What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

WR Josh Gordon, KC (11 Viewers)

Here's what I don't get. Josh Gordon signed a 4 year contract for $5.3m in 2012. He apparently has had no shortage of things to spend it on.

Where's he getting the money to pay Suh? or is Suh not that expensive?
His camo Porsche was his big expense, but weed isn't that expensive.

 
Here's what I don't get. Josh Gordon signed a 4 year contract for $5.3m in 2012. He apparently has had no shortage of things to spend it on.

Where's he getting the money to pay Suh? or is Suh not that expensive?
His camo Porsche was his big expense, but weed isn't that expensive.
Didn't he swap his Mercedes with an SUV when he got busted for DUI (so multiple cars...)

 
ESPN's Adam Schefter reports the Josh Gordon verdict may not be handed down before the end of next week.
Gordon's appeal hearing with Harold Henderson reportedly contained a high volume of testimony and evidence from both sides, leading to this lengthy delay. In standard 12-team drafts, we would begin considering Gordon in the 10th and 11th rounds, although that's obviously a high-risk approach. He's going to be eligible for eight games in a best case scenario, and there remains a realistic chance Gordon won't take the field at all this season.
 
Here's what I don't get. Josh Gordon signed a 4 year contract for $5.3m in 2012. He apparently has had no shortage of things to spend it on.

Where's he getting the money to pay Suh? or is Suh not that expensive?
His camo Porsche was his big expense, but weed isn't that expensive.
Didn't he swap his Mercedes with an SUV when he got busted for DUI (so multiple cars...)
No, that was just a once time thing when he met someone at a grocery store and liked his car.

 
Here's what I don't get. Josh Gordon signed a 4 year contract for $5.3m in 2012. He apparently has had no shortage of things to spend it on.

Where's he getting the money to pay Suh? or is Suh not that expensive?
His camo Porsche was his big expense, but weed isn't that expensive.
Didn't he swap his Mercedes with an SUV when he got busted for DUI (so multiple cars...)
No, that was just a once time thing when he met someone at a grocery store and liked his car.
Mercedes confirmed

http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nba/2014/07/10/vehicle-swap-leads-to-trouble-for-gordon-hairston/12493139/

 




ESPN's Adam Schefter reports the Josh Gordon verdict may not be handed down before the end of next week.

Gordon's appeal hearing with Harold Henderson reportedly contained a high volume of testimony and evidence from both sides, leading to this lengthy delay. In standard 12-team drafts, we would begin considering Gordon in the 10th and 11th rounds, although that's obviously a high-risk approach. He's going to be eligible for eight games in a best case scenario, and there remains a realistic chance Gordon won't take the field at all this season.
Totally normal delay. Right guys?

 
ESPN's Adam Schefter reports the Josh Gordon verdict may not be handed down before the end of next week.

Gordon's appeal hearing with Harold Henderson reportedly contained a high volume of testimony and evidence from both sides, leading to this lengthy delay. In standard 12-team drafts, we would begin considering Gordon in the 10th and 11th rounds, although that's obviously a high-risk approach. He's going to be eligible for eight games in a best case scenario, and there remains a realistic chance Gordon won't take the field at all this season.
Totally normal delay. Right guys?
I thought this was black and white. Open and closed. Sheesh.

 
ESPN's Adam Schefter reports the Josh Gordon verdict may not be handed down before the end of next week.

Gordon's appeal hearing with Harold Henderson reportedly contained a high volume of testimony and evidence from both sides, leading to this lengthy delay. In standard 12-team drafts, we would begin considering Gordon in the 10th and 11th rounds, although that's obviously a high-risk approach. He's going to be eligible for eight games in a best case scenario, and there remains a realistic chance Gordon won't take the field at all this season.
Isn't the best case an overturning of the suspension? I've heard it's all or none and now best case is 8 games?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ESPN's Adam Schefter reports the Josh Gordon verdict may not be handed down before the end of next week.

