What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

WIS MMXI: Back to the Future Edition- Draft & Season Thread (1 Viewer)

Weeks has a lot to like ... but 28 SO/100PA (2010) is hard to take at lead-off. Then again, he might chop that down some in 2011.

Then there's the theory that a SO is the same as a groundout. I don't buy into that totally, but some do.

 
Link for 2010 fielding stats? (Also, anyone wanna explain the letter/letter grade you're giving for fielding?)

 
Tough pick. Everyone that comes back to me in round 4 will be crappy, so this pick needs to be a killer. Probably would have picked Cain if he was here.

3.05 Carlos Santana, C

 
Weeks has a lot to like ... but 28 SO/100PA (2010) is hard to take at lead-off. Then again, he might chop that down some in 2011.Then there's the theory that a SO is the same as a groundout. I don't buy into that totally, but some do.
my theory with Rickie is that if he doesn't get hurt he is going to play every single game and not ever get tired.Beyond that, i can move him around. If I choose to draft another leadoff hitter, I can move Rickie to other spots in the lineup and still get production out of him as he has power and will drive in runs if I put him in a position to do that. Not that WIS really notices this (I'm sure), but Rickie hit .304 with a .426 OBP with runners in scoring position last year. Now if only he can start hitting like that every time he comes to the plate...But that's my thought. He's got a versatile bat and will get a ton of ABs at a position that doesn't have a ton of greatness at the plate...
 
Weeks has a lot to like ... but 28 SO/100PA (2010) is hard to take at lead-off. Then again, he might chop that down some in 2011.Then there's the theory that a SO is the same as a groundout. I don't buy into that totally, but some do.
Possible scenarios if you hit a groundball:Groundout - badError - goodBase Hit - goodDouble Play - badMove the runner over - goodPossible scenarios if you strike out:Out - badDropped third strike - possibly goodSo while a strikeout doesnt have the downside of possibly hitting into a double play it doesnt offer the other chances to get on base or move the runner.
 
Weeks has a lot to like ... but 28 SO/100PA (2010) is hard to take at lead-off. Then again, he might chop that down some in 2011.Then there's the theory that a SO is the same as a groundout. I don't buy into that totally, but some do.
Possible scenarios if you hit a groundball:Groundout - badError - goodBase Hit - goodDouble Play - badMove the runner over - goodPossible scenarios if you strike out:Out - badDropped third strike - possibly goodSo while a strikeout doesnt have the downside of possibly hitting into a double play it doesnt offer the other chances to get on base or move the runner.
In pretend baseball, the Sim has a way of punishing players with high K rates. The shallownessh of pitching will probably help them a bit.
 
Seven of the first 32 picks were SPs. 12 of the next 22 have been SPs. Guess we can call that a run.

 
3 . 8 belljr Chris Carpenter P

eta: I was going to get "fancy" with the owner tabs but gave up - use at your will.

I'm done for the day . peace out

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Seven of the first 32 picks were SPs. 12 of the next 22 have been SPs. Guess we can call that a run.
I blame oso.
blame not drafting for another 45 picks
I assumed you and Tre did this by design. Just perfect. Stud hitter with two aces, you guys are well on your way to getting a playoff berth. I just wish I had the luxary of a top of the order pick too.
I don't know if was by design, but none of the hitters stood out.
 
Seven of the first 32 picks were SPs. 12 of the next 22 have been SPs. Guess we can call that a run.
I blame oso.
blame not drafting for another 45 picks
I assumed you and Tre did this by design. Just perfect. Stud hitter with two aces, you guys are well on your way to getting a playoff berth. I just wish I had the luxary of a top of the order pick too.
I don't know if was by design, but none of the hitters stood out.
get used to it
 
Seven of the first 32 picks were SPs. 12 of the next 22 have been SPs. Guess we can call that a run.
I blame oso.
blame not drafting for another 45 picks
I assumed you and Tre did this by design. Just perfect. Stud hitter with two aces, you guys are well on your way to getting a playoff berth. I just wish I had the luxary of a top of the order pick too.
I don't know if was by design, but none of the hitters stood out.
get used to it
Oh I'm used to it...we're currently doing a 16 person draft in Cake with 14 hitters. It's craptacular. Pretty soon the pitchers will suck soon
 
:lmao: :thumbup:
Link for 2010 fielding stats? (Also, anyone wanna explain the letter/letter grade you're giving for fielding?)
WIS uses fielding percentage and relative range factor to give defensive grades. I believe range includes a normalization for games or innings played because guys with a lot of partial games at a position get screwed for range. Catchers also get a throwing arm rating based on CS percentage (except for Victor Martinez who just automatically gives the runner the base).If you haven't played WIS, I'd strongly recommend signing up for a free WIS spring training league so you can get a feel for the Draft Center and sim engine.
 
