diesel7982
Footballguy
Yay Denial.
It's a rather bad epidemic this time of year especially for the Parker crowd.Yay Denial.
Beat me to it Jason, but not such a tough call to make. But I just made a post that is now a honda.Bettis getting a ton of work and the goal line carries...looks like FWP isn't the greatest thing since sliced bread after all.![]()
Yes, he will play all three. Staley, Bettis, and Parker are all going to get a significant share of carries in this offense. (Significant meaning enough to decrease the value of the other two.) Cowher does not have to have all three of them active together to do this.I understand you are trying to clarify a point, but In the end, no matter how the weekly assignments shakeout, I see a fantasy mess. At least for the foreseeable future.Well you said he'd play all three. Given that Haynes is needed for special teams, that would give 4 RB's. Hence, Staley seems to be the odd man out at this point. Staley, Bettis, Parker likely will not be active all in one week.Who said Cowher would be keeping 4 RB's active .........This is great in theory, except that he isn't going to keep 4 RB's active in Parker, Bettis, Haynes and Staley. Haynes isnt going to be the odd man out as he is a key special teams guy. One of the others is likely to be inactive- right now it seems to be Staley.He wont get this much work night in night out. Obvioulsly, Duce will start to get carries in the future as well. Cowher will play all three and favor the hot hand depending on who is most effective in the game.
Cowher loves to run the ball. And he likes to keep his RBs fresh, especially considering how much they like to run, and are prone to injury. As many of us have said this is going to be a RBBC involving all three players. There is the potential for any one RB to get a majority of the work on a given night.
At this point, it is best to hold Parker and wait for another big game or injury to Bettis/Duce, before looking to trade him.
Bettis looked good, Parker had no room to run, Haynes did his job blocking on 3rd down....Why would Staley's situation change next week??Yes, he will play all three. Staley, Bettis, and Parker are all going to get a significant share of carries in this offense. (Significant meaning enough to decrease the value of the other two.) Cowher does not have to have all three of them active together to do this.I understand you are trying to clarify a point, but In the end, no matter how the weekly assignments shakeout, I see a fantasy mess. At least for the foreseeable future.Well you said he'd play all three. Given that Haynes is needed for special teams, that would give 4 RB's. Hence, Staley seems to be the odd man out at this point. Staley, Bettis, Parker likely will not be active all in one week.Who said Cowher would be keeping 4 RB's active .........This is great in theory, except that he isn't going to keep 4 RB's active in Parker, Bettis, Haynes and Staley. Haynes isnt going to be the odd man out as he is a key special teams guy. One of the others is likely to be inactive- right now it seems to be Staley.He wont get this much work night in night out. Obvioulsly, Duce will start to get carries in the future as well. Cowher will play all three and favor the hot hand depending on who is most effective in the game.
Cowher loves to run the ball. And he likes to keep his RBs fresh, especially considering how much they like to run, and are prone to injury. As many of us have said this is going to be a RBBC involving all three players. There is the potential for any one RB to get a majority of the work on a given night.
At this point, it is best to hold Parker and wait for another big game or injury to Bettis/Duce, before looking to trade him.
Must be a FWP hater.The Bus is fired up. You guys are dreaming if you think he's going to "get tired" and turn the ball over to FWP.
Bus=17 carries and a TD
FWP=10 carries for 26 yards -- aka fork stuck in him for fantasy owners.

Yay Denial.
Sure did. I won my first two games of the season thanks to FWP.Willie Parker Owners: I Hope..., ...you enjoyed it while it lasted
What's the over/under on Bettis' next injury? I'll say 3 games, and I'm taking the under. But he did run with authority last night, I'll give the old man that.I still think us Parker owners will get the last laugh.
I'm not dropping him. Too much talent. I think Pitt realized Bettis was the better fit against the SD defense. Will it continue? Who knows. But I'm not willing to give up on FWP just yet.
I agree. He looked great. I just don't see it as the trend going forward.What's the over/under on Bettis' next injury? I'll say 3 games, and I'm taking the under. But he did run with authority last night, I'll give the old man that.I still think us Parker owners will get the last laugh.
I'm not dropping him. Too much talent. I think Pitt realized Bettis was the better fit against the SD defense. Will it continue? Who knows. But I'm not willing to give up on FWP just yet.
