1.10 in a rookie draft in 2007 i offered henry for M.Drew Jones .. and was turned down .. IMO - Henry is a bust waiting to happen ..
I guarantee you that Henry won't be with Denver in 3 years, and probably not 2 either, but he could be a 1000 yd back for someone I guess.I'm surprsied you guys are considering offers for picks lower than the 1.3 - 1.4. IMO, the money that DEN gave Henry says that they're tired of plugging in random RBs and want some stability. It is Shannahan, so you never know though.
After the 1.3 it seems like the next 10 guys are a crapshoot. I'd rather have a RB that I know should at least break 1k yds for the next 2-3 yrs than the 5th rookie WR or RB.
RB Travis Henry agreed to a five-year contract that includes $12 million in guaranteed money with the Denver Broncos. Henry was scheduled to visit Oakland, Green Bay and the New York Giants. My understanding of the salary cap may be wrong, but won't 2.4M count against the cap this year and if they cut or trade him next year they'd eat the rest of the $9.6M in cap hit? I guess they could wait until after June 1 so the $9.6 would be spread out over '08 + '09 but seems like a lot of eaten cap for a 1 yr RB. This is why I was assuming that he'll be there for a couple/few years.I guarantee you that Henry won't be with Denver in 3 years, and probably not 2 either, but he could be a 1000 yd back for someone I guess.I'm surprsied you guys are considering offers for picks lower than the 1.3 - 1.4. IMO, the money that DEN gave Henry says that they're tired of plugging in random RBs and want some stability. It is Shannahan, so you never know though.
After the 1.3 it seems like the next 10 guys are a crapshoot. I'd rather have a RB that I know should at least break 1k yds for the next 2-3 yrs than the 5th rookie WR or RB.
Check me out in the AC.Anyone shopping M. Bell to Henry owners?
They are not paying $12 million guaranteed money unless they were going to use him in '07, and '08...'09 is a little bit of a cloud, but $12 million is a lot for Denver...RB Travis Henry agreed to a five-year contract that includes $12 million in guaranteed money with the Denver Broncos. Henry was scheduled to visit Oakland, Green Bay and the New York Giants. My understanding of the salary cap may be wrong, but won't 2.4M count against the cap this year and if they cut or trade him next year they'd eat the rest of the $9.6M in cap hit? I guess they could wait until after June 1 so the $9.6 would be spread out over '08 + '09 but seems like a lot of eaten cap for a 1 yr RB. This is why I was assuming that he'll be there for a couple/few years.I guarantee you that Henry won't be with Denver in 3 years, and probably not 2 either, but he could be a 1000 yd back for someone I guess.I'm surprsied you guys are considering offers for picks lower than the 1.3 - 1.4. IMO, the money that DEN gave Henry says that they're tired of plugging in random RBs and want some stability. It is Shannahan, so you never know though.
After the 1.3 it seems like the next 10 guys are a crapshoot. I'd rather have a RB that I know should at least break 1k yds for the next 2-3 yrs than the 5th rookie WR or RB.
ETA: I just realized it only specifies "guaranteed money" not necessarily signing bonus so I'm not sure how this would make it work out now.
They are not paying $12 million guaranteed money unless they were going to use him in '07, and '08...'09 is a little bit of a cloud, but $12 million is a lot for Denver...RB Travis Henry agreed to a five-year contract that includes $12 million in guaranteed money with the Denver Broncos. Henry was scheduled to visit Oakland, Green Bay and the New York Giants. My understanding of the salary cap may be wrong, but won't 2.4M count against the cap this year and if they cut or trade him next year they'd eat the rest of the $9.6M in cap hit? I guess they could wait until after June 1 so the $9.6 would be spread out over '08 + '09 but seems like a lot of eaten cap for a 1 yr RB. This is why I was assuming that he'll be there for a couple/few years.I guarantee you that Henry won't be with Denver in 3 years, and probably not 2 either, but he could be a 1000 yd back for someone I guess.I'm surprsied you guys are considering offers for picks lower than the 1.3 - 1.4. IMO, the money that DEN gave Henry says that they're tired of plugging in random RBs and want some stability. It is Shannahan, so you never know though.