Gordon's appeal hearing with Harold Henderson reportedly contained a high volume of testimony and evidence from both sides, leading to this lengthy delay. In standard 12-team drafts, we would begin considering Gordon in the 10th and 11th rounds, although that's obviously a high-risk approach. He's going to be eligible for eight games in a best case scenario, and there remains a realistic chance Gordon won't take the field at all this season.
Isn't the best case an overturning of the suspension? I've heard it's all or none and now best case is 8 games?
No one knows anything and all we hear is what is being speculated. Then this group of blood thirsty sharks jump on the chum and tear it to shreds with the "I told you so" and "no you didn't" until we're bored and leave until the next morsel of chum hits the water and we start the whole process all over again.

The only one that may truly know what will happen is Goodell, and I'm not 100% certain he truly knows anything.

 
@ProFootballTalk

· 59m
The excuse that the Josh Gordon ruling is being delayed by the time needed to prepare a transcript is a load of crap
Wow... what a headline......

Great/funny quote from the article too...

Schefter attributed the delay to the lengthy hearing, which resulted in extra time being needed to transcribe the hearing. Which is, quite frankly, a load of crap.

I’m not saying Schefter is full of crap. I’m saying whoever told him that is.

Transcripts can be prepared very quickly, almost instantaneously. In this case, the testimony began on Friday, August 1, with the hearing running from 9:30 a.m. ET until 7:00 p.m. ET. The process of preparing the written transcript could have — and should have — begun immediately. The second day of testimony, which lasted roughly three hours on Monday, August 4, likewise could have been turned around quickly on Monday night.
Now... Im not saying this is what's happening... BUT, imagine the delay in a verdict of the appeal ends up being the reason Gordon gets off?

The world would implode.

 
@ProFootballTalk

· 59m





The excuse that the Josh Gordon ruling is being delayed by the time needed to prepare a transcript is a load of crap
Wow... what a headline......

Great/funny quote from the article too...

Schefter attributed the delay to the lengthy hearing, which resulted in extra time being needed to transcribe the hearing. Which is, quite frankly, a load of crap.



Im not saying Schefter is full of crap. Im saying whoever told him that is.

Transcripts can be prepared very quickly, almost instantaneously. In this case, the testimony began on Friday, August 1, with the hearing running from 9:30 a.m. ET until 7:00 p.m. ET. The process of preparing the written transcript could have and should have begun immediately. The second day of testimony, which lasted roughly three hours on Monday, August 4, likewise could have been turned around quickly on Monday night.
Now... Im not saying this is what's happening... BUT, imagine the delay in a verdict of the appeal ends up being the reason Gordon gets off?

The world would implode.
Guess we can put that, "the owner talked to him for 10 minutes in public, and was caught frowning while doing so, which means he's gone for the season" theory to bed now?

 
Great. So at least we can conclude emphatically that Schefter doesn't understand the transcript process.

Now back to your regularly scheduled program: the Professional Jump to Conclusions League game of the week.

 
So after 2 weeks we know nothing. SInce a huge amount of drafts arethis weekend where are most taking him now if you draft him. . On mocks I see if he is drafted its rounds 11-12 .

 
Last edited by a moderator:
DISCUSSION

What are the chances that Rosenhaus and the NFLPA are, or will be shortly, arguing the length of time the decision on the appeal is taking?

Straight from the NFL agreement:

Within a reasonable period of time, following the hearing, the Commissioner will issue a written decision which will constitute a full, final, and complete disposition of the appeal and which will be binding on all parties.
We have NO idea what a "reasonable period" is... But I bet my balls that the NFLPA does, based on precedent.

--------------

This is for discussion only. I am not implying this is happening, but it's obviously an avenue they would take for an increased chance at success at some point.

 
So after 2 weeks we know nothing. SInce a huge amount of drafts arethis weekend where are most taking him now if you draft him. . On mocks I see if he is drafted its rounds 11-12 .
I took him in 10 last weekend happily, keeper format too for up to 3 years. If he isn't maxed out, I just hit the lottery. How many guys in round 10+ can you forecast that for? Do that all day, drop him if he gets 16 games.

