Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
When has that ever stopped Trump from commenting before? Also praising the good work of the FBI in preventing someone from "allegedly" planning a terrorist attack would not be interfering with an ongoing investigation. And Twitter is his favorite mode of communication, if you haven't already noticed.Maybe it’s an ongoing investigation.
You have an unhealthy obsession with who says what and when about Twitter
When has that stopped him before?
You have an unhealthy obsession with who says what and when about Twitter
It's an ok airport, but there are far better in the region. Mainland China had invested heavily in airport infrastructure. I typically prefer to fly into Hong Kong because if I get stuck, I like Hong Kong...It's a nice place. Was late and bag was overweight but they still let it slide.
Merry Christmas to you and yours too.
Remember, he likes to have all of the facts* before commenting.
Because it has absolutely zero to do with this story.
No we can't. At least I won't.
Schtick? Again...it’s a simple yes or no question that deals with the point of the posts.
Where did I say I want to ignore his comments and pretend it’s not happening? That’s totally unfair to shove those words in my mouth.
Partisan opinions like this is why we are where we are. So many think the President owes them personally or their “side”some “shout out.” It’s sad that a country that once stormed the beaches of Normandy now just storm social media to air their grievances.
Exactly. Unfortunately a few bad eggs weren’t in 2016 which led to Trump’s comments.
He seems to never hesitate to comment on any actual or attempted terrorist attack (particularly if there is a Muslim involved) yet here he has been silent for over 24 hours - pretty obviously because he can't talk about it without mentioning the FBI, which is extremely awkward after calling the bureau's conduct "really, really disgraceful" and its reputation "in tatters".
Bro, you are Trumpsessed over this.squistion said:
More important things like playing golf today, plus taking time to make the five tweets below? (two involving the FBI Deputy Director and one, the FBI lawyer James Baker):
Link? What are you referring to? How was the FBI supposed to stop this guy from going on a shooting spree against police?
Kyle Griffin is Producer of The Last Word with Lawrence O'Donnell, an hour-long weeknight news and political commentary program on MSNBC. He lives in New York City.
From that link
I'm curious about something- why does Trump spend so much time attacking CNN and yet almost never attacks MSNBC? Do you have an explanation for that?
This is a pretty tasteless comment and the lousy shtick has been done better. Please step up your trolling game.
I would assume it’s not worth his time as everyone knows MSNBC is partisan propaganda. CNN still tries to pawn themselves off as a news network rather than an opinion network.
So the problem as you see it is that CNN is considered objective, and Trump wants to change that?
I don’t think anyone unbiased sees CNN as objective. I worried about the easily deceived buying into their propaganda.
Ok but Trump obviously thinks it's worth the effort to try to convince people who thinks CNN is objective to think otherwise, do you agree?
If he feels they are being purposefully misleading then I have no problem with him pointing that out.
Yes. It’s his way of defending himself against their slander. I am proud we have a president willing to challenge media bias.
Thanks, but just to be clear, he must assume that about MSNBC too, but he doesn't attack them for the most part.
He is so concerned about challenging media bias that he tags Fox & Friends in 75% of his tweets.
Sure, Trump is a horrible partisan. But is it that much different than those who attack and hate Fox but love MSNBC?
Justvto be clear, that's not the point. The point is he mostly attacks CNN, not MSNBC. If they're both 'partisan' then why the different treatment?
Because Trump is petty and has some personal vendetta against them. I am not sure why you expect Trump to have a rational reason behind it.
Ok I'll accept that. However, I do think Trump can be a rational actor, especially when we're clearly looking at a 2 year pattern of behavior which looks more like strategy than one of his multiple freakouts.
Trump hasn't and if the White House or someone with the administration has, I haven't heard about it.
