Actually, the didn't ban lawn darts. They changed them to make them less deadly.The US banned lawn darts permanently after 4 children were killed. 4.
its a heck of a lot more than are killed IMO but no - that's like asking how many times does brakes on a car stop an accident - the number isn't tracked because everytime isn't reportedYou can't provide stats for these questions that you bring up.
you're right, on guns I see no reason for more controls on them - we have enough and as more and more own guns and concealed weapons, crime is still going down overall and people are defending themselves more and more - those are GOOD thingsThe bolded is something that will not happen. I honestly don't see you agreeing to many proposals that would be set forth that include guns.
As far as an overview on the thread? I get the impression that most here don't think a full on ban would work or is the answer, but that changes need to be made. I guess that leaves us mostly talking about how best to keep the guns out of the hands of people who might do this and/or severely limiting the amount of damage they can once they decide to carry out an act- with the main focus on the mass/school/church/concert shootings
So you want to use what you want to when making a comparison or analogy (like cars or knives) but I can’t. Got it.you REALLY want to compare carrying a nuclear weapon and carrying a gun and try to pass both of them off as self defense? seriously ?
concealed weapon carriers save lives every year - you can google stories all day long on how people have used them.
how are bombs different? Well you blow everything up in the area around where you detonate the bomb is one difference. They're illegal and nowhere in the Constitution. Those are differences. I suppose if 150 million homes had bombs with never much of a problem and 15 million carried them every day without a problem and people used bombs in self defense then you'd have a decent analogy
but they don't
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawn_dartsActually, the didn't ban lawn darts. They changed them to make them less deadly.
Which brings us back to our topic of the thread. How many proposed gun regulations would make guns less deadly? Magazine capacity? Lethality of caliber?
Does a gun registration make a gun any less lethal?
no - make all analogies you want - but a nuclear bomb is a terrible oneSo you want to use what you want to when making a comparison or analogy (like cars or knives) but I can’t. Got it.
You do realize there are large portions of the world that think carrying a gun around in public is just as stupid and extreme as you think carrying a bomb around is. Just because you and 15 million other people think it’s normal to carry a gun around every day in no way shape or form makes it normal. There’s probably more than 15 million people who think it’s normal to drive drunk as you love to point out, this too does not make that normal
Bombs save lives too, in fact bombs ended WW2 thus saving million of lives.
I’d also like to point out that less people died last year from bombs in the US then guns.
Anyways my point was a gun is not just a tool. No matter how bad you want it to be. It’s an item that was designed and built to kill. Just like
There really is not much point to this conversation, is there?its a heck of a lot more than are killed IMO but no - that's like asking how many times does brakes on a car stop an accident - the number isn't tracked because everytime isn't reported
its been guesstimated - but the value is real. We do known all the instances that media reports, we know incidents happen that are not reported, we know officers use guns to stop crimes, we know guns are used to the greater good and its not rare but common
what else can you think of that would target criminals and not impact legal law abiding gun owners ?
there ya go !There really is not much point to this conversation, is there?
You have said that gun owners have given up enough and are very much against anything that would effect them one bit. I like the theory of Red Flags, but I have gone on in depth about how different the shooters are and how hard it would be to predict that (you yourself admitted this last part). So that is not a primary weapon for this. I think HF had a great point about the stricter punishments and that the shooters seem to be going in for suicide by cop more and more. Of the ideas, I am most against turning our schools into prisons. Let's just say there is probably 0 I could say that you will agree with, and 0 you could say that I would agree with and call it good
they are crazy mentally ill people - those are the mass school/concert/theatre shooters .... harder sentencing probably won't affect those very few and rare people anyway. I think it WOULD impact common criminals that commit gun violence. Thank God they are very very few like that.I think HF had a great point about the stricter punishments and that the shooters seem to be going in for suicide by cop more and more.
hope you don't have kids in schools because arming schools is coming fast everywhere.I am most against turning our schools into prisons.
So a long winded way of saying you agree that we dont agree on things.there ya go !
Red Flag laws we can agree on - they can be crafted for the good
example
https://thebrunswicknews.com/breaking/cops-bhs-student-arrested-for-shooting-threats/article_f2b91606-4381-5bed-b247-5227f75938bd.html
they are crazy mentally ill people - those are the mass school/concert/theatre shooters .... harder sentencing probably won't affect those very few and rare people anyway. I think it WOULD impact common criminals that commit gun violence. Thank God they are very very few like that.
hope you don't have kids in schools because arming schools is coming fast everywhere.
and they work - so we don't agree on them but school shootings is way way down for the first time in years especially when it comes to a shooter going to mass kill
eventually they will be rare occurrences IMO - time will tell, your side has already lost this battle, people want their kids safe and protected and we're doing it nationwide !
You understand that it isn’t healthy for children to believe they’ll be murdered at school, right?Stealthycat said:why would I think about that article when I shoot an AR15? You can't take guns anywhere near a school - that's the law.
