What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Tre Mason (1 Viewer)

It will take some time, but once he gets the pass pro down, he will be very fantasy relevant. He looked like the much superior running back tonight when the ball was in his hands.

 
That fat plodder, stacy, is finally being exposed for what he is

A fraud.

A benefactor of volume.

I said Mason would take over this job by week 6-8. I was wrong

But it seems it may be soon regardless

 
That fat plodder, stacy, is finally being exposed for what he is

A fraud.

A benefactor of volume.

I said Mason would take over this job by week 6-8. I was wrong

But it seems it may be soon regardless
This is probably correct but given that this team is constantly in a hole they need someone who can block and it sounds like that may keep Mason off the field.

 
His quickness and burst were evident in the preseason, but I thought he looked and ran small.

Nice to see him lowering the boom tonight, even if it was only against a DB:

https://vine.co/v/OqZLFxLYQXD

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Fresh legs. Pass pro is still a obvious weakness that will keep him on the bench

 
Last edited by a moderator:
superior talent,and possibly the only thing to spare Fisher's job at the end of the year, is for Mason to become a top tier RB the remainder of the season, and get this offense headed in the right direction..

it's evident they need a running game in the worst way,and they've finally found it in Mason...it's time to pound him at opposing defenses..

 
In their next 6 games they face 5 top 10 run Ds. Sea, @KC, @SF, @Ari, Den and @SD. :X
Yeah, not pretty. I think all we can do now is just see if he passes the eye test and compare how he does relative to the other backs on the team. I don't see him blowing up like an Oliver. This may be a long, gradual process.

 
Tanner9919 said:
superior talent,and possibly the only thing to spare Fisher's job at the end of the year, is for Mason to become a top tier RB the remainder of the season, and get this offense headed in the right direction..

it's evident they need a running game in the worst way,and they've finally found it in Mason...it's time to pound him at opposing defenses..
Fisher lost his starting QB and the schedule is brutal, yet they are still being competitive in their losses (except the horrific opener). The talent on the defense is there, but takes time to put together. Firing Fisher now would be a terrible decision.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
RBM said:
Soulfly3 said:
That fat plodder
:lol:
Stacy looks like a blob.. I know he isnt, but he looks like one.

Mason's physique is just.... daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaamn *snaps fingers*

anyways... coaches should be working OT on getting him to improve in pass pro - this kid is real. he's going to be something special

 
Tanner9919 said:
superior talent,and possibly the only thing to spare Fisher's job at the end of the year, is for Mason to become a top tier RB the remainder of the season, and get this offense headed in the right direction..

it's evident they need a running game in the worst way,and they've finally found it in Mason...it's time to pound him at opposing defenses..
Fisher lost his starting QB and the schedule is brutal, yet they are still being competitive in there losses (except the horrific opener). The talent on the defense is there, but takes time to put together. Firing Fisher now would be a terrible decision.
Yeah, I think Fisher is safe. Shotty should be gone though.

 
Rotoworld:

Making his NFL debut, Rams rookie RB Tre Mason rushed for 40 yards on five carries in St. Louis' Week 6 loss to San Francisco on Monday night, adding one catch for 12 yards.

Mason had been a healthy scratch each of the first four games of the season. He entered the game in the first quarter, taking the place of Trey Watts as the No. 3 back behind Zac Stacy and Benny Cunningham. Mason turned his first NFL touch into a 12-yard gain in the red zone. His first carry went for 27 yards and would have likely gone for a touchdown if Brian Quick hadn't gotten in the way downfield. Mason showed that it's clear he has the most talent as a runner in the Rams' backfield. Stacy and Cunningham are plodders in the Shonn Greene mold and haven't showed anything to keep Mason off the field. Mason is worth a look in 12- and 14-team leagues. This is the same time Stacy entered the fantasy picture last season.

Oct 13 - 11:53 PM
 
It was all Mason and Cunningham in the 4th, no sign of chubby stacy.

Good Sign #1

If he continues to make the most of his chances and hold onto the ball, his carries will rise.

Had him as my #1 rb out of college, and against a beastly SF defense, he made that assessment look accurate. Hope he continues, cuz this kid is lightening in a bottle. Will be fun to watch

 
This is not going to amount to nothing for FF. Get away from this entire backfield if you still can guys.
Are you not sure it's not going to not amount to nothing? If not, How not not sure are you?

