No one in dynasty is untouchable if your team is awful
Of course not, but it all depends on what you're getting.
I don't think trading a phenomenal player like Graham for a bunch of smaller parts is a wise long term strategy. Of course it's another story if you're able to get a legitimate elite player + extras in return, but trading one mega star for a handful of mediocre pieces is usually a huge mistake IMO. You can always find a WR3 or RB2 to fill out your lineup. Players like Graham come along once or twice per decade. They are much, much harder to find and acquire than supporting pieces.
The longer I play dynasty, the more I think it's all about stockpiling top 10 overall players. The team that has the most first round caliber players usually has the best roster. Depth and complementary players can always be found later.
I agree with that, you need to get another borderline rb1/wr1 or top 5 tight end that is younger than Graham, plus other young pieces that could develop into studs or possibly be in the wr2/rb2 range.
This very much depends on the league type. FFPC you can almost always fill 1-2 lineup spots on waivers with guys that will at least produce enough points to not hurt you too bad. For example, Graham and two waiver players is better most weeks than trading graham for three "decent" players. So in the FFPC, I definitely agree. 3 studs (say you have Peterson, Calvin, and Graham) and some waiver guys will get you a winning record.
In one league I play in, 35 man rosters with a 30 man taxi limit where you can hold guys for 3 years, there is NEVER anything on waivers.
If your team is bad, and you have Graham, it's pretty much a NECESSITY to look into trading him for a slew of picks and young unproven players.
Now, Bell and a couple 1sts is still an easy no for me, regardless of my team or the league structure. For one, it just isnt worth it. And two, you KNOW you can do better.