I do wonder about school safety and my local schools have really beefed up security in the past few years. My son's school is now gun toting guarded THANK GOD. They also have lockdown drills etc. I told him once get away, and if he can't get away? fight like hell - don't be a fish in a pond. ever
if people are telling kids that they need to stop IMO. I've told me kids they have a smaller chance of dying in school from an attack than from many many other things that happen daily and that there is an irrational fear associated with school shootings - don't fear them, have security in place to ensure everyone feels safe and that IF it ever did occur, there is a plan in place to address it. what does that tell kids ? that just like industrial parks that have fences/razor wire, and like federal building have 24x7 guards and like airports that have security .... schools do too and its just safety measures that make us all safeYou understand that it isn’t healthy for children to believe they’ll be murdered at school, right?
more like defend my positionI’m tapping out. SC I appreciate your willingness to engage, I really do, but I just don’t feel you have any other intention but pushing your desire.
Best of luck to you, and may your trips to racquetball be safe.
But muh AR is fun too shoot!! Not MY fault!!!You understand that it isn’t healthy for children to believe they’ll be murdered at school, right?
Every school has active shooter drills multiple times a year.if people are telling kids that they need to stop IMO. I've told me kids they have a smaller chance of dying in school from an attack than from many many other things that happen daily and that there is an irrational fear associated with school shootings - don't fear them, have security in place to ensure everyone feels safe and that IF it ever did occur, there is a plan in place to address it. what does that tell kids ? that just like industrial parks that have fences/razor wire, and like federal building have 24x7 guards and like airports that have security .... schools do too and its just safety measures that make us all safe
what article ?Every school has active shooter drills multiple times a year.
You either:
A: Didn't read the article
N: Don't have kids
3: Have kids but don't know what is going on at their school
D Most of the above
I read the article. It's a sad state of affairs.Every school has active shooter drills multiple times a year.
You either:
A: Didn't read the article
N: Don't have kids
3: Have kids but don't know what is going on at their school
D Most of the above
Not sure what the answer is. It only leads to more questions.Nonetheless, school shootings remain relatively rare, even after a year of historic carnage on K-12 campuses. What's not rare are lockdowns, which have become a hallmark of American education and a byproduct of this country's inability to curb its gun violence epidemic. Lockdowns save lives during real attacks, but even when there is no gunman stalking the hallways, the procedures can inflict immense psychological damage on children convinced that they're in danger. And the number of kids who have experienced these ordeals is extraordinary.
I tried to find out more information on these men. But was unsuccessful. Sounds like gang violence, but I can't confirm. Would any gun regulations stop gang violence? Would it stop the lockdowns in this neighborhood if guns were banned in DC?Three times between September and November, bursts of gunfire near MaKenzie's public charter elementary school led DC Prep to seal off its Washington campus and sequester its students. During the last one, on Nov. 16, a silver sedan parked just around the corner at 10:42 a.m., then the men inside stepped out and fired more than 40 rounds. As MaKenzie's class hid upstairs, teachers frantically rushed three dozen preschoolers off the playground and back into the building.
This article, you know, the one you quoted.what article ?
N and 3 you'll ether believe what I say or not, that's your choice, can't do anything about that.
this one then ?Sheriff Bart said:
the wording of the home page seems to blame the guns instead of blaming the people using the guns. I think that's a fundamental flawIlov80s said:Student of mine who got accepted into Princeton for the fall has been involved in a writing project the last year documenting gun deaths with The Miami Herald.
https://sinceparkland.org/authors/auhjanae-mcgee/
The homepage saysthe wording of the home page seems to blame the guns instead of blaming the people using the guns. I think that's a fundamental flaw
Fatal shootings of children have been on the rise, government data show. But as the deaths mount, the toll is bigger than what numbers can capture.
Working with The Trace, The Miami Herald, and McClatchy, student reporters set out to measure the void left in homes and classrooms that have lost young people to the pull of a trigger.
"Saving kids from guns"The homepage says
Where is the fundamental flaw?
Where is that? It's not on the main part of the homepage or in the about section. Also, you really think using the phrase "gun violence" is a fundamental flaw for writing articles about people shot to death? How do we even talk about the problem?"Saving kids from guns"
"guns take a heavy toll"
"this city fights back against gun violence"
"children dying, injured by guns"
wordings like that makes the gun seem like the instigator and attacker ....... vs them being inanimate objects that PEOPLE use for their violent acts
I did click on multiple links there ... this one is interesting as it hits on what's been discussed recently "Do careless gun owners go to jail when their kids shoot themselves? It depends"
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/national/article225006255.html
He only approves of anything that does not put a light on gun owners. I think just "violence" and "death" is what he would be going for. A gun just happened to be the tool that was used.Where is that? It's not on the main part of the homepage or in the about section. Also, you really think using the phrase "gun violence" is a fundamental flaw for writing articles about people shot to death? How do we even talk about the problem?
