Sure thing but wrong Matt. You probably know of Matt Harmon
Ah, very familiar, just read it wrong and yes that's much more meaningful Matt when its comes to assessing WR's.
AR is not kryptonite to Downs, but to bring it full circle, he is to AD right now.
I acutally view this oppositely.
Downs is the smaller target, smaller catch radius guy which is not ideal for AR. AD is the bigger target, down field threat which plays into Richardson's arm strength and accuracy issues better IMO. This is all just a theory with AD, did not play enough together to really know, not so much a theory with Downs.
Downs made a big play or two in some Richardson games but otherwise it was night and day to when Flacco was starting.
Downs 7 full games with AR: 41 targets, 23 receptions, 328 yards, 3 TD's. 10.54 PPR a game. 42.8% of his production came on 3 plays, almost 20% on one long play which was a busted coverage. He turned Downs from a consistent PPR cheat code type to a TD/big play dependent sort. In short with AR down I considered Downs a must start, with AR in the lineup I was trying hard to not use Downs and if I did mainly praying for a TD.
He had 6 full games without AR and one game where AR played 13 snaps, got injured late in their second drive and before he left AR had targeted and completed one pass of 11 yards to Downs. I'll remove that target catch and say this is Downs in 7 almost full games without AR(even though he's losing almost two full drives so I'm lowballing him a little)
64 targets, 49 receptions, 457 yards, 2 TD's. 15.24 fantasy points a game and doing it in a way you prefer to see which is consistently with only one those games being a sub 12 PPR fantasy game and not needing a TD or big play to reach those numbers.
This is why I'd have to say while I like Downs, Harmon is higher on him then I would be. Plus he's got dinged a lot. I'd probably put him somewhere in the WR 30'ish range.
AD's split with and without AR I just don't have enough data to move it from theory to backing up with stats. AD had one good fantasy game all year, was without AR, but also was the one game Pittman missed but that's encouraging for his long term outlook, as in he just needs a chance.
To be clear I think AR is good for nobody, just again in theory I think he should be less of a drain on AD then he is on Downs.