F
FightingWombat
Guest
Homebrew.
ORLY?What did you make?Homebrew.![]()
Did I get this?
No, we just tapped both last night, neither got bottled.This was the third batch of the IPA, we've been pretty consistant with it and the base recipe is going to be used in my hop bomb.. At our large local competition, it got a 46/50 per style and was the highest rated beer!The Gator said:Did I get this?Organized Chaos said:
bout timeI signed up for the clubhouse, just awaiting for my registration to be processed![]()
It was a Mai bock I made in the spring. I didn't get to lager it properly so its not quite a clean tasting as it should be. Still some tasty stuff. AVB in the 7-8 range.Tonight is wheat beer. Just kegged and forced Co2'ed today.ORLY?What did you make?FightingWombat said:Homebrew.![]()
Nice... I just bought my thermostat controller for my chest freezer, the lagering will begin soon!!!It was a Mai bock I made in the spring. I didn't get to lager it properly so its not quite a clean tasting as it should be. Still some tasty stuff. AVB in the 7-8 range.Tonight is wheat beer. Just kegged and forced Co2'ed today.ORLY?What did you make?FightingWombat said:Homebrew.![]()
Please stop.Kstone LT., of course.
Yeah, because at 1am I give a #### how you spell a large group of arthropods, comprising approximately 52000 described species?COME ON!The Gator said:Shared an Old Crustaionat least give it a shot
Yeah, because at 1am I give a #### how you spell a large group of arthropods, comprising approximately 52000 described species?COME ON!The Gator said:Shared an Old Crustaionat least give it a shot
now you're just making #### upIt was one hell of a party.at the Great Taste of the Midwest beer fest in Madison, Wi yesterday. With over 100 craft brewers from all over the midwest, the winner of the day for me was from Bell's brewery in Michigan - called "Batch 6000". Highly recommended if you can find this tremendous ale. I also had Bell's batch 8000 later in the day and recommend it as well.
Still sort of am.Damn, jsut as TT was getting fired up.![]()
We have plenty of other reasonsJethro Q. Walrustitty said:Bombay SapphireDon't hate me because I'mm different

Refrain from going off, repeat, refrain from going off.Hey, before I go off on someone for this statement "DFH 60 and 90 have IBU of 60, and 90" can I find out that that's for sure not true?
tyvm. Just thought it was too much of a coincidence and only referred to the hop time in the boil.Refrain from going off, repeat, refrain from going off.Hey, before I go off on someone for this statement "DFH 60 and 90 have IBU of 60, and 90" can I find out that that's for sure not true?
I had no idea until I looked at the website. I would have been tempted to go off as well.tyvm. Just thought it was too much of a coincidence and only referred to the hop time in the boil.
No TE Mandatory?New poales up in BFFL.
What's the rationale for putting this up for a vote? There are plenty of TEs and this could create separation in the league. If you want to punt TE then punt it. I'd at least want to see someone else express interest in voting on this. If there is I'll put it up.No TE Mandatory?New poales up in BFFL.
Now we have punters?What's the rationale for putting this up for a vote? There are plenty of TEs and this could create separation in the league. If you want to punt TE then punt it. I'd at least want to see someone else express interest in voting on this. If there is I'll put it up.No TE Mandatory?New poales up in BFFL.