Yeah I definitely know where he stands on the issue but to complain about the term "gun violence" being used in articles highlighting children who have been be shot and killed is a new level of absurdity. Sad that his only takeaway from the whole project was that it was unfair to guns.He only approves of anything that does not put a light on gun owners. I think just "violence" and "death" is what he would be going for. A gun just happened to be the tool that was used.
Unfortunately, I am not surprised at all.Yeah I definitely know where he stands on the issue but to complain about the term "gun violence" being used in articles highlighting children who have been be shot and killed is a new level of absurdity. Sad that his only takeaway from the whole project was that it was unfair to guns.
It's an emotional day for thousands of people connected to the MSD victims. Students have used the power of social media to make their voices heard.The local press has been reporting on how the family members of the 17 victims, especially parents, have tried to cope and make a difference for others. The parents of a teacher Scott Schulman played a role in red flag legislation in NY. One mother was elected to the Broward County school board. Others have worked on school safety, while others have tried to influence legislation on gun control. Baby steps. Meanwhile, as I write this post, there have likely been several victims of gun violence outside of a school setting.On the one year anniversary of the mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, today seems like a good time to reflect on our lives and the lives of our loved ones. It could all be over at any second.
I posted this a day or 2 ago but a student of mine was part of this year long nationwide project documenting children shot to death across the country since ParklandIt's an emotional day for thousands of people connected to the MSD victims. Students have used the power of social media to make their voices heard.The local press has been reporting on how the family members of the 17 victims, especially parents, have tried to cope and make a difference for others. The parents of a teacher Scott Schulman played a role in red flag legislation in NY. One mother was elected to the Broward County school board. Others have worked on school safety, while others have tried to influence legislation on gun control. Baby steps. Meanwhile, as I write this post, there have likely been several victims of gun violence outside of a school setting.
"What about car accidents are you going to ban cars didn't think so" or "not statistically significant."I posted this a day or 2 ago but a student of mine was part of this year long nationwide project documenting children shot to death across the country since Parkland
https://sinceparkland.org/
1200 kids in 12 months
I didn't say that.Yeah I definitely know where he stands on the issue but to complain about the term "gun violence" being used in articles highlighting children who have been be shot and killed is a new level of absurdity. Sad that his only takeaway from the whole project was that it was unfair to guns.
Man wanted to kill his wife and did. Concealed carry prevented nothing.I didn't say that.
What I said was that its fundamentally flawed to blame guns and not the people that are the evil ones behind the guns.
concealed carry worth it - again
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/02/13/man-enters-dental-office-to-kill-wife-is-shot-multiple-times-by-armed-patient/?fbclid=IwAR2Do2dEHhWIK35wq0eGvdOfdrKnwnwuiofZexcDx_E6hB7z_7AnjOf1A34
I posted a project highlighting the shooting deaths of children and you said they shouldn’t have used the phrase “gun violence”. They aren’t trying to solve any kind of gun problem. There’s no recommendation for legislation in the articles, it’s just the stories of kids who were shot and killed. You couldn’t just look at it for what it is but instead inserted your defense of guns. You complained about stories about kids who were shot and killed for using the phrase “gun violence”. That actually happened.I didn't say that.
What I said was that its fundamentally flawed to blame guns and not the people that are the evil ones behind the guns.
I didn't say that.
What I said was that its fundamentally flawed to blame guns and not the people that are the evil ones behind the guns.
concealed carry worth it - again
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/02/13/man-enters-dental-office-to-kill-wife-is-shot-multiple-times-by-armed-patient/?fbclid=IwAR2Do2dEHhWIK35wq0eGvdOfdrKnwnwuiofZexcDx_E6hB7z_7AnjOf1A34
Bunch of innocent people shot barely gets a reaction anymore...who caresBucky86 said:At least we got the border wall emergency out of the way.
Yeah, If thats the success story you have on guns.....-fish- said:Man wanted to kill his wife and did. Concealed carry prevented nothing.
Another gun death. That's tragic.
Wrong. The police showed up to stop this guy after he was shooting at his co-workers.One of the arguments that you always here from NRA types is that the crazies avoid facing other armed people; that’s why they look for gun free zones.
Apparently in Illinois this guy shot at policemen. Seems to blow that theory to hell...
That theory was already bogus.One of the arguments that you always here from NRA types is that the crazies avoid facing other armed people; that’s why they look for gun free zones.
Apparently in Illinois this guy shot at policemen. Seems to blow that theory to hell...
The police showed up to stop this guy after he was shooting at his co-workers.
Feel free to give it a try.Not seeing many solutions being offered here. Just more traffic after a mass shooting.
“Death of the natural cause of lack of oxygen to the brain related to blood loss coincidentally occurring following the introduction of metal projectiles into the body at high rates of speed.”Where is that? It's not on the main part of the homepage or in the about section. Also, you really think using the phrase "gun violence" is a fundamental flaw for writing articles about people shot to death? How do we even talk about the problem?
This is from the guy who posted a link to a "self defense" shooting that involved 2 knuckleheads fighting, getting separated a couple times in a different location, then one of them going to get a gun.Yeah, If thats the success story you have on guns......