As far as this particular game, I think most of Osweiler's worst throws in terms of accuracy / ball placement relative to the receiver, happened to mostly all go to Hopkins. Teams are still focusing on Hopkins, but Fuller's emergence, plus in this game the TEs actually were like NFL TEs for a change, gave other options.What is happening here?
And I start Fuller as wellLooking like I should have moved him for Baldwin and Reed last week when I had the chance. Got @Min and @Den in 2 of the next 3 weeks too. Ouch.
well, they dont pay him reallyWhy pay him if you are not going to use him?
Baldwin and Reed straight up. Cant be a mandatory TE league? I'd have done that.Looking like I should have moved him for Baldwin and Reed last week when I had the chance. Got @Min and @Den in 2 of the next 3 weeks too. Ouch.
Me too. Putting Emanuel Sanders in for him.So that's 2 weeks of duds and now the Vikings. I'm sitting him this week. Before the comments about my ####ty league etc., I drafted WR->WR->WR->WR...
This. Osweiler just didn't put the ball in a position for bhop to have much of a chance. Throws were low and or low in the path of a defender on juno balls where he had to come back.As far as this particular game, I think most of Osweiler's worst throws in terms of accuracy / ball placement relative to the receiver, happened to mostly all go to Hopkins. Teams are still focusing on Hopkins, but Fuller's emergence, plus in this game the TEs actually were like NFL TEs for a change, gave other options.
Maybe a little of it is, Hopkins is the guy Oz is looking to in emergency when he's throwing on the move and that contributes to the less accurate passes he saw. But some of it might just be random chance. I don't think I'd panic enough to move him, but then I'm probably prone to hanging onto a player too long, so take that with appropriate salt.
FixedSloppy game. Osweiler justwasn'tisn't very good.
Yeah, I noted that the schedule looks relatively good after @DEN and that I wasnt looking for him to be top 5, like many drafted him to be, but top 10-12. So like you said low wend WR1, high end WR2.I think Hopkins #'s are without a doubt going to be down from last year. It just doesn't seem like him and Osweiler have great chemistry and now that they finally have some other legit weapons, Hopkins won't be force fed the ball. With that being said, I can't imagine Fuller is going to continue to get more of the market share than him. After MIN and DEN, his schedule eases up, so hopefully he's in for a big 2nd half of the season. As of now I still view him as a low end WR1, high end WR2.
Yea, I've been thinking of shopping him, but I'm gonna see how it plays out. I'd probably want a very good RB in return.Yeah, I noted that the schedule looks relatively good after @DEN and that I wasnt looking for him to be top 5, like many drafted him to be, but top 10-12. So like you said low wend WR1, high end WR2.
I'm overthinking, obsessive, and bored at work so I've now put some offers out to flip Nuk in package deals as I look for a stud WR and RB depth. Probably just need to relax.
Not expecting much 2 of the next 3 weeks then hoping he has a big 2nd half of the season.
How does that rating translate to FF points? What is that rating measuring?Hopkins has an 80.9 rating through 4 games on PFF...good for 13th in the league
Good question.How does that rating translate to FF points? What is that rating measuring?
If anyone believes that, it is solely due to fantasy football bias. He's basically a younger Crabtree (quality hands, quality routes, mediocre measurables). If Crabtree had ever gotten almost 200 targets with a third of them in garbage time, he'd have put up the same numbers and gotten the same hype.Hopkins must be biting his tongue. Shiny new quarterback doesn't know he has one of the league's top five receivers on his team. Watching Antonio and Julio go off and Osweiler uses Hopkins as his third or fourth option. Just terrible.
The NFL top 100, which as I'm sure you know, is based on rankings by the players and has ZERO to do with FF bias has Hopkins as the 5th best WR and 19th best player overall.If anyone believes that, it is solely due to fantasy football bias. He's basically a younger Crabtree (quality hands, quality routes, mediocre measurables). If Crabtree had ever gotten almost 200 targets with a third of them in garbage time, he'd have put up the same numbers and gotten the same hype.
Yep, even when they got shutout against the Pats, pretty much all of Hopkins receptions were contested and very good catches, showing great hands, body control and awareness.Good question.
My concern is not at all with Hopkins as a player. He has elite hands, body control, and timing on his jumps. All of these things have been on display this season.
Its Osweiler's terrible accuracy and ball placement as well as the significant reduction in targets that are the concern.
Dude, you can't seriously be using the NFL top 100 as a credible source. That list is widely panned every year for its ridiculousness.The NFL top 100, which as I'm sure you know, is based on rankings by the players and has ZERO to do with FF bias has Hopkins as the 5th best WR and 19th best player overall.
There are many football people who have no FF bias who believe Hopkins is a top 5 NFL WR. Plenty of all time great players had mediocre measurables including the guy who is widely considered the greatest WR and NFL player of all time.
