What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Undocumented Immigrant Thread (1 Viewer)

I don't think I said anything about you believing people should work without getting paid. Did I? I only posted 7 sentences in my 2 posts. You said people need to control their own destiny, and my personal take is that should not include depleting savings for political grandstanding. I think it is undermining to actual preparedness.

You then compared federal employees to those who defiantly create danger to others ignoring a hurricane warning. I don't think that is a good analogy.
Actually in KC defense.   I believe he said, we shouldn't send government employees into hurricanes for people that ignored the warnings....  But I haven't paid close enough attention

 
[icon] said:
Fun fact: 

4 of the Government Shutdowns (about 1/3 of all shutdowns) were when Democrats held the Presidency, House, AND senate. 🤣 🤣

How does that even happen when you have control of the whole show and STILL have to shut the machine down? :lol:  
Fun with Facts

So, basically you're using Carter and the economic issues during his time as your Fun Fact? That's not really a Fun Fact, more so a dumb reality if we're going to equate all shutdowns as equal in weight. So, by all means, believe your Fun Fact but that was 40 years ago... hey, that is a Fun Fact.

1 = Ford (R). House (D). Senate (D)

2 = Carter (D), House (D), Senate (D)

3 = Carter (D), House (D), Senate (D)

4 = Carter (D), House (D), Senate (D)

5 = Carter (D), House (D), Senate (D)

6 = Carter (D), House (D), Senate (D)

7 = Reagan (R) House (D), Senate (R)

8 = Reagan (R), House (D), Senate (R)

9 = Reagan (R), House (D), Senate (R)

10 = Reagan (R), House (D), Senate (R)

11 = Reagan (R), House (D), Senate (R)

12 = Reagan (R), House (D), Senate (R)

13 = Reagan (R), House (D), Senate (R)

14 = Reagan (R), House (D), Senate (D)

15 = HW Bush (R), House (D), Senate (D)

16 = Clinton (D), House (R), Senate (R)

17 = Clinton (D), House (R), Senate (R)

18 = Obama (D), House (R), Senate (R)

19 = Trump (R), House (R), Senate (R)

20 = Trump (R), House (R), Senate (R)

21 = Trump (R), House (R), Senate (R)

Math is hard. 5/21 = 33.33%

3/21 = 14%
He was so eager to jump in with his talk-radio-approved "Democrats controlled all 3 branches!" talking point that he didn't even realize that the past 3 shutdowns (including the current one) involved one party controlling all the branches.

How does that even happen, indeed!

 
They should have started the sick out before Congress all flew back to Washington for the new session.
Haven't you heard the sick out is fake news.

Tyler Q. Houlton @SpoxDHS · 18h

More #FakeNews from @CNN

. Security operations at airports have not been impacted by a non-existent sick out. CNN has the cell numbers of multiple @TSA public affairs professionals, but rather than validate statistics, they grossly misrepresented them.

 
He was so eager to jump in with his talk-radio-approved "Democrats controlled all 3 branches!" talking point that he didn't even realize that the past 3 shutdowns (including the current one) involved one party controlling all the branches.

How does that even happen, indeed!
Facts are hard. 

 
Like a lot of others, I’m thinking this ends when the paychecks and tax returns stop coming. Unless they find a way to fix that- they just might- in which case it go on for months. 

I’m starting to think that the surrender won’t come from Trump; it will come from McConnell. 
Unless Trump is onboard he will veto it and McConnell would not probably want to push for the votes needed for a veto override as he is running for reelection in 2020 and that might bring him a primary challenger from the right.

 
What were the shutdowns about under Carter? That predates me.
Shutdown #2: The Abortion Shutdown

When did it take place? Sept. 30 to Oct. 13, 1977
How long did it last? 12 days
Who was president? Jimmy Carter
Who controlled the Senate? Democrats, 59-41; Robert Byrd was majority leader
Who controlled the House? Democrats, 292-143; Tip O'Neill was speaker
Why did it happen? The House insisted on continuing the ban on using Medicaid dollars to pay for abortions except in cases where the life of the mother was at stake. The Senate wanted to loosen this to include allowances for abortions in the case of rape or incest or when the mother's health was in danger. Because the issue had become tied to funding for Labor and HEW, failure to come to an agreement led those agencies to have a funding gap.
What resolved it? The Medicaid ban was continued until Oct. 31 and the shutdown ended, to give negotiators more time to work out a deal.