To clear it up, what you just said is: This is going to amount to something for FF.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rotoworld:

Making his NFL debut, Rams rookie RB Tre Mason rushed for 40 yards on five carries in St. Louis' Week 6 loss to San Francisco on Monday night, adding one catch for 12 yards.

Mason had been a healthy scratch each of the first four games of the season. He entered the game in the first quarter, taking the place of Trey Watts as the No. 3 back behind Zac Stacy and Benny Cunningham. Mason turned his first NFL touch into a 12-yard gain in the red zone. His first carry went for 27 yards and would have likely gone for a touchdown if Brian Quick hadn't gotten in the way downfield. Mason showed that it's clear he has the most talent as a runner in the Rams' backfield. Stacy and Cunningham are plodders in the Shonn Greene mold and haven't showed anything to keep Mason off the field. Mason is worth a look in 12- and 14-team leagues. This is the same time Stacy entered the fantasy picture last season.

Oct 13 - 11:53 PM
Like how RW talked up Stacy last season and this pre-season but now calls him a plodder.

 
Stacy, who was destined to "rule this backfield for years" and be the "main roadblock for Mason" has seen more than 12 carries only once this season. His carries have also decreased over each of the last 3 weeks... 12, 11, 8....

His ypc, is his usual plodding 3.9, but has also decreased over each of the past 3 weeks... 5.6, 3.8, 2.1

yikes for the fatman.

 
This is not going to amount to nothing for FF. Get away from this entire backfield if you still can guys.
Are you not sure it's not going to not amount to nothing? If not, How not not sure are you?

To clear it up, what you just said is: This is going to amount to something for FF.
What are your saying??

This is a mess. The Rams have a good group of RBs. That's great for the NFL, but useless for FF. Even Tavon Austin is getting carries now. By my count that's 4 backs in the stable with an unpredictable coach. You can't logically make anything more out of this. Mason looked like fresh legs( and a weak pass blocker), but he's not going to be a factor getting 3-7 touches a game. He's not Antone Smith.

 
This is not going to amount to nothing for FF. Get away from this entire backfield if you still can guys.
Are you not sure it's not going to not amount to nothing? If not, How not not sure are you?

To clear it up, what you just said is: This is going to amount to something for FF.
What are your saying??

This is a mess. The Rams have a good group of RBs. That's great for the NFL, but useless for FF. Even Tavon Austin is getting carries now. By my count that's 4 backs in the stable with an unpredictable coach. You can't logically make anything more out of this. Mason looked like fresh legs( and a weak pass blocker), but he's not going to be a factor getting 3-7 touches a game. He's not Antone Smith.
who's to say what will happen RB wise...no one predicted Stacy would emerge last year. a guy gets injured, someone becomes inactive. You have to keep firing bullets at guys with upside and if doesn't work for a week or two you retread them. Snagged Beckham a couple weeks back who may help out my team, grabbed Oliver a week before he broke out....you never know but I'd rather be early and miss than be late. Unless you're at the bottom of the waiver wire you have no shot at Mason if he goes out next week and have 12-81-1 next week.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is not going to amount to nothing for FF. Get away from this entire backfield if you still can guys.
Are you not sure it's not going to not amount to nothing? If not, How not not sure are you?

To clear it up, what you just said is: This is going to amount to something for FF.
What are your saying??

This is a mess. The Rams have a good group of RBs. That's great for the NFL, but useless for FF. Even Tavon Austin is getting carries now. By my count that's 4 backs in the stable with an unpredictable coach. You can't logically make anything more out of this. Mason looked like fresh legs( and a weak pass blocker), but he's not going to be a factor getting 3-7 touches a game. He's not Antone Smith.
who's to say what will happen RB wise...no one predicted Stacy would emerge last year. a guy gets injured, someone becomes inactive.
I did.

 
This is not going to amount to nothing for FF. Get away from this entire backfield if you still can guys.
Are you not sure it's not going to not amount to nothing? If not, How not not sure are you?

To clear it up, what you just said is: This is going to amount to something for FF.
What are your saying??

