What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Vincent Brown (1 Viewer)

As expected Vincent Jackson was not tagged today and this pretty much means he's as good as gone. If the Chargers were going to resign him they would have had a deal worked out already and he'll get far more money thrown at him in free agency than what the Chargers would ever dream of paying him. I think they also know what they have in Vincent Brown......a potential star WR! Now's the time to get him boys. Those that have rookie picks to spend, I think you can get him during your draft process for an early 2nd round pick.

I was able to watch Brown in a handful of games this season and what I saw of him was quite impressive, in limited action. Anyone have a different opinion on the guy? I'm I off my rocker?

Also, any highlights of the guy out there?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rumors say that VJax is willing to listen to San Diego and they are comfortable allowing free agency to set the price tag for VJax...he is a weird player to gauge because not many NFL critics and scouts view him as a true WR1, more of an explosive guy who can have big numbers but many weeks simply vanishes for whatever reason. San Diego is willing to give him about $10m a season if need be so there is a good chance he actually stays in San Diego despite what I thought which is that he was as good as gone.

The VJax thread on page 1 has some decent info you might check out.

 
The time to add him was a few months ago :) (luckily i did)! There isn't much of Brown out there but here is a little something.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rumors say that VJax is willing to listen to San Diego and they are comfortable allowing free agency to set the price tag for VJax...he is a weird player to gauge because not many NFL critics and scouts view him as a true WR1, more of an explosive guy who can have big numbers but many weeks simply vanishes for whatever reason. San Diego is willing to give him about $10m a season if need be so there is a good chance he actually stays in San Diego despite what I thought which is that he was as good as gone. The VJax thread on page 1 has some decent info you might check out.
I'm not sure if my response should go here or in the VJax thread, so sorry if it's out of place. I did hear that he might be willing to take a home town discount as well, but I do think the market will be set so high for him that SD will be priced out. There are plenty of WR's in FA this year, but not many that fit the mold of VJax (big possession WR + deep threat ability). The Bears, the Vikings, the Bucs, the Patriots, and the 49ers all have significant money to spend in free agency and all would be helped greatly by a player like VJax.....I think one of these teams will step up with an offer that VJax can't say no to and that SD will not come close to touching. A team will overpay for him. I might be wrong with VJax though......but if VJax does resign, Brown's asking price will go down. I'm not sure if it matters that much for Brown's value/worth if VJax is gone or remains in SD. Either way I see Brown as a breakout type guy this season.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If VJax does leave SD Floyd will be the #1 WR. He's not as sexy of a dynasty pick as Brown but when healthy he does produce.

 
If VJax does leave SD Floyd will be the #1 WR. He's not as sexy of a dynasty pick as Brown but when healthy he does produce.
Isn't Floyd a FA as well?
Yep
Floyd is not a FA. He's signed through 2012. He's a FA in 2013. See Below (From Rotoworld back in August of 2011)...Chargers re-signed WR Malcom Floyd to a two-year, $5 million contract.

The Ravens are the big losers in this one; Baltimore really could've used a field-stretching wideout to take full advantage of Joe Flacco's big arm. The 30-year-old Floyd will return to his No. 2 wide receiver role in San Diego, playing third fiddle in the passing game to Antonio Gates and Vincent Jackson. Floyd will essentially serve as a situational deep threat, and won't be worth targeting as more than a WR4 in 12-team leagues. Related: RavensSource: Adam Caplan on Twitter Fri, Aug 5, 2011 03:16:00 PM

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I may be wrong, but I don't really see big upside with Brown. Yes he is talented and a polished route runner, but I don't see him as ever being more than the 3rd or 4th target on that team. He could have decent production as a wr3 or 4 in fantasy, but I wouldn't count on him being more than that.

Anything is possible and he has a great QB throwing to him, but if they do lose Jackson, I think they replace him through the draft or free agency. He was the 10th WR taken in a draft that was pretty weak at WR outside of the top 2. Right next to Jerrel Jernigan. I have a hard time believing that a pick of that level will become a breakout player, but again, anything is possible I guess.

 
I've overpaid for Vincent Brown in a couple leagues this off-season. He's #2 on my "get'em before it's too late" list - Randall Cobb being #1, Arrelious Benn being #3.

Regarding Brown specifically, the Brandon Lloyd-like skills he flashed late last season in prime time makes him a near-must gamble.

 
I may be wrong, but I don't really see big upside with Brown. Yes he is talented and a polished route runner, but I don't see him as ever being more than the 3rd or 4th target on that team. He could have decent production as a wr3 or 4 in fantasy, but I wouldn't count on him being more than that.Anything is possible and he has a great QB throwing to him, but if they do lose Jackson, I think they replace him through the draft or free agency. He was the 10th WR taken in a draft that was pretty weak at WR outside of the top 2. Right next to Jerrel Jernigan. I have a hard time believing that a pick of that level will become a breakout player, but again, anything is possible I guess.
SD isn't known for going after big name WR free agents. I drafted Brown last year with the expectation that VJax would be gone soon and Gates was on the downside of his career. BTW, Mike Wallace was the 11th WR taken and was taken two spots later.
 
Lets say jackson walks and per the note above floyd is locked in till 2013 (I thought he was a FA as well). Not saying they will or should do this because with Deilman retiring their line needs help (gaither and hardwick are unrestricted), but they could toss their 18th pick at Wallace right? They have a lot of areas of need so doubt they even sniff wallace.

