Here's what I wrote in another thread regarding Harrison V. Gonzales from a dynasty perspective:This is the first major injury whatsoever that Harrison has had in his entire career. Anyone who has followed him knows that he has never taken a big hit. I often describe him as the "anti-Ed Mac" due to his ability to avoid big hits. With the modern technology and training that these guys have, I see no reason why he cannot bounce back from this injury. He has shown no signs of wanting to retire that I have heard about, and his team is still highly competitive. I picture him in the mold of Jerry Rice, as I have always heard of him being very regimented in his training and focus on football. I see Isaac Bruce in a similar light. These are veterans that know what to do and how to do it to succeed in the NFL, and I have not seen a significant enough drop-off in their skill-sets to drop them off my radar. The stricter rules on DBs will also help WR career longevity. So, as of now I would take Harrison over Gonzales.On the other hand I could be wrong about my assumption that Harrison still has the desire to play, and he could up and retire tomorrow-a la Jimmy Smith-but that is a risk I am willing to take for a guy who could very well play a large part in winning championships for years to come.
What constitutes no reason to keep playing?I think He will. No reason for Him to keep playing.So yes He retires soon.
Not sure?1. Won Super Bowl.2. Lock for HOF.3. Enough money to not have too.4. First injury, why get hurt again.Other than that, yep He's coming back.What constitutes no reason to keep playing?I think He will. No reason for Him to keep playing.So yes He retires soon.
Maybe he enjoys his profession?Maybe he wants more money, more rings more reason to prove he should be in HOF and possibly wants to prove that one injury can't kill him.He has lots to play for.Not sure?1. Won Super Bowl.2. Lock for HOF.3. Enough money to not have too.4. First injury, why get hurt again.Other than that, yep He's coming back.What constitutes no reason to keep playing?I think He will. No reason for Him to keep playing.So yes He retires soon.![]()
According to that logic, Jerry Rice should have retired in 1997 at the latest.Not sure?1. Won Super Bowl.2. Lock for HOF.3. Enough money to not have too.4. First injury, why get hurt again.Other than that, yep He's coming back.What constitutes no reason to keep playing?I think He will. No reason for Him to keep playing.So yes He retires soon.![]()
He didn't.According to that logic, Jerry Rice should have retired in 1997 at the latest.Not sure?1. Won Super Bowl.2. Lock for HOF.3. Enough money to not have too.4. First injury, why get hurt again.Other than that, yep He's coming back.What constitutes no reason to keep playing?I think He will. No reason for Him to keep playing.So yes He retires soon.![]()
How many other WR are as good as Marvin Harrison?He didn't.According to that logic, Jerry Rice should have retired in 1997 at the latest.Not sure?1. Won Super Bowl.2. Lock for HOF.3. Enough money to not have too.4. First injury, why get hurt again.Other than that, yep He's coming back.What constitutes no reason to keep playing?I think He will. No reason for Him to keep playing.So yes He retires soon.![]()
How many other WR, are has good has Rice, besides Moss.I'll give you some time.
![]()
Now 312, last year 10 or so. Whats your point?He's done.How many other WR are as good as Marvin Harrison?He didn't.According to that logic, Jerry Rice should have retired in 1997 at the latest.Not sure?1. Won Super Bowl.2. Lock for HOF.3. Enough money to not have too.4. First injury, why get hurt again.Other than that, yep He's coming back.What constitutes no reason to keep playing?I think He will. No reason for Him to keep playing.So yes He retires soon.![]()
How many other WR, are has good has Rice, besides Moss.I'll give you some time.
![]()
You have a weak argument. Your entire basis is that he will retire because he has no reason to play any longer. For which you supply no valid premises. My argument is that he will continue to play because: -This is the first time he has ever had a substantial injury.-His team is still highly competetive and could win the Super Bowl.-There is no reason he has personally given, that I have heard of, that he will retire any time soon.-He is very regimented in his training and work ethic toward football.-The stricter rules on DBs will allow WR to have longer careers.I'll stick with my argument.Now 312, last year 10 or so. Whats your point?He's done.How many other WR are as good as Marvin Harrison?He didn't.According to that logic, Jerry Rice should have retired in 1997 at the latest.Not sure?1. Won Super Bowl.2. Lock for HOF.3. Enough money to not have too.4. First injury, why get hurt again.Other than that, yep He's coming back.What constitutes no reason to keep playing?I think He will. No reason for Him to keep playing.So yes He retires soon.![]()
How many other WR, are has good has Rice, besides Moss.I'll give you some time.
