Hoss_Cartwright
Footballguy
Just for fun, I would like to know which of these issues do you IGNORE when evaluating players.
Yeah, I tend to like the quick Colts playersFatness
or ______________ (fill in the many thousands of names). Lately that could be Malcom Kelly.Injury History. Though sometimes i just got a hunch to stay away from a player cause i got a feeling he's gonna get injured. This year that player is ADP![]()
so at 1.2 last year you took Stephen Jackson? Well im the guy who took Westbrook at 1.5.or ______________ (fill in the many thousands of names). Lately that could be Malcom Kelly.Injury History. Though sometimes i just got a hunch to stay away from a player cause i got a feeling he's gonna get injured. This year that player is ADP![]()
what does that have to do with the price of tea in China?so at 1.2 last year you took Stephen Jackson? Well im the guy who took Westbrook at 1.5.or ______________ (fill in the many thousands of names). Lately that could be Malcom Kelly.Injury History. Though sometimes i just got a hunch to stay away from a player cause i got a feeling he's gonna get injured. This year that player is ADP![]()
Sure I've been burned...but I've also stolen many players that way.But to be clear...I read this as HISTORY. If a player is still recovering or hurt at draft time (not yet proven they are back healthy), that's an entirely different ball of wax.I'm flabbergasted that Injury history is tied for the lead. I guess those 5 voters haven't been burned by the bum knee or chronic ######l pain.
I would be very surprised if anything other than BMI won this poll.Even though BMI does a good of explaining difference like short and small, there are not enough of ALL RBs in the NFL outside of the target BMI range to be of any predictive use.
Me2, but I wonder how people are interpreting "injury history" and how that may help skew the results.I would be very surprised if anything other than BMI won this poll.Even though BMI does a good of explaining difference like short and small, there are not enough of ALL RBs in the NFL outside of the target BMI range to be of any predictive use.
Mine is because Ricky Williams might start or get a lot of carries. Or Warrick Dunn will create a RBBC. Those two are funny.Just for fun, I would like to know which of these issues do you IGNORE when evaluating players.
I also consider whether the player has sat for many injuries or if he's able to play through them. Take Westbrook, seems the guy is almost always banged up, yet he plays. OTOH, take Jeremy Shockey, it might be my perception, but he seems to miss time for injuries where other players would play.Chronic injuries, maybe. But that's it. I think every situation is different and it's hard to put a generic label over a specific situation.
Exactly. Every player should be evaluated independently and on his very individual situation. For one a lack of speed could be the killer, for another character could be the problem, and another could have serious injury issues. On the other hand a player could be so skilled we overlook his lack of speed, or research a character problem to find it is mostly meaningless, or the injury history is nothing major just fluky. One case at a time. Draw your best conclusions. Favor no particular issue over the others.Chronic injuries, maybe. But that's it.
I think every situation is different and it's hard to put a generic label over a specific situation.
BMI matters more in dynasty leagues, IMO... the primary benefit is figuring out which RBs have workhorse capacity and which don't. In a redraft league, BMI is trumped by opportunity. BMI matters for WRs, but its usefulness is more limited.It answers some of what owners think when they draft rookies in dynasty leagues and /or draft in redraft leagues. I wish I would have made a distinction in the thread title. Character issues probably means more in dynasty leagues than redraft leagues. Speed probably means the same for both, BMI leans more toward redraft leagues, and injury history means more to redraft leagues, with a disclaimer. It means a lot to dynasty leagues if the very thought of the injury lingering exits. Especially if it involves anything below the belt.
I read an article that said the five most common reasons for a player to bust is
1. age
2. coming off a career year after compiling mediocre stats for most of their career
3. major competition brought in for their job either in the draft or free agency
4. had a major injury the previous season
5. switched teams and the new team is much less talented than the old
Derek Anderson - 2
Edgerrin James - 1
John Kitna - 1
Derrick Mason - 3, 1
Reggie Williams - 4
Joey Galloway - 1
Bobby Engram - 2, 1, 4
DeAngelo and Javon are going in the 9th and 14th rounds in 10 team drafts, pretty hard for them to be 'busts'. DA had 3 starts and 5 games in his career at QB, not nearly enough time to talk about his career.I read an article that said the five most common reasons for a player to bust is1. age2. coming off a career year after compiling mediocre stats for most of their career3. major competition brought in for their job either in the draft or free agency4. had a major injury the previous season5. switched teams and the new team is much less talented than the oldA lot of times, your fellow fantasy GMs won't be aware of negative developments like this, causing the player in question to be drafted far higher than they should.Under this criteria the following players are risks:Wes Welker - 2Javon Walker - 5Willie Parker - 3DeAngelo Williams - 3Also Derek Anderson - 2Edgerrin James - 1John Kitna - 1Derrick Mason - 3Reggie Williams - 4Joey Galloway - 1Bobby Engram - 2
15915151514not a guy who misses a lot of time. I don't like shockey, but hes no #####.FUBAR said:I also consider whether the player has sat for many injuries or if he's able to play through them. Take Westbrook, seems the guy is almost always banged up, yet he plays. OTOH, take Jeremy Shockey, it might be my perception, but he seems to miss time for injuries where other players would play.Chronic injuries, maybe. But that's it. I think every situation is different and it's hard to put a generic label over a specific situation.