Bob Magaw
Footballguy
especially compared to last year's class...
* in case it serves as a valuational calibration guideline, maybe hakeem nicks would be a useful "benchmark"...
i think he has future top 10 upside (this may not be a consensus?)...
is there a consensus in the scouting community that bryant is a clearly superior talent and higher graded prospect than nicks (was at this stage of the process last year, comparitively)?
or substitute '09 comp WR, like crabtree or britt (i like nicks better, but think they could all be very good)...
* in case it serves as a valuational calibration guideline, maybe hakeem nicks would be a useful "benchmark"...
i think he has future top 10 upside (this may not be a consensus?)...
is there a consensus in the scouting community that bryant is a clearly superior talent and higher graded prospect than nicks (was at this stage of the process last year, comparitively)?
or substitute '09 comp WR, like crabtree or britt (i like nicks better, but think they could all be very good)...
Last edited by a moderator: