What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

WR DeSean Jackson (1 Viewer)

I may be in the minority, but much like the Brees thing a few weeks ago. I don't really see the big deal here. I mean, yeah, he probably should have just said nothing, but I really detest this idea that people should lose their jobs for saying things, that effect nobody. 

 
I may be in the minority, but much like the Brees thing a few weeks ago. I don't really see the big deal here. I mean, yeah, he probably should have just said nothing, but I really detest this idea that people should lose their jobs for saying things, that effect nobody. 
You don’t see a big deal “quoting Hitler” and saying Jews are extorting America with the goal of world domination? 

 
The only issue Trump understands is racism and how to get simpletons frothing at the mouth. I could give a damn what that fool in the White House thinks re: football. He's got bigger issues to worry about like protecting statues for Robert E Lee and ensuring the Confederate Flag is flown on a NASCAR track. His base is smaller today than it was 2016. Of course its in his wheelhouse, he has a 1-sheet playbook. 
What a completely ignorant, inaccurate, and inappropriate post. 

 
You don’t see a big deal “quoting Hitler” and saying Jews are extorting America with the goal of world domination? 
If Jackson were somehow supporting Hitler, and actually making some kind of call to arms or whatever, then sure I'd see the big deal. This is just someone saying a stupid thing they haven't thought through. I don't see that as a big deal, worth losing his job over. Hell, our President has said just as bad of things almost daily.

 
If Jackson were somehow supporting Hitler, and actually making some kind of call to arms or whatever, then sure I'd see the big deal. This is just someone saying a stupid thing they haven't thought through. I don't see that as a big deal, worth losing his job over. Hell, our President has said just as bad of things almost daily.
Perhaps but Jackson is an entertainer, public figure, face of the team, is in the business of selling tickets and has a Jewish boss. He’s lucky as hell if he keeps his job.

 
I may be in the minority, but much like the Brees thing a few weeks ago. I don't really see the big deal here. I mean, yeah, he probably should have just said nothing, but I really detest this idea that people should lose their jobs for saying things, that effect nobody. 
I agree 💯 with this.....but you realize people are losing their jobs for saying much less.....ie, the Sac Kings announcer for tweeting "All lives matter"

 
I am also not saying ignorance is an 'excuse' to 'excuse (v)" him of what he did. 
The bolded part above simply doesn't square with the bolded part below. I don't give DJax a pass on what he posted even if he isn't truly antisemitic at heart. The words land the same way out there regardless of intent.

Don't think that was his intention.  He didn't know he was doing that.  Was he an idiot for not proof reading and researching what he was posting before doing it?  100% yes.  Is he ACTUALLY  Anti-Jew and Pro-Hitler?  100% no.


If Jackson were somehow supporting Hitler, and actually making some kind of call to arms or whatever, then sure I'd see the big deal. This is just someone saying a stupid thing they haven't thought through. I don't see that as a big deal, worth losing his job over. Hell, our President has said just as bad of things almost daily.
To the same point I am making, I do see it as a big deal. Yes, absolutely it was stupid and not thought out. But regardless of intent, age-old hate speech still gets spread.

The fact that you have someone in office who says/does equally as bad things almost daily is not the right comparison to bring up. Saying racist things isn't somehow better because someone else says more racist things more frequently.

 
The bolded part above simply doesn't square with the bolded part below. I don't give DJax a pass on what he posted even if he isn't truly antisemitic at heart. The words land the same way out there regardless of intent.
How am I giving him a pass?  We both agree what he did was wrong.  You think it was 'more wrong' than I do, and think he should be punished "more" than i do. 

We disagree on if intent matters.  In most instances of the law, intent does matter.  Murder cases, theft, etc.... punishments are greater if you did the deed, knowingly, willingly, knowing that what you did would cause the harm.  I personally do not believe he knowingly, willingly, knew what he did would cause the harm... nor do I believe he feels the exact way the article is stating just because he hit share (it's amazing how many people are falsely saying that he '" typed the words 'hitler was right'  ".  You can disagree with that, but I'm pretty confident on that.  He is still 100% in the wrong... but I feel his 'deed' is LESS PUNISHABLE than you do.  I do believe there's a 'scale of badness" and I think what he did isn't a 100/100 based on many factors (that it was shared not said, his apology, his history, the likelihood in my mind of him not fully understanding the post before sharing, etc)

 

The fact that you have someone in office who says/does equally as bad things almost daily is not the right comparison to bring up. Saying racist things isn't somehow better because someone else says more racist things more frequently.
Correct.  Agree with you here.

 
I agree 💯 with this.....but you realize people are losing their jobs for saying much less.....ie, the Sac Kings announcer for tweeting "All lives matter"
That’s not quite the whole story though. There had been a history of complaints of racial for years about the Kings announcer. 

 
You think it was 'more wrong' than I do, and think he should be punished "more" than i do. 

We disagree on if intent matters.
No. That is entirely incorrect.

I have not said one word about what his punishment should or should not be. I can't be more clear on that being entirely tangential to the point. 

We are not disagreeing on intent either. I can't be more clear that saying intent in my mind doesn't matter -- the impact of the deed does.

You can say something racist and believe it to your core; you can say something racist mistakenly, as a joke, etc. -- both land the same way to the targeted group.

Correct.  Agree with you here.
Well, what do you know, miracles can indeed happen. 😉

 
No. That is entirely incorrect.

I have not said one word about what his punishment should or should not be. I can't be more clear on that being entirely tangential to the point. 

We are not disagreeing on intent either. I can't be more clear that saying intent in my mind doesn't matter -- the impact of the deed does.

You can say something racist and believe it to your core; you can say something racist mistakenly, as a joke, etc. -- both land the same way to the targeted group.

Well, what do you know, miracles can indeed happen. 😉
Ok so what is your disagreement then?  I said he was wrong.  You said he was wrong.  You don't want to discuss intent, or punishment.  So we're on the exact same page?  We both agree he was wrong?

 
Ok so what is your disagreement then?  I said he was wrong.  You said he was wrong.  You don't want to discuss intent, or punishment.  So we're on the exact same page?  We both agree he was wrong?
You believe he was less wrong because he didn't mean it. I think what he said has the same impact regardless.

Your continued failure to see that point is actually quite astonishing. 

 
You believe he was less wrong because he didn't mean it. I think what he said has the same impact regardless.

Your continued failure to see that point is actually quite astonishing. 
Right.  Like I said, we are on different spots on the sliding scale of "how wrong he is".  Some people think "more wrong" than even you do probably.  We both think he screwed up, your view of how wrong he is isn't any better than anyone else's including mine. 

And he didn't "Say" anything.  More wrong information being spread.

The law disagrees with you in your statement that 'intent' doesn't count towards "how wrong" someone is.  I believe it does.  I, and the law, believe that the intent of his actions dictates the degree of wrongness someone has.

 
Right.  Like I said, we are on different spots on the sliding scale of "how wrong he is".  Some people think "more wrong" than even you do probably.  We both think he screwed up, your view of how wrong he is isn't any better than anyone else's including mine. 

And he didn't "Say" anything.  More wrong information being spread.

The law disagrees with you in your statement that 'intent' doesn't count towards "how wrong" someone is.  I believe it does.  I, and the law, believe that the intent of his actions dictates the degree of wrongness someone has.
Questions:

*What is the difference between saying something and taking the time to post something on social media that has the ability to reach more people?

*How exactly do you know his intent?

 
Questions:

*What is the difference between saying something and taking the time to post something on social media that has the ability to reach more people?

*How exactly do you know his intent?
1.  Saying something is 100% your own thoughts and words that you formed.  There's no grey area.  RE-posting something on social media does not mean you agree with everything written.  It could mean there's a few good points in there you liked.  Or you liked the author.  I think we've all 'shared' something that we don't agree 100% with every single word of.
Sub Question:  How do you know how much time he took to post it?  It could have been something someone sent him, he glanced over and clicked re-post.

2.  I don't.  Do you?  Neither of us do, so we are both making assumptions.  Based on many factors (his history, his responses, etc.), MY view is strongly that he is not pro-Hitler.  You're welcome to take the opposing view.

 
Yea, except some say he's not racist......pretty easy to be labeled racist anymore.  Lefties throw it around whether it's true or not
Quite the over-generalization.  Righties tend to throw out "fake news" a lot, then they are the most prone to actually believe fake news.  We can both play this game.

 
1.  Saying something is 100% your own thoughts and words that you formed.  There's no grey area.  RE-posting something on social media does not mean you agree with everything written.  It could mean there's a few good points in there you liked.  Or you liked the author.  I think we've all 'shared' something that we don't agree 100% with every single word of.
Sub Question:  How do you know how much time he took to post it?  It could have been something someone sent him, he glanced over and clicked re-post.

2.  I don't.  Do you?  Neither of us do, so we are both making assumptions.  Based on many factors (his history, his responses, etc.), MY view is strongly that he is not pro-Hitler.  You're welcome to take the opposing view.
No need for us to go round and round about this again...I just feel when it involves a genocidal maniac like Adolph Hitler there really is no middle ground or misunderstandings as to what he stood/stands for and I would assume anyone who spent three years at a prestigious college would fully understand this especially when discussing Jews.