After the 1.3 it seems like the next 10 guys are a crapshoot. I'd rather have a RB that I know should at least break 1k yds for the next 2-3 yrs than the 5th rookie WR or RB.
ETA: I just realized it only specifies "guaranteed money" not necessarily signing bonus so I'm not sure how this would make it work out now.
just look at Henry #s when he was the starter for the Bills(02,03) and last year with the Titans. His is a solid #2RB.http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/235216its still on the table . thinking about it .. trying to see if i can get the 1.6 or 1.7 instead .. if a no go .. will most likley take the 1.10 ..
betting on " SYSTEM " RB's .. has never seemed to be a good bet .....
the best you can hope for IMO is to get 1 maybe 2 good years from Henry ... nothing more ..
the ceiling is not as high as some on the boards are jumping around saying .. atleast IMO
totally agreeWhen considering trade offers for Travis Henry, you have to ask yourself... what would I have taken from anyone a year ago? A 3rd? A swap of my-backup-for-yours?Trade high. Anyone who turns down a high first rounder for this guy is nuts. Of course I'm talking dynasty.
By that logic you are paying out the nose to get Randy Moss? What would you have given a couple years ago for him still holds today? Things change and new information is available. Henry had a good year last year in what 12-13 games and just landed some nice bank for a team looking for some stablility at the position. He has good value. Anyone trying to gauge value 3 years out is wasting their time or should be playing the stock market and not FF.Yes, he's a nice sell high candidate wih the hype around Denver RBs, but I agree with those that said trading him for anything outside the first three picks this year is a waste. You will be kicking yourself. Because there is no guarantee that you will be the lucky guy that drafts this year's MJD, if there even is one this year. By the time you know, it's too late. At least you know what you've got with Henry. A season similar to last year's...minimum.totally agreeWhen considering trade offers for Travis Henry, you have to ask yourself... what would I have taken from anyone a year ago? A 3rd? A swap of my-backup-for-yours?
Hey KF,I think you make a great point...but I have also read a lot of your posts and you don't think Henry will make for a good starter this season...yes/no? I'm not saying your opinion is biased...ALL OPINIONS are biased including mine. If you can get 2 seasons of solid production out of a guy that was going to be a bench guy...you can talk trade high but Henry might be good enough to help some teams get deep into their playoffs.Even in Dynasty leagues you have to draw a line in the sand...you can't have a roster full of "potential"...you can have all the guys you want in years 1-3 in the league with pedigrees, but you also need some productive players ages 26-30 that can propel you to a title. Henry would seem to fit the bill right now and is in a decent situation.Just some food for thought as I see you post "Sell High" a lot...I'm not disagreeing for the right price.When considering trade offers for Travis Henry, you have to ask yourself... what would I have taken from anyone a year ago? A 3rd? A swap of my-backup-for-yours?Trade high. Anyone who turns down a high first rounder for this guy is nuts. Of course I'm talking dynasty.
Can't disagree with this. Is that the Rock n Roll Express dude in your avatar?By that logic you are paying out the nose to get Randy Moss? What would you have given a couple years ago for him still holds today? Things change and new information is available. Henry had a good year last year in what 12-13 games and just landed some nice bank for a team looking for some stablility at the position. He has good value. Anyone trying to gauge value 3 years out is wasting their time or should be playing the stock market and not FF.Yes, he's a nice sell high candidate wih the hype around Denver RBs, but I agree with those that said trading him for anything outside the first three picks this year is a waste. You will be kicking yourself. Because there is no guarantee that you will be the lucky guy that drafts this year's MJD, if there even is one this year. By the time you know, it's too late. At least you know what you've got with Henry. A season similar to last year's...minimum.totally agreeWhen considering trade offers for Travis Henry, you have to ask yourself... what would I have taken from anyone a year ago? A 3rd? A swap of my-backup-for-yours?