 
As expected Vincent Jackson was not tagged today and this pretty much means he's as good as gone. If the Chargers were going to resign him they would have had a deal worked out already and he'll get far more money thrown at him in free agency than what the Chargers would ever dream of paying him. I think they also know what they have in Vincent Brown......a potential star WR! Now's the time to get him boys. Those that have rookie picks to spend, I think you can get him during your draft process for an early 2nd round pick. I was able to watch Brown in a handful of games this season and what I saw of him was quite impressive, in limited action. Anyone have a different opinion on the guy? I'm I off my rocker? Also, any highlights of the guy out there?
:goodposting:
 
Lets say jackson walks and per the note above floyd is locked in till 2013 (I thought he was a FA as well). Not saying they will or should do this because with Deilman retiring their line needs help (gaither and hardwick are unrestricted), but they could toss their 18th pick at Wallace right? They have a lot of areas of need so doubt they even sniff wallace.
Why would they give up a pick and a big contract for Wallace, who doesn't know their offense, rather than keeping Jackson, who does know the offense, for a similar contract but without having to give up a pick?The reality is they shouldn't keep Jackson or go after Wallace. Two years ago, Jackson held out most of the season, Gates played hurt and missed several games, and they had a revolving door at WR, yet they were #2 in the NFL in passing yards. Meanwhile, they need major help with the offensive line, pass rush, and to a lesser degree at cornerback. And on top of all that, A.J. Smith has not been one to spend big money on free agents or to trade away first round picks.The answer to your question is no.
 
I may be wrong, but I don't really see big upside with Brown. Yes he is talented and a polished route runner, but I don't see him as ever being more than the 3rd or 4th target on that team. He could have decent production as a wr3 or 4 in fantasy, but I wouldn't count on him being more than that.Anything is possible and he has a great QB throwing to him, but if they do lose Jackson, I think they replace him through the draft or free agency. He was the 10th WR taken in a draft that was pretty weak at WR outside of the top 2. Right next to Jerrel Jernigan. I have a hard time believing that a pick of that level will become a breakout player, but again, anything is possible I guess.
SD isn't known for going after big name WR free agents. I drafted Brown last year with the expectation that VJax would be gone soon and Gates was on the downside of his career. BTW, Mike Wallace was the 11th WR taken and was taken two spots later.
SD isn't known for going after FA WRs but they may have to now. And what better year to have to start with so many available. Mike Wallace did get drafted pretty low, but has elite speed and was more risk/reward. Nothing really elite about V Brown. Just real solid. He may be good, I just think the ceiling is a bit lower than the majority.
 
I've overpaid for Vincent Brown in a couple leagues this off-season. He's #2 on my "get'em before it's too late" list - Randall Cobb being #1, Arrelious Benn being #3.Regarding Brown specifically, the Brandon Lloyd-like skills he flashed late last season in prime time makes him a near-must gamble.
Brown showed flashes in 2011 and with a full camp and pre season, I think he can make further strides in 2012. And then of course, the big thing for him is that his opportunity in SD could greatly improve if V Jackson leaves town. I know the V Jackson thing is an if right now, but if he does sign elsewhere, Brown's value increases substantially that day. If V Jackson stays in SD, Brown's big opportunity might not come until 2013 when potentially Floyd is done in SD. IMO, Brown is likely to get a real shot in SD this season or next. Not saying he is a lock to capitalize on such, but I like what I've seen of him thus far.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Those that have rookie picks to spend, I think you can get him during your draft process for an early 2nd round pick.
Anybody able to get him for this? I don't think the guy in my league would even think about it.
I just got him for Kyle Rudolph and the equivalent of the 3.04.I think Brown looked great when given a chance last season so I'm looking forward to seeing him with a full offseason and the departure of VJax. As bad as the defense is, I think he'll put up some nice stats as SD's WR2.
 
Probably too late to get Brown for cheap, his owners see the potential now. You'll need to wait to see what FA/prospect(s) the Bolts bring in, if he's still penciled in as a starter you're going to have to hope for a slow start or a camp injury to slow him down.

 
'Guinis72 said:
'Andrew74 said:
'Carl Eller said:
Those that have rookie picks to spend, I think you can get him during your draft process for an early 2nd round pick.
Anybody able to get him for this? I don't think the guy in my league would even think about it.
I just got him for Kyle Rudolph and the equivalent of the 3.04.I think Brown looked great when given a chance last season so I'm looking forward to seeing him with a full offseason and the departure of VJax. As bad as the defense is, I think he'll put up some nice stats as SD's WR2.
San Diego's #2 WR has not traditionally had much fantasy value. They throw a lot to the RBs and TEs, and Rivers spreads the ball around between the #2/3/4 WRs.Here are the number of targets for the second most targeted Chargers WR by season since Norv arrived:2011 - 70 (Floyd)2010 - 46 (Naanee)2009 - 91 (Chambers)2008 - 64 (Chambers)2007 - 63 (Chambers)It's pretty tough to have fantasy value with target numbers like that.I own Brown in a dynasty league, so I am hopeful that he will emerge. But I have not really been sold on his hype since it started last season.
 
'Guinis72 said:
'Andrew74 said:
'Carl Eller said:
Those that have rookie picks to spend, I think you can get him during your draft process for an early 2nd round pick.
Anybody able to get him for this? I don't think the guy in my league would even think about it.
I just got him for Kyle Rudolph and the equivalent of the 3.04.I think Brown looked great when given a chance last season so I'm looking forward to seeing him with a full offseason and the departure of VJax. As bad as the defense is, I think he'll put up some nice stats as SD's WR2.
San Diego's #2 WR has not traditionally had much fantasy value. They throw a lot to the RBs and TEs, and Rivers spreads the ball around between the #2/3/4 WRs.Here are the number of targets for the second most targeted Chargers WR by season since Norv arrived:2011 - 70 (Floyd)2010 - 46 (Naanee)2009 - 91 (Chambers)2008 - 64 (Chambers)2007 - 63 (Chambers)It's pretty tough to have fantasy value with target numbers like that.I own Brown in a dynasty league, so I am hopeful that he will emerge. But I have not really been sold on his hype since it started last season.
I think one needs to be careful when pigeonholing values of fantasy players based on the past numbers. I'd like to refute the above numbers by saying:2011 - Floyd missed 4 full games2009 - Nannee missed 6 full games As far as Chambers, well I'm not going to dig back that far. We do have to remember that Gates could be considered their #1 WR for the years Chambers played there, so Chambers really would have been their #3 WR and Jackson being their #2 WR. I'm hopeful for Brown too, but he's not a guarantee. I do know he has underrated skills and is unknown in non-fantasy nerd realms. We all know who he is because we are one step ahead of the game, but it doesn't mean he'll pan out. On the flip side, I think it's important to not look at past numbers of Charger WR2's and extrapolate those numbers to Brown. Things in the NFL are always in flux.......I do know a few things in V Browns favor: 1) He has a very good QB 2) Gates is aging 3) Floyd is aging + FA in 2013 4) VJax, despite reports of "home town discount" is likely gone 5) VBrown has the skills to produce.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'Guinis72 said:
'Andrew74 said:
'Carl Eller said:
Those that have rookie picks to spend, I think you can get him during your draft process for an early 2nd round pick.
Anybody able to get him for this? I don't think the guy in my league would even think about it.
I just got him for Kyle Rudolph and the equivalent of the 3.04.I think Brown looked great when given a chance last season so I'm looking forward to seeing him with a full offseason and the departure of VJax. As bad as the defense is, I think he'll put up some nice stats as SD's WR2.
San Diego's #2 WR has not traditionally had much fantasy value. They throw a lot to the RBs and TEs, and Rivers spreads the ball around between the #2/3/4 WRs.Here are the number of targets for the second most targeted Chargers WR by season since Norv arrived:

2011 - 70 (Floyd)

2010 - 46 (Naanee)

2009 - 91 (Chambers)

2008 - 64 (Chambers)

2007 - 63 (Chambers)

It's pretty tough to have fantasy value with target numbers like that.

I own Brown in a dynasty league, so I am hopeful that he will emerge. But I have not really been sold on his hype since it started last season.
I think one needs to be careful when pigeonholing values of fantasy players based on the past numbers. I'd like to refute the above numbers by saying:2011 - Floyd missed 4 full games

2009 - Nannee missed 6 full games

As far as Chambers, well I'm not going to dig back that far. We do have to remember that Gates could be considered their #1 WR for the years Chambers played there, so Chambers really would have been their #3 WR and Jackson being their #2 WR.

I'm hopeful for Brown too, but he's not a guarantee. I do know he has underrated skills and is unknown in non-fantasy nerd realms. We all know who he is because we are one step ahead of the game, but it doesn't mean he'll pan out. On the flip side, I think it's important to not look at past numbers of Charger WR2's and extrapolate those numbers to Brown. Things in the NFL are always in flux.......I do know a few things in V Browns favor: 1) He has a very good QB 2) Gates is aging 3) Floyd is aging + FA in 2013 4) VJax, despite reports of "home town discount" is likely gone 5) VBrown has the skills to produce.
:goodposting: I see things very similar to what you've laid out. Brown is no lock, he's still relatively unproven. But the odds of a great opportunity opening up for him are looking quite good now. It's almost a perfect storm for him, or some other WR, to step up in the next year or two.

 
If VJax does leave SD Floyd will be the #1 WR. He's not as sexy of a dynasty pick as Brown but when healthy he does produce.
If VJax ends up signing elsewhere and SD does not bring in another free agent, Floyd is the play.
Care to expand on that a bit? Floyd has played 8 seasons. He's never caught more than 45 passes in any of them. There's been some quality games along the way no doubt. I just don't see how you can be so certain he's the play with the resume that he's got at this point. Don't get me wrong, I don't think Brown is any sort of slam dunk either. What I do think though is that he flashed some big play potential last year. That's something that I really like to see from a rookie. Coincidently, we've seen that from Floyd too. Unfortunately, that's all he's really shown though. Sporatic big plays and difficulty staying healthy is what I think of when talking about Floyd.
 
If VJax leaves, who is the bigger value: Floyd or Brown? I could see Floyd falling to the 8th or 9th round despite being SD's #1 because of average production at best over his career and injury problems, while I could see Brown being everyone's hot pick as a sleeper and go just a few rounds later. If thats what it seems like once draft season hits, I think Floyd is probably a better value.

 
If VJax does leave SD Floyd will be the #1 WR. He's not as sexy of a dynasty pick as Brown but when healthy he does produce.
If VJax ends up signing elsewhere and SD does not bring in another free agent, Floyd is the play.
Care to expand on that a bit? Floyd has played 8 seasons. He's never caught more than 45 passes in any of them. There's been some quality games along the way no doubt. I just don't see how you can be so certain he's the play with the resume that he's got at this point. Don't get me wrong, I don't think Brown is any sort of slam dunk either. What I do think though is that he flashed some big play potential last year. That's something that I really like to see from a rookie. Coincidently, we've seen that from Floyd too. Unfortunately, that's all he's really shown though. Sporatic big plays and difficulty staying healthy is what I think of when talking about Floyd.
Floyd is always hurt, so there is certainly room for another guy to steal the limelight. Rivers trusts Floyd out there wide and Floyd produces very well when healthy. I think we would have been blown away by Floyd's 2010 season had he stayed healthy for more than the first 5 games. He was averaging 100 yard games with a 60% shot at a TD.
 
If VJax leaves, who is the bigger value: Floyd or Brown? I could see Floyd falling to the 8th or 9th round despite being SD's #1 because of average production at best over his career and injury problems, while I could see Brown being everyone's hot pick as a sleeper and go just a few rounds later. If thats what it seems like once draft season hits, I think Floyd is probably a better value.
I don’t necessarily disagree with Floyd being the value play, if VJax leaves and no significant FA is brought in to SD. That said, there are reasons he isn’t as sexy of a play (which have already been covered): 1) Age… turns 31 this coming season 2) Injury issues 3) Free agent after 2012 season. From a short-term perspective, I like Floyd as a value play (under the scenario described above), no argument from me on that point. Long-term; however, I think Brown is the play right now in dynasty. As I’ve said previously in this thread, he is not at all a lock to pan out in SD, but the situation sure seems ripe for him, imo.
 
If VJax leaves, who is the bigger value: Floyd or Brown? I could see Floyd falling to the 8th or 9th round despite being SD's #1 because of average production at best over his career and injury problems, while I could see Brown being everyone's hot pick as a sleeper and go just a few rounds later. If thats what it seems like once draft season hits, I think Floyd is probably a better value.
I don’t necessarily disagree with Floyd being the value play, if VJax leaves and no significant FA is brought in to SD. That said, there are reasons he isn’t as sexy of a play (which have already been covered): 1) Age… turns 31 this coming season 2) Injury issues 3) Free agent after 2012 season. From a short-term perspective, I like Floyd as a value play (under the scenario described above), no argument from me on that point. Long-term; however, I think Brown is the play right now in dynasty. As I’ve said previously in this thread, he is not at all a lock to pan out in SD, but the situation sure seems ripe for him, imo.
Agree with all of this except I see Floyd being in a contract year a big positive (plays thru an injury possibly) in redraft.
 
