What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Who is the Vikings QB? (1 Viewer)

Gr00vus

Footballguy
I haven't seen any news since the blurb on the blogger yesterday about some Vikings players lobbying for Tavaris Jackson. I was looking at the Viking QB as an alternative to Vick in the playoffs, but now I have no clue who that would be - anyone got any news and/or opinions on this one?

ETA: Well the blogger is telling me the Vikes have resigned Drew Henson to the practice squad, but I don't think that means much right now.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Head Coach Brad ChildressOK, injury-wise, Brooks (Bollinger) continues to improve here. He's working on his range on motion. After he gets through all treatments today, I'll have a way that we end up listing him. But he's continuing to improve. He's still extremely sore and not where he needs to be yet. Chester Taylor is improving. He spent some time in the pool to try to move around, get himself feeling comfortable. Anyone that has had a rib injury knows how those things feel, let alone moving and getting poked on it. He's treating. He's working at it, and he's improving as well. Matt (Birk) saw a doctor. He appears to be OK. He'll have some additional testing next week, but he played on through that. Chris Kluwe has improved today.In addition, a practice squad move we've made, we brought Drew Henson back. He knows something about our system, spent time with us, knows how we do business. So he'll be here to be able to take some of those reps and preparing our defense.And then from my standpoint, four games to go, but all we can worry about is the Detroit Lions. Detroit gave New England a run for their money largely because New England did not do a great job of taking care of the football and that will always turn games to close games. It's a divisional game, NFC game, big game for us obviously as we move forward to this fourth quarter of the season.Q: Where do you stand on the quarterback situation?A: Later in the week is when I'm going to make the decision. You know guys, I'm probably not going to share that with you just because I'm not competitively going to do that. Both of those guys have got to take reps and they will take reps.Q: Have you made a personal decision on who will start?A: Yeah, I have.Q: Is it hard to consider Bollinger with his injury?A: Not as he stands right now. I mean he's still trying to get his arm above his shoulder.Q: Have you shared this information with the quarterback you have chosen?A: Yes, I have.Q: Have all quarterbacks had equal reps this week? Is it 50-50 at this point?A: No, it's not quite 50-50. I mean if one guy is repped to play, another guy doesn't need to take it again if that guy needs to see it. It may be 50-50, sometimes it can be, depending on how many plays are in a period, 60-40, "hey you've got to see this one", you know. They are both standing there taking mental reps and both looking at them.Q: Does this have an impact on your receivers?A: I don't think so. I think it more has to do with cadence and snap count and things that are just as important as center/quarterback exchanges and things like that. Different people put their hands in there differently.Q: Why won't you share QB info? Are you trying to hide information from the other team?A: I mean they have to prepare differently for different guys. Different guys play the game different ways.Q: Is it realistic that Tarvaris Jackson is ready and he has done everything that he needs to do in order to start?A: Well, I think there are a couple things. The guys were repping plays basically that are training camp plays. Is there anything new? There are some new things, but conceptually the concepts are very similar to what he has seen. When he repped against our defense, typically those are on cards but they are given a name. A lot of people run similar concepts so if you are able to paint a picture with our words, "this is a two jet flanker drive". OK, read it like that. And he is able to get reps against really elevated speed against our defense.Q: So he has gained some experience just from the scout team?A: That's something over the course of time that you always look at. Whether you are looking at an A.J. Feeley or a Drew Henson, those are things that you evaluate as the guy is competing and throwing because it's not something that you do easily. They want to give a good accounting of themselves. They don't want to scuff the football around.Q: How are Marcus Johnson and Artis Hicks progressing?A: We'll have to see about that. I'm not going to share that with you. You'll probably have to look at that at game time. Artis is going to try to go today and see what he can do, particularly in some of that contact work because that's what the game is. Then Marcus is going to try to go as well.Q: How has Brad Johnson handled things since the game?A: Brad is a pro. You guys know that that deal with him. In 15 years he has seen a number of different things go on. He doesn't always like things that go on. He doesn't like the way that he played, but I know that he is a competitor. I know his heart is in the right spot. Whatever his role is, I know that he's going to compete his tail off.Q: Does it help in situations like this that you had some experience in Philadelphia shuffling quarterbacks?A: It depends on if you made the change already, what kind of menus you give. I know we gave A.J. Feeley a different menu than we gave Donovan (McNabb). You have to do that sometimes. But by the same token, you are attacking that defense. You know what your guys can do, what they're capable of, and then you're still attacking the Detroit Lions' defense. You're not just putting up plays just to put them up.Q: Will you try to attack them differently with Shaun Rogers out of the lineup?A: The thing that Rod (Marinelli) has done a great job of because of his background as a defensive line coach is he has done a great job with all of those guys that have come in there. They have also lost (Shaun) Cody, but they've taken Cory Redding and moved him in as a three-technique. He's playing at a high level. You wouldn't expect him, being an edge guy, move into the meathouse in there and do such a great job, but he's done a great job inside. I think it's a compliment to Rod. They've simplified things a little bit, which allows them to play with great speed. They are trusting their reads and they're flying to the football.Q: In some of Tarvaris Jackson's comments this weekend he sounded like he wasn't sure if he was ready to start. Does that concern you?A: I think Tarvaris has been to handling school and I don't think he's going to say anything that is going to be offensive to anybody.Q: Is this a difficult call to make and do you find yourself going back and forth?A: You do. You make a list of factors plus and factors minus and then you go with your gut instinct of what you think is best. If I took a poll now, I'd still be vacillating and bumping back and forth.Q: Will this starter start the duration of the season?A: I wish I had a crystal ball.Q: But do you make a decision for the next four weeks?A: The unforeseen is the unforeseen. I wish I was a, what is it, a clairvoyant. I'm not. It's this week against the Detroit Lions.Q: Your wide receivers have shown a penchant for dropping the ball. Is that as big of a concern for you as the quarterback position?A: I think it's always a concern. I reference things like turnovers, drops, and it's drops on offense or defense. A drop here or a drop there can influence the outcome of a game. Whether it's a third-down drop or a drop in the end zone or first down, it prevents you from moving ahead. I've said it before; receivers by definition should receive.Q: Do you have any consideration to an in-game rotation at quarterback or do you not consider that?A: I've considered it. I've done that before, but that's probably not where I am at right at this point.Q: What do you expect out of the quarterback position?A: There are a couple of things; people need to play better around the quarterback. That's always the guy that gets the glare. Did Brad play a great game? He didn't play a great game. What I expect to get better is I expect to get the decision-making better. The decision-making goes a long way, whether it's a route progression, a read. He is a guy that touches the ball. He has to use discretion. Sometimes things break down. Sometimes you have to live to play another down, just all of those things. Decision-making in our system, decision-making with what he is going to do with the football because in the end, it's his choice.
 