sorry not real big on any denver running back dynasty wise, especially a guy like Henry.By that logic you are paying out the nose to get Randy Moss? What would you have given a couple years ago for him still holds today? Things change and new information is available. Henry had a good year last year in what 12-13 games and just landed some nice bank for a team looking for some stablility at the position. He has good value. Anyone trying to gauge value 3 years out is wasting their time or should be playing the stock market and not FF.Yes, he's a nice sell high candidate wih the hype around Denver RBs, but I agree with those that said trading him for anything outside the first three picks this year is a waste. You will be kicking yourself. Because there is no guarantee that you will be the lucky guy that drafts this year's MJD, if there even is one this year. By the time you know, it's too late. At least you know what you've got with Henry. A season similar to last year's...minimum.totally agreeWhen considering trade offers for Travis Henry, you have to ask yourself... what would I have taken from anyone a year ago? A 3rd? A swap of my-backup-for-yours?
I got an offer today of Travis Henry for the 2007 1.04 rookie pick.I declined. If it was the 1.03 I may have accepted it.What kind of offers are being thrown around out there?
Negotiating in the shark pool now, are we?I was thinking of offering Roy Williams to an owner in a Dynasty league for Travis Henry.
I agree with alot the points you make as well MOP. But for the right price yes, sell high. If you can get a high-to-mid first rounder, send him packing. Some of these offers I'm seeing guys getting in this thread, I wouldn't be able to hit ACCEPT fast enough!I think anybody trying to convince themselves that Shanahan is done playing RB head-games is kidding themselves (or a Henry owner!). Say what you will pundits, but Mike Bell is still around, Shanahan has interest in Betts, and then there's still the draft. The starting RB in Denver changes with the wind, and personally, no, I don't believe Shanahan is done with the RBBC and I don't see Henry as the long-term, full-time answer.Hey KF,I think you make a great point...but I have also read a lot of your posts and you don't think Henry will make for a good starter this season...yes/no? I'm not saying your opinion is biased...ALL OPINIONS are biased including mine. If you can get 2 seasons of solid production out of a guy that was going to be a bench guy...you can talk trade high but Henry might be good enough to help some teams get deep into their playoffs.Even in Dynasty leagues you have to draw a line in the sand...you can't have a roster full of "potential"...you can have all the guys you want in years 1-3 in the league with pedigrees, but you also need some productive players ages 26-30 that can propel you to a title. Henry would seem to fit the bill right now and is in a decent situation.Just some food for thought as I see you post "Sell High" a lot...I'm not disagreeing for the right price.When considering trade offers for Travis Henry, you have to ask yourself... what would I have taken from anyone a year ago? A 3rd? A swap of my-backup-for-yours?Trade high. Anyone who turns down a high first rounder for this guy is nuts. Of course I'm talking dynasty.
I would also add to this that alot of anyone's decision-making process on whether to trade or hold Henry would depend on a.) their own team's situation, or b.) their ability to draft. If your close, yeah hold him and enjoy Tatum Bell Part Deux. If you're not a contender, bye-bye Travis! This is NOT the second coming of Clinton Portis or Terrell Davis.But we don't always have to agree, right?Hey KF,I think you make a great point...but I have also read a lot of your posts and you don't think Henry will make for a good starter this season...yes/no? I'm not saying your opinion is biased...ALL OPINIONS are biased including mine. If you can get 2 seasons of solid production out of a guy that was going to be a bench guy...you can talk trade high but Henry might be good enough to help some teams get deep into their playoffs.Even in Dynasty leagues you have to draw a line in the sand...you can't have a roster full of "potential"...you can have all the guys you want in years 1-3 in the league with pedigrees, but you also need some productive players ages 26-30 that can propel you to a title. Henry would seem to fit the bill right now and is in a decent situation.Just some food for thought as I see you post "Sell High" a lot...I'm not disagreeing for the right price.When considering trade offers for Travis Henry, you have to ask yourself... what would I have taken from anyone a year ago? A 3rd? A swap of my-backup-for-yours?Trade high. Anyone who turns down a high first rounder for this guy is nuts. Of course I'm talking dynasty.
