nonetheless blue onion, I already explained why there's no reason to get upset about the calls in my previous post. none can be proven absolutely 100% wrong, they were calls that the refs had to use their best judgement on. could've gone either way.
I never said I was upset with the calls. The Steelers won the game and I don't see anybody disputing this. What I see being the problem is that
Steeler fans put a large precident on respect and have a preconceived notion of how much respect they should get. For whatever reason, their preconceived preceptions are not getting met and it bothers them.I am not a Steeler fan nor Seahawk fan, so I really have no dog in the fight and I am completely confussed on what I would be whining about.
I don't know what that means, but maybe someday your boys will win a title after years of toil and you'll be ready to bask in the glow of victory.
Then, maybe a bunch of people will suggest it was somehow handed to you, thus intentionally or inadvertantly devaluing the entire thing. See how you feel then, and you'll understand why some fans got a little defensive about it. Especially when it's months later and people are still pointing to polls comparing your Super Bowl Champions to losers of the past decade.This

and "I don't know why you're getting upset....." shtick is amusing, though.
That is what kills me, I wouldn't care what others thought as long as a Super Bowl was obtained. I am completely baffled why somebody else's opinion would have an influence on my emotions in regards to the outcome of a game.You either win or you lose. Arguing style points is very un-Steeler like.
What baffles me is why you continue to try to devalue the Steeler championship.
This is where you miss the boat because I am not trying to devalue the Steelers' championship. This would be like me accusing you of trying to inflate the Steelers' championship.I just don't feel the Steelers' body of work in Super Bowl XL was all that impressive. I will still go on record and say the Steelers' body of work in their Super Bowl loss to the Cowboys was more impressive than their Super Bowl win over the Seahawks. I don't think my opinion is the minority and why Steeler fans would like this opinion to go away completely baffles me.
Personally, I think Steeler fans are more concerned with style points than they are with championships, which is not the Steeler fan I have grown to appreciate.
I don't even disagree with you on that. I don't think any Steeler fan feels like they played a great game in the Super Bowl. The offense was asleep for a quarter and a half before coming to life. The defense played very well all game long, however, and only a Roethlisberger blunder kept the game from getting out of hand in the third quarter. I think it was a better win than some are giving them credit for, but let's not forget the road taken to get there. People focusing on a performance in one game are missing the bigger picture. That's all I am saying, and why all this asterisk crap is really moronic.That said, it's really more tiresome than anything at this point.
You know I like you. And it pains me to argue with you. It all comes down to perception; your perception is different from mine.
- You and I differ on the body of work displayed by the Steelers in their Super Bowl win.
- You will categorize a negative comment about the Steelers Super Bowl performance as an asterisk but then offer a qualifier to referencing their path to the Super Bowl. Is an asterisk all that different from a qualifer?
- Whose perception is correct? Am I devaluing the Steelers Super Bowl performance or are you inflating it?
I agree it is all moronic because we are talking about perceptions which are not measureable. My point has been, why are Steeler fans concerning themselves more with a perceived creditibility entitlement then with their actual championship?
I think the problem is that the line has been blurred between those who are merely saying the Steelers did not play a great game vs. Seattle and those who are insinuating that somehow this was a "gift championship."I like you too, and if your contention is strictly that the Steelers turned in a subpar effort in the Super Bowl, I won't disagree. They were not at their best, and there's nothing shameful in that. They had just gone through the hardest road to the big game that any team had ever endured, by any measurable.
If your contention, however, is that they were "gifted" a win, or that the team's achievements as a whole were unimpressive, as it often seems you are, then I take issue with that. Many NFL "experts" and fans would have given you Indianapolis, Seattle, Denver, and Cincinnati as the 4 best teams in the NFL at the end of the regular season and the Steelers beat all of them, by an average of over 11 ppg. To me, that's as impressive as it gets. If you disagree, fine, but all the talk of "worst Super Bowl team in the last 20 years" or "Stealers" is garbage, and indicative of a viewpoint which is at worst biased, and at best, extremely myopic.