If it was indeed still Brad Johnson, I would think Childress would have just said "Nothing has changed. Brad is still our starter" and would have given him the ol' vote of confidence. Seems like Travaris to me, but it's hard to know for sure.

 
Local sports radio are hoping they will get a leak tomorrow morning about who has been practicing the most with the first team.

I'll let you know if they say anything tomorrow.

 
If it was indeed still Brad Johnson, I would think Childress would have just said "Nothing has changed. Brad is still our starter" and would have given him the ol' vote of confidence. Seems like Travaris to me, but it's hard to know for sure.
Agree completely. If you read between the lines of the transcript I posted, it sure looks like Jackson. Bollinger can't raise his arm, and he is expected to be listed as doubtful. If it was still Brad, he would likely have said so. I do think that Jackson has to look fairly decent to keep the job into next week when Bollinger's health improves. If he looks completely lost, he'll probably head back to the bench.And the Lions made Tom Brady of all people look terrible through 3 quarters last week, so who knows.
 
ESPN's Len Pasquarelli reports Brad Johnson is "all but certain to retain" his starting quarterback position in Week 14 at Detroit.

Johnson took the first-team snaps on Wednesday, and in the expected absence of Brooks Bollinger (shoulder), will take the field with the ones on Sunday. Bollinger likely would've been the starter had he not been hurt. Minnesota is not ready to go with Tarvaris Jackson just yet, but if the team loses this weekend, look for Jackson to finish out the year. Dec. 6 - 4:16 pm et

Source: ESPN.com
http://www.rotoworld.com/content/HeadLines.aspx?sport=NFL

 
JetsWillWin said:
ESPN's Len Pasquarelli reports Brad Johnson is "all but certain to retain" his starting quarterback position in Week 14 at Detroit.

Johnson took the first-team snaps on Wednesday, and in the expected absence of Brooks Bollinger (shoulder), will take the field with the ones on Sunday. Bollinger likely would've been the starter had he not been hurt. Minnesota is not ready to go with Tarvaris Jackson just yet, but if the team loses this weekend, look for Jackson to finish out the year. Dec. 6 - 4:16 pm et

Source: ESPN.com
http://www.rotoworld.com/content/HeadLines.aspx?sport=NFL
Thanks, Jets!If this is true, I guess Childress is just using every competitive advantage he has... making Marinelli use some prep time on the rook. Well, I guess I'm starting M-Rob now. Johnson has a nice rapport with him. I would have sat Robinson if Jackson got the start.

 
I believe Bollinger could suprise people if given the opportunity. We'll see if he gets healthy in time, but he's the QB I'd be most afraid of if my team was playing the Vikings.

 
I believe Bollinger could suprise people if given the opportunity. We'll see if he gets healthy in time, but he's the QB I'd be most afraid of if my team was playing the Vikings.
I agree with this, and it could be the main reason that B.J. is the QB again this week. Let's say that Childress KNOWS Bollinger would be ready next week. It makes no sense to play the rookie this week, then sit him down when Bollinger is ready. First, it may kill the kid's confidence. Secondly, the fans would be all over the coach due to the "our season is over anyway, so why not keep Jackson in there?" argument.
 
