Who would you rather have on your fantasy team? (1 Viewer)

[stymin52]

go!

 

[DAMAC3]

McFadden. Not Close.

I will usually take the higher risk/reward player, and the discrepancy is wide in this case.

 

[solorca]

I have Jackson and would be thrilled if I had the ability to snag Mcfadden for him.

 

[Crazy Tony]

McFadden is the more valuable player.

FJAX is a player who should have a great strength of schedule and is the top RB2 in FBGs article on RBBC from this summer.

Expect FJAX's success to continue throughout the season.

 

[SacramentoBob]

The better RB playing for the better team. Shouldn't even be close.

 

[zamboni]

I have Jackson and would be thrilled if I had the ability to snag Mcfadden for him.

Same here, but not as a knock against Fred, but more an affirmation of McFadden.Fred is running well, but getting up there in RB years with a highly drafted guy that the team really wants to see what he can do. McFadden is much younger and in the pecking order behind him is only Bush, who's as talented as just about any other backup RB in the league, but ultimately expendible by the organization.If both teams falter down the stretch, you can bet we'll see more Spiller. McFadden, on the other hand, will remain the clear cut guy as long as he's healthy.

 

[Ignoratio Elenchi]

The better RB playing for the better team. Shouldn't even be close.

Jackson in a landslide.

 

[todisco1]

I wonder how many people would trade McFadden straight up for Fred Jackson in a redraft. I do not think many.

 

[Oscar]

I wonder how many people would trade McFadden straight up for Fred Jackson in a redraft. I do not think many.

I certainly wouldn't.

 

[LawFitz]

FJax is a poor man's DMC. I'll take the real DMC. That said, I really wish I had FJax to pair with DMC as my RB duo. FJax's value in my redraft was amazing, but I sat there and disrespected him in every round. Dude can play.

 

[need2know]

poll is 42-3. think u got your answer

 

[Drunken Cowboy]

poll is 42-3. think u got your answer

I don't know where the 3 comes from. This should be unanimous.

 

[California]

I'd be thrilled to have either on my roster. Both of them are studs but they don't get the full respect they deserve (which should definitely change going forward).

I'd prefer McFadden over Jackson if I had to choose one. I wouldn't trade for Jackson straight up. McFadden can put up 100-150 combined yards pretty consistently every week. Sprinkle in some TD's and he can give you a monster game.

 

[B Maverick]

I have Jackson and would be thrilled if I had the ability to snag Mcfadden for him.

FJax is VERY underrated but McFadden is the guy you want.

 

[Hue G]

All I know is that I would have rather drafted a top WR or QB in the 2nd than DMC and grabbed FJax in the 5th or 6th round, I just don't see them being very far apart at the end of the season barring injury

 

[scrumptrulescent]

The better RB playing for the better team. Shouldn't even be close.

Jackson in a landslide.

I disagree. You take the perceived best RB and that is McFadden by far. Perception is reality when trading.

 

[solorca]

If we're talking value though, I was able to snag Jackson as my RB4 in the NINTH round. That's some crazy value.

I wanted Mcfadden really bad too, and even traded up to 2.01 to get him. When he went at 1.10, I moved back down into the round.

 

[JuSt CuZ]

I wonder how many ways people are gonna try to slide questions and advice about their team into the Shark Pool, like this is even a general question or something.

Go to the AC forum.

Less then 8 percent of people even prolly deal with this question.

 

[Warrior]

Way to disguise your Assistant Coach forum question.

I'll answer anyway. McFadden and it's not remotely close. In other words, no...you shouldn't trade DMC for FJax

 

[Ignoratio Elenchi]

The better RB playing for the better team. Shouldn't even be close.

Jackson in a landslide.