A tie game IS a conclusion. It’s one point. A win is three. It’s like in hockey.
Not to all people. I feel like there are lots of people that would prefer that there be a clear winner and a clear loser to sporting events. Just reading through this thread leads me to believe that there are people that basically feel like a “tie” is the same as if the game/event never happened. They feel like they are investing their time and energy into watching something—and the only thing they ask in return is a clear result of a win or a loss. Personaly—I agree with you. I think a tie is a valid conclusion—and that sits well with me—but I don’t think that everybody feels the same way.
Except saying that a tie is the same as the game never taking place is just flat out wrong. It’s not an opinion. It’s just wrong.
Ask the US team if their tie between them and England yesterday is the same as having not played. It kept them alive and for fans who knew anything at all, it was very much a desired result against a superior England team.
You can prefer there be a clear winner, but people shouldn’t claim that a tie is the same as not having played at all. That just shows more ignorance of the game.