These are guys that were picked up in leagues weeks ago.I'm going to go out on a limb and say people will be going crazy over Crowell in leagues he isn't owned in.
Also Tim Wright for those who need TE help.
Why wait for RGIII to come back? Already talk in D.C. about benching Cousins for Colt McCoy. LOLRyan isn't a sell high after two lousy performances. You aren't getting much if you trade Ryan right now. That's why I am holding Ryan and just deciding which QB off the WW to add as another option.Why do people think Ryan's line will get better? Convince me he isn't a sell high basically
On the subject of Cousins, is there ANY concern he will be benched if/when RG3 comes back?
I'd heavily consider Wright for Holmes because of the league being more TD heavy and extra points for long tds. That's Holmes' strength.Would you cut Kendall Wright for A. Holmes or Beckham
which do you rank higher..
more of a TD heavy league with extra points for long tds
Crowell is still out there in one of mine. Hope I can get him. Surprised hes still there. The smith guy from atl is there too. I think he may be starting for some teams soonThese are guys that were picked up in leagues weeks ago.I'm going to go out on a limb and say people will be going crazy over Crowell in leagues he isn't owned in.
Also Tim Wright for those who need TE help.
I think you should just stick with Vereen and not pick up any of those others. Hes got the best chance of having a big game esp with ridley goneJust read a tweet by Yahoo's Brad Evans that according to the Globe Bellijerk is considering some guy named Jonas Gray with Bolden for Ridley's power back role?! Aargh! I knew I'd regret investing in the Pats' backfield!
i like holmes the best out of that bunch and being td heavy solidifies it even more. wright is pretty useless and beckham seems to have more ppr potential.Would you cut Kendall Wright for A. Holmes or Beckham
which do you rank higher..
more of a TD heavy league with extra points for long tds
Prior to this week Vereen was RB31 and Ridley was RB34 in my main league. That's bye week filler material.what kind of value are we talking about? RB2?Agreed.Agreed.Bolden IMORidley forced out of game with knee injury...if it forces him to miss game(s) does this open the door for James White?
Yeah I agree. I already have vereen, don't really want any more pats rbs. Barely want vereen to be honestPrior to this week Vereen was RB31 and Ridley was RB34 in my main league. That's bye week filler material.what kind of value are we talking about? RB2?Agreed.Agreed.Bolden IMORidley forced out of game with knee injury...if it forces him to miss game(s) does this open the door for James White?
I'm just not seeing the gain in running out to snag Bolden or White, neither of whom are likely to get all of Ridley's touches. My guess is that Vereen is going to get some of Ridley's pie. It may not be much, but since there isn't much to begin with, Ridley's successor can't afford to lose any. If even 2-3 carries slide over onto Vereen's plate, you are suddenly very dependent upon Bolden or White scoring a TD for them to make any kind of contribution to your score. I'm not crazy about depending on any particular Patriot to score TD's for them to add value to my lineup.
I would think so if you carry 5 or more rbsVereen hit our WW. ...is it worth the headache over McKinnon?
are you ####### kidding?Vereen hit our WW. ...is it worth the headache over McKinnon?
def prefer mckinnon. he just got 18 touches and seemed to take over the starting role.Vereen hit our WW. ...is it worth the headache over McKinnon?
I hate to agree since I like Vereen and own him but I think there is a chance for McKinnon to carve out a reliable week to week role. At this point, I just don't get what BB and company are thinking. Sad, because Vereen is averaging about 5 ypc.def prefer mckinnon. he just got 18 touches and seemed to take over the starting role.Vereen hit our WW. ...is it worth the headache over McKinnon?
Just reading the tea leaves a bit but I wonder if Coughlin punishes OBJ for his muffed punt and drops yesterday. Lord knows he started to show his frustration with OBJ's hammy. And we know how he handled David Wilson.That has a bit to do with Gibson being inactive, they split slot reps.Jarvis Landry looked pretty good today.
CrowellCan someone rank these?:
Randle
Beckham
Crowell
Hill
Asiata
Storm Johnson
Randle = Beckham
Hill
Storm
Asiata
Randle's role will remain unchanged as he was already seeing massive amount of targets and RZ looks over the past three or so weeks. Beckham sees the biggest bump but if that makes him more valuable than Randle is anyone's guess. On one hand, he's a rookie and probably doesn't have the same trust with Eli that Randle has built. On the other hand, Randle has been pretty inefficient with his targets and I'm quite confident if Beckham received some of the screens Randle has been getting for example, he could do much more with them.
No one should actively seek to join the fantasy #### show that is the NE backfield. Everyone..stay away.Isn't he kinds small and a little slow. Maybe a backup for Vereen since he's a good receiver.White, that is. Not Bolden imo.
Serious.are you ####### kidding?Vereen hit our WW. ...is it worth the headache over McKinnon?
Who else do you think they are going to start at wr with Cruz out?Just reading the tea leaves a bit but I wonder if Coughlin punishes OBJ for his muffed punt and drops yesterday. Lord knows he started to show his frustration with OBJ's hammy. And we know how he handled David Wilson.That has a bit to do with Gibson being inactive, they split slot reps.Jarvis Landry looked pretty good today.