If VJax leaves, who is the bigger value: Floyd or Brown? I could see Floyd falling to the 8th or 9th round despite being SD's #1 because of average production at best over his career and injury problems, while I could see Brown being everyone's hot pick as a sleeper and go just a few rounds later. If thats what it seems like once draft season hits, I think Floyd is probably a better value.
I don’t necessarily disagree with Floyd being the value play, if VJax leaves and no significant FA is brought in to SD. That said, there are reasons he isn’t as sexy of a play (which have already been covered): 1) Age… turns 31 this coming season 2) Injury issues 3) Free agent after 2012 season. From a short-term perspective, I like Floyd as a value play (under the scenario described above), no argument from me on that point. Long-term; however, I think Brown is the play right now in dynasty. As I’ve said previously in this thread, he is not at all a lock to pan out in SD, but the situation sure seems ripe for him, imo.
I can see Floyd being a great play for dynasty teams that need some filler for year or two. I've had the owner asking about trading him; probably can grab him for peanuts. Definitely a watch for FA and draft.
 
Floyd has played 8 seasons. He's never caught more than 45 passes in any of them. There's been some quality games along the way no doubt. I just don't see how you can be so certain he's the play with the resume that he's got at this point.
If VJax is gone, Floyd will fill his role as the #1 WR target. He is very similar to Jackson physically and has great ability as a deep threat. He also has the size the Chargers like in their receivers; Brown is smaller.Floyd hasn't had more than 45 catches in a season for two reasons:1. He has not been able to stay healthy and on the field.2. He has never been higher than the #2 WR in the offense; as I already posted, the Chargers' #2 offense does not typically get a high volume of targets.Floyd's production per target has been outstanding. He has averaged 18.5 ypr over the past 4 seasons and had 16 receiving TDs on 152 catches, a pretty good ratio, particularly considering that Gates, Jackson, and the RBs were given most of the red zone opportunities.
 
Floyd has played 8 seasons. He's never caught more than 45 passes in any of them. There's been some quality games along the way no doubt. I just don't see how you can be so certain he's the play with the resume that he's got at this point.
If VJax is gone, Floyd will fill his role as the #1 WR target. He is very similar to Jackson physically and has great ability as a deep threat. He also has the size the Chargers like in their receivers; Brown is smaller.Floyd hasn't had more than 45 catches in a season for two reasons:1. He has not been able to stay healthy and on the field.2. He has never been higher than the #2 WR in the offense; as I already posted, the Chargers' #2 offense does not typically get a high volume of targets.Floyd's production per target has been outstanding. He has averaged 18.5 ypr over the past 4 seasons and had 16 receiving TDs on 152 catches, a pretty good ratio, particularly considering that Gates, Jackson, and the RBs were given most of the red zone opportunities.
Once again you state the #2 in the Chargers offense doesn't produce, and I'm going to say this again since didn't respond to my response to you. In the past wasn't Gates the #1 and Jackson the #2.....so the Chargers WR#2 was really the third option? Here's what I responded before:I think one needs to be careful when pigeonholing values of fantasy players based on the past numbers. I'd like to refute the above numbers by saying:2011 - Floyd missed 4 full games2009 - Nannee missed 6 full games As far as Chambers, well I'm not going to dig back that far. We do have to remember that Gates could be considered their #1 WR for the years Chambers played there, so Chambers really would have been their #3 WR and Jackson being their #2 WR.With Gates aging, doesn't that open up the #2 WR for more targets? Those that think the NFL never changes fall behind quickly. You sir are about to be one of those that fall behind. The NFL is always in flux. If it's not Brown, it's going to be a new FA or rookie they bring in that will benefit soon.....if not 2012, 2013. I'm for one that is going to be ahead of the curve on this one! I lost out on Victor Cruz last season by the same train of thought you are using now....."Nicks and Manningham is all the offense has to offer". It's the same as your thinking "Gates and Floyd is all the Chargers have to offer". BTW - Floyd is getting long in the tooth as well. One could make the argument that he's older than his age given all the injuries he's had. Floyd is a FA in 2013 as well.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Floyd has played 8 seasons. He's never caught more than 45 passes in any of them. There's been some quality games along the way no doubt. I just don't see how you can be so certain he's the play with the resume that he's got at this point.
If VJax is gone, Floyd will fill his role as the #1 WR target. He is very similar to Jackson physically and has great ability as a deep threat. He also has the size the Chargers like in their receivers; Brown is smaller.Floyd hasn't had more than 45 catches in a season for two reasons:1. He has not been able to stay healthy and on the field.2. He has never been higher than the #2 WR in the offense; as I already posted, the Chargers' #2 offense does not typically get a high volume of targets.Floyd's production per target has been outstanding. He has averaged 18.5 ypr over the past 4 seasons and had 16 receiving TDs on 152 catches, a pretty good ratio, particularly considering that Gates, Jackson, and the RBs were given most of the red zone opportunities.
Once again you state the #2 in the Chargers offense doesn't produce, and I'm going to say this again since didn't respond to my response to you. In the past wasn't Gates the #1 and Jackson the #2.....so the Chargers WR#2 was really the third option? Here's what I responded before:I think one needs to be careful when pigeonholing values of fantasy players based on the past numbers. I'd like to refute the above numbers by saying:2011 - Floyd missed 4 full games2009 - Nannee missed 6 full games As far as Chambers, well I'm not going to dig back that far. We do have to remember that Gates could be considered their #1 WR for the years Chambers played there, so Chambers really would have been their #3 WR and Jackson being their #2 WR.With Gates aging, doesn't that open up the #2 WR for more targets? Those that think the NFL never changes fall behind quickly. You sir are about to be one of those that fall behind. The NFL is always in flux. If it's not Brown, it's going to be a new FA or rookie they bring in that will benefit soon.....if not 2012, 2013. I'm for one that is going to be ahead of the curve on this one! I lost out on Victor Cruz last season by the same train of thought you are using now....."Nicks and Manningham is all the offense has to offer". It's the same as your thinking "Gates and Floyd is all the Chargers have to offer". BTW - Floyd is getting long in the tooth as well. One could make the argument that he's older than his age given all the injuries he's had. Floyd is a FA in 2013 as well.
This post of mine was talking about Floyd's past performance. When he was the Chargers #2 WR in recent seasons, he did not get a high volume of targets. That's not the same thing as speculating about the offense going forward. Do you see the difference?As for your first post, I didn't respond to it because IMO it isn't overly relevant to the point I made. Sure, there have been mitigating circumstances at times, whether midseason personnel changes (Chambers twice) or injuries (and, by the way, Naanee's injury was in 2010, not 2009). That doesn't change the facts of the situation, which is what I posted about.The offense is designed to throw a lot to the TEs and RBs. Since Norv arrived, the Chargers are last in the NFL in WR targets, and by a fair margin. They targeted their WRs 1215 times over those 5 seasons; the next lowest was Oakland with 1263, the median was 1561, and the leader was Arizona with 2074. Those are huge discrepancies.Part of our discussion here is the possibility that Jackson leaves... so you are suggesting their best WR could leave, but WR targets could go up substantially because of other personnel changes/aging. Sure, that could happen, and Brown could emerge as a stud WR who gets a lot of targets from a great QB in Rivers. But it seems unlikely IMO.Yes, Gates is aging. One might have said the same thing about Tomlinson a few years ago and speculated that the Chargers would throw less often to their RBs, given what a great receiving RB he was for them, but that didn't happen... they threw more often to their RBs the past two seasons than in any season when LT was with the Chargers.IMO it is likely the offense will continue to throw a lot to the TEs and RBs. If they need a new TE to do that, I suspect they'll get one.
 