![]()
So your going to play the odds, and say Harrison won't retire.Whats are you laying? 7-1,2-1?Name your price. I'll than tell you why He will.But I want the money, I mean the bet first.You have a weak argument. Your entire basis is that he will retire because he has no reason to play any longer. For which you supply no valid premises. My argument is that he will continue to play because: -This is the first time he has ever had a substantial injury.-His team is still highly competetive and could win the Super Bowl.-There is no reason he has personally given, that I have heard of, that he will retire any time soon.-He is very regimented in his training and work ethic toward football.-The stricter rules on DBs will allow WR to have longer careers.I'll stick with my argument.Now 312, last year 10 or so. Whats your point?He's done.How many other WR are as good as Marvin Harrison?He didn't.According to that logic, Jerry Rice should have retired in 1997 at the latest.Not sure?1. Won Super Bowl.2. Lock for HOF.3. Enough money to not have too.4. First injury, why get hurt again.Other than that, yep He's coming back.What constitutes no reason to keep playing?I think He will. No reason for Him to keep playing.So yes He retires soon.![]()
How many other WR, are has good has Rice, besides Moss.I'll give you some time.
![]()
So your saying, He may retire because He doesn't like to play the game has much as Rice.You could be correct.Harrison is going to be 36 years old, he's done it all like a previous poster said. The question is how long does he wanna play, I really dont think he has the passion for the game like Rice. Its hard to tell alot of times if Harrison is enjoying himself or not, with Rice it was obviously he had a love for the game.
I value substantial conversation more than money.So your going to play the odds, and say Harrison won't retire.Whats are you laying? 7-1,2-1?Name your price. I'll than tell you why He will.But I want the money, I mean the bet first.You have a weak argument. Your entire basis is that he will retire because he has no reason to play any longer. For which you supply no valid premises. My argument is that he will continue to play because: -This is the first time he has ever had a substantial injury.-His team is still highly competetive and could win the Super Bowl.-There is no reason he has personally given, that I have heard of, that he will retire any time soon.-He is very regimented in his training and work ethic toward football.-The stricter rules on DBs will allow WR to have longer careers.I'll stick with my argument.Now 312, last year 10 or so. Whats your point?He's done.How many other WR are as good as Marvin Harrison?He didn't.According to that logic, Jerry Rice should have retired in 1997 at the latest.Not sure?1. Won Super Bowl.2. Lock for HOF.3. Enough money to not have too.4. First injury, why get hurt again.Other than that, yep He's coming back.What constitutes no reason to keep playing?I think He will. No reason for Him to keep playing.So yes He retires soon.![]()
How many other WR, are has good has Rice, besides Moss.I'll give you some time.
![]()
![]()
Take the 's' away thats what you have, anyway.I value substantial conversation more than money.So your going to play the odds, and say Harrison won't retire.Whats are you laying? 7-1,2-1?Name your price. I'll than tell you why He will.But I want the money, I mean the bet first.You have a weak argument. Your entire basis is that he will retire because he has no reason to play any longer. For which you supply no valid premises. My argument is that he will continue to play because: -This is the first time he has ever had a substantial injury.-His team is still highly competetive and could win the Super Bowl.-There is no reason he has personally given, that I have heard of, that he will retire any time soon.-He is very regimented in his training and work ethic toward football.-The stricter rules on DBs will allow WR to have longer careers.I'll stick with my argument.Now 312, last year 10 or so. Whats your point?He's done.How many other WR are as good as Marvin Harrison?He didn't.According to that logic, Jerry Rice should have retired in 1997 at the latest.Not sure?1. Won Super Bowl.2. Lock for HOF.3. Enough money to not have too.4. First injury, why get hurt again.Other than that, yep He's coming back.What constitutes no reason to keep playing?I think He will. No reason for Him to keep playing.So yes He retires soon.![]()
How many other WR, are has good has Rice, besides Moss.I'll give you some time.
![]()
![]()