This is a mess. The Rams have a good group of RBs. That's great for the NFL, but useless for FF. Even Tavon Austin is getting carries now. By my count that's 4 backs in the stable with an unpredictable coach. You can't logically make anything more out of this. Mason looked like fresh legs( and a weak pass blocker), but he's not going to be a factor getting 3-7 touches a game. He's not Antone Smith.
who's to say what will happen RB wise...no one predicted Stacy would emerge last year. a guy gets injured, someone becomes inactive.
Agree. All the same things were being said about this same team at this time last year. If you're going to take a flyer on one of them, wouldn't you want it to be on the one that appears to be the most explosive?

 
Tanner9919 said:
superior talent,and possibly the only thing to spare Fisher's job at the end of the year, is for Mason to become a top tier RB the remainder of the season, and get this offense headed in the right direction..

it's evident they need a running game in the worst way,and they've finally found it in Mason...it's time to pound him at opposing defenses..
Fisher lost his starting QB and the schedule is brutal, yet they are still being competitive in there losses (except the horrific opener). The talent on the defense is there, but takes time to put together. Firing Fisher now would be a terrible decision.
Yeah, I think Fisher is safe. Shotty should be gone though.
shotty is fine. Gregg Williams is terrible...terrible hire by fish....

Last night collapse doesn't bode well fo him either

 
Rotoworld:

Making his NFL debut, Rams rookie RB Tre Mason rushed for 40 yards on five carries in St. Louis' Week 6 loss to San Francisco on Monday night, adding one catch for 12 yards.

Mason had been a healthy scratch each of the first four games of the season. He entered the game in the first quarter, taking the place of Trey Watts as the No. 3 back behind Zac Stacy and Benny Cunningham. Mason turned his first NFL touch into a 12-yard gain in the red zone. His first carry went for 27 yards and would have likely gone for a touchdown if Brian Quick hadn't gotten in the way downfield. Mason showed that it's clear he has the most talent as a runner in the Rams' backfield. Stacy and Cunningham are plodders in the Shonn Greene mold and haven't showed anything to keep Mason off the field. Mason is worth a look in 12- and 14-team leagues. This is the same time Stacy entered the fantasy picture last season.

Oct 13 - 11:53 PM
Like how RW talked up Stacy last season and this pre-season but now calls him a plodder.
ummmmmm.....I believe rotoworld is not actually a guy

 
This is not going to amount to nothing for FF. Get away from this entire backfield if you still can guys.
Are you not sure it's not going to not amount to nothing? If not, How not not sure are you?

To clear it up, what you just said is: This is going to amount to something for FF.
What are your saying??

This is a mess. The Rams have a good group of RBs. That's great for the NFL, but useless for FF. Even Tavon Austin is getting carries now. By my count that's 4 backs in the stable with an unpredictable coach. You can't logically make anything more out of this. Mason looked like fresh legs( and a weak pass blocker), but he's not going to be a factor getting 3-7 touches a game. He's not Antone Smith.
who's to say what will happen RB wise...no one predicted Stacy would emerge last year. a guy gets injured, someone becomes inactive.
Agree. All the same things were being said about this same team at this time last year. If you're going to take a flyer on one of them, wouldn't you want it to be on the one that appears to be the most explosive?
I guess... I'd rather stay away. I don't see a reason for Fisher to change what he's did vs SF last night. It could have easily been T. Austin, or any of the other handful of RBs, with a big play or two and we would not care about Mason today.

 
This is not going to amount to nothing for FF. Get away from this entire backfield if you still can guys.
Are you not sure it's not going to not amount to nothing? If not, How not not sure are you?

To clear it up, what you just said is: This is going to amount to something for FF.
What are your saying??

This is a mess. The Rams have a good group of RBs. That's great for the NFL, but useless for FF. Even Tavon Austin is getting carries now. By my count that's 4 backs in the stable with an unpredictable coach. You can't logically make anything more out of this. Mason looked like fresh legs( and a weak pass blocker), but he's not going to be a factor getting 3-7 touches a game. He's not Antone Smith.
who's to say what will happen RB wise...no one predicted Stacy would emerge last year. a guy gets injured, someone becomes inactive.
Agree. All the same things were being said about this same team at this time last year. If you're going to take a flyer on one of them, wouldn't you want it to be on the one that appears to be the most explosive?
I guess... I'd rather stay away. I don't see a reason for Fisher to change what he's did vs SF last night. It could have easily been T. Austin, or any of the other handful of RBs, with a big play or two and we would not care about Mason today.
sure, except that of the 4 guys who carried the ball, he was the only one to not look completely useless against a top tier DEF

in fact, he looked great

 
Rotoworld:

Making his NFL debut, Rams rookie RB Tre Mason rushed for 40 yards on five carries in St. Louis' Week 6 loss to San Francisco on Monday night, adding one catch for 12 yards.