13th round pick in a dynasty draft there sport---plus apparent RB after Pitts cuts bait w/Bettis AND Staley this year...plus you assume they both stay healthy the rest of the yearBettis getting a ton of work and the goal line carries...looks like FWP isn't the greatest thing since sliced bread after all.![]()
Hey nightshift,Don't know how many times I have to say it, I'm speaking of Parker's REDRAFT league value. OBVIOUSLY his dynasty value remains sterling. There's no reason to think he won't be the Steelers unquestioned starter next year. I'm speaking about Parker's ascendent value THIS YEAR. Slice it any way you want to, but for Bettis to get that workload his first game back AND get the goal line work, Parker's days of being THE guy and, in turn, being an enviable fantasy RB week in, week out, are likely over unless Bettis goes down to injury again.Lemme get this straight, the Bus returns to run a few times against a strong run D and FWP's glory days are over?
Wood, did you forget the age of Bettis or the fact that he's very likely in his last year? This is the beginning of the FWP era & the end of the Bus.
Staley? You mean the guy that can't even play better than Haynes for 3rd downs?
Sheesh, this site is goin' down hill fast. :X
The Bus is fired up. You guys are dreaming if you think he's going to "get tired" and turn the ball over to FWP.
Bus=17 carries and a TD
FWP=10 carries for 26 yards -- aka fork stuck in him for fantasy owners.
NOT!!!Man, in my league I'd feel lucky if could get a Kevan Barlow for Parker...I am officially off the FWP bandwagon and just this weekend accepted this trade (just in time):
Priest Holmes for Willie Parker
I have Larry Johnson and the other guy has Duce his logic was that he would get the PIT running game and I would have the KC running game. Tough to have the PIT running game with out the Bus, but hey that's his problem.
It was unbelievable when I saw the offer and I was shopping Parker and T. Jones at the time I was really looking for a QB for one of them but this offer came in and I had to jump on it. This league is in its 9th season so it's not like it was a noob move this guy is the commish.Man, in my league I'd feel lucky if could get a Kevan Barlow for Parker...I am officially off the FWP bandwagon and just this weekend accepted this trade (just in time):
Priest Holmes for Willie Parker
I have Larry Johnson and the other guy has Duce his logic was that he would get the PIT running game and I would have the KC running game. Tough to have the PIT running game with out the Bus, but hey that's his problem.
It doesn't necessarily change next week. But as I said in my earlier post, in this system, Cowher likes big backs and he likes to keep them fresh. He has said many times you need more thatn one quality RB to make it through the season. It's only week five.If you are thinking that Duce will stay inactive for most the year beause of what you saw last night (not injury related) I think you are misjudging the situation.Bettis looked good, Parker had no room to run, Haynes did his job blocking on 3rd down....Why would Staley's situation change next week??Yes, he will play all three. Staley, Bettis, and Parker are all going to get a significant share of carries in this offense. (Significant meaning enough to decrease the value of the other two.) Cowher does not have to have all three of them active together to do this.I understand you are trying to clarify a point, but In the end, no matter how the weekly assignments shakeout, I see a fantasy mess. At least for the foreseeable future.Well you said he'd play all three. Given that Haynes is needed for special teams, that would give 4 RB's. Hence, Staley seems to be the odd man out at this point. Staley, Bettis, Parker likely will not be active all in one week.Who said Cowher would be keeping 4 RB's active .........This is great in theory, except that he isn't going to keep 4 RB's active in Parker, Bettis, Haynes and Staley. Haynes isnt going to be the odd man out as he is a key special teams guy. One of the others is likely to be inactive- right now it seems to be Staley.He wont get this much work night in night out. Obvioulsly, Duce will start to get carries in the future as well. Cowher will play all three and favor the hot hand depending on who is most effective in the game.
Cowher loves to run the ball. And he likes to keep his RBs fresh, especially considering how much they like to run, and are prone to injury. As many of us have said this is going to be a RBBC involving all three players. There is the potential for any one RB to get a majority of the work on a given night.
At this point, it is best to hold Parker and wait for another big game or injury to Bettis/Duce, before looking to trade him.