Hopkins has elite hands, route running, timing on his jumps, and ball skills. You can make an argument for a number of WRs to round out the top 5 so I understand if he's left out of some people's list but your first sentence is sort of ridiculous.
Don't do this. That list is merely a ranking of who had the best season last year, it's complete ####e in terms of actual value.The NFL top 100, which as I'm sure you know, is based on rankings by the players and has ZERO to do with FF bias has Hopkins as the 5th best WR and 19th best player overall.
Thanks, but I'll do what I please.Don't do this. That list is merely a ranking of who had the best season last year, it's complete ####e in terms of actual value.
Except you cited the most bull#### possible source. He had the 5th best season by a WR last year, according to the players who actually voted in that stupid thing. If you want to continue sourcing garbage, expect the natives to call you out on it.Thanks, but I'll do what I please.
The use of the NFL top 100 was simply a response to someone saying anyone who believes Hopkins is top 5 was doing so simply for FF bias. I cited a source with no FF bias that ranked him top 5.
It really does not matter to me where he ranks on people's subjective lists. In all honesty Hopkins is probably not in my top 5 but to suggest that those who think he is, when there are plenty of non FF people who do think he is top 5 or close to it, are doing so only b/c of FF bias is silly.
Call me on it then. So what?Except you cited the most bull#### possible source. He had the 5th best season by a WR last year, according to the players who actually voted in that stupid thing. If you want to continue sourcing garbage, expect the natives to call you out on it.
N O P EIf anyone believes that, it is solely due to fantasy football bias. He's basically a younger Crabtree (quality hands, quality routes, mediocre measurables). If Crabtree had ever gotten almost 200 targets with a third of them in garbage time, he'd have put up the same numbers and gotten the same hype.
Think whatever you want about your overpriced dynasty "gem" or first round redraft player. The results will speak for themselves. But if you're looking for confirmation bias, I'm sure you can find some other owners in here who will tell you Hopkins is the best thing since sliced bread. In the meantime, Crabtree is WR5 on 37 targets while Hopkins is WR30 on 33 targets.N O P E
+1. Plus, look at who Crabtree has faced. The Saints and Falcons have 2 of the worst defenses in the NFL, and he scored 3 TD's last week against Shareece Wright who has been getting burned all year. Crabtree and the Raiders offense in general are going to take a hit when they start playing legit defenses.Crabtree had 3 TDs in this last game, what was his ranking before that? You dont find anything odd with the fact the #2 on the Raiders has more targets than the #1 on Houston?
As a Vikings fan my mouth is watering a bit about the prospect.Five of Osweiler's six interceptions have been targeting Nuk.
Still higher than Hopkins? If you remove 18 points from him, he'd be WR13. And I don't mean to derail this into a Crabtree discussion, but FWIW, he's got more targets than Cooper, so the #2 on the Raiders has more targets than the #1 on the Raiders according to you. He also had more targets than Cooper last year.WheelsUp said:Crabtree had 3 TDs in this last game, what was his ranking before that? You dont find anything odd with the fact the #2 on the Raiders has more targets than the #1 on Houston?
As a Texans fan, I'm not looking forward to Sunday.Biabreakable said:I was just reading this article where they cite an interesting stat.
As a Vikings fan my mouth is watering a bit about the prospect.
Let's level set here. Your quote, "He's basically a younger Crabtree..."FF Ninja said:Think whatever you want about your overpriced dynasty "gem" or first round redraft player. The results will speak for themselves. But if you're looking for confirmation bias, I'm sure you can find some other owners in here who will tell you Hopkins is the best thing since sliced bread. In the meantime, Crabtree is WR5 on 37 targets while Hopkins is WR30 on 33 targets.
Let's level set here. Your quote, "He's basically a younger Crabtree..."
A comparison of first 3 years in league:
Rec
Yds
Y/R
TD
Crabtree
58
747
13
4
Dhop
80
1,178
15
6
Maybe it is just me, but I don't see the similarity. I also think a good argument can be made that DHop played with lesser QBs his first 3 years.
If your position is that Crabtree will be more fantasy relevant THIS year I don't take issue with your position.
Reading comprehension isn't for everyone. If you re-read my original post that you initially replied to, you just might understand how hilarious this post of yours is. To help you out, I'll quote that post below and then try to clarify:So as you can see, I basically said the only reason people think Hopkins is better than Crabtree is because of statistics. And then you're all like, "Hopkins is better than Crabtree!! Look at these statistics for proof!!"FF Ninja said:If anyone believes that, it is solely due to fantasy football bias. He's basically a younger Crabtree (quality hands, quality routes, mediocre measurables). If Crabtree had ever gotten almost 200 targets with a third of them in garbage time, he'd have put up the same numbers and gotten the same hype.
C'mon man.