Mason had been a healthy scratch each of the first four games of the season. He entered the game in the first quarter, taking the place of Trey Watts as the No. 3 back behind Zac Stacy and Benny Cunningham. Mason turned his first NFL touch into a 12-yard gain in the red zone. His first carry went for 27 yards and would have likely gone for a touchdown if Brian Quick hadn't gotten in the way downfield. Mason showed that it's clear he has the most talent as a runner in the Rams' backfield. Stacy and Cunningham are plodders in the Shonn Greene mold and haven't showed anything to keep Mason off the field. Mason is worth a look in 12- and 14-team leagues. This is the same time Stacy entered the fantasy picture last season.

Oct 13 - 11:53 PM
Like how RW talked up Stacy last season and this pre-season but now calls him a plodder.
Rotoworld rule of thumb:

Any time there's a younger, faster RB behind you, you're a plodder. All objectivity goes by the wayside and weekly blue love letters are spun in favor of the rookie.

 
This is not going to amount to nothing for FF. Get away from this entire backfield if you still can guys.
Are you not sure it's not going to not amount to nothing? If not, How not not sure are you?

To clear it up, what you just said is: This is going to amount to something for FF.
What are your saying??

This is a mess. The Rams have a good group of RBs. That's great for the NFL, but useless for FF. Even Tavon Austin is getting carries now. By my count that's 4 backs in the stable with an unpredictable coach. You can't logically make anything more out of this. Mason looked like fresh legs( and a weak pass blocker), but he's not going to be a factor getting 3-7 touches a game. He's not Antone Smith.
who's to say what will happen RB wise...no one predicted Stacy would emerge last year. a guy gets injured, someone becomes inactive.
Agree. All the same things were being said about this same team at this time last year. If you're going to take a flyer on one of them, wouldn't you want it to be on the one that appears to be the most explosive?
I guess... I'd rather stay away. I don't see a reason for Fisher to change what he's did vs SF last night. It could have easily been T. Austin, or any of the other handful of RBs, with a big play or two and we would not care about Mason today.
sure, except that of the 4 guys who carried the ball, he was the only one to not look completely useless against a top tier DEF

in fact, he looked great
Cunningham look fine on a TD. T. Austin is at 11.4 yards a clip for his career. It's an uphill battle for all of them.

 
This is not going to amount to nothing for FF. Get away from this entire backfield if you still can guys.
Are you not sure it's not going to not amount to nothing? If not, How not not sure are you?

To clear it up, what you just said is: This is going to amount to something for FF.
What are your saying??

This is a mess. The Rams have a good group of RBs. That's great for the NFL, but useless for FF. Even Tavon Austin is getting carries now. By my count that's 4 backs in the stable with an unpredictable coach. You can't logically make anything more out of this. Mason looked like fresh legs( and a weak pass blocker), but he's not going to be a factor getting 3-7 touches a game. He's not Antone Smith.
who's to say what will happen RB wise...no one predicted Stacy would emerge last year. a guy gets injured, someone becomes inactive.
I did.
ok, everyone beside you. BTW, I picked him up as well due to the thread here on the site.

 
This is not going to amount to nothing for FF. Get away from this entire backfield if you still can guys.
Are you not sure it's not going to not amount to nothing? If not, How not not sure are you?

To clear it up, what you just said is: This is going to amount to something for FF.
What are your saying??

This is a mess. The Rams have a good group of RBs. That's great for the NFL, but useless for FF. Even Tavon Austin is getting carries now. By my count that's 4 backs in the stable with an unpredictable coach. You can't logically make anything more out of this. Mason looked like fresh legs( and a weak pass blocker), but he's not going to be a factor getting 3-7 touches a game. He's not Antone Smith.
who's to say what will happen RB wise...no one predicted Stacy would emerge last year. a guy gets injured, someone becomes inactive.
Agree. All the same things were being said about this same team at this time last year. If you're going to take a flyer on one of them, wouldn't you want it to be on the one that appears to be the most explosive?
I guess... I'd rather stay away. I don't see a reason for Fisher to change what he's did vs SF last night. It could have easily been T. Austin, or any of the other handful of RBs, with a big play or two and we would not care about Mason today.
sure, except that of the 4 guys who carried the ball, he was the only one to not look completely useless against a top tier DEF

in fact, he looked great
Cunningham look fine on a TD. T. Austin is at 11.4 yards a clip for his career. It's an uphill battle for all of them.
cunningham looked fine on a 1yd carry?

