Sea Bass will be on the next boat to Poland if he commits anything serious much less a felony.Still like your odds though.The Jamal Lewis owner is thinking he might win this. The commissioner has ruled that a plea bargain must stilll result in a FELONY guilty plea. I think he's screwed; there's no way Lewis pleads guilty to a felony charge.Janakowski is still in it to win it....
We have had a rule like this for 4 years now. We just increased it from $10 to $20 though.Any team with a player that gets arrested pays the fine.$20 felony bonus for the first team to have one of its players convicted during the season.I can't stop laughing!!
thats a cool rule.We considered a rule last year where the high score for each week would get to rename the team that posted the low score, for the rest of that week.Never went ahead with it though...
In one of my leagues this year, the commish decided (after the draft, mind you) to institute a home field advantage of 5 points in favor of the higher seeded team in the first round of the playoffs. In the second round, home field advantage goes up to 10 points. That is quite simply one of the most bizarre rules I've ever seen in about fifteen years of playing FF. It's just stupid and indefensible.What's the strangest league rule you've ever seen?
So, the first player to allegedly commit a crime wins? Seems this would get decided by the first week every year in this league.Back to the original poster - So, did the Jamal owner win, or is the commish still waiting for it to officially be labeled a "felony?"We do the same in my league, but it is $15, and it doesn't have to be felony, and you don't have to be convicted.
Sounds like a great idea to me.Places more importance on the regular season; reduces the luck quotient of the playoffs. Good stuff! We have a 'sucks to be you' award just like the 'quit your whinin' award mentioned above.home field advantage of 5 points in favor of the higher seeded team in the first round of the playoffs. In the second round, home field advantage goes up to 10 points. That is quite simply one of the most bizarre rules I've ever seen in about fifteen years of playing FF. It's just stupid and indefensible.
So...how do you justify unilaterally changing league rules after the draft...or increasing the HFA from 5 in week 1 of the playoffs to 10 in week 2.A 10 point head start in a playoff game is beyond ridiculous.BTW, I'm high scorer overall, and have been high scorer two of 4 weeks, only missing by 1 point in each of the other two weeks, so I very well could possibly be the one receiving the HFA throughout the playoffs. That doesn't make the rule any less stupid or any more defensible.sounds like a great idea to me
Changing it after the draft was a bad idea, but I don't see how he gained any sort of advantage by doing so.10 points is also excessive, but it's hardly:So...how do you justify changing league rules after the draft...or increasing the HFA from 5 in week 1 of the playoffs to 10 in week 2.A 10 point head start in a playoff game beyond ridiculous.Sounds like a great idea to me
That is quite simply one of the most bizarre rules I've ever seen in about fifteen years of playing FF. It's just stupid and indefensible.
Was this a unilateral decision made by the commish or did your league vote on it?So...how do you justify changing league rules after the draft...or increasing the HFA from 5 in week 1 of the playoffs to 10 in week 2.A 10 point head start in a playoff game beyond ridiculous.Sounds like a great idea to me
Speaking of not happenning frequently, I would have thought that having such a potentially large point differential in the playoffs would have given too much of an advantage to those with it. However, over the last two years and twelve total post season contests, the point differential advantage only came into play once.This is a different rule in one of my H2H leagues, but one I like nonetheless. For all the teams that make the playoffs, teams are awarded the difference between their weekly average and their opponents'. For example, if Team A averaged 140 points per week and he's playing Team B in round 1 of the playoffs who only averaged 125 point per week, then Team B would have to outscore Team A by more than the 15 point differential. Very interesting and it awards teams that score well and don't just "squeak" into the playoffs. Some people don't like it though.We have the 'home field advantage' rule, but it is only 1/2 a point. We have ties in the regular season and if a tie occurs in the playoffs, the higher seed wins. It has never happened, though.
The details of the plea agreement are not yet public, so no conclusion has been made. The winner won't get his money until the end of the season anyway.So, the first player to allegedly commit a crime wins? Seems this would get decided by the first week every year in this league.Back to the original poster - So, did the Jamal owner win, or is the commish still waiting for it to officially be labeled a "felony?"We do the same in my league, but it is $15, and it doesn't have to be felony, and you don't have to be convicted.