See... dsrm just turned down Adrian Peterson/Calvin Johnson/Marshawn Lynch/JaMarcus Russell/Brady Quinn for Travis Henry.I got an offer today of Travis Henry for the 2007 1.04 rookie pick.I declined. If it was the 1.03 I may have accepted it.What kind of offers are being thrown around out there?
I was thinking of offering Roy Williams to an owner in a Dynasty league for Travis Henry.
KUB!!!!!I got an offer today of Travis Henry for the 2007 1.04 rookie pick.I declined. If it was the 1.03 I may have accepted it.What kind of offers are being thrown around out there?Negotiating in the shark pool now, are we?I was thinking of offering Roy Williams to an owner in a Dynasty league for Travis Henry.
I am not going to turn this into an AC type post.I already have the 1.2 pick, so All-Day or Marshawn will be on my team.The reason that I have the #2 pick (14 team league) is that Travis Henry would be considered my stud RB even if he was still in Tennessee. Now that he is in Denver, his studliness for me increases a whole bunch.See... dsrm just turned down Adrian Peterson/Calvin Johnson/Marshawn Lynch/JaMarcus Russell/Brady Quinn for Travis Henry.I got an offer today of Travis Henry for the 2007 1.04 rookie pick.I declined. If it was the 1.03 I may have accepted it.What kind of offers are being thrown around out there?DSRM, MAKE THAT TRADE!
No...I have Henry. I was offered the 1.04.Like I said, if it was the 1.3...I'd probably do it. The dropoff though is pretty extreme.Donnybrook said:I am assuming he was offered Henry.I was offer Henry, 3rd rounder and a 4th rounder for my 1.02 and my 2008 1st rounder. I declined. I have never really liked Henry.See... dsrm just turned down Adrian Peterson/Calvin Johnson/Marshawn Lynch/JaMarcus Russell/Brady Quinn for Travis Henry.I got an offer today of Travis Henry for the 2007 1.04 rookie pick.I declined. If it was the 1.03 I may have accepted it.What kind of offers are being thrown around out there?DSRM, MAKE THAT TRADE!
Let's examine this for fun.1.01: No way, people are going to take Peterson as fast as theyware on the clock and I don't want to turn the thread into a AP thread so let's leave this one alone. I don't think anyone will get that offer.I agree with alot the points you make as well MOP. But for the right price yes, sell high. If you can get a high-to-mid first rounder, send him packing. Some of these offers I'm seeing guys getting in this thread, I wouldn't be able to hit ACCEPT fast enough!I think anybody trying to convince themselves that Shanahan is done playing RB head-games is kidding themselves (or a Henry owner!). Say what you will pundits, but Mike Bell is still around, Shanahan has interest in Betts, and then there's still the draft. The starting RB in Denver changes with the wind, and personally, no, I don't believe Shanahan is done with the RBBC and I don't see Henry as the long-term, full-time answer.Hey KF,I think you make a great point...but I have also read a lot of your posts and you don't think Henry will make for a good starter this season...yes/no? I'm not saying your opinion is biased...ALL OPINIONS are biased including mine. If you can get 2 seasons of solid production out of a guy that was going to be a bench guy...you can talk trade high but Henry might be good enough to help some teams get deep into their playoffs.When considering trade offers for Travis Henry, you have to ask yourself... what would I have taken from anyone a year ago? A 3rd? A swap of my-backup-for-yours?
Trade high. Anyone who turns down a high first rounder for this guy is nuts. Of course I'm talking dynasty.
