Good Posting Judge
Footballguy
Could you beat up Manny Pacquiao in a street fight?Ketamine Dreams said:Haha. Laughable.
Could you beat up Manny Pacquiao in a street fight?Ketamine Dreams said:Haha. Laughable.
I once had all 3 top scores in “Discs of Tron”Happened to me decades ago. I was the king of Joust and Pong. Next thing you know I was sweeping the streets I used to own.
Joking aside there is no doubt. Yesterday’s golfers were skilled but weren’t the fittest. Often smoked. Drank every night. Tiger changed all of that. Now the great majority are super conditioned, cross trained athletes who take all aspects of their health including nutrition very seriously. And they do exercises centered on core to gain swing speed. They are athletes.The majority of the golfers on the PGA had to choose golf full time over other sports at the age of 13/14. Some keep playing other sports (see Gary Woodland who had a scholarship offer to play hoops). But to be great at golf requires almost all of your time to improve. These guys are athletes and can do things none of us posting here can do - excel at a sport to the point where it's your livelihood.
Uh whatever bruhOh please. If you played Gary Woodland one vs one in hoops to a score of 10, you'd not score a point. If you faced Dustin Johnson in the batter's box, he'd strike you out in 3 pitches. And Brooks Koepka would knock your manhood in the dirt if you lined up against him. But cool bench stats, bruh.
Is a golfer ever out of breath? No. Not really athletes. I mean one can classify them as athletes but it's a pretty loose definition of the term.Joking aside there is no doubt. Yesterday’s golfers were skilled but weren’t the fittest. Often smoked. Drank every night. Tiger changed all of that. Now the great majority are super conditioned, cross trained athletes who take all aspects of their health including nutrition very seriously. And they do exercises centered on core to gain swing speed. They are athletes.
The only argument that could be made otherwise is the domination by Asians on the LPGA. One could argue the best female athletes aren’t centered in Asia per se. But the willingness to put time required to master a skill through endless hours of repetition puts them ahead of others. No different than piano, cello, etc. Need ability but power is a little less important and the precise skill can be mastered with enough time.
At a PGA level? Probably not.Is a golfer ever out of breath? No. Not really athletes. I mean one can classify them as athletes but it's a pretty loose definition of the term.
I'm not doubting this applies to some, but to the untrained eye, it doesn’t appear true for the majority of golfers.Joking aside there is no doubt. Yesterday’s golfers were skilled but weren’t the fittest. Often smoked. Drank every night. Tiger changed all of that. Now the great majority are super conditioned, cross trained athletes who take all aspects of their health including nutrition very seriously. And they do exercises centered on core to gain swing speed. They are athletes.
The only argument that could be made otherwise is the domination by Asians on the LPGA. One could argue the best female athletes aren’t centered in Asia per se. But the willingness to put time required to master a skill through endless hours of repetition puts them ahead of others. No different than piano, cello, etc. Need ability but power is a little less important and the precise skill can be mastered with enough time.
It's actually the case for 70%+ of the golfers today. Patrick Reed, who would've been considered a fatass 2 years ago, has lost 40 lbs the last year and is working out 3+ hours a day. Just about every good golfer puts almost as much time in the gym now as they do on the practice range. It's a different game today than it was in Hal Sutton's day.I'm not doubting this applies to some, but to the untrained eye, it doesn’t appear true for the majority of golfers.
Also, why are you assuming Asian women aren’t good athletes?
Do you have a source for your numbers?It's actually the case for 70%+ of the golfers today. Patrick Reed, who would've been considered a fatass 2 years ago, has lost 40 lbs the last year and is working out 3+ hours a day. Just about every good golfer puts almost as much time in the gym now as they do on the practice range. It's a different game today than it was in Hal Sutton's day.
Even if true, who cares. Being in reasonable shape does not make someone an 'athlete'. My dad's in his 70's and works out a couple hours a day.It's actually the case for 70%+ of the golfers today. Patrick Reed, who would've been considered a fatass 2 years ago, has lost 40 lbs the last year and is working out 3+ hours a day. Just about every good golfer puts almost as much time in the gym now as they do on the practice range. It's a different game today than it was in Hal Sutton's day.