Depends on the scoring systemSpeaking of not happenning frequently, I would have thought that having such a potentially large point differential in the playoffs would have given too much of an advantage to those with it. However, over the last two years and twelve total post season contests, the point differential advantage only came into play once.This is a different rule in one of my H2H leagues, but one I like nonetheless. For all the teams that make the playoffs, teams are awarded the difference between their weekly average and their opponents'. For example, if Team A averaged 140 points per week and he's playing Team B in round 1 of the playoffs who only averaged 125 point per week, then Team B would have to outscore Team A by more than the 15 point differential. Very interesting and it awards teams that score well and don't just "squeak" into the playoffs. Some people don't like it though.We have the 'home field advantage' rule, but it is only 1/2 a point. We have ties in the regular season and if a tie occurs in the playoffs, the higher seed wins. It has never happened, though.
That's kind of clever, actually...what do the sharks think?
Clever way of doing it. In ours, home field gets first opportunity to win in ties. First bench pts win, so it's not guaranteed (negative pts count against and some teams get all zeroes for the 4 player bench due to injury/bye).just had a rule proposed for next season for home field advantage that eliminates the allocation of points, and instead gives a subtler advantage.the home team may change his starting lineup up until kickoff of the game the player is participating in. (this is typical of many leagues, including ours)the visiting team, however, must declare his starting lineup by kickoff of the first game of the week.normally, this won't matter a lick. it can be pivotal, though, when your player is a game-time decision, particularly when a thursday game (or to a lesser extent a saturday game) is involved.should add an interesting wrinkle without going overboard on the advantage.anyone have any experience with this? what do the sharks think?
I don't know if I'm a shark but homefield advantage should not play a role in any FANTASY FOOTBALL game other than just for fun.just had a rule proposed for next season for home field advantage that eliminates the allocation of points, and instead gives a subtler advantage.the home team may change his starting lineup up until kickoff of the game the player is participating in. (this is typical of many leagues, including ours)the visiting team, however, must declare his starting lineup by kickoff of the first game of the week.normally, this won't matter a lick. it can be pivotal, though, when your player is a game-time decision, particularly when a thursday game (or to a lesser extent a saturday game) is involved.should add an interesting wrinkle without going overboard on the advantage.anyone have any experience with this? what do the sharks think?
Same here. And no rushing yards for for WRs or QBs. Yet, every year someone drafts Vick as their starting QB.I'm in a league that doesn't count receiving yards for runningbacks. Go figure.
That is actually a good rule. Did not think a group of people would do that.Same here. And no rushing yards for for WRs or QBs. Yet, every year someone drafts Vick as their starting QB.I'm in a league that doesn't count receiving yards for runningbacks. Go figure.
How often has this happened? I remember the Cowboys' kicker running one in a few years back, I think...After quite a number of beers last year in the preseason league meeting, we voted on including this rule just to piss off the people that didn't show up:
CRAZY KICKER TRADE RULE
If a starting kicker scores a non-passing TD the owner
of the kicker may evoke the Crazy Kicker Trade Rule which
means he can trade his starting kicker for 1 player on his
opponent's starting lineup for that week. The trade takes
effect for the next week and is permanent. Once a team has
had the Crazy Kicker Trade Rule evoked on him he then gets
Crazy Kicker Trade Rule Immunity and no one may evoke the
Crazy Kicker Trade Rule on him for the rest of the season.
Furthermore, once a team has Crazy Kicker Trade Rule
Immunity, if an opponent's kicker scores a non-passing TD
in their matchup the team with Crazy Kicker Trade Rule
Immunity may evoke the Crazy Kicker Trade Rule against his
opponent even though it was not his kicker that scored the
TD.
I can't remember it ever happening, but I'm sure it has.How often has this happened? I remember the Cowboys' kicker running one in a few years back, I think...