ETA: My point being, anything near or around his current market value has high risk of failure. Just take him, these are the rounds where you're churning these guys between trips to the WW anyways, why not take someone with an absolute ton of talent that can win your league for you if he's around a few weeks before fantasy playoff time? It's a no-brainer. If he gets 16 games a week from now, no different than the rest of the guys you're drafting at his current market value anyways, just drop him to the WW.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
DISCUSSION

What are the chances that Rosenhaus and the NFLPA are, or will be shortly, arguing the length of time the decision on the appeal is taking?

Straight from the NFL agreement:

Within a reasonable period of time, following the hearing, the Commissioner will issue a written decision which will constitute a full, final, and complete disposition of the appeal and which will be binding on all parties.
We have NO idea what a "reasonable period" is... But I bet my balls that the NFLPA does, based on precedent.

--------------

This is for discussion only. I am not implying this is happening, but it's obviously an avenue they would take for an increased chance at success at some point.
I'm not going to search, but I read somewhere that the appeal process typically has a 1 - 3 week timeframe. Again, no real urgency here for the team / league / anyone outside of Gordon owners in FF. What effect does a decision last Friday vs. next Friday have on anything? It's not like the team is missing out on good replacements either way. Whenever the decision is / was rendered, they're over the same barrel either way, since everything meaningful player / roster movement wise happened in March w/ FA and May w/ the draft. A few extra practice reps from Austin / Johnson / etc is the ONLY thing here that is effected by the timing of the decision.

 
I'm not going to search, but I read somewhere that the appeal process typically has a 1 - 3 week timeframe. Again, no real urgency here for the team / league / anyone outside of Gordon owners in FF. What effect does a decision last Friday vs. next Friday have on anything? It's not like the team is missing out on good replacements either way. Whenever the decision is / was rendered, they're over the same barrel either way, since everything meaningful player / roster movement wise happened in March w/ FA and May w/ the draft. A few extra practice reps from Austin / Johnson / etc is the ONLY thing here that is effected by the timing of the decision.
You don't think a team knowing/not knowing if one of the league's top WRs will be at their disposal isn't that important?

The difference between knowing last week and this week is... ONE WEEK. One week they could be confident is drawing plays for their QBs w Gordon involved, or conversely, drawing plays WITHOUT him involved.

There is an insane dropoff from having an offense with Gordona and without. If this does go 1-3 weeks, as you implied, you dont think that has a MAJOR MAJOR effect on how a team prepares for Week 1 and beyond?

It's a near death sentence for the Browns. We dont have Tom Brady or Manning behind center. We have Hoyer and Manziel.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm not going to search, but I read somewhere that the appeal process typically has a 1 - 3 week timeframe. Again, no real urgency here for the team / league / anyone outside of Gordon owners in FF. What effect does a decision last Friday vs. next Friday have on anything? It's not like the team is missing out on good replacements either way. Whenever the decision is / was rendered, they're over the same barrel either way, since everything meaningful player / roster movement wise happened in March w/ FA and May w/ the draft. A few extra practice reps from Austin / Johnson / etc is the ONLY thing here that is effected by the timing of the decision.
You don't think a team knowing/not knowing if one of the league's top WRs will be at their disposal isn't that important?

The difference between knowing last week and this week is... ONE WEEK. One week they could be confident is drawing plays for their QBs w Gordon involved, or conversely, drawing plays WITHOUT him involved.

There is an insane dropoff from having an offense with Gordona and without. If this does go 1-3 weeks, as you implied, you dont think that has a MAJOR MAJOR effect on how a team prepares for Week 1 and beyond?

It's a near death sentence for the Browns. We dont have Tom Brady or Manning behind center. We have Hoyer and Manziel.
I think that they're installing the same offense regardless -- it'll just be far more effective with Gordon obviously. The in game play calling will certainly change, but the foundational stuff, which is almost certainly what they're working on now, stays the same. And the Browns' 2014 "death sentence" occurred the minute that Gordon puffed a blunt this offseason, and has nothing at all to with when the final decision is rendered. No number of TC reps was going to turn Miles Austin or Charles Johnson into Josh Gordon.