Even in Dynasty leagues you have to draw a line in the sand...you can't have a roster full of "potential"...you can have all the guys you want in years 1-3 in the league with pedigrees, but you also need some productive players ages 26-30 that can propel you to a title. Henry would seem to fit the bill right now and is in a decent situation.
Just some food for thought as I see you post "Sell High" a lot...I'm not disagreeing for the right price.
LoL....I couldn't resistI got an offer today of Travis Henry for the 2007 1.04 rookie pick.I declined. If it was the 1.03 I may have accepted it.What kind of offers are being thrown around out there?Negotiating in the shark pool now, are we?I was thinking of offering Roy Williams to an owner in a Dynasty league for Travis Henry.
OK, so you're little thin at RB. How do your QBs/WRs look?I am not going to turn this into an AC type post.I already have the 1.2 pick, so All-Day or Marshawn will be on my team.The reason that I have the #2 pick (14 team league) is that Travis Henry would be considered my stud RB even if he was still in Tennessee. Now that he is in Denver, his studliness for me increases a whole bunch.See... dsrm just turned down Adrian Peterson/Calvin Johnson/Marshawn Lynch/JaMarcus Russell/Brady Quinn for Travis Henry.I got an offer today of Travis Henry for the 2007 1.04 rookie pick.I declined. If it was the 1.03 I may have accepted it.What kind of offers are being thrown around out there?DSRM, MAKE THAT TRADE!
LOL...I see Willy...waiting for him to join inLoL....I couldn't resistI got an offer today of Travis Henry for the 2007 1.04 rookie pick.I declined. If it was the 1.03 I may have accepted it.What kind of offers are being thrown around out there?Negotiating in the shark pool now, are we?I was thinking of offering Roy Williams to an owner in a Dynasty league for Travis Henry.![]()
QB #1 is solid (Brady)No backups worth mentioning though. I do have a 1.9 pick which should = either jamarcus or BradyWR's are pretty darn good. ocho Cinco, Andre, Hines...with Brandon EEEEEE Marshall and Tony Gonzo as depth.OK, so you're little thin at RB. How do your QBs/WRs look?I am not going to turn this into an AC type post.I already have the 1.2 pick, so All-Day or Marshawn will be on my team.The reason that I have the #2 pick (14 team league) is that Travis Henry would be considered my stud RB even if he was still in Tennessee. Now that he is in Denver, his studliness for me increases a whole bunch.See... dsrm just turned down Adrian Peterson/Calvin Johnson/Marshawn Lynch/JaMarcus Russell/Brady Quinn for Travis Henry.I got an offer today of Travis Henry for the 2007 1.04 rookie pick.I declined. If it was the 1.03 I may have accepted it.What kind of offers are being thrown around out there?DSRM, MAKE THAT TRADE!
I agree with alot of what you say too, MOP. You make valid points. To each his own I guess.Let's examine this for fun.1.01: No way, people are going to take Peterson as fast as theyware on the clock and I don't want to turn the thread into a AP thread so let's leave this one alone. I don't think anyone will get that offer.I agree with alot the points you make as well MOP. But for the right price yes, sell high. If you can get a high-to-mid first rounder, send him packing. Some of these offers I'm seeing guys getting in this thread, I wouldn't be able to hit ACCEPT fast enough!I think anybody trying to convince themselves that Shanahan is done playing RB head-games is kidding themselves (or a Henry owner!). Say what you will pundits, but Mike Bell is still around, Shanahan has interest in Betts, and then there's still the draft. The starting RB in Denver changes with the wind, and personally, no, I don't believe Shanahan is done with the RBBC and I don't see Henry as the long-term, full-time answer.Hey KF,I think you make a great point...but I have also read a lot of your posts and you don't think Henry will make for a good starter this season...yes/no? I'm not saying your opinion is biased...ALL OPINIONS are biased including mine. If you can get 2 seasons of solid production out of a guy that was going to be a bench guy...you can talk trade high but Henry might be good enough to help some teams get deep into their playoffs.When considering trade offers for Travis Henry, you have to ask yourself... what would I have taken from anyone a year ago? A 3rd? A swap of my-backup-for-yours?
