What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Warrick Dunn going on IR most likely... (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Matrix - feel free to draft only running backs next year that have played all 16 games every season during their careers. Good luck.Dunn clearly is NOT injury prone with the numbers listed by superbowlchampion.
i know i'll never draft one that hasn't ever started all 16 games in a season.
 
Matrix - feel free to draft only running backs next year that have played all 16 games every season during their careers. Good luck.Dunn clearly is NOT injury prone with the numbers listed by superbowlchampion.
i know i'll never draft one that hasn't ever started all 16 games in a season.
So who did you draft as your running backs? I cant think of anyone that started all 16 games that has not had some kind of injury.You obviously dont have Priest.
 
Matrix - feel free to draft only running backs next year that have played all 16 games every season during their careers.  Good luck.Dunn clearly is NOT injury prone with the numbers listed by superbowlchampion.
i know i'll never draft one that hasn't ever started all 16 games in a season.
So who did you draft as your running backs? I cant think of anyone that started all 16 games that has not had some kind of injury.You obviously dont have Priest.
maybe you're not understanding me. i did not say 16 games every season. i said never started 16 games. priest and jamal both combined have started and played an entire season twice (once each) :)
 
Matrix - feel free to draft only running backs next year that have played all 16 games every season during their careers.  Good luck.Dunn clearly is NOT injury prone with the numbers listed by superbowlchampion.
i know i'll never draft one that hasn't ever started all 16 games in a season.
So who did you draft as your running backs? I cant think of anyone that started all 16 games that has not had some kind of injury.You obviously dont have Priest.
maybe you're not understanding me. i did not say 16 games every season. i said never started 16 games. priest and jamal both combined have started and played an entire season twice (once each) :)
The point is that you are trying to discredit taking Dunn who has started and played 16 games in a season. Yet on the other hand say "No I'll take Priest or Jamal" even though both have had injuries that were considered career threatening. All three of these guys have had injuries and played all 16 games.Make up your mind.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
so, matrix, you wont be drafting clinton portis next year? or barlow if he gets a feature RB gig? how about rudi or dom davis?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The point is that you are trying to discredit taking Dunn who has started and played 16 games in a season. Yet on the other hand say "No I'll take Priest or Jamal even though both have had injuries that were considered career threatening.Make up your mind.
let me repeat. look at the stats. he has never started and played 16 games in a season. also priest and jamal's injuries were never seriously considered career threatening. i do not see where i am being inconsistent in my line of thinking. :)
 
also, matrix, going into 2001, priest had never started all 16 games in a season, so there's no way you would have drafted him.and you answered your own question:"i know i'll never draft one(RB) that hasn't ever started all 16 games in a season."portis, barlow, rudi, dom - all have not started all 16 games in a season, going into next year.

 
PLease can't you close your mouth for once/? WHY DO YOU HAVE TO DOMINATE A THREAD???? :rant: :hot:
love how you chose that line to quote. i think that you're just a little biased against me but i could be wrong. :)
 
also, matrix, going into 2001, priest had never started all 16 games in a season, so there's no way you would have drafted him.and you answered your own question:"i know i'll never draft one(RB) that hasn't ever started all 16 games in a season."portis, barlow, rudi, dom - all have not started all 16 games in a season, going into next year.
okay he started all 16 games in 2001. i drafted him in 2003. where's the inconsistency? :)
 
also, matrix, going into 2001, priest had never started all 16 games in a season, so there's no way you would have drafted him.and you answered your own question:"i know i'll never draft one(RB) that hasn't ever started all 16 games in a season."portis, barlow, rudi, dom - all have not started all 16 games in a season, going into next year.
okay he started all 16 games in 2001. i drafted him in 2003. where's the inconsistency? :)
Some people just love to argue, no matter what the subject. I'm amused sometimes at the going back and forth, each trying desperately to prove their point. There comes a time to just say **** it and move on.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
also, matrix, going into 2001, priest had never started all 16 games in a season, so there's no way you would have drafted him.and you answered your own question:"i know i'll never draft one(RB) that hasn't ever started all 16 games in a season."portis, barlow, rudi, dom - all have not started all 16 games in a season, going into next year.
okay he started all 16 games in 2001. i drafted him in 2003. where's the inconsistency? :)
Some people just love to argue, no matter what the subject. I'm amused sometimes at the going back and forth, each trying desperately to prove their point. There comes a time to just say ##### it and move on.
sure especially when i know i'm right. :)
 
