It's really tough for me to believe the bolded.This one's easy.
Steve Smith and Larry Fitzgerald.
And though not an individual, Bengals D was a stud point scorer week in, week out, but now I'm playing matchups.
If you've got someone like Jordy Nelson on your bench it makes it tough to keep Fitzy in there at this point of the year.It's really tough for me to believe the bolded.This one's easy.
Steve Smith and Larry Fitzgerald.
And though not an individual, Bengals D was a stud point scorer week in, week out, but now I'm playing matchups.
Week 14 he will be a stud. Week 15 you might as well sit him against the 49ers.'CentralPA said:Could Mendenhall be consider a stud still? He has scored 5 TDs in his last four games though so he's starting to gain my trust back a little bit.
If a guy doesn't score 100 yds and/or a TD every week. You cannot trust them in your lineup.Larry Fitzgerald is #9 in scoring in ppr leagues and is targeted more than all but 4 or 5 receivers. You people are crazy
It has nothing to do with Nelson, GB seems to always have a flavor of the week. One week it is Jones, then Finley, then Driver, then Nelson. Getting like Saint WRs. Never know who it going to be from week to week.Bowe & Steve Smiff.Jordy Nelson is getting close. Man, for a guy that catches almost everything thrown his way, GB sure isn't utilizing Nelson as well as they could.
Yep, that's I rarely start Nelson. He was a good bye week and inury replacement. Plus, good luck starting over Mega, Welker and AJ GreenIt has nothing to do with Nelson, GB seems to always have a flavor of the week. One week it is Jones, then Finley, then Driver, then Nelson. Getting like Saint WRs. Never know who it going to be from week to week.Bowe & Steve Smiff.Jordy Nelson is getting close. Man, for a guy that catches almost everything thrown his way, GB sure isn't utilizing Nelson as well as they could.
Yep, very true... In my case, Steve Smith likely goes to my bench in favor of MWTB (who I haven't started since I had to use him to cover week 9 BYEs of Megatron & Smith). Megatron's production has been underwhelming, but even his disappointing outings result in 8-10 pts in my .5 PPR (for WRs) league, so it was intentional hyperbole on my part saying I'd consider benching him. After such a great 1st half of the season, it's a shame seeing Smiff struggling to be a top 30 WR any given week. I'm guessing most owners are just frustrated & when push comes to shove, they'll stick w/ their "stud" during the playoffs.Benching answers are useless in a vaccum.It all depends on who you have to start instead of the stud you're benching to determine relative value and frustration.
Last time I did, he scored 2 TDs. Own Fitz, VJax, Gronk, Harvin, Graham. TE = WR in this league. Can start up to 4. Always a tough choice, and usually I sit the wrong one. nuts.Fitz is scaring the life out of me but how do you sit him down?
Believe.In a PPR league, since week 5 he's only had 1 game with more than 15 fantasy points. That was week 10 where he got off for 33.6pts. The last two weeks he's gotten less than 10 fantasy points. And with Kolb throwing the ball, I'm very leery going forward.It's really tough for me to believe the bolded.This one's easy.
Steve Smith and Larry Fitzgerald.
And though not an individual, Bengals D was a stud point scorer week in, week out, but now I'm playing matchups.
depends on the matchup. Sit vs 49ersSteven Jackson
I was so wrong on SJ and Bradford this year. Targetted both in many leagues and luckily I think many were thinking a lot like me and I couldn't get them in a few leagues. I would sit everyone except Foster, Rice, Peterson, and MJD vs Niners. Nasty run D.depends on the matchup. Sit vs 49ersSteven Jackson
He's top 10.Believe.In a PPR league, since week 5 he's only had 1 game with more than 15 fantasy points. That was week 10 where he got off for 33.6pts. The last two weeks he's gotten less than 10 fantasy points. And with Kolb throwing the ball, I'm very leery going forward.It's really tough for me to believe the bolded.This one's easy.
Steve Smith and Larry Fitzgerald.
And though not an individual, Bengals D was a stud point scorer week in, week out, but now I'm playing matchups.
He's a stud in name only this year. I still start him and take my chances, but not with much expectation.
Well, he's #11th in our scoring but close enough. I said I was starting him. The thread title references studs we can no longer trust. Me not trusting him and me not starting him are two different things. I've made my bed with Fitzgerald and Steve Smith. Thing with Fitz is that he's had only two really good weeks. Week 2 and Week 10. And he's trending down right now. That's all I'm saying. I'm starting him, but I don't trust him. Nor do I trust Steve Smith, but I'm starting him too.He's top 10.Believe.In a PPR league, since week 5 he's only had 1 game with more than 15 fantasy points. That was week 10 where he got off for 33.6pts. The last two weeks he's gotten less than 10 fantasy points. And with Kolb throwing the ball, I'm very leery going forward.It's really tough for me to believe the bolded.This one's easy.
Steve Smith and Larry Fitzgerald.
And though not an individual, Bengals D was a stud point scorer week in, week out, but now I'm playing matchups.
He's a stud in name only this year. I still start him and take my chances, but not with much expectation.You're nuts if you sit Larry Fitzgerald. Obviously depending on who you're starting in his place.
This was Kolb's first start after a month off. Don't overreact.
The problem is the trend- over the last 3 weeks Fitz is WR #35. In that same time-frame he's targeted 16th most, which isnt stellar. Speaking of targets, with Kolb at QB the first 8 weeks he was tied with 6 guys for WR14 in targets. This week he was 27th in targets. If you think he's going to be a top 3 targeted WR going forward the numbers to date are against you. Fitzgerald is fine, but his offense is running the ball a lot and Kolb doesn't force him the ball or take big shots with him as much as you'd like to see. Sure he could score 2 tds, but he could also go for 50 yards and no tds. For most years and most owners that isn't a disaster, but with the pass happiness of this season and potential options like AJ Green or Laurent Robinson tempting you, its a tougher decision than it might have been. In 3WR (much less flex) leagues its not much of a question unless you are crazy stacked, but in a 2WR leagues its very much a question mark.I skimmed over the last part where you mentioned you were starting him. My apologies. I can see the frustration with Fitz, but it isn't necessarily reality. Drafting a guy in the top 3 and having them play around WR10 isn't a tragedy. Several Fitzgerald owners missed out on his big game against the Eagles. Those types of days when a player was on the bench skews the view of their season overall. He's going to have more targets than all but about 3 WRs any given week, and he's a monster in the red zone. I don't see how you bench that. WR production is the least consistent of any position. Even Calvin Johnson has had a few down games in a row. It only takes one huge performance to get the numbers back on track though. I'd hate to have it happen on my bench in the fantasy postseason.
Yep. Gore plays until they wrap up the bye week but that doesn't mean he even plays the whole game. Once the game is in the bag, he sits, just like this past week.Frank Gore comes to mind.
At this point I don't even know if the matchup makes a difference.Do you feel comfortable starting him, even as a flex, against Seattle (in Seattle), Cincinnatti, and Pittsburgh. Practically worthless in the FF Playoffs. Not to mention he's likely got Brandstater at QB now, and his OLine is TRASHED. The offense as a whole is scoring less than a TD per game...and can't even sniff the redzone! OUCH.If I knew Starks would miss serious time, I might drop SJ for Ryan Grant who is on waivers in one of my leagues. It's bad.depends on the matchup. Sit vs 49ersSteven Jackson
I'd bench him. He definitely can't be trusted.Calvin Johnson has been pretty miserable post BYE week. 1 TD in 4 weeks and not a single 100 yd game.