Not sure if you guys are aware, but game developers are intentionally trying to kill Gamestop/Game/Gameshop type stores. Apparently they had been working for years to try and make an agreement with the stores to receive a percentage of used game purchases and have decided instead to just kill them off.
The next gen consoles (excluding Nintento) are intending to use various forms of soft DRM to make resale and purchase of used games impossible.
Microsoft is supposedly moving to a cloud based storage system with a requirement to have a constant internet connection to play games or access your files (obviously.)
Sony is supposedly making all purchases account bound and all games system locked (ie. each game is registered to a system and will not launch on unregistered systems.)
Combination of the DRM and supposed leaked hardware specs (worse than my current PC which I built two years ago) I think ill just stick to my PC.
Yes, I understand this. But I think linking your game to your PSN account would work better than to your system. Should I re-purchase my entire catalog of games just because I choose to buy a new system, have it sent in for repairs and get a refurbished system, etc. I would think it would have to work like XBLA games where the games may be tied to the system, but you can transfer the license on rare occasions. This isn't to say I like it. I still believe that once a game has been purchased, the publisher has been paid. I don't feel that the publisher has any claim to future sales of that game. For example, if someone buys a car new, sells it to me used, then after 50,000 miles or so, I sell it to someone else, should Ford/Chevy/Toyota/etc get a cut of those sales beyond the first sale?
I'm sure I'm preaching to the choir. I don't know many gamers who agree with this. It's just another money grab for the publishers, and highly doubt any of the cut of those extra sales would go to the developer.