let me repeat. look at the stats. he has never started and played 16 games in a season. also priest and jamal's injuries were never seriously considered career threatening. i do not see where i am being inconsistent in my line of thinking. :)
Now that is a crock if I have ever read it. How many threads were there comparing the Priest injury to Bo Jackson? How far down the draft list did Priest drop specifically based upon the injury and season ending Hip surgery?No Jamal ripped his Knee up in a serious manner and people were surprised to see him come back. This guy had been written off by many folks. Please do not tell me that people did not have concerns that these injuries were not career threatening! What a joke.Dunn may not have been in on play 1 of each game. However, there is a very high likely hood that he was in on play 2. So although he had not started, technically. He was utilized as frequently as possible in game plan by the team he was on.So based on your criteria you wont draft next year:CpeppPortisRudi JohnsonM HarrisonJerry PorterKeyshawn JohnsonSchockeyI would love to walk out with this lineup and fill in the kicker and D
 
Public service announcement to the uninitiated: matrix offers no value or insight, ignore him and he'll go away.
How do I set my parameters to ignore Matrix?..........and if I do, how does it appear on screen when he does post?

(what if we ALL put our settings to ignore his posts?)...............WHO'S WITH ME?

(seriously.....I'm going to do this or my other idea is to keep hitting "Report this post".........this is ridiculous and it's ruining this board with your schenanigans)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
i do not see where i am being inconsistent in my line of thinking. :)
Not sure why I keep coming back to this thread to debate this guy -- unhealthy yet addictive -- kind of like crack.Anyhoo....here's where you've been "inconsistent" and/or just plain wrong about (and i reserve the right to add to the list if...er...when you post further):1. You said "Dunn is always getting hurt" -- Wrong. It was shown his health record is up there with the best backs in the league.2. You said when a "little man" gets "too much (sic) carries stuff [injuries] like this happens." -- Wrong. Case and point, a guy like Barry Sanders.3. You said it would be a mistake to draft a RB that has never started all 16 games of a season -- Wrong. Case and point, Portis and potentially guys like Dom, Rudi, Barlow et al.4. Ah forget it, this is getting too tedious.
 
How many threads were there comparing the Priest injury to Bo Jackson?
too many apparently since it wasn't true.
How far down the draft list did Priest drop specifically based upon the injury and season ending Hip surgery?
enough to get me priest and jamal lewis.
No Jamal ripped his Knee up in a serious manner and people were surprised to see him come back. This guy had been written off by many folks
while a lot of running backs are not the same after acl surgery jamal was one of the few who has come back stronger from it. never was it thought to be career threatening. the ravens never saw it that way. why should you or i have?dunn is not a durable back. he is too small to handle a lot of carries.
So based on your criteria you wont draft next year:CpeppPortisRudi JohnsonM HarrisonJerry PorterKeyshawn JohnsonSchockeyI would love to walk out with this lineup and fill in the kicker and D
your list is flawed. lollipopper harrison and keyshawn have all started and played a full season. we'll agree to disagree on that being a great lineup.
 
[QUOTE='ghosttothe]Not sure why I keep coming back to this thread to debate this guy -- unhealthy yet addictive -- kind of like crack.Anyhoo....here's where you've been "inconsistent" and/or just plain wrong about (and i reserve the right to add to the list if...er...when you post further):1. You said "Dunn is always getting hurt" -- Wrong. It was shown his health record is up there with the best backs in the league.2. You said when a "little man" gets "too much (sic) carries stuff [injuries] like this happens." -- Wrong. Case and point, a guy like Barry Sanders.3. You said it would be a mistake to draft a RB that has never started all 16 games of a season -- Wrong. Case and point, Portis and potentially guys like Dom, Rudi, Barlow et al.4. Ah forget it, this is getting too tedious.
[/QUOTE]the last three seasons he has been hurt. where am i wrong there? barry sanders wasn't the biggest guy but please do not compare warrick done to him. he never played at 180 pounds like done has. and well maybe those are running backs to avoid. though they haven't been hurt 3 consecutives seasons like warrick done.
 
stupid me for thinking a 3 page thread about a player possibly being lost for the season would have some actual useful info. :rolleyes: :wall:

 
I am reporting all posts where matrix flames, argues, states perceptions as facts that he can not back up, responds to his own responses, and generally being a pain in the ####.We are better that this. This is not FFToday.

 
I am reporting all posts where matrix flames, argues, states perceptions as facts that he can not back up, responds to his own responses, and generally being a pain in the ####.
when you find those please let me know.
 
I am reporting all posts where matrix flames, argues, states perceptions as facts that he can not back up, responds to his own responses, and generally being a pain in the ####.We are better that this. This is not FFToday.
Amen!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top