You seem to be losing sight of the fact that this is all 100% absolutely Gordon's fault. He knew what the consequences would be when he smoked up, let a guy in his car with a sack, drove drunk, etc. The league has nothing whatsoever to do with the rough situation that the Browns are in right now.

 
The longer this goes on the more I think theres a chance of a reduced suspension. Just my thoughts and a hunch no fact involved. Might be a good thing for us drafting this weekend that a decision is not expected until next week. if you an grab him at pick 9 lets say you will make out if he gets no ban or 6-8 games.and if its 10-12 games ban then you break even I guess and just wait and if he is suspended the year you drop him. Hes your #3 wr so not a big issue that should cause major distress to your team in the long run. I draft monday and if no decision i am targeting round 9.

 
Member name Posts Soulfly3 433 cstu 210 amnesiac 152 Ditka Butkus 137 Bayhawks 132 Bracie Smathers 128 Chaka 119 Ojaays 110 ROYALWITCHEESE 108 BustedKnuckles 104 Adam Harstad 101 Bazinga! 99 Sabertooth 99 Coeur de Lion 94 Bucky86 88 Faust 86 Dr. Octopus 85 Bigboy10182000 80 False Start 75 wdcrob 72 donkshow 71 MAC_32 69 Raider Nation 59 Proust Loves Cake 59 massraider 56 fridayfrenzy 52 Banger 51 ghostguy123 51 LawFitz 51 KellysHeroes 51 PlasmaDogPlasma 47 SaintsInDome2006 47 Bronco Billy 47 JuniorNB 40 bicycle_seat_sniffer 40 Dismattle 40 Dragon1952 40 jurb26 38 RBM 37 Bamac 36 Shutout 35 Houston turmOiler 34 werdnoynek 34 Brewtown 33 PatsWillWin 33 jdoggydogg 31 ItsOnlytheRiver 31 Concept Coop 31 matttyl 31 Bronx Bomber 30 MoveToSkypager 29 pghrob 29 ConnSKINS26 28 tdhartis 27 Kool-Aid Larry 26 Bojang0301 26 lod01 25 georg013 25 GoodLloydHaveMercy 24 Kevrunner 24 identikit 22 VA703 21 Clifford 21 squistion 21 DaveGrumbles 21 Touchdown There 20 Phenix 20 LittlePhatty 19 Greg Russell 19 CentralPA 18 Khy 18 Kenny Powers 18 damageinc 18 cdubz 17 treat88 17 smapdi 17 Steed 17 maf005 17 Skeletore Eh 16 karmarooster 16 Captain Quinoa 16 SameSongNDance 15 Junior McSpiffy 15 mquinnjr 15 FBG Moderator 15 msommer 15 Azhais 15 SCT 15 mvereb 15 SproutDaddy 14 jdswan922 14 Anarchy99 14 wadegarrett 14 fantasycurse42 13 Andrew74 13 TartanLion 13 Joe Bryant 13 TxBuckeye 13 Ace zero1 13 grateful zed 13 rdrouyn 13 RUSF18 12 thriftyrocker 12 towney 12 just_want_2_win 12 slackjawedyokel 12 BoltNlava 12 Insein 11 Stompin' Tom Connors 11 dickey moe 11 Hoot&HoLLer 11 biju 11 cobalt_27 11 Sake-Bombers 10 shadyridr 10 Coach3K 10 Holy Schneikes 10 