Do you really think Bettis is gonna carry any kind of load the rest of the season? C'mon. I love what the Bus has meant to my team, but reality check time. Here and there, in special situations (like last night), okay. Bettis ain't up to serious week in, week out pounding. He will get injured for sure.FWP will shine this year again.Hey nightshift,Don't know how many times I have to say it, I'm speaking of Parker's REDRAFT league value. OBVIOUSLY his dynasty value remains sterling. There's no reason to think he won't be the Steelers unquestioned starter next year. I'm speaking about Parker's ascendent value THIS YEAR. Slice it any way you want to, but for Bettis to get that workload his first game back AND get the goal line work, Parker's days of being THE guy and, in turn, being an enviable fantasy RB week in, week out, are likely over unless Bettis goes down to injury again.Lemme get this straight, the Bus returns to run a few times against a strong run D and FWP's glory days are over?
Wood, did you forget the age of Bettis or the fact that he's very likely in his last year? This is the beginning of the FWP era & the end of the Bus.
Staley? You mean the guy that can't even play better than Haynes for 3rd downs?
Sheesh, this site is goin' down hill fast. :X
And as for your comment that this "site" is going down fast, please recognize that my comments do not necessarily mirror those of Joe and David.
Come on, seriously even if Bettis doesn't carry the load the rest of the year, it's clear as day that Parker won't either (baring injuries to both Bettis and Staley again). This will only become a larger RBBC when Staley comes back. Could Bettis and Staley both get hurt again? Yes, of course. Why in the world would you want to have to count on that to get any real value out of Parker in redraft leagues though? Parkers value has seen it's peak for this year.Do you really think Bettis is gonna carry any kind of load the rest of the season? C'mon. I love what the Bus has meant to my team, but reality check time. Here and there, in special situations (like last night), okay. Bettis ain't up to serious week in, week out pounding. He will get injured for sure.FWP will shine this year again.Hey nightshift,Don't know how many times I have to say it, I'm speaking of Parker's REDRAFT league value. OBVIOUSLY his dynasty value remains sterling. There's no reason to think he won't be the Steelers unquestioned starter next year. I'm speaking about Parker's ascendent value THIS YEAR. Slice it any way you want to, but for Bettis to get that workload his first game back AND get the goal line work, Parker's days of being THE guy and, in turn, being an enviable fantasy RB week in, week out, are likely over unless Bettis goes down to injury again.Lemme get this straight, the Bus returns to run a few times against a strong run D and FWP's glory days are over?
Wood, did you forget the age of Bettis or the fact that he's very likely in his last year? This is the beginning of the FWP era & the end of the Bus.
Staley? You mean the guy that can't even play better than Haynes for 3rd downs?
Sheesh, this site is goin' down hill fast. :X
And as for your comment that this "site" is going down fast, please recognize that my comments do not necessarily mirror those of Joe and David.![]()
BTW, a lot of us associate you with the FBG core. Right or wrong, you are noted as part of the inner circle. So what you do and say reflects on FBG the organization.
I don't get it either. I have always disliked Bettis (even being a Steeler fan), but it's obvious this guy can still play well and DID outplay Parker last night. What is most important though is that it is clear that Pitt plans on using all it's RBs, not just Parker or Parker in some sort of featured role as many would like.nightshift this sounds like 04 again. why the doubt for bettis? he didnt show you last year that he still has it? he looked great last night.
Parkers value has seen it's peak for this year.