Several people at TBS have suggested this today, I know that you dont go there much so I figured I'd mention it.Thats the whole point IMO, there ARE plenty that could create seperation in the league and with this being such a deep league, gives that many more options in the draft especially when the WR's are flying off the board since we only start one RB.Edit: Reading the punt the TE comment, I'm not sure we are on the same page. I want a mandatory TE, currently it doesnt appear we have one.. That is allWhat's the rationale for putting this up for a vote? There are plenty of TEs and this could create separation in the league. If you want to punt TE then punt it. I'd at least want to see someone else express interest in voting on this. If there is I'll put it up.No TE Mandatory?New poales up in BFFL.
There IS a mandatory TE. Some wanted to know if the TE spot itself was a WR/TE or whether that was another spot entirely. The league site has all the information right now current and accurate.Organized Chaos said:Several people at TBS have suggested this today, I know that you dont go there much so I figured I'd mention it.Thats the whole point IMO, there ARE plenty that could create seperation in the league and with this being such a deep league, gives that many more options in the draft especially when the WR's are flying off the board since we only start one RB.Edit: Reading the punt the TE comment, I'm not sure we are on the same page. I want a mandatory TE, currently it doesnt appear we have one.. That is allculdeus said:What's the rationale for putting this up for a vote? There are plenty of TEs and this could create separation in the league. If you want to punt TE then punt it. I'd at least want to see someone else express interest in voting on this. If there is I'll put it up.Organized Chaos said:No TE Mandatory?culdeus said:New poales up in BFFL.
Good deal, its just that all the poals that we were voting on suggested otherwise. thanks.There IS a mandatory TE. Some wanted to know if the TE spot itself was a WR/TE or whether that was another spot entirely. The league site has all the information right now current and accurate.Organized Chaos said:Several people at TBS have suggested this today, I know that you dont go there much so I figured I'd mention it.Thats the whole point IMO, there ARE plenty that could create seperation in the league and with this being such a deep league, gives that many more options in the draft especially when the WR's are flying off the board since we only start one RB.Edit: Reading the punt the TE comment, I'm not sure we are on the same page. I want a mandatory TE, currently it doesnt appear we have one.. That is allculdeus said:What's the rationale for putting this up for a vote? There are plenty of TEs and this could create separation in the league. If you want to punt TE then punt it. I'd at least want to see someone else express interest in voting on this. If there is I'll put it up.Organized Chaos said:No TE Mandatory?culdeus said:New poales up in BFFL.
Agreed. So, it's 1 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE AND 1 RB/WR/TE Flex, right? Plus others of course.Good deal, its just that all the poals that we were voting on suggested otherwise. thanks.There IS a mandatory TE. Some wanted to know if the TE spot itself was a WR/TE or whether that was another spot entirely. The league site has all the information right now current and accurate.Organized Chaos said:Several people at TBS have suggested this today, I know that you dont go there much so I figured I'd mention it.Thats the whole point IMO, there ARE plenty that could create seperation in the league and with this being such a deep league, gives that many more options in the draft especially when the WR's are flying off the board since we only start one RB.Edit: Reading the punt the TE comment, I'm not sure we are on the same page. I want a mandatory TE, currently it doesnt appear we have one.. That is allculdeus said:What's the rationale for putting this up for a vote? There are plenty of TEs and this could create separation in the league. If you want to punt TE then punt it. I'd at least want to see someone else express interest in voting on this. If there is I'll put it up.Organized Chaos said:No TE Mandatory?culdeus said:New poales up in BFFL.
Also, you need to tweak the starting info a little bit.Good deal, its just that all the poals that we were voting on suggested otherwise. thanks.There IS a mandatory TE. Some wanted to know if the TE spot itself was a WR/TE or whether that was another spot entirely. The league site has all the information right now current and accurate.Organized Chaos said:Several people at TBS have suggested this today, I know that you dont go there much so I figured I'd mention it.Thats the whole point IMO, there ARE plenty that could create seperation in the league and with this being such a deep league, gives that many more options in the draft especially when the WR's are flying off the board since we only start one RB.Edit: Reading the punt the TE comment, I'm not sure we are on the same page. I want a mandatory TE, currently it doesnt appear we have one.. That is allculdeus said:What's the rationale for putting this up for a vote? There are plenty of TEs and this could create separation in the league. If you want to punt TE then punt it. I'd at least want to see someone else express interest in voting on this. If there is I'll put it up.Organized Chaos said:No TE Mandatory?culdeus said:New poales up in BFFL.
should beStarting Lineup Setup Total Starters: 10 Number of Starting QBs: 1 Number of Starting RBs: 2-3 Number of Starting WRs: 3-4 Number of Starting TEs: 1-2 Number of Starting PKs: 1 Number of Starting Defs: 1
Starting Lineup Setup Total Starters: 8 Number of Starting QBs: 1 Number of Starting RBs: 1-2 Number of Starting WRs: 2-3 Number of Starting TEs: 1-2 Number of Starting PKs: 1 Number of Starting Defs: 1
site's down, JF. Deal With It.wrong thread, fellas![]()
edit: oops, that was quick.site's down, JF. Deal With It.wrong thread, fellas![]()
edit: oops, that was quick.

Want more Portsmouth Kate??site's down, JF. Deal With It.wrong thread, fellas![]()
edit: oops, that was quick.
![]()

Hack, take Culdeus off ignore. What did he ever do to you?? TIA.Can someone get urbanhack to take me off ignore?