Trade high. Anyone who turns down a high first rounder for this guy is nuts. Of course I'm talking dynasty.
Even in Dynasty leagues you have to draw a line in the sand...you can't have a roster full of "potential"...you can have all the guys you want in years 1-3 in the league with pedigrees, but you also need some productive players ages 26-30 that can propel you to a title. Henry would seem to fit the bill right now and is in a decent situation.
Just some food for thought as I see you post "Sell High" a lot...I'm not disagreeing for the right price.
1.02 and 1.03: Again I think most people will not get this as an offer for Henry but looking at the popular rookies...I see WR Calvin Johnson...and Marshawn Lynch. Johnson should be a 10 year pro and a lot of dynasty owners will take him and assume they have a potential top10WR for the next decade.
Lynch will depend on who drafts him. But again I still think most owners will take him. I would probably jump on the 1.02...the 1.03 has a little mystery to it.
OK, let's look at the 1.04 thru 1.10
Micahel Bush, Kenny Irons, Antonio Pittman, all these type of RB that could be drafted in rounds 2, 3, and 4 are risks to me. I would rather have the production out of Henry for the next couple of seasons. In a lot of league I wouldn't have to part with him to get these types of picks. At WR you have guys like Jarrett and Bowe who I think will have good NFL careers but no reason to trade henry for a rookie WR IMO.
I am just putting out food for thought. KF, you're a solid poster and I like reading what you put up here, but I think Henry is better or worth more at this moment than a rookie like Antonio Pittman.
I would rather leverage henry and maybe a decent WR for a guy like Joseph Addai...or put together a package for Maroney...I like the RB from the 1st round last year a whole lot better than the crap after Lynch this season.
Pretty much the same price you paid to acquire him a few years ago Dope.I got an offer today of Travis Henry for the 2007 1.04 rookie pick.
Yeah...That didn't quite work out the way I hoped. Live and learn.Pretty much the same price you paid to acquire him a few years ago Dope.I got an offer today of Travis Henry for the 2007 1.04 rookie pick.![]()
Exactly. Most sharks are going to make sure they don't overpay for him...wait till the summer unfolds a bit and Henry is worth a lot more as the Denver RB.Sell high to me would be he opens th eseason as the starter, does very well early on with an avg of 100 yds and a TD per week...if he can do that, then you want to sell high if you think it will better your team. Selling high right now unless it really is a blockbuster trade is probably not the best move.I've got him in 2 leagues. Floated him out there in both. So far, zero interest in league #1, and only one nibble in league #2. The guy there tossed out a mixed bag, including Brandon Jacobs, Jerramy Stevens, AJ Hawk, Sean Jones, maybe a draft pick. I am not too thrilled with something in that vein, and will likely stand pat if I can't get a substantially better return. Someone's going to need a back sometime before the season starts. No need to rush to make a deal right now.
