NewlyRetired
Footballguy
And that is just one piece of the revenue gap. The massive gaps exist in all other forms as well (ticket sales, game day revenue, tv revenue etc). The women's games would not even be shown in most countries if FIFA did not package them in with the men's games.I was reading a story on SI about this today, and it worked out that the women's WC generated less than 1/2 of 1% of the advertising revenue of the men's WC. I had no idea the gap was that big. That's pretty amazing.As I said, FIFA does not pay the players. They give out prize money to the federations based on the finish for each team. The prize money amount is based on FIFA tv contracts and FIFA sponsorships of which the men obviously have SIGNIFICANTLY more of.The women got 2 million in prize money. Germany got 35 million. The women outdrew the World Series.FIFA is corrupt to the core but they don't pay the players.The players club team pays his/her salary.Just wanted to add the way FIFA treats the women players is outrageous. Underpaid, lesser facilities, etc. That corrupt organization can not be brought to heel quickly enough.
For international games, it is the countries federation that adds some renumeration.
Each player then has a contract with their local federation to get renumeration based on a multitude of issues.
It sounds like you don't understand the incredible gap in revenue difference for the men vs the women at the FIFA level.
The mens World Cup is a money making machine. The WWC probably struggles to make just a little if any profit.
The article I linked from ESPN quoted that the 2014 WC brought in $4.5 Billion in direct revenue to FIFA. That is staggering number for a 64 game "season".