Indian valley in Novato is a mofo to walk with all the elevation changes, it's a work out in itself. Now the important part, are you a member at mayacamas?At a PGA level? Probably not.
That said, I’ve played a few courses (e.g. Mayacamas in Santa Rosa) where the elevation change hole to hole, along with overall course distance/difficulty, left me gasping and sore at the end of 18.
1. Yes, Indian Valley is “cart only” for me.Indian valley in Novato is a mofo to walk with all the elevation changes, it's a work out in itself. Now the important part, are you a member at mayacamas?
you know what else they aren't? TRAVELERS!!!!Anyone ever watch NBA clips from the 60s/70s? Maybe 10% of those guys have what you would consider "athleticism" today.
Agreed. I laugh at anyone who says Tiger Woods or Brooks Koepka aren't athletes. Come on. You don't have to be a great athlete to be great at golf but it does help.I do not understand the fascination with the golfers are not athletes argument. So what? Skill is most important, but the better physical condition you're in the better you are at the game.
You live in the north bay?1. Yes, Indian Valley is “cart only” for me.
2. No, I don’t have FBG money for Mayacamas.
Is Indian Valley a relatively new course? I don't recall it being there when I lived in the area. Played most of my north bay golf at Fountaingrove and San Geronimo.1. Yes, Indian Valley is “cart only” for me.
2. No, I don’t have FBG money for Mayacamas.
IV has been around for a good while. I played SG once, and it may be shut down now. Never got on at Fountaingrove, but heard it’s similar to Mayacamas in elevation change (and I think they’ll allow you to ride instead of walking only).Is Indian Valley a relatively new course? I don't recall it being there when I lived in the area. Played most of my north bay golf at Fountaingrove and San Geronimo.
I see Fountaingrove is private now. It used to be public and when I left its future was up in the air as the Japanese investors who owned it were desperate to sell and couldn't find buyers.IV has been around for a good while. I played SG once, and it may be shut down now. Never got on at Fountaingrove, but heard it’s similar to Mayacamas in elevation change (and I think they’ll allow you to ride instead of walking only).
I usually get on at Oakmont West (short drive from home), and have played a good number of North Bay tracks. Bodega Bay is probably my favorite, though the wind can get nasty in the late afternoon.
Sounds good, I just got stitches in my wrist but should be good to go in a couple weeks.Quint said:Hit me up....I’m usually good for Sunday/Mondays.
I talked to a friend and he says I've played it. No recollection.Sounds good, I just got stitches in my wrist but should be good to go in a couple weeks.
For the Indian valley question, I’ve lived up here basically 20 years and it’s been here since I’ve lived here. It’s a great course once it dries out after winter.
Couldn't it be about imperfect knowledge or the failure of sensory perception? Why hubris, if it's deceptively short by according to all the information that one has?I live on a course (LAM!). Our backyard is right around where most drives land, it's a par 4 that's about 380 yards. If you're on the left side of the green, near us, you have to carry a swamp that's deceptively longer than it looks. I see people conk balls into that thing all day, and it's really a metaphor for the hubris of mankind.
If you really take a look at it, after a few seconds, you can really gauge that there's more swamp that you have to carry than you think. But I think SOME people *cough* *Americans* *cough* never really take the time to study a situation, we just barrel on in.Couldn't it be about imperfect knowledge or the failure of sensory perception? Why hubris, if it's deceptively short by according to all the information that one has?
See 12 on Sunday at Augusta this year.I live on a course (LAM!). Our backyard is right around where most drives land, it's a par 4 that's about 380 yards. If you're on the left side of the green, near us, you have to carry a swamp that's deceptively longer than it looks. I see people conk balls into that thing all day, and it's really a metaphor for the hubris of mankind.
Natch. I stand corrected. Sorry about the wimmins. Must be crazy.If you really take a look at it, after a few seconds, you can really gauge that there's more swamp that you have to carry than you think. But I think SOME people *cough* *Americans* *cough* never really take the time to study a situation, we just barrel on in.
Wish I could post a map, but most of the women of FBG are stalking me and I can't end up with another ___________ in my closet at night scenario.
I watch a lot of golf but totally agree with this statement.As for watching I don’t like to watch easy courses where these guys shoot 25 under. No John Deere classics with lesser fields and lesser tests.