I wouldn't trade Henry straight up for anyone past those first 4 names. Leinert and Young have lots of value, but I'm a QB minimalist as RB's are scarce and QB's are not in most dynasty leagues. Even last year, Henry was RB16 in PPG playing in the wasteland of Tennesee. Denver is a much better situation than Tennesee.I agree with M.O.P., the best time to trade him will be after the first few weeks of the season when Henry puts together some good games and the reality of production drowns out the Denver RB short life-span stigma. Unless somebody knocks my socks off, I'm not trading Henry for developing prospects or roster fodder when his short-term production is bound to be very good and I'll likely be able to get the same if not better during the season.Kit Fisto said:I agree with alot of what you say too, MOP. You make valid points. To each his own I guess.Ministry of Pain said:Let's examine this for fun.1.01: No way, people are going to take Peterson as fast as theyware on the clock and I don't want to turn the thread into a AP thread so let's leave this one alone. I don't think anyone will get that offer.I agree with alot the points you make as well MOP. But for the right price yes, sell high. If you can get a high-to-mid first rounder, send him packing. Some of these offers I'm seeing guys getting in this thread, I wouldn't be able to hit ACCEPT fast enough!I think anybody trying to convince themselves that Shanahan is done playing RB head-games is kidding themselves (or a Henry owner!). Say what you will pundits, but Mike Bell is still around, Shanahan has interest in Betts, and then there's still the draft. The starting RB in Denver changes with the wind, and personally, no, I don't believe Shanahan is done with the RBBC and I don't see Henry as the long-term, full-time answer.Hey KF,I think you make a great point...but I have also read a lot of your posts and you don't think Henry will make for a good starter this season...yes/no? I'm not saying your opinion is biased...ALL OPINIONS are biased including mine. If you can get 2 seasons of solid production out of a guy that was going to be a bench guy...you can talk trade high but Henry might be good enough to help some teams get deep into their playoffs.When considering trade offers for Travis Henry, you have to ask yourself... what would I have taken from anyone a year ago? A 3rd? A swap of my-backup-for-yours?
Trade high. Anyone who turns down a high first rounder for this guy is nuts. Of course I'm talking dynasty.
Even in Dynasty leagues you have to draw a line in the sand...you can't have a roster full of "potential"...you can have all the guys you want in years 1-3 in the league with pedigrees, but you also need some productive players ages 26-30 that can propel you to a title. Henry would seem to fit the bill right now and is in a decent situation.
Just some food for thought as I see you post "Sell High" a lot...I'm not disagreeing for the right price.
1.02 and 1.03: Again I think most people will not get this as an offer for Henry but looking at the popular rookies...I see WR Calvin Johnson...and Marshawn Lynch. Johnson should be a 10 year pro and a lot of dynasty owners will take him and assume they have a potential top10WR for the next decade.
Lynch will depend on who drafts him. But again I still think most owners will take him. I would probably jump on the 1.02...the 1.03 has a little mystery to it.
OK, let's look at the 1.04 thru 1.10
Micahel Bush, Kenny Irons, Antonio Pittman, all these type of RB that could be drafted in rounds 2, 3, and 4 are risks to me. I would rather have the production out of Henry for the next couple of seasons. In a lot of league I wouldn't have to part with him to get these types of picks. At WR you have guys like Jarrett and Bowe who I think will have good NFL careers but no reason to trade henry for a rookie WR IMO.
I am just putting out food for thought. KF, you're a solid poster and I like reading what you put up here, but I think Henry is better or worth more at this moment than a rookie like Antonio Pittman.
I would rather leverage henry and maybe a decent WR for a guy like Joseph Addai...or put together a package for Maroney...I like the RB from the 1st round last year a whole lot better than the crap after Lynch this season.One last thing, talking about Antonio Pittman... this time last year, Joseph Addai was a nobody. Last year's dynasty #1-12 in August/September were typically (in a rough order)...
1. Bush
2. Maroney
3. DeAngelo
4. Addai
5. White
6. Leinart
7. Young
8. Jennings
9. Cutler
10. Norwood
11. Santonio Holmes
12. Chad Jackson
I'd take every single one of them except for maybe White, Holmes or Jackson straight-up for Henry. We always say the draft is thin this time of year.