Shutdown #3: The Abortion Shutdown II: Abortion Boogaloo

When did it take place? Oct. 31 to Nov. 9, 1977
How long did it last? 8 days
Who was president? Jimmy Carter
Who controlled the Senate? Democrats, 59-41; Robert Byrd was majority leader
Who controlled the House? Democrats, 292-143; Tip O'Neill was speaker
Why did it happen? Not enough time had elapsed since the temporary measure ending the shutdown passed for the abortion standoff to be resolved.
What resolved it? Another temporary bill was signed by Carter to allow for more time for Congress to resolve its abortion dispute.

Shutdown #4: The Abortion Shutdown III: Dark of the Moon

When did it take place? Nov. 30 to Dec. 9, 1977
How long did it last? 8 days
Who was president? Jimmy Carter
Who controlled the Senate? Democrats, 59-41; Robert Byrd was majority leader
Who controlled the House? Democrats, 292-143; Tip O'Neill was speaker
Why did it happen? The second temporary measure ending a shutdown, meant to allow more time for negotiation, didn't last long enough. The House, in particular, rejected a Senate proposal that would have allowed for Medicaid to pay for abortions by victims of statutory rape. House conservatives rejected it as too lax and House liberals as too tough on rape victims. Rep. George Miller (D-Calif.), who is still in the House, asked on the House floor, "What happens in Fort Apache [South Bronx], where a girl is gang-raped and told she will be killed if she reports it?"

What resolved it? A deal was brokered in which the exception allowing Medicaid to pay for abortions in cases where the mother's life is endangered was widened to include abortions resulting from rape or incest, or which are necessary to protect the mother's health (even if her life was not endangered).

Shutdown #5: Jimmy Carter vs. the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier

When did it take place? Sept. 30 to Oct.18, 1978
How long did it last? 18 days
Who was president? Jimmy Carter
Who controlled the Senate? Democrats, 59-41; Robert Byrd was majority leader
Who controlled the House? Democrats, 292-143; Tip O'Neill was speaker
Why did it happen? Congress passed a defense bill including funding for a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier. Carter judged that carrier wasteful and vetoed it. He also vetoed a public works appropriations bill because of water projects that he considered wasteful pork. Additionally, spending for HEW was delayed, once again, over a dispute concerning funding for abortion.
What resolved it? A new defense bill, excluding funding for the carrier, was passed, as was a new public works bill excluding the water projects Carter opposed. The previous year's compromise solution on abortion, in which funding was reserved for cases of rape, incest and jeopardy to the mother's health, was agreed to in both houses.

 
Shutdown #6: Higher pay, fewer abortions

When did it take place? Sept. 30 to Oct. 12, 1979
How long did it last? 11 days
Who was president? Jimmy Carter
Who controlled the Senate? Democrats, 58-42; Robert Byrd was majority leader
Who controlled the House? Democrats, 277-158; Tip O'Neill was speaker
Why did it happen? The House wanted to raise congressional and senior civil servant pay by 5.5 percent, which the Senate opposed. The lower house also wanted to limit federal abortion spending to cases where the mother's life was in danger, while the Senate wanted to keep funding in cases of rape, incest, and when the mother's health is in serious jeopardy. The dispute was not resolved before a partial shutdown.
What resolved it? The House got its pay increases but had to allow abortion funding in cases of rape or incest (but not when the mother's health, rather than life, was in danger). The latter was a slight tightening of the previous year's Medicaid abortion compromise.

 
:lol:  I feel like some of you struggle with reading.

I’m not a Republican. These aren’t “talk radio points”. I’ve REPEATEDLY said both sides are partisan idiots and the 3 shutdowns during the fully Republican  government solidify that point. Both instances are pathetic. 

As an ADDED bonus I have a bunch of you falling over yourselves to paint this into a left v right issue with further supports my claim that both the left and right are more obsessed with “winning” this red v blue slapfight than they are actually concerned with improving the nation.

Here’s a spoiler: we are ALL losing. ;)  

 
Actually in KC defense.   I believe he said, we shouldn't send government employees into hurricanes for people that ignored the warnings....  But I haven't paid close enough attention
Huh, well I’m drawing a blank on what sending government employees into risk of death to protect the defiant is at all relevant to any of my positions. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Z Machine said:
I think blocking Congressional pay and expenses during shutdowns could help. 
I think that would most compromise reps who do not have large donors or bank accounts.