CrowellCan someone rank these?:
Randle
Beckham
Crowell
Hill
Asiata
Storm Johnson
Randle = Beckham
Hill
Storm
Asiata
Randle's role will remain unchanged as he was already seeing massive amount of targets and RZ looks over the past three or so weeks. Beckham sees the biggest bump but if that makes him more valuable than Randle is anyone's guess. On one hand, he's a rookie and probably doesn't have the same trust with Eli that Randle has built. On the other hand, Randle has been pretty inefficient with his targets and I'm quite confident if Beckham received some of the screens Randle has been getting for example, he could do much more with them.
No one should actively seek to join the fantasy #### show that is the NE backfield. Everyone..stay away.Isn't he kinds small and a little slow. Maybe a backup for Vereen since he's a good receiver.White, that is. Not Bolden imo.
I'd normally see this as a perfect opportunity for OBJ to become fantasy relevant since I believe in his talent and this would create opportunity. But I don't trust Coughlin to not try and motivate Beckham by sitting him.
Yeah, the talent gap between OBJ and Parker/Jernigan is larger than let's say Wilson and Bradshaw of 2012. It's conceivable but unlikely.Who else do you think they are going to start at wr with Cruz out?Just reading the tea leaves a bit but I wonder if Coughlin punishes OBJ for his muffed punt and drops yesterday. Lord knows he started to show his frustration with OBJ's hammy. And we know how he handled David Wilson.That has a bit to do with Gibson being inactive, they split slot reps.Jarvis Landry looked pretty good today.
CrowellCan someone rank these?:
Randle
Beckham
Crowell
Hill
Asiata
Storm Johnson
Randle = Beckham
Hill
Storm
Asiata
Randle's role will remain unchanged as he was already seeing massive amount of targets and RZ looks over the past three or so weeks. Beckham sees the biggest bump but if that makes him more valuable than Randle is anyone's guess. On one hand, he's a rookie and probably doesn't have the same trust with Eli that Randle has built. On the other hand, Randle has been pretty inefficient with his targets and I'm quite confident if Beckham received some of the screens Randle has been getting for example, he could do much more with them.
No one should actively seek to join the fantasy #### show that is the NE backfield. Everyone..stay away.Isn't he kinds small and a little slow. Maybe a backup for Vereen since he's a good receiver.White, that is. Not Bolden imo.
I'd normally see this as a perfect opportunity for OBJ to become fantasy relevant since I believe in his talent and this would create opportunity. But I don't trust Coughlin to not try and motivate Beckham by sitting him.
What are the other options? IMO Rivers loves Floyd type WRs but his floor is super low regardless of format. He's the ultimate feast or famine WR, he literally relies on 50 yard bombs. I probably wouldn't burn priority on him unless I was crazy thin at the position.Is malcolm floyd worth spending the number one ww pic
Sanu carried an outstanding camp and preseason over to the regular season. He also has gotten his bye out of the way. I'd rather have him over them as well.Last 4 games from Sanu in PPR
16.60
14.65
15.67
24.00
I watched the last game and Sanu had 2 other plays, one for deep yardage called back on penalties so it could have been much bigger. And now its looking like Marvin Jones is not coming back and AJ Green is hobbled, may not play next week. Call me crazy but OBJ/Randle haven't shown anything close to Sanu in consistency or ceiling. Even when AJ comes back if Jones stays out Sanu has game.
it's Coughlin,he passionately distrusts rookies...Beckham has to be #1.Randle or Beckham if available. Cruz looks like he's gonna be out quite a while with the patellar tendon.
He's got stud WR talent and now he's playing every snap.
I like Cousins much more than this. For me, Cousins and Palmer are splitting hairs, but I rank Cousins first. Palmer over Flacco by a decent amount.As a Ryan owner, I'll be targeting QBs.
Flacco, Palmer, Tannehill, Cousins, Hoyer and Carr are all out there.
Am I right in thinking Palmer > Flacco > Cousins.... although Hoyer has a very good matchup against TB when Ryan goes on bye.
What are you talking about?Whoever the RB next in line behind Lamar Miller could be a stash since Moreno is now on IR with an ACL.
WOW Tough break for Moreno because I root for him in an underdog kind of way but man, he's probably done. Lamar's value will never be higher.
Could be, but good good luck guessing who will get the most carries from week to week - and that's not even factoring in the presence of Vereen.Just read an article on ESPN Boston talking about how Bolden is a core special teams player with a lot of responsibility on all 4 special teams units.. Should we be looking at White or Gray instead?
I think vereen gets a big bump. But what do I knowCould be, but good good luck guessing who will get the most carries from week to week - and that's not even factoring in the presence of Vereen.Just read an article on ESPN Boston talking about how Bolden is a core special teams player with a lot of responsibility on all 4 special teams units.. Should we be looking at White or Gray instead?
Realize this is because Moreno is out, but Daniel Thomas is terrible. Damien Williams maybe but not Thomas.MCguidance said:Daniel Thomas as a stash?
Not disagreeing, but Thomas has the benefit of being more familiar with the offense.Realize this is because Moreno is out, but Daniel Thomas is terrible. Damien Williams maybe but not Thomas.MCguidance said:Daniel Thomas as a stash?