Again though, to each his own!![]()
Hmmm...had another owner in league #2 come to me with the 1.04. This team is at least 2 years off from serious competitiveness, so this may be a worthwhile deal. By the time I am ready to make some noise, Henry will be 30+ and possibly out or on the way out in Denver. 1.04 looks kinda weak now in comparison to 1.01-1.03, but I am pretty sure someone else will step up and close that gap at least some.Ministry of Pain said:Exactly. Most sharks are going to make sure they don't overpay for him...wait till the summer unfolds a bit and Henry is worth a lot more as the Denver RB.Sell high to me would be he opens th eseason as the starter, does very well early on with an avg of 100 yds and a TD per week...if he can do that, then you want to sell high if you think it will better your team. Selling high right now unless it really is a blockbuster trade is probably not the best move.purplehaze67 said:I've got him in 2 leagues. Floated him out there in both. So far, zero interest in league #1, and only one nibble in league #2. The guy there tossed out a mixed bag, including Brandon Jacobs, Jerramy Stevens, AJ Hawk, Sean Jones, maybe a draft pick. I am not too thrilled with something in that vein, and will likely stand pat if I can't get a substantially better return. Someone's going to need a back sometime before the season starts. No need to rush to make a deal right now.
It is fairly close, but Team B wins this one.benson_will_lead_the_way said:This one just went down in my 12 team dynasty leagueTeam A gets: Henry, Travis DEN RB Year 2007 Draft Pick 3.02Team B gets: Dunn, Warrick ATL RB Faulk, Kevin NEP RB Norwood, Jerious ATL RB Burress, Plaxico NYG WR Year 2007 Draft Pick 2.03 Year 2007 Draft Pick 4.01seems pretty fair.
So you traded Henry for the 1.08? You traded about 1200-1500 yds and 8-10TD for the next 2 seasons for a project WR at best...or something along the lines of Pittman/Jackson at RB? I would have to see the rest of your team but I would not have traded him for anything less than a solid WR2 that has some track history of production.50% of the 1st/2nd round WR in this year's draft will be complete busts. Rice, Meachem, Bowe, Ginn, Jarrett, JohnnieLee, and yes Calvin Johnson...they can't all be superstars. Now CJ looks like a surefire...even more than Braylon, or Rogers...but the next 6-8 WR...no way they all pan out. And the alternative is some RB that probably is lobbying for a backup role on most teams that draft them. I don't want to be overly critical but I don't see this as a good trade IMHO.i just dealt Henry for the 1.8 rookie pick 3 reasons ( Henry was aquired this season for two # 3 rd picks in week # 2 so the 1.8 is a nice gain ) ( Henry was my # 5 Rb so depth wise he was going to sit and rot ) ( I do like Henry as a RB .. always have .. even in Tenn when he wasnt getting a chance ... I used to really like him in Buffalo ---------BUT I have a hunch personally that the Broncos might not be done either drafting for a RB / trading for a RB / or simply going with some wierd RBBC with Mike Bell .. so the 1.8 seems like a happy medium I get to take a chance at a rookie - possibly a M.Bush type to stash on my team for later or QB ( we have a 2 qb type league ) or a top Wr ( since the QB's should go fast because of the 2 qb thing ) -- and in a couple years when my other Rb's start to wear down ( rudi - L.J - L.T ) the project M.Bush will be ready and the team that dealt for HENRY from me .. was in serious need of a # 1 type RB .. currently on his team he has Norwood and M>Turner and Mike Bell .. so aquiring Henry will immediatly give him a starting Rb .. and if HENRY does do 1400 yards and 12 td 's it was a great trade for him .. everyones happy a couple owners touched on this ... it does depend on what your team makeup is at the time of the trade ... your league rules and starting requirements will also be a part of the value
People don't often evaluate Wrs on the right timeline. Getting a WR early - before his 4th or 5th season - should be considered a bet for later. There are a TON of WRs who could have easily been labeled busts who produced later on. The good news is, the price comes down. For example, there is no doubt in my mind that a guy like Donte Stallworth will outproduce the 3rd WR taken in the upcoming draft over the next 2-3 years. That said, the person sitting on 1.7 isn't likely going to move the pick for Stallworth. More likely, a nice 2nd rounder would get the job done.50% of the 1st/2nd round WR in this year's draft will be complete busts. Rice, Meachem, Bowe, Ginn, Jarrett, JohnnieLee, and yes Calvin Johnson...they can't all be superstars.