 
:lol:  I feel like some of you struggle with reading.

I’m not a Republican. These aren’t “talk radio points”. I’ve REPEATEDLY said both sides are partisan idiots and the 3 shutdowns during the fully Republican  government solidify that point. Both instances are pathetic. 

As an ADDED bonus I have a bunch of you falling over yourselves to paint this into a left v right issue with further supports my claim that both the left and right are more obsessed with “winning” this red v blue slapfight than they are actually concerned with improving the nation.

Here’s a spoiler: we are ALL losing. ;)  
If that was your point then why did you go all

Emoji emoji Democrats emojie!@!@!@!

To add.  I'm not a Democrat

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think that would most compromise reps who do not have large donors or bank accounts.
Ok. I don't really care. If a large chunk of the government isn't getting paid due to legislators not doing their jobs, the people who hold the power to change that should also be affected. 

The legislators can get back pay when everyone else does.

 
:lol:  I feel like some of you struggle with reading.

I’m not a Republican. These aren’t “talk radio points”. I’ve REPEATEDLY said both sides are partisan idiots and the 3 shutdowns during the fully Republican  government solidify that point. Both instances are pathetic. 

As an ADDED bonus I have a bunch of you falling over yourselves to paint this into a left v right issue with further supports my claim that both the left and right are more obsessed with “winning” this red v blue slapfight than they are actually concerned with improving the nation.

Here’s a spoiler: we are ALL losing. ;)  
The current shutdown is a left vs right issue. 

 
:lol:  I feel like some of you struggle with reading.

I’m not a Republican. These aren’t “talk radio points”. I’ve REPEATEDLY said both sides are partisan idiots and the 3 shutdowns during the fully Republican  government solidify that point. Both instances are pathetic. 

As an ADDED bonus I have a bunch of you falling over yourselves to paint this into a left v right issue with further supports my claim that both the left and right are more obsessed with “winning” this red v blue slapfight than they are actually concerned with improving the nation.

Here’s a spoiler: we are ALL losing. ;)  
Translation: Republicans are at fault, Republicans are losing. 

 
Banger said:
Josh Dawsey‏Verified account @jdawsey1

I think the president just proposed a see-through steel wall? Did I hear that correctly?

11:44 AM - 4 Jan 2019
Star Trek IV....Transparent Aluminum.

Trump is REALLY ahead of the game on this one!.

 
GoBirds said:
Isn’t it funny how childish they act regarding the ignore function and people quoting those they supposedly ignored but didn’t really as they need to troll?

Totally get what you are saying, would be interested to hear if you do find a board like you mention. The one sided echo isn’t interesting  or productive in any way. 
you guys really don't understand how the ignore feature works?   if someone posts an ignored poster, the quote shows up.  it defeats the purpose of ignore, because now everyone has to see the post.   that's why where there is someone who is ignored by a lot of people gets quoted, there is often a reminder or a request not to quote them.    

 
[icon] said:
Shutdowns are widely a result of dissent between presidency and house or senate (more often the former). There have been slightly more shutdowns during Republican presidencies with a Democratic house. 

Fun fact: 

4 of the Government Shutdowns (about 1/3 of all shutdowns) were when Democrats held the Presidency, House, AND senate. 🤣 🤣

How does that even happen when you have control of the whole show and STILL have to shut the machine down? :lol:  
You know Trump's had 2 full shutdowns and a 3rd budget gap in one year while controlling the whole show.  So yeah,  :lmao:   Great leadership.

 
you guys really don't understand how the ignore feature works?   if someone posts an ignored poster, the quote shows up.  it defeats the purpose of ignore, because now everyone has to see the post.   that's why where there is someone who is ignored by a lot of people gets quoted, there is often a reminder or a request not to quote them.    
Some of you don't know what ignore means. Making a comment about a poster you have on ignore, is not ignoring them. 

 
Like a lot of others, I’m thinking this ends when the paychecks and tax returns stop coming. Unless they find a way to fix that- they just might- in which case it go on for months. 

I’m starting to think that the surrender won’t come from Trump; it will come from McConnell. 
Trump's not going to give the press/Democrats the glee of HIM giving in.  McConnell is going to be the fall guy if the Republicans cave. 