Floyd has played 8 seasons. He's never caught more than 45 passes in any of them. There's been some quality games along the way no doubt. I just don't see how you can be so certain he's the play with the resume that he's got at this point.
If VJax is gone, Floyd will fill his role as the #1 WR target. He is very similar to Jackson physically and has great ability as a deep threat. He also has the size the Chargers like in their receivers; Brown is smaller.Floyd hasn't had more than 45 catches in a season for two reasons:1. He has not been able to stay healthy and on the field.2. He has never been higher than the #2 WR in the offense; as I already posted, the Chargers' #2 offense does not typically get a high volume of targets.Floyd's production per target has been outstanding. He has averaged 18.5 ypr over the past 4 seasons and had 16 receiving TDs on 152 catches, a pretty good ratio, particularly considering that Gates, Jackson, and the RBs were given most of the red zone opportunities.
Once again you state the #2 in the Chargers offense doesn't produce, and I'm going to say this again since didn't respond to my response to you. In the past wasn't Gates the #1 and Jackson the #2.....so the Chargers WR#2 was really the third option? Here's what I responded before:I think one needs to be careful when pigeonholing values of fantasy players based on the past numbers. I'd like to refute the above numbers by saying:2011 - Floyd missed 4 full games2009 - Nannee missed 6 full games As far as Chambers, well I'm not going to dig back that far. We do have to remember that Gates could be considered their #1 WR for the years Chambers played there, so Chambers really would have been their #3 WR and Jackson being their #2 WR.With Gates aging, doesn't that open up the #2 WR for more targets? Those that think the NFL never changes fall behind quickly. You sir are about to be one of those that fall behind. The NFL is always in flux. If it's not Brown, it's going to be a new FA or rookie they bring in that will benefit soon.....if not 2012, 2013. I'm for one that is going to be ahead of the curve on this one! I lost out on Victor Cruz last season by the same train of thought you are using now....."Nicks and Manningham is all the offense has to offer". It's the same as your thinking "Gates and Floyd is all the Chargers have to offer". BTW - Floyd is getting long in the tooth as well. One could make the argument that he's older than his age given all the injuries he's had. Floyd is a FA in 2013 as well.
This post of mine was talking about Floyd's past performance. When he was the Chargers #2 WR in recent seasons, he did not get a high volume of targets. That's not the same thing as speculating about the offense going forward. Do you see the difference?As for your first post, I didn't respond to it because IMO it isn't overly relevant to the point I made. Sure, there have been mitigating circumstances at times, whether midseason personnel changes (Chambers twice) or injuries (and, by the way, Naanee's injury was in 2010, not 2009). That doesn't change the facts of the situation, which is what I posted about.The offense is designed to throw a lot to the TEs and RBs. Since Norv arrived, the Chargers are last in the NFL in WR targets, and by a fair margin. They targeted their WRs 1215 times over those 5 seasons; the next lowest was Oakland with 1263, the median was 1561, and the leader was Arizona with 2074. Those are huge discrepancies.Part of our discussion here is the possibility that Jackson leaves... so you are suggesting their best WR could leave, but WR targets could go up substantially because of other personnel changes/aging. Sure, that could happen, and Brown could emerge as a stud WR who gets a lot of targets from a great QB in Rivers. But it seems unlikely IMO.Yes, Gates is aging. One might have said the same thing about Tomlinson a few years ago and speculated that the Chargers would throw less often to their RBs, given what a great receiving RB he was for them, but that didn't happen... they threw more often to their RBs the past two seasons than in any season when LT was with the Chargers.IMO it is likely the offense will continue to throw a lot to the TEs and RBs. If they need a new TE to do that, I suspect they'll get one.
I do think Floyd can approach numbers similar to VJax's (assuming he stays healthy) but VJax leaving still opens up room for Brown. Tolbert is probably gone too and I don't think he will be that easy to replace as a receiving threat.
 