 
No need for us to go round and round about this again...I just feel when it involves a genocidal maniac like Adolph Hitler there really is no middle ground or misunderstandings as to what he stood/stands for and I would assume anyone who spent three years at a prestigious college would fully understand this especially when discussing Jews.
Fair enough.  I think what he stands for is important though, and I think the fact that he "MAY" have just randomly clicked the share button as he glazed over it is important to consider.  I think the "prestigious college" thing is a joke though.  We both know the type of education many of these athletes actually get.

 
Man, whole lotta dudes in the NFL that went after Brees hard right after he said what he said are totally quiet on this one. I do think Brees was ignorant in what he said, but he at least seems to have realized it, and I do think that what he said was more out of ignorance than racism. What Jackson posted was straight up racist and there are other players, mostly in the NBA, who are agreeing with and/or defending it including Stephen Jackson and Kevin Durant. 

Refusing to speak out against this garbage after you’ve been so vocal against other more innocuous comments is a bad look. Stephen Jackson damages his credibility when he’s been a very prominent BLM spokesman and then turns around and agrees with such a horribly racist thing. It just feeds into the worst that critics and other racists believe about him.

 
Man, whole lotta dudes in the NFL that went after Brees hard right after he said what he said are totally quiet on this one. I do think Brees was ignorant in what he said, but he at least seems to have realized it, and I do think that what he said was more out of ignorance than racism. What Jackson posted was straight up racist and there are other players, mostly in the NBA, who are agreeing with and/or defending it including Stephen Jackson and Kevin Durant. 

Refusing to speak out against this garbage after you’ve been so vocal against other more innocuous comments is a bad look. Stephen Jackson damages his credibility when he’s been a very prominent BLM spokesman and then turns around and agrees with such a horribly racist thing. It just feeds into the worst that critics and other racists believe about him.
It's all insanity.....Stephen Jackson is saying "racism is at an all-time high."......huhhh?  Does he know what year it is?  Does he know what country he's in?

Drew Brees, by all accounts, is a good human being.  He acknowledged what he said wasn't taking into account every Americans experience.....he was still roasted and the mob wanted him cancelled......DJax throws out the garbage he did, and yea..........

 
It's all insanity.....Stephen Jackson is saying "racism is at an all-time high."......huhhh?  Does he know what year it is?  Does he know what country he's in?

Drew Brees, by all accounts, is a good human being.  He acknowledged what he said wasn't taking into account every Americans experience.....he was still roasted and the mob wanted him cancelled......DJax throws out the garbage he did, and yea..........
Stephen Jackson? Former Ram?

 
There's a former NBA Stephen Jackson, as well.
Roger that. While I'm not sure what he meant if he truly said "racism is at an all time high" I can say with certainty the documentation of it is at an all time high. Can't say "fake news" to actual video, like the event in Bloomington, IN over the weekend. 20 years ago that would not have even made the local news. 

 
zeeshan2 said:
I had so much respect for him last month but then he doubled down on Desean's posts and Stephen A smith and Max Kellerman on their show called him out on it
Completely agree. Hypocrite. 

 
Officially staying with the team. 

Good move by the Eagles.... PR stunt or not, they are turning this awful situation into a positive and spreading education, and pushing Desean to speak out further about this.  He's also donating some of his salary to the jewish community.  Good job all around... let's hope this acts as a lesson to him and others.

 
 It just feeds into the worst that critics and other racists believe about him.
It just feeds into the stereotypes that sadly, in my experience, are way more true than we'd like to believe. The tension between black nationalism and Jewish people is real. I don't know where it comes from, other than the Middle Eastern influence of the Koran upon black nationalists like Nation Of Islam, etc.

Scratch the surface of a Nation Of Islam guy a bit and you'll likely find some anti-Semitic comments or apologies for those comments sure to follow. That's my experience.

As for people talking about Brees, Brees offered nothing like that. He said it was unpatriotic not to stand for the flag. That applied to everyone, not just BLM or its adherents. Two totally different things. One was universal. The other was Farrakhan quoting Hitler talking about Jews.

That's way, way beyond what Brees did. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It just feeds into the stereotypes that sadly, in my experience, are way more true than we'd like to believe. The tension between black nationalism and Jewish people is real. I don't know where it comes from, other than the Middle Eastern influence of the Koran upon black nationalists like Nation Of Islam, etc.

Scratch the surface of an Nation Of Islam guy a bit and you'll likely find some anti-Semitic comments or apologies for those comments sure to follow. That's my experience.

As for people talking about Brees, Brees offered nothing like that. He said it was unpatriotic not to stand for the flag. That applied to everyone, not just BLM or its adherents. Two totally different things. One was universal. The other was Farrakhan quoting Hitler talking about Jews.

That's way, way beyond what Brees did. 
And one was said from the heart, the other was possibly (likely in my opinion) glazed over and shared without fully understanding what it meant.

That being said, I still agree with you that Djax's mistake was bigger than Drew's. 

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top