 
Trump's not going to give the press/Democrats the glee of HIM giving in.  McConnell is going to be the fall guy if the Republicans cave. 
They could agree to tear down the existing fence, allow Central Americans in and give them free townhomes in Laredo and Trump would claim he won and this was what he was saying all along. 

 
Come gather round, children,

It's high time ye learned

'Bout a hero named Homer

And a devil named Burns.

We'll march 'till we drop

The girls and the fellas.

We'll fight 'till the death

Or else fold like umbrellas.

So we'll march day and night

By the big cooling tower.

They have the plant

But we have the power.

 
I wonder if Trump knows what will happen when health insurance premium payments are missed because paychecks didn't go out.  Those premiums are taken out of every bi-weekly paycheck.

I wonder if Trump knows that what will happen to agency matching contributions to the Federal TSP?  Are they lost to the employee?

Long-term care insurance premiums?  Do they lapse?  Life insurance premiums?

Nah - if he was actually aware he wouldn't GAF.  And anyway, the employees should have planned better.  [Or maybe the insurers should have planned better!]

 
Last edited by a moderator:
you guys really don't understand how the ignore feature works?   if someone posts an ignored poster, the quote shows up.  it defeats the purpose of ignore, because now everyone has to see the post.   that's why where there is someone who is ignored by a lot of people gets quoted, there is often a reminder or a request not to quote them.    
Sounds like a really big deal. Sorry don’t use the ignore button, don’t see the need to get worked up over people on th cyberwebs with extreme political positions. 

 
They could agree to tear down the existing fence, allow Central Americans in and give them free townhomes in Laredo and Trump would claim he won and this was what he was saying all along. 
With Trump Org building those condos? OK, granting naming rights....they don't actually build much. This one might have legs.

Wanna start the petition? I get that you were jesting and not actually in favor, but I really don't see any way to rescue Donny from the corner he's painted himself into, so let's start thinking outside the box to see if we can get the gubermint reopened.

 
Sally Yates‏Verified account @SallyQYates 3h3 hours ago

More

POTUS’ latest temper tantrum is not about border security. Like a spoiled two year old holding his breath, he is holding our nation hostage—trying to force taxpayers to foot the bill for his vanity project he promised Mexico would fund. Meanwhile, the country suffers.

 
With Trump Org building those condos? OK, granting naming rights....they don't actually build much. This one might have legs.

Wanna start the petition? I get that you were jesting and not actually in favor, but I really don't see any way to rescue Donny from the corner he's painted himself into, so let's start thinking outside the box to see if we can get the gubermint reopened.
Well, Trump would definitely agree to that. He’d sell Texas back to Mexico if he personally got to make some cash off the deal.

 
Well, Trump would definitely agree to that. He’d sell Texas back to Mexico if he personally got to make some cash off the deal.
I still think a buyout would be quicker than impeachment. Everyone has a price. He seems to be stuck on $5Bn, that’d probably do it.

Would save us from economic ruin / nuclear annihilation / worldwide embarrassment. Totally worth it.

 
squistion said:
:mellow:

Daily Beast reports:

Along with saying the word "####" at least 3 times throughout the White House meeting, Trump bizarrely stated that he didn't want to call the government shutdown a "shutdown." He wanted to call it a "strike," 

https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-referred-to-shutdown-as-strike-in-profanity-laced-meeting-with-democratic-leaders?via=twitter_page
Well, @Henry Ford diagnosed this craziness during our exchange a couple of days ago in this very thread. He’s correct that words do matter, as does their meaning.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hmmm, might need to check this out during the Viadoom period.  Obviously won't be driving down to Georgetown.
Really curious how that few weeks is going to go...prepared for chaos! In the meantime, Chuck's on 85th will take care of your growler needs. Place has you covered for pretty much everything.

 
:lol:

Mark Landler‏ @MarkLandler 3h3 hours ago

Trump’s advisers came up with the “Wall” as a memory device to keep him from forgetting immigration in his campaign speeches. Now it is boxing in his entire presidency.

⁦@juliehdavis⁩ ⁦@peterbakernyt⁩

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/05/us/politics/donald-trump-border-wall.html
emptywheel‏ @emptywheel 3h3 hours ago

The entire government has been shut down because Sam Nunberg and Roger Stone needed to find a way to get Trump to remember his racist lines.

https://twitter.com/emptywheel/status/1081655796117712896

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top