I believe Bollinger could suprise people if given the opportunity.
I agree. He had virtually no chance at success last year with the Jets' big-time struggles, but he actually looked decent at times. While he doesn't have the biggest arm, but he seemingly has good poise.
 
Any Friday practice updates (who worked most with the 1st team) would be appreciated. It sounded like they're going with Johnson as of Wed, but who knows...

 
I still have a funny feeling it is going to be Tarvaris Jackson. I think the strategy there is to not announce it until the day of the game to take the pressure off him and not having reporters in his face for a couple of days. It's what I would do as a coach and was going to make a change.

 
It's Johnson.

LINK

The Vikings have attempted not to tip their hand about Sunday's starter, but the secret has sprung some leaks. The likely verdict: no change.

Kevin Seifert, Star Tribune

A few minutes after noon Sunday, we will discover whom the Vikings will start at quarterback against Detroit. (Here's a hint: It's the same guy they've used for the first 12 games of the season.)

Despite an amusing attempt at subterfuge from coach Brad Childress, there were the strongest indications Wednesday that incumbent Brad Johnson will retain his job for at least one more week. Childress twice claimed in interviews that he had not decided on a starter, but he finally acknowledged he "competitively" wanted that player's identity kept secret until kickoff.

Rookie Tarvaris Jackson, however, inadvertently revealed a decision that also was confirmed elsewhere.

"Brad is the starting quarterback and I'm doing like I do every week," Jackson said. "Trying to get ready for the game like I'm the starter and just trying to get better each day."

Jackson is expected to serve as the No. 2 quarterback Sunday while backup Brooks Bollinger rehabilitates a separated left shoulder. Bollinger might have supplanted Johnson if he were healthy, but instead Bollinger is unable to lift his arm and was listed as doubtful on the Vikings injury report.

That ailment left Childress to choose between Johnson, who threw four interceptions last Sunday in the Vikings' 23-13 loss to Chicago, and Jackson, who had not taken a regular-season practice snap with the Vikings offense before Wednesday.

Childress said he considered using a rotation of Johnson and Jackson but admitted "that's probably not where I'm at at this point." He said the players' divergent styles would add uncertainty to the Lions' preparations this week.

"They have to prepare differently for different guys," Childress said. "Different guys play the game different ways."

Lions coach Rod Marinelli seemed unmoved.

"When you prepare, you prepare," he said. "It doesn't matter if a certain back is up, a certain quarterback is up, you still prepare [the same]. ... It's what you do. That's the issue."

The charade put Johnson, a 15-year veteran, in the awkward spot of preparing for a game without the public support of his coach. Johnson spoke carefully Wednesday and would not answer a direct question about whether he was the starter. But Johnson made clear his routine was not changing this week.

"I'm just preparing like I always have," Johnson said. "I don't see any difference. Coaches' decisions are coaches' decisions. My thought and work haven't changed a bit."

Johnson has committed 18 turnovers this season, and Childress reiterated that "I expect to get the decision-making better.

"The decision-making goes a long way," he added. "[The quarterback] is a guy that touches the ball. He has to use discretion. Sometimes things break down. Sometimes you have to live to play another down."

Johnson might not be guaranteed a start beyond Sunday's game, as Childress refused to say whether his decision will apply for the remainder of the season. "I wish I was clairvoyant," he said.

That sentiment will give hope to the legion of Vikings fans who want to see more of Jackson, a local favorite during training camp and the preseason. Because of the Bollinger injury, Jackson will get practice time with the first and second teams and could become a factor if the Vikings are eliminated from playoff contention.

Jackson seemed hesitant earlier this week when asked if he was ready to start, but Childress said he will not count that uncertainty against him.

"I think Tarvaris has been to handling school," Childress said, "and I don't think he's going to say anything that is going to be offensive to anybody."
 
It's pretty ridiculous that Childress is playing games like this for a meaningless week 14 matchup. If I'm Marineli I'm laughing my head off at this, since my defense sucks regardless of which option Childress goes with - neither of which are exactly Brett Favre, and I mean the current Brett Favre.

 
Actually they dont have a NFL QB on their roster at the moment , but one of them will the the start and i would bet on Jhonson.

 
It's pretty ridiculous that Childress is playing games like this for a meaningless week 14 matchup. If I'm Marineli I'm laughing my head off at this, since my defense sucks regardless of which option Childress goes with - neither of which are exactly Brett Favre, and I mean the current Brett Favre.
Not really meaningless :no: They are still in the wild card picture. Sure they are a crappy team, but they are still trying to make it to the post season.
 
Traders2001 said:
Actually they don't have a NFL QB on their roster at the moment , but one of them will the the start and i would bet on Johnson.
Actually I just heard that tryouts to be a Viking QB are being held at North Hennepin Community College tomorrow morning at 8 AM.You are required to bring cleats and sweat pants for the workout.Coffee and donuts will be provided.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top