Floyd has played 8 seasons. He's never caught more than 45 passes in any of them. There's been some quality games along the way no doubt. I just don't see how you can be so certain he's the play with the resume that he's got at this point.
If VJax is gone, Floyd will fill his role as the #1 WR target. He is very similar to Jackson physically and has great ability as a deep threat. He also has the size the Chargers like in their receivers; Brown is smaller.Floyd hasn't had more than 45 catches in a season for two reasons:1. He has not been able to stay healthy and on the field.2. He has never been higher than the #2 WR in the offense; as I already posted, the Chargers' #2 offense does not typically get a high volume of targets.Floyd's production per target has been outstanding. He has averaged 18.5 ypr over the past 4 seasons and had 16 receiving TDs on 152 catches, a pretty good ratio, particularly considering that Gates, Jackson, and the RBs were given most of the red zone opportunities.
Once again you state the #2 in the Chargers offense doesn't produce, and I'm going to say this again since didn't respond to my response to you. In the past wasn't Gates the #1 and Jackson the #2.....so the Chargers WR#2 was really the third option? Here's what I responded before:I think one needs to be careful when pigeonholing values of fantasy players based on the past numbers. I'd like to refute the above numbers by saying:2011 - Floyd missed 4 full games2009 - Nannee missed 6 full games As far as Chambers, well I'm not going to dig back that far. We do have to remember that Gates could be considered their #1 WR for the years Chambers played there, so Chambers really would have been their #3 WR and Jackson being their #2 WR.With Gates aging, doesn't that open up the #2 WR for more targets? Those that think the NFL never changes fall behind quickly. You sir are about to be one of those that fall behind. The NFL is always in flux. If it's not Brown, it's going to be a new FA or rookie they bring in that will benefit soon.....if not 2012, 2013. I'm for one that is going to be ahead of the curve on this one! I lost out on Victor Cruz last season by the same train of thought you are using now....."Nicks and Manningham is all the offense has to offer". It's the same as your thinking "Gates and Floyd is all the Chargers have to offer". BTW - Floyd is getting long in the tooth as well. One could make the argument that he's older than his age given all the injuries he's had. Floyd is a FA in 2013 as well.
This post of mine was talking about Floyd's past performance. When he was the Chargers #2 WR in recent seasons, he did not get a high volume of targets. That's not the same thing as speculating about the offense going forward. Do you see the difference?As for your first post, I didn't respond to it because IMO it isn't overly relevant to the point I made. Sure, there have been mitigating circumstances at times, whether midseason personnel changes (Chambers twice) or injuries (and, by the way, Naanee's injury was in 2010, not 2009). That doesn't change the facts of the situation, which is what I posted about.The offense is designed to throw a lot to the TEs and RBs. Since Norv arrived, the Chargers are last in the NFL in WR targets, and by a fair margin. They targeted their WRs 1215 times over those 5 seasons; the next lowest was Oakland with 1263, the median was 1561, and the leader was Arizona with 2074. Those are huge discrepancies.Part of our discussion here is the possibility that Jackson leaves... so you are suggesting their best WR could leave, but WR targets could go up substantially because of other personnel changes/aging. Sure, that could happen, and Brown could emerge as a stud WR who gets a lot of targets from a great QB in Rivers. But it seems unlikely IMO.Yes, Gates is aging. One might have said the same thing about Tomlinson a few years ago and speculated that the Chargers would throw less often to their RBs, given what a great receiving RB he was for them, but that didn't happen... they threw more often to their RBs the past two seasons than in any season when LT was with the Chargers.IMO it is likely the offense will continue to throw a lot to the TEs and RBs. If they need a new TE to do that, I suspect they'll get one.
I do think Floyd can approach numbers similar to VJax's (assuming he stays healthy) but VJax leaving still opens up room for Brown. Tolbert is probably gone too and I don't think he will be that easy to replace as a receiving threat.
Mathews was a better receiving threat than Tolbert. If Tolbert goes, Mathews could lead the team in receptions.
 
Floyd has played 8 seasons. He's never caught more than 45 passes in any of them. There's been some quality games along the way no doubt. I just don't see how you can be so certain he's the play with the resume that he's got at this point.
If VJax is gone, Floyd will fill his role as the #1 WR target. He is very similar to Jackson physically and has great ability as a deep threat. He also has the size the Chargers like in their receivers; Brown is smaller.Floyd hasn't had more than 45 catches in a season for two reasons:

1. He has not been able to stay healthy and on the field.

2. He has never been higher than the #2 WR in the offense; as I already posted, the Chargers' #2 offense does not typically get a high volume of targets.

Floyd's production per target has been outstanding. He has averaged 18.5 ypr over the past 4 seasons and had 16 receiving TDs on 152 catches, a pretty good ratio, particularly considering that Gates, Jackson, and the RBs were given most of the red zone opportunities.
Once again you state the #2 in the Chargers offense doesn't produce, and I'm going to say this again since didn't respond to my response to you. In the past wasn't Gates the #1 and Jackson the #2.....so the Chargers WR#2 was really the third option? Here's what I responded before:I think one needs to be careful when pigeonholing values of fantasy players based on the past numbers. I'd like to refute the above numbers by saying:

2011 - Floyd missed 4 full games

2009 - Nannee missed 6 full games

As far as Chambers, well I'm not going to dig back that far. We do have to remember that Gates could be considered their #1 WR for the years Chambers played there, so Chambers really would have been their #3 WR and Jackson being their #2 WR.

With Gates aging, doesn't that open up the #2 WR for more targets? Those that think the NFL never changes fall behind quickly. You sir are about to be one of those that fall behind. The NFL is always in flux. If it's not Brown, it's going to be a new FA or rookie they bring in that will benefit soon.....if not 2012, 2013. I'm for one that is going to be ahead of the curve on this one! I lost out on Victor Cruz last season by the same train of thought you are using now....."Nicks and Manningham is all the offense has to offer". It's the same as your thinking "Gates and Floyd is all the Chargers have to offer". BTW - Floyd is getting long in the tooth as well. One could make the argument that he's older than his age given all the injuries he's had. Floyd is a FA in 2013 as well.
This post of mine was talking about Floyd's past performance. When he was the Chargers #2 WR in recent seasons, he did not get a high volume of targets. That's not the same thing as speculating about the offense going forward. Do you see the difference?As for your first post, I didn't respond to it because IMO it isn't overly relevant to the point I made. Sure, there have been mitigating circumstances at times, whether midseason personnel changes (Chambers twice) or injuries (and, by the way, Naanee's injury was in 2010, not 2009). That doesn't change the facts of the situation, which is what I posted about.