Austin looked like crap yesterday... and he is NOT a running back.

 
This is not going to amount to nothing for FF. Get away from this entire backfield if you still can guys.
Are you not sure it's not going to not amount to nothing? If not, How not not sure are you?

To clear it up, what you just said is: This is going to amount to something for FF.
What are your saying??
You are saying that it will amount to something, because you said that it will not(!) amount to nothing(!). Minus + minus = plus

 
This is not going to amount to nothing for FF. Get away from this entire backfield if you still can guys.
Are you not sure it's not going to not amount to nothing? If not, How not not sure are you?

To clear it up, what you just said is: This is going to amount to something for FF.
What are your saying??

This is a mess. The Rams have a good group of RBs. That's great for the NFL, but useless for FF. Even Tavon Austin is getting carries now. By my count that's 4 backs in the stable with an unpredictable coach. You can't logically make anything more out of this. Mason looked like fresh legs( and a weak pass blocker), but he's not going to be a factor getting 3-7 touches a game. He's not Antone Smith.
who's to say what will happen RB wise...no one predicted Stacy would emerge last year. a guy gets injured, someone becomes inactive.
I did.
ok, everyone beside you. BTW, I picked him up as well due to the thread here on the site.
Seriously? Dude was a 1st round pick in one of my leagues. Pretty sure lots of people predicted that Stacy would emerge last year. In fact, there's a whole 19 page thread about it.

 
This is not going to amount to nothing for FF. Get away from this entire backfield if you still can guys.
Are you not sure it's not going to not amount to nothing? If not, How not not sure are you?

To clear it up, what you just said is: This is going to amount to something for FF.
What are your saying??

This is a mess. The Rams have a good group of RBs. That's great for the NFL, but useless for FF. Even Tavon Austin is getting carries now. By my count that's 4 backs in the stable with an unpredictable coach. You can't logically make anything more out of this. Mason looked like fresh legs( and a weak pass blocker), but he's not going to be a factor getting 3-7 touches a game. He's not Antone Smith.
who's to say what will happen RB wise...no one predicted Stacy would emerge last year. a guy gets injured, someone becomes inactive.
Agree. All the same things were being said about this same team at this time last year. If you're going to take a flyer on one of them, wouldn't you want it to be on the one that appears to be the most explosive?
I guess... I'd rather stay away. I don't see a reason for Fisher to change what he's did vs SF last night. It could have easily been T. Austin, or any of the other handful of RBs, with a big play or two and we would not care about Mason today.
I don't know...what I look for are unstable situations and a guy with talent that could potentially emerge and the settle the situation. Fisher likes to have a guy and run with them but no one is running away with the job and week by week Cunningham is chipping away at Stacy but landing no death blows. Neither Cunningham or Stacy has a run for 20+ yards on the year in 95 carries and Mason runs for 24 yards on his first career carry.

Are you telling me if he goes out and busts two big runs next week that they are going to keep handing it off to those guys? Also, why was Mason active for the 1st time all year this week? I don't know the answer but I wouldn't be suprised if they were looking for a more explosive option.

Look, they knew they had Stacy and Cunningham, both young guys coming into the year and yet they went out and grabbed him in the 3rd round. My ear perk up a bit when I see something like that.

 
This is not going to amount to nothing for FF. Get away from this entire backfield if you still can guys.
Are you not sure it's not going to not amount to nothing? If not, How not not sure are you?

To clear it up, what you just said is: This is going to amount to something for FF.
What are your saying??