<BR>Link for 2010 fielding stats? (Also, anyone wanna explain the letter/letter grade you're giving for fielding?)<BR>
Scoobus, go to whatifsports.com and set yourself up an exhibition baseball team. Don't actually draft the squad, however -- just use the Draft Center to research player stats. Fielding is shown at the far right.Whatifsports uses a letter grade system that goes from A+ down to D-. Each player (except catchers) gets two grades -- one for their Glove and one for their Range. These grades are expressed like so: A+/C

Catchers have an extra grade for their throwing Arm. Their grades work look like so: A-/B/C+

 
Last edited by a moderator:
3.09 Cole Hamels SP

Now that I have my 3 pitchers picked I can share my theory (that is all it is). I figure that if I have 3 or 4 decent hitters that I can cobble together enough hitting to compete. Pitching is not the same beast. You cant platoon 2 starters the way you can 2 hitters. I wanted to make sure I had a big 3 so that I will be in most games. I might not score a ton of runs, but I should be in a lot of close games.

 
Hamels was the other guy I was considering so for the 3rd round in a row I will take the hitter instead.

3.10 Jay Bruce

Not sure how I'm going to make the lineup work, but getting probable A defense out of a guy with his offensive upside is worth it for me. Plus, the homer factor of course.

 
<BR>Link for 2010 fielding stats? (Also, anyone wanna explain the letter/letter grade you're giving for fielding?)<BR>
Scoobus, go to whatifsports.com and set yourself up an exhibition baseball team. Don't actually draft the squad, however -- just use the Draft Center to research player stats. Fielding is shown at the far right.Whatifsports uses a letter grade system that goes from A+ down to D-. Each player (except catchers) gets two grades -- one for their Glove and one for their Range. These grades are expressed like so: A+/C

Catchers have an extra grade for their throwing Arm. Their grades work look like so: A-/B/C+
:kicksrock: Gracias
 
Hamels was the other guy I was considering so for the 3rd round in a row I will take the hitter instead.3.10 Jay BruceNot sure how I'm going to make the lineup work, but getting probable A defense out of a guy with his offensive upside is worth it for me. Plus, the homer factor of course.
SOD. I almost took him back at 2.5.He'll be good value here if all he does is duplicate last year, and he's got a good chance to take the next step up.
 
Hamels was the other guy I was considering so for the 3rd round in a row I will take the hitter instead.3.10 Jay BruceNot sure how I'm going to make the lineup work, but getting probable A defense out of a guy with his offensive upside is worth it for me. Plus, the homer factor of course.
SOD. I almost took him back at 2.5.He'll be good value here if all he does is duplicate last year, and he's got a good chance to take the next step up.
He improved a lot against LHP last year, although I doubt he'll have a .899 OPS against lefties.I think we're way too early for a SOD.
 
3 . 11 Greco…. SKIP

3 . 12 rodg12… OTC to xx41

3 . 13 ChemX….

If rodg12 doesn't pick before the top of the hour, the clock is off for the evening.

 
Hamels was the other guy I was considering so for the 3rd round in a row I will take the hitter instead.3.10 Jay BruceNot sure how I'm going to make the lineup work, but getting probable A defense out of a guy with his offensive upside is worth it for me. Plus, the homer factor of course.
SOD. I almost took him back at 2.5.He'll be good value here if all he does is duplicate last year, and he's got a good chance to take the next step up.
Yeah, his defensive rating was kind of a shocker for me. I'll be interested to see if that holds up in 2011.
 
Hamels was the other guy I was considering so for the 3rd round in a row I will take the hitter instead.3.10 Jay BruceNot sure how I'm going to make the lineup work, but getting probable A defense out of a guy with his offensive upside is worth it for me. Plus, the homer factor of course.
SOD. I almost took him back at 2.5.He'll be good value here if all he does is duplicate last year, and he's got a good chance to take the next step up.
Yeah, his defensive rating was kind of a shocker for me. I'll be interested to see if that holds up in 2011.
His range factor was exceptionally high for a corner OF.
 
Clock is off for the night.

3 . 12 rodg12…

3 . 13 ChemX….

3 . 14 Arsenal..

3 . 15 DougB….

3 . 16 SNC……

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top