The offense is designed to throw a lot to the TEs and RBs. Since Norv arrived, the Chargers are last in the NFL in WR targets, and by a fair margin. They targeted their WRs 1215 times over those 5 seasons; the next lowest was Oakland with 1263, the median was 1561, and the leader was Arizona with 2074. Those are huge discrepancies.

Part of our discussion here is the possibility that Jackson leaves... so you are suggesting their best WR could leave, but WR targets could go up substantially because of other personnel changes/aging. Sure, that could happen, and Brown could emerge as a stud WR who gets a lot of targets from a great QB in Rivers. But it seems unlikely IMO.

Yes, Gates is aging. One might have said the same thing about Tomlinson a few years ago and speculated that the Chargers would throw less often to their RBs, given what a great receiving RB he was for them, but that didn't happen... they threw more often to their RBs the past two seasons than in any season when LT was with the Chargers.

IMO it is likely the offense will continue to throw a lot to the TEs and RBs. If they need a new TE to do that, I suspect they'll get one.
I do think Floyd can approach numbers similar to VJax's (assuming he stays healthy) but VJax leaving still opens up room for Brown. Tolbert is probably gone too and I don't think he will be that easy to replace as a receiving threat.
Mathews was a better receiving threat than Tolbert. If Tolbert goes, Mathews could lead the team in receptions.
Oh come on!
 
Floyd has played 8 seasons. He's never caught more than 45 passes in any of them. There's been some quality games along the way no doubt. I just don't see how you can be so certain he's the play with the resume that he's got at this point.
If VJax is gone, Floyd will fill his role as the #1 WR target. He is very similar to Jackson physically and has great ability as a deep threat. He also has the size the Chargers like in their receivers; Brown is smaller.Floyd hasn't had more than 45 catches in a season for two reasons:

1. He has not been able to stay healthy and on the field.

2. He has never been higher than the #2 WR in the offense; as I already posted, the Chargers' #2 offense does not typically get a high volume of targets.

Floyd's production per target has been outstanding. He has averaged 18.5 ypr over the past 4 seasons and had 16 receiving TDs on 152 catches, a pretty good ratio, particularly considering that Gates, Jackson, and the RBs were given most of the red zone opportunities.
Once again you state the #2 in the Chargers offense doesn't produce, and I'm going to say this again since didn't respond to my response to you. In the past wasn't Gates the #1 and Jackson the #2.....so the Chargers WR#2 was really the third option? Here's what I responded before:I think one needs to be careful when pigeonholing values of fantasy players based on the past numbers. I'd like to refute the above numbers by saying:

2011 - Floyd missed 4 full games

2009 - Nannee missed 6 full games

As far as Chambers, well I'm not going to dig back that far. We do have to remember that Gates could be considered their #1 WR for the years Chambers played there, so Chambers really would have been their #3 WR and Jackson being their #2 WR.

With Gates aging, doesn't that open up the #2 WR for more targets? Those that think the NFL never changes fall behind quickly. You sir are about to be one of those that fall behind. The NFL is always in flux. If it's not Brown, it's going to be a new FA or rookie they bring in that will benefit soon.....if not 2012, 2013. I'm for one that is going to be ahead of the curve on this one! I lost out on Victor Cruz last season by the same train of thought you are using now....."Nicks and Manningham is all the offense has to offer". It's the same as your thinking "Gates and Floyd is all the Chargers have to offer". BTW - Floyd is getting long in the tooth as well. One could make the argument that he's older than his age given all the injuries he's had. Floyd is a FA in 2013 as well.
This post of mine was talking about Floyd's past performance. When he was the Chargers #2 WR in recent seasons, he did not get a high volume of targets. That's not the same thing as speculating about the offense going forward. Do you see the difference?As for your first post, I didn't respond to it because IMO it isn't overly relevant to the point I made. Sure, there have been mitigating circumstances at times, whether midseason personnel changes (Chambers twice) or injuries (and, by the way, Naanee's injury was in 2010, not 2009). That doesn't change the facts of the situation, which is what I posted about.

The offense is designed to throw a lot to the TEs and RBs. Since Norv arrived, the Chargers are last in the NFL in WR targets, and by a fair margin. They targeted their WRs 1215 times over those 5 seasons; the next lowest was Oakland with 1263, the median was 1561, and the leader was Arizona with 2074. Those are huge discrepancies.

Part of our discussion here is the possibility that Jackson leaves... so you are suggesting their best WR could leave, but WR targets could go up substantially because of other personnel changes/aging. Sure, that could happen, and Brown could emerge as a stud WR who gets a lot of targets from a great QB in Rivers. But it seems unlikely IMO.

Yes, Gates is aging. One might have said the same thing about Tomlinson a few years ago and speculated that the Chargers would throw less often to their RBs, given what a great receiving RB he was for them, but that didn't happen... they threw more often to their RBs the past two seasons than in any season when LT was with the Chargers.

IMO it is likely the offense will continue to throw a lot to the TEs and RBs. If they need a new TE to do that, I suspect they'll get one.
I do think Floyd can approach numbers similar to VJax's (assuming he stays healthy) but VJax leaving still opens up room for Brown. Tolbert is probably gone too and I don't think he will be that easy to replace as a receiving threat.
Mathews was a better receiving threat than Tolbert. If Tolbert goes, Mathews could lead the team in receptions.
Oh come on!
:confused: Last season, Mathews was 4th on the Chargers in receptions. He had 50 receptions in 14 games. Tolbert had 54, Jackson had 60, and Gates had 64. With Tolbert and Jackson potentially gone, it's easy to see a path to Mathews having the most receptions on the team, perhaps with 65+.

The facts are pretty obvious. What are you disagreeing with?