This is a mess. The Rams have a good group of RBs. That's great for the NFL, but useless for FF. Even Tavon Austin is getting carries now. By my count that's 4 backs in the stable with an unpredictable coach. You can't logically make anything more out of this. Mason looked like fresh legs( and a weak pass blocker), but he's not going to be a factor getting 3-7 touches a game. He's not Antone Smith.
who's to say what will happen RB wise...no one predicted Stacy would emerge last year. a guy gets injured, someone becomes inactive.
I did.
ok, everyone beside you. BTW, I picked him up as well due to the thread here on the site.
Seriously? Dude was a 1st round pick in one of my leagues. Pretty sure lots of people predicted that Stacy would emerge last year. In fact, there's a whole 19 page thread about it.
that was a dynasty league I'm sure, not a redraft and there's a thread on every player here. Tre Mason has an 11 page thread and he was inactive for 4 games and has 4 career carries. whatever. the point being that even everyone knows everything that once in a while there are situations that surprise people and players emerge that weren't expected to and that there's value on trying to get in early while they are cheap.

 
This is not going to amount to nothing for FF. Get away from this entire backfield if you still can guys.
Are you not sure it's not going to not amount to nothing? If not, How not not sure are you?

To clear it up, what you just said is: This is going to amount to something for FF.
What are your saying??
You are saying that it will amount to something, because you said that it will not(!) amount to nothing(!). Minus + minus = plus
:goodposting:
 
This is not going to amount to nothing for FF. Get away from this entire backfield if you still can guys.
Are you not sure it's not going to not amount to nothing? If not, How not not sure are you?

To clear it up, what you just said is: This is going to amount to something for FF.
What are your saying??This is a mess. The Rams have a good group of RBs. That's great for the NFL, but useless for FF. Even Tavon Austin is getting carries now. By my count that's 4 backs in the stable with an unpredictable coach. You can't logically make anything more out of this. Mason looked like fresh legs( and a weak pass blocker), but he's not going to be a factor getting 3-7 touches a game. He's not Antone Smith.
who's to say what will happen RB wise...no one predicted Stacy would emerge last year. a guy gets injured, someone becomes inactive.
Agree. All the same things were being said about this same team at this time last year. If you're going to take a flyer on one of them, wouldn't you want it to be on the one that appears to be the most explosive?
I guess... I'd rather stay away. I don't see a reason for Fisher to change what he's did vs SF last night. It could have easily been T. Austin, or any of the other handful of RBs, with a big play or two and we would not care about Mason today.
sure, except that of the 4 guys who carried the ball, he was the only one to not look completely useless against a top tier DEF

in fact, he looked great
Cunningham look fine on a TD. T. Austin is at 11.4 yards a clip for his career. It's an uphill battle for all of them.
cunningham looked fine on a 1yd carry?

Austin looked like crap yesterday... and he is NOT a running back.
It was dramatic lol. Cunningham is the best of the bunch to me so I won't mention him for the sake of being objective. Really? Austin looked fine. I'm just saying he is a factor in the run game as well. They seem committed to getting him involved in the game. We know he's a threat to take any touch to the house. Let's not ack like he's some fatass plotter too.

 
No, Austin is definitely a player - but I cant see him ever being more than a 2-4 carry a game guy. He'll get destroyed

Mason, imo, is a better runner and talent than Stacy and Cunningham... I can see your argument for Cunningham, but I dont agree with your conclusion.

The cream always rises to the top... and Mason is whipping cream.

 
Tanner9919 said:
superior talent,and possibly the only thing to spare Fisher's job at the end of the year, is for Mason to become a top tier RB the remainder of the season, and get this offense headed in the right direction..

it's evident they need a running game in the worst way,and they've finally found it in Mason...it's time to pound him at opposing defenses..
Fisher lost his starting QB and the schedule is brutal, yet they are still being competitive in there losses (except the horrific opener). The talent on the defense is there, but takes time to put together. Firing Fisher now would be a terrible decision.
Yeah, I think Fisher is safe. Shotty should be gone though.
shotty is fine. Gregg Williams is terrible...terrible hire by fish....

Last night collapse doesn't bode well fo him either
Fine? Shotty sucks, always has always will. One reason he gets jobs and its not his talent.

 
No, Austin is definitely a player - but I cant see him ever being more than a 2-4 carry a game guy. He'll get destroyed

Mason, imo, is a better runner and talent than Stacy and Cunningham... I can see your argument for Cunningham, but I dont agree with your conclusion.

The cream always rises to the top... and Mason is whipping cream.
:lol:

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top