ImTheScientist
Footballguy
What u got.
I like kerley but the qb switch could mean trouble.Devonte Booker - if he's still out there (probably not in most leagues). He outgained Anderson this week.
Jeremy Kerley - the last two weeks and target stats show he is a legit WR in a passing offense. Could be a top 25 WR rest of season.
Agree completely.Hoyer. Guy is throwing for 300+ every week without even feeding Alshon. Can't see a switch back to Cutler.
vs Jaguars and then Packers in next two weeksHoyer. Guy is throwing for 300+ every week without even feeding Alshon. Can't see a switch back to Cutler.
Packers Defense is pretty darn good.vs Jaguars and then Packers in next two weeks![]()
against Eli and a non existent run game maybePackers Defense is pretty darn good.
I agree. But the position he plays in Chip's offense is setup to produce no matter the QB. As someone who had Ellington everywhere(before reception perception), it pains me to see him producing like this :(I like kerley but the qb switch could mean trouble.
Been without their star corner all season practicallyagainst Eli and a non existent run game maybe
Evan Silva @evansilva
Devontae Booker's weekly snap rates:
Wk 1: 10%
Wk 2: 19%
Wk 3: 23%
Wk 4: 25%
Wk 5: 41%
I guess we all look at different thingsBeen without their star corner all season practically
I'm not saying they are great but they aren't terrible
The original quote was salivating over JAX and GB both... Jacksonville is 7th best in passing YPG... their D is very solid. You can make a case against GB but not Jacksonville
The OP was advocating picking up Hoyer, and then you suggest Jacksonville as a great matchup. Yeah that Jacksonville defense gives up a lot of points, but that isn't due to having a porous passing defense. So unless your QBs get points for total points scored, Jacksonville is a matchup you may want to actually avoid if you're streamingI guess we all look at different things
Jaguars have give up 23, 38, 19, and 27 points so far this season.
I think Starks falls into the 17 for 33 type stuff at this point as well.Meredith and Kerley at WR.
RB is nothing special, Starks is terrible, he is good for one game but the rest are 17 carries for 33 yards type stuff. Dont fall for that again.
Opposite order for me.How would you guys rank Hogan, Kerley, Meredith in full PPR?
- Kerley - QB change coming but no one else has emerged as a reliable chain mover. If the new QB gets Smith involved, he'll be running the same 9 route that has defined his route tree since he came into the league. Macdonald due back this week but I think the impact is minimal.
- Meredith - seems like he'll be the #2 RoS.
- Hogan - good boom/bust bye week filler, he'll catch deep balls but he's pretty far down the pecking order on that offense.
Hunter looks so smooth out there. Its almost effortlless it seems for him to get open. But hes such a good blocker too.Gates.
I have Hunter in a best ball league. Figure at least one will get a td every week.Hunter looks so smooth out there. Its almost effortlless it seems for him to get open. But hes such a good blocker too.
Chasing points here.Opposite order for me.
Pats going to be going up and down the field. No team can dictate any coverage towards him. His 4-112 was almost 6-180 TD...
Other two are ok-- meredith > Kerley for redzone upside alone. Kerley boom or bust in that brutal offense- plus Kap stinks.
Have been trying to get him as the Shady owner. I do think Jon Williams would surface a little bit, but I fully agree that Gillislee would be the guy.In a season with so many injuries to running backs......I look for a back up, on a running team, with little to no competition if the starter goes down....and a back up who has some real ability.
As I scan the league....I see one player who fits that bill....or should I say BILLS....and that's Mike Gillislee!
I never want to see a player get injured...but with the Bills pounding the rock so often...I could see McCoy getting dinged here soon enough.
He was scheduled to sign last week...and then the meeting was cancelled. I was wondering if that was because they are no longer interested in Karlos...no? Karlos seems to have some issues....with so many running backs injured, and him not being brought in, something is up. I wouldn't pass on Gill....because they "might" re-sign a player they cut...and then cancelled a meeting on recently. Non-sense in my book.....but you are allowed to your own opinion. And...I am just throwing his name out. I spent last week scanning the landscape of back-up running backs....watching tape.....He stood out to me.If shady gets hurt bills would sign Karlos Williams so I'm not wasting a roster spot on Gill as a McCoy owner.
But you will pick up someone because the starter "might" get hurt? The Bills had some type of interest based on setting up a meeting, that interest would grow exponentially if shady went down imo. To each their own but I prefer to keep players who have value without an injury on my bench.He was scheduled to sign last week...and then the meeting was cancelled. I was wondering if that was because they are no longer interested in Karlos...no? Karlos seems to have some issues....with so many running backs injured, and him not being brought in, something is up. I wouldn't pass on Gill....because they "might" re-sign a player they cut...and then cancelled a meeting on recently. Non-sense in my book.....but you are allowed to your own opinion. And...I am just throwing his name out. I spent last week scanning the landscape of back-up running backs....watching tape.....He stood out to me.
Very close to doing this before I read about Dion Lewis. What is the situation with Lewis? If he comes back in week 7 he essentially takes James White current role right?Perhaps James White in PPR.
Supposedly. White has looked good though. And lewis hasn't even started practicing yetVery close to doing this before I read about Dion Lewis. What is the situation with Lewis? If he comes back in week 7 he essentially takes James White current role right?
Lewis is not allowed to practice until taken off the PUP list. Which can't be done until after after week 6 gamesSupposedly. White has looked good though. And lewis hasn't even started practicing yet
Probably at least 30% to make sure you land him. I'm still kicking myself for losing out on Howard in a league in faab when he flashed the week before Lankford went down. I assume Booker will get a ton of work (like Howard) if something did happen to Anderson or possibly sooner if he puts up a couple more stinkers.What FAAB for Booker do you all think? Short bench league, think I might go for him and hold for a few weeks to see how that backfield plays out...
Yes. Doesn't make what I said falseLewis is not allowed to practice until taken off the PUP list. Which can't be done until after after week 6 games
Taking a capable backup on a team that loves to run the football makes a hell of a lot more sense than worrying who might get signed off the street.But you will pick up someone because the starter "might" get hurt? The Bills had some type of interest based on setting up a meeting, that interest would grow exponentially if shady went down imo. To each their own but I prefer to keep players who have value without an injury on my bench.
I guess you missed the second half of my post. I'm done responding though don't want to muck up the thread.Taking a capable backup on a team that loves to run the football makes a hell of a lot more sense than worrying who might get signed off the street.
Sorry. I inferred you thought his injury was holding up his practice participation.Yes. Doesn't make what I said false
Yeah, I'm in similar boat with a weak RB corps and cornucopia of handcuffs, hopefuls etc. Lacey, Ware, D. Henry, Dixon, Powell, waiting for someone to break thru --Booker would be another -Is Booker worth the number one waiver pick this week or should i wait? I'm in a standard league struggling at RB. I have Gurley, Stewart, Johnson Jr., J. White, Dw. Washington
I'll admit my league is conservative in FAAB bidding. I'm bidding 20%. Maybe he goes upwards of 30% depending on the league?For those targeting Coates, what % of FAAB are you going with?
Gonna depend on league size and format. In decent-sized standard scoring leagues where I'm light at WR I'd have no problem bidding 50-75% of my remaining money (if you have more than half your FAAB still in your kitty at this stage, u r doin it rong).LaFours said:For those targeting Coates, what % of FAAB are you going with?