JohnnyU
Footballguy
Again, why is that? Yes in 2013, no in 2019.why do you keep asking the same questions over and over?
better yet, to everyone else, why do you keep giving him the answers?
It's clear he's ignoring them...why bother?
Again, why is that? Yes in 2013, no in 2019.why do you keep asking the same questions over and over?
better yet, to everyone else, why do you keep giving him the answers?
It's clear he's ignoring them...why bother?
answered yesterday, last week and a month ago...don't let the search function defeat youAgain, why is that? Yes in 2013, no in 2019.
Agree, I gotta spit the hook. You can only provide the same answers so many times.why do you keep asking the same questions over and over?
better yet, to everyone else, why do you keep giving him the answers?
It's clear he's ignoring them...why bother?
RINOS, yes, I agree with you.Considering the GOP held both houses of Congress and the Presidency for two years and didn't provide funding for the wall, I assume you don't think the GOP cares about the American people either?
My last reply...Again, why is that? Yes in 2013, no in 2019.
Can’t get what he wants so he is going to tax Americans to get back. Everything with him is about keeping score with dollars.Trump just backed away from his threat to shut down the border. Now it’s tariffs on cars first, and then maybe a shutdown.
I don’t know why other countries should take anything he says seriously; he constantly changes his mind.
Well to be fair, he thinks Mexico will be paying the tariff and not the American consumer (if the trade war with China is any indication). Stable genius and all....More tarrifs...those have worked out so well for the American worker and consumer.
I think he might be frustrated with the negotiations to replace NAFTA.Can’t get what he wants so he is going to tax Americans to get back. Everything with him is about keeping score with dollars.
Then where do you read it? Cuz it seems like you really don't read anything. You sure haven't bothered to read any of the many, many links you have been supplied with that completely refute your arguments day after day.I sure has hell don't read it in MSM.
Exhibit A as to why its so difficult to have any meaningful conversations with Trump supporters sometimes.Then where do you read it? Cuz it seems like you really don't read anything. You sure haven't bothered to read any of the many, many links you have been supplied with that completely refute your arguments day after day.
My guess is your primary news source is conservative talk radio, and has been for a long while. Your postings have all the hallmarks.
We can cut back on our Avacados, tomatoes, fruits, and nuts for awhile. Plus, how quickly can we produce the car parts we get from Mexico in the US? As for labor, we have enough of them here already to work the fields.
I really wish they'd sue over this "national emergency" that has allowed him to do the tariffs...probably for the other thread, but I'm pretty surprised they haven't pushed back on that bogus "national emergency" too.WASHINGTON — The House of Representatives plans to sue the Trump administration over the president’s national emergency declaration to build a wall on the southern border, House Democratic leadership announced Thursday.
***
The Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group, made up of House leadership from both parties, voted to authorize the lawsuit, Pelosi’s statement said.
“We authorized,” House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer told BuzzFeed News after votes on Thursday. “I presume we’ll follow through on that.”
The House’s Office of General Counsel did not immediately respond to a request for comment on when it plans to file the lawsuit.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/lissandravilla/house-lawsuit-donald-trump-wall-national-emergency
Yet the Democrats were all for the wall in 2013, but not now? Why is that?It has been in the news ad nausem but Trump didn't want any part of it because he didn't get all of the funding for his wall. Use Google , you'll find it
Geez. At least wait a few hours before laying on the terrible shtick.I only care about what they are doing now, not the past.
Wait...he's giving Mexico a 1-year warning? If they don't stop the "invasion" within a year, THEN he's going the tariff route? So nothing now? His emergency situation doesn't need to be addressed for a year?Trump just backed away from his threat to shut down the border. Now it’s tariffs on cars first, and then maybe a shutdown.
I don’t know why other countries should take anything he says seriously; he constantly changes his mind.
He has a tough time with the concept of "emergency."Wait...he's giving Mexico a 1-year warning? If they don't stop the "invasion" within a year, THEN he's going the tariff route? So nothing now? His emergency situation doesn't need to be addressed for a year?
That’s what he said. A one year warning. Then the tariffs; and if that doesn’t work, the shutdown. It’s an emergency!!!Wait...he's giving Mexico a 1-year warning? If they don't stop the "invasion" within a year, THEN he's going the tariff route? So nothing now? His emergency situation doesn't need to be addressed for a year?
I guess he decided it would take too much work to keep the faux outrage going for a full year and a half. See you in a year for a push towards election night!Wait...he's giving Mexico a 1-year warning? If they don't stop the "invasion" within a year, THEN he's going the tariff route? So nothing now? His emergency situation doesn't need to be addressed for a year?
Oh, come on. He doesn’t write his ideas down.Wait, don't we have a new trade deal waiting to be approved between the US, Mexico and Canada? So before its approved you are going to threaten to impose more tariffs? If I were Mexico I'd say screw you....your word is as worthless as the paper it is written on Donald!
I think he's realizing that his rhetoric isn't helping him now...so he's going to wait for an election year.Wait...he's giving Mexico a 1-year warning? If they don't stop the "invasion" within a year, THEN he's going the tariff route? So nothing now? His emergency situation doesn't need to be addressed for a year?
Trump: If you don't stop illegal immigration into the US I'm going to shut down the border!!
Mexico: meh
US Business: Oh dear god no
Trump: Okay, if CONGRESS doesn't stop illegal immigration by Friday, I'm going to shut down the border!!
Congress: meh
Trump: Okay, I'm giving you a year. You're on notice mister!
A buffoon, a disgrace, utterly incompetent
Toga!!!!!!Looks like Mexico has been put on the old Double Secret Probation. I hope they can pull through.
How are those caravans coming...also such a coincidence they pop up at the most opportune times.It’s crazy that this will be his big issue in one year just as we roll into the election. That’s such a coincidence!
- LOL. This guy was caught appearing at a racist, full on extremist web site, but this, this is what gets his nomination pulled.Kaitlan CollinsVerified account @kaitlancollins
News — Stephen Miller directly lobbied President Trump to withdraw Ron Vitiello’s nomination to lead ICE, multiple sources say. Miller went to Trump and said Vitiello was not fully in favor of closing the southern border.
10:41 AM - 5 Apr 2019
Run away from the imminent peril!!!The Commish said:EMERGENCY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!@!!!Sheriff Bart said:A year![]()
![]()
How big of a hit to GDP would you accept? Considering a decade worth of 3-4% is required for the recent tax cuts to pay for themselves.The US should be self sufficient when forced to. Never depend completely on another country for things you cannot do without if possible.
I didn't know to put the laughing or sad response, in disbelief this is our President and people actually want to vote for him in 2020, smh...![]()
Any wall experts care to translate this?
Says you.Oh, come on. He doesn’t write his ideas down.
Doors, walls, trucks oh my
Head of the EPA resigned because he wanted to break more laws than he was allowed.So what's the defense of essentially wanting to ignore the law of the land and do what he wants? Trump that is. Has there been a person that "resigned" that didn't do so because the Trump was trying to make them break the law? I'm sure there are a few, but this is quite remarkable to watch. Thank God he's not very bright with rules/laws.
Totally. Designing immigration policy to score cheap political points to punish your perceived political enemies is always the way to handle the lives of real human beings. These are gods children man. These guys are clowns.Seems like sanctuary cities would be the logical place...no?
"we aren't paid to do the federal government's job" is not a policy."Sanctuary city" is a broad term applied to jurisdictions that have policies in place designed to limit cooperation with or involvement in federal immigration enforcement actions. Cities, counties and some states have a range of informal policies as well as laws that qualify as "sanctuary" positions.