Right on.Parker will continue to be a contributor for the Steelers, but he's not going to get 20 carries a game. He'll help them win this year, but not by being the workhorse.He's an RB3 for fantasy purposes now, IMHO.As opposed to the one game that started the Willie Parker love fest in the first place?funny how one game can always sway the opinions of most people around here. :X
It's one thing to base opinions on one game out of a set that all share similar characteristics. But in this case this "one game" was notable because it was the first time that Bettis was part of the equation. To pretend like this was just "one bad game" for Parker without recognizing that Bettis got an equivalent workload AND the goal line touches ignores relevant data.I'd like to see the people that viewed Parker as a RB1 the rest of the way. (Regardless of how good/bad Bettis looked or will look in the future)But does this raise a serious question as to whether or not Parker can be thought of as a RB1 the rest of the way? Of course it does.funny how one game can always sway the opinions of most people around here. :X
Bingo. Willie should have a "playing with house money" feel for most FF owners, nothing more, nothing less. Most guys got him as a total late round flier or a waiver pickup, but if you were counting on him to carry you to a title despite 1. Not ever having started at UNC (and please don't give me "two words: Priest Holmes" response because there was no Ricky Wiliams-level RB starting in front of him, 2. Putting up big numbers against TENN and HOU, and 3. Knowing full well that Bettis and/or Staley would be back...then my friend, you were delusional.And, yes, I'm a Willie owner and like the guy, but am looking at him as an injury/bye-week starter at best from here on out unless Bus gets hurt again, which could happen.I'd like to see the people that viewed Parker as a RB1 the rest of the way. (Regardless of how good/bad Bettis looked or will look in the future)But does this raise a serious question as to whether or not Parker can be thought of as a RB1 the rest of the way? Of course it does.funny how one game can always sway the opinions of most people around here. :X
Bingo. Willie should have a "playing with house money" feel for most FF owners, nothing more, nothing less. Most guys got him as a total late round flier or a waiver pickup, but if you were counting on him to carry you to a title despite 1. Not ever having started at UNC (and please don't give me "two words: Priest Holmes" response because there was no Ricky Wiliams-level RB starting in front of him, 2. Putting up big numbers against TENN and HOU, and 3. Knowing full well that Bettis and/or Staley would be back...then my friend, you were delusional.And, yes, I'm a Willie owner and like the guy, but am looking at him as an injury/bye-week starter at best from here on out unless Bus gets hurt again, which could happen.I'd like to see the people that viewed Parker as a RB1 the rest of the way. (Regardless of how good/bad Bettis looked or will look in the future)But does this raise a serious question as to whether or not Parker can be thought of as a RB1 the rest of the way? Of course it does.funny how one game can always sway the opinions of most people around here. :X
I'm not sure why JWood has such a passion about throwing this around. Do you hate Willie? Did he do something to you? Did he whoop ya in week 1 or something?![]()
I'm not sure why JWood has such a passion about throwing this around. Do you hate Willie? Did he do something to you? Did he whoop ya in week 1 or something?
Championships are made on late round picks that produce. Willie won't do it all year, but, I got more than I expected out of him this year. Time to find the next pot of gold.
This is not the toon that Parker owners were singing for the last 2 weeks. He was suposed to be the starter and featured runner all year, remember..... No threat of RBBC and he would loose only 3rd down and GL work and even with that, there was to be plenty of carries to go around with Parker still getting 20+ touches per game. Well, that is not the case. Not even close. Parker was splitting series with Bettis and Bettis is who they turned to in crunch time. This does in fact look like a RBBC and one in which Parker is on the short end of the carries, not the high end. The 20+ touches that people were expecting look like they are in the distant past with Staley coming back on top of Bettis playing well. Wood and a ton of us never were arguing that Parker was great and does still hold great value in dynasty leagues. Only that for redraft, this year only, his value hit it's peak 2 weeks ago and that you would have been wise to sell high, very high.I think it was a small but very vocal minority that thought Parker could be a RB1 the rest of the way. I was very high on Parker... still am. But my enthusiasm was tempered by the unknown. I expected Bettis to come back and have a role. The guy has had a few seasons now where he starts gangbusters, and then gets old quick. So I assumed the Steelers would use that weapon as best they could, while Willie would provide more production outside the 5 yard line.As opposed to the one game that started the Willie Parker love fest in the first place?funny how one game can always sway the opinions of most people around here. :XIt's one thing to base opinions on one game out of a set that all share similar characteristics. But in this case this "one game" was notable because it was the first time that Bettis was part of the equation. To pretend like this was just "one bad game" for Parker without recognizing that Bettis got an equivalent workload AND the goal line touches ignores relevant data.
Does this mean Parker is no longer a viable fantasy starter? Not necessarily.
Does this mean DYNASTY owners should panic? Not in the least.
But does this raise a serious question as to whether or not Parker can be thought of as a RB1 the rest of the way? Of course it does.
You are right, and that's exactley my point.As opposed to the one game that started the Willie Parker love fest in the first place?funny how one game can always sway the opinions of most people around here. :X![]()
Not really, this was the reaction I was expecting.Holy overreaction thread Batman!![]()