 
Floyd has played 8 seasons. He's never caught more than 45 passes in any of them. There's been some quality games along the way no doubt. I just don't see how you can be so certain he's the play with the resume that he's got at this point.
If VJax is gone, Floyd will fill his role as the #1 WR target. He is very similar to Jackson physically and has great ability as a deep threat. He also has the size the Chargers like in their receivers; Brown is smaller.Floyd hasn't had more than 45 catches in a season for two reasons:

1. He has not been able to stay healthy and on the field.

2. He has never been higher than the #2 WR in the offense; as I already posted, the Chargers' #2 offense does not typically get a high volume of targets.

Floyd's production per target has been outstanding. He has averaged 18.5 ypr over the past 4 seasons and had 16 receiving TDs on 152 catches, a pretty good ratio, particularly considering that Gates, Jackson, and the RBs were given most of the red zone opportunities.
Once again you state the #2 in the Chargers offense doesn't produce, and I'm going to say this again since didn't respond to my response to you. In the past wasn't Gates the #1 and Jackson the #2.....so the Chargers WR#2 was really the third option? Here's what I responded before:I think one needs to be careful when pigeonholing values of fantasy players based on the past numbers. I'd like to refute the above numbers by saying:

2011 - Floyd missed 4 full games

2009 - Nannee missed 6 full games

As far as Chambers, well I'm not going to dig back that far. We do have to remember that Gates could be considered their #1 WR for the years Chambers played there, so Chambers really would have been their #3 WR and Jackson being their #2 WR.

With Gates aging, doesn't that open up the #2 WR for more targets? Those that think the NFL never changes fall behind quickly. You sir are about to be one of those that fall behind. The NFL is always in flux. If it's not Brown, it's going to be a new FA or rookie they bring in that will benefit soon.....if not 2012, 2013. I'm for one that is going to be ahead of the curve on this one! I lost out on Victor Cruz last season by the same train of thought you are using now....."Nicks and Manningham is all the offense has to offer". It's the same as your thinking "Gates and Floyd is all the Chargers have to offer". BTW - Floyd is getting long in the tooth as well. One could make the argument that he's older than his age given all the injuries he's had. Floyd is a FA in 2013 as well.
This post of mine was talking about Floyd's past performance. When he was the Chargers #2 WR in recent seasons, he did not get a high volume of targets. That's not the same thing as speculating about the offense going forward. Do you see the difference?As for your first post, I didn't respond to it because IMO it isn't overly relevant to the point I made. Sure, there have been mitigating circumstances at times, whether midseason personnel changes (Chambers twice) or injuries (and, by the way, Naanee's injury was in 2010, not 2009). That doesn't change the facts of the situation, which is what I posted about.

The offense is designed to throw a lot to the TEs and RBs. Since Norv arrived, the Chargers are last in the NFL in WR targets, and by a fair margin. They targeted their WRs 1215 times over those 5 seasons; the next lowest was Oakland with 1263, the median was 1561, and the leader was Arizona with 2074. Those are huge discrepancies.

Part of our discussion here is the possibility that Jackson leaves... so you are suggesting their best WR could leave, but WR targets could go up substantially because of other personnel changes/aging. Sure, that could happen, and Brown could emerge as a stud WR who gets a lot of targets from a great QB in Rivers. But it seems unlikely IMO.

Yes, Gates is aging. One might have said the same thing about Tomlinson a few years ago and speculated that the Chargers would throw less often to their RBs, given what a great receiving RB he was for them, but that didn't happen... they threw more often to their RBs the past two seasons than in any season when LT was with the Chargers.

IMO it is likely the offense will continue to throw a lot to the TEs and RBs. If they need a new TE to do that, I suspect they'll get one.
I do think Floyd can approach numbers similar to VJax's (assuming he stays healthy) but VJax leaving still opens up room for Brown. Tolbert is probably gone too and I don't think he will be that easy to replace as a receiving threat.
Mathews was a better receiving threat than Tolbert. If Tolbert goes, Mathews could lead the team in receptions.
Oh come on!
:confused: Last season, Mathews was 4th on the Chargers in receptions. He had 50 receptions in 14 games. Tolbert had 54, Jackson had 60, and Gates had 64. With Tolbert and Jackson potentially gone, it's easy to see a path to Mathews having the most receptions on the team, perhaps with 65+.

The facts are pretty obvious. What are you disagreeing with?
If Gates is healthy I think he's good for 80 catches and will lead the team. However, 65 for Mathews wouldn't be a stretch at all.
 
Malcom Floyd is the real winner in the short term. If he stays healthy, he should have a top 15-20 season.

 
SD must have some trust in Vincent Brown if they let VJax go. There aren't many FA's WRs out there so this will leave SD trying to find WR's via the draft. Floyd can play the deep threat and Brown the #2 taking the crossing routes.

Can you guys see VB breaking out like Ant. Brown in Pittsburg? No question Rivers can deliver that ball, and I think VB has developed some trust with Rivers toward the end of last season.

 
SD must have some trust in Vincent Brown if they let VJax go. There aren't many FA's WRs out there so this will leave SD trying to find WR's via the draft. Floyd can play the deep threat and Brown the #2 taking the crossing routes. Can you guys see VB breaking out like Ant. Brown in Pittsburg? No question Rivers can deliver that ball, and I think VB has developed some trust with Rivers toward the end of last season.
I got definitely see him doing some thing similar. Talent-wise I think he similar to Mario Manningham but a runs better routes and has better hands.
 
Malcom Floyd is the real winner in the short term. If he stays healthy, he should have a top 15-20 season.
:goodposting:Of course, he never stays healthy...
Floyd becoming a top 15-20 WR in his age 31 season is a longshot.
Well, it's certainly not a given. As noted, he has trouble staying on the field, having missed 9 games in the past 2 seasons. However, note that in the 23 games he played over the past 2 seasons, he averaged 9.7 fppg (non PPR). For comparison purposes:2011: Dez Bryant was the #20 WR in ppg, at 9.7 fppg2010: Colston was the #20 WR in ppg, at 9.6 fppg
 
The signing of Meacham can't be good for his value, unless he somehow manages to outplay Floyd.
I would assume this means Brown is the #3 WR for 2012. Floyd is a free agent after 2012 and presumably won't be back, so maybe Brown moves into the #2 role then.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top