Dinsy Ejotuz
Footballguy
Your Freudian slip is showing.Concacaf really ceases to entertain
Your Freudian slip is showing.Concacaf really ceases to entertain
I did something similar to this injury on high school playing volleyball. Recovery was looooong.NewlyRetired said:This sounds better than "ruptured"
Brian Sciaretta @BrianSciaretta
US Soccer re-confirms today that Weston McKennie had no fractures after seeing a foot/ankle specialist in Houston. He was diagnosed with a moderate to high-degree left ankle sprain and is expected to miss several weeks
Jeff CarlisleVerified account @JeffreyCarlisle 8m8 minutes ago
Berhalter said re: McKennie injury, difference in language btwn Schalke's release & what US Soccer is saying is "semantics. It's an ankle sprain." In terms of returning in time for the Gold Cup, GB says with an injury like this McKennie will have to take it "week by week."
I have a feeling we are all going to have to get used to this idea of "vets" on the team.Really never wanted to see Gonzalez in a USMNT match ever again, but here we are.
yes. It is more an age thing for me.Hasn't Gonzo had a nice run of form in Mex?
He's a complete mess. Serves no purpose.I’m sorry. Get Gonzo the f out of here.
Something with his right quad. Didn’t show what happened; he was just down on the ground pointing to his quad. Sideline reporter said they pulled him as a precautionary.What happened to CP?
He stood out, and not in a good way, in the previous pair of friendlies too IMO.Baird experiment is meh.
he was not limping so hopefully it is just some sort of bruise/contusion.Something with his right quad. Didn’t show what happened; he was just down on the ground pointing to his quad. Sideline reporter said they pulled him as a precautionary.
we have a clear hole on right wing as Morris did not look up to it the other night either.He stood out, and not in a good way, in the previous pair of friendlies too IMO.
He was limping off after halftime. I said to the kids when he was getting looked at that he was done for the night. You could read it on his face.he was not limping so hopefully it is just some sort of bruise/contusion.
It was a bit concerning that Pulisic himself must have felt something was wrong though to just sit down and get treatment.
hmm, I watched him walk off at halftime and did not notice this. I thought it was his normal gait. Damn :(He was limping off after halftime.
I think it's just a simple knock. Nobody looked at all concerned.hmm, I watched him walk off at halftime and did not notice this. I thought it was his normal gait. Damn :(
I know of a certain Israeli that would slot into CPs spot to allow CP to push out wide right.we have a clear hole on right wing as Morris did not look up to it the other night either.
There may be something to putting Pulisic in that spot at least until Weah is ready to be on the squad full time.
I trust our resident docI think it's just a simple knock. Nobody looked at all concerned.
I lost track of the times they played/dummied through a runner into a wide open area to a secondary runner -- especially in the first half. There were possessions where they strung multiple passes like that together.Chile's movement was outstanding- that entire MF was rotating and moving forward/back w the other lines- which helped open a lot of holes.
he is a chameleon that can fit the situation. When you think of it, there are very few players in the world that can be both the De Jong level thug and an excellent #10.Always thought of Vidal as a thug, but he was the obvious world-class player on the field in all aspects.. and his teammates knew how to find him.
Bradley was MotM for me in one of the games last camp... so it's not like he's languished in mediocrity. that's his game- great positioning and smart, quick passing to help optimize his team's possession- whether it's going forward or just controlling it square. but his body just doesn't let him achieve it as well any more under duress, and he just cedes too much space and time defensively, even though the motor is still there.Offensively this was one of Bradley’s best USMNT games in some time. Great composure on the balll with some world class passing. On the other hand, our set pieces were terrible. Zardes shockingly had some uncharacteristic touch in a few spots but generally Weah, Jozy and Sargent can’t get here fast enough.
As a team, Defensively could have been quite a bit worse. I thought we surpassed expectations given the personnel and you have to give Berhalter some credit there. Midfield was obviously chipped to bits but I doubt we get this result with JK.
it was the movement and understand of where to play the ball- I was really impressed with Chile on the night. as organized as the US was, they shredded them because of that movement and willingness to put the ball into the right spots.I lost track of the times they played/dummied through a runner into a wide open area to a secondary runner -- especially in the first half. There were possessions where they strung multiple passes like that together.
Not a soccer coach, didn't say at a Holiday Inn last night, but it seemed like textbook use of movement to create space.
totally agree. I don't know anything about his Columbus style/history... so all I've been hearing has been about this RB/CM thing- which seemed potentially forced. nice to see him not only switch it up, but make the switch that worked by getting the additional MF help around Caillou. Was disappointing to see the quality of the subs, tbh... Lovitz, Morris... but they all did their collective defensive job- which again, is full credit to the coach.from a coaching aspect it was good to see Berhalter being able to switch up tactics to help fix the issues. It showed he was not married to one system do or die.
I probably would have made the change at half time but I think the fact that it was a friendly changed up how many minutes he wanted to see from each player.
agree about Horvath.Couple of other player thoughts not heavily mentioned yet
Horvath - He was not asked to do much and was not at fault on the flukey goal but I don't get a sense of confidence when I watch him in the box. He seems a touch slow off the line and his distribution was struggling under the heavy pressure. He does not "command" the box the way Steffen does. I don't think we saw anything that should make us think Steffen is not the #1
Gonzo - we said it before the game and it turned out to be true in the game. He did not belong on the field. However, in terms of some balance in the thought process, I think almost any right footed back we have that was placed in that position last night would have struggled. Luckily I think Brooks himself would have been solid.
Nips - The guy is clearly limited and yet his energy and willingness to run with the ball into open spaces continues to impress me. Maybe this is one of those "look at how bad RW has been" and by association Nips has looked better, but in any case, I think he warrants a Gold Cup call up.