Peyton Marino 10 Phlash 10 King of the Jungle 10 battlebaby 10 Milkman 10 whatadai 10 steveski 10 LarryAllen'sJockstrap 9 Childress 9 Gvindy 9 Mr Non Sequitur 9 Tackling Dummies 9 LOCO 9 Franknbeans 9 JohnnyU 9 HurryUpSundays 9 TheCommish 9 fbelange 9 5-ish Finkle 9 fatness 8 Penguin 8 NDyse10 8 zftcg 8 boilerdave 8 jbz 8 Jeremy 8 oswizzle 8 Ketamine Dreams 8 Macdaddy_2004 8 buck naked 8 Pumpnick 8 NJ 8 Mr.Pack 8 Mene 7 domvin 7 Mr.Underhill 7 JFS171 7 MattFancy 7 Warrior 7 Two Deep 7 eric rymer 7 BroadwayG 7 Ray 7 The Man With No Name 7 Darryl Talley 7 Old Smiley 7 T with T 7 bulger2holt 7 Bob Magaw 7 Peak 7 spider321 7 Bruce Hammond 7 cc texan 7 Leeroy Jenkins 7 ShaHBucks 7 Raiderfan32904 7 Ned Ryerson 7 gandalas 6 DropKick 6 daveR 6 DansRams 6 Matt Bitonti 6 Ghost Rider 6 Ned 6 Braktastic 6 benson_will_lead_the_way 6 msudaisy26 6 Warhogs 6 Phenomena 6 beef 6 IheartGuinness 6 zilladog 6 az_prof 6 pantherclub 6 NetnautX 5 ebsteelers 5 Donnybrook 5 omally 5 BigSteelThrill 5 menobrown 5 GreenBaySnackers 5 Sir Psycho 5 Louche 5 lbouchard 5 Tony Jabroni 5 IHEARTFF 5 Casting Couch 5 opensourcebeer 5 ldizzle 5 Kleck 5 Ministry of Pain 5 Slider 5 yoadrian 5 salmonstud 5 Half in the bag 5 rude classless thugs 5 montana_grizzly_bears 5 Monsters of the Midway 5 cvnpoka 4 Long Ball Larry 4 metoo 4 chem 4 JetMaxx 4 Rookie_Whisperer 4 silentcoach 4 FF Wiseguy 4 Da Gildz 4 Wyld Stallyns 4 Landro21 4 eoMMan 4 drfeelgood 4 Freelove 4 Catbird 4 jojoh07 4 Mr. Brownstone 4 Zow 4 FUBAR 4 Donsmith753 4 Evilgrin 72 4 finito 4 Thunderlips 4 Gopher State 4 cubbie5150 3 Lavachebeadsman 3 Clee1969 3 bmsarvis 3 FavreCo 3 babydemon90 3 Krilons Resa 3 3nOut 3 duaneok66 3 Heatman 3 Mister CIA 3 Boston 3 bushdocda 3 EastonBlues22 3 jmo87usc 3 JH56 3 Grahamburn 3 TheDirtyWord 3 moondog 3 meanjoegreen 3 SelenaCat 3 VikingFrog 3 loqutis 3 fCheeze 3 knowledge dropper 3 Nucker101 3 Carl Eller's Dead Liver 3 bcat01 3 Dawg Pound 69 3 Ilov80s 3 Captain Hook 3 Black 3 eurotrashman 3 placebo 3 JamesTheScot 3 Sweetness_34 3 Kwai Chang Caine 3 RoosterScott 3 NajehHejan 3 tsarc888 3 [icon] 3 cpd90 3 Keith Lewis 3 VaTerp 3 socrates 3 SeanTaylor21 2 Cookiemonster 2 Billy Bats 2 3optic 2 Tibereas 2 Ted Mullins 2 tdmills 2 Golfjim 2 Ted Lange as your Bartender 2 DocHolliday 2 atcdav 2 DirtyCashDylan 2 12punch 2 Sweet Love 2 Doctor Detroit 2 ericttspikes 2 Bobcat10 2 Shawn 2 Buckna 2 loser 2 Dez 2 johnb 2 hammerva 2 sdp1226 2 Otis 2 Arwald 2 simey 2 meatwad1 2 DAG 2 ffgiant 2 Routilla 2 cmh 2 drew726 2 CataclysmicThunder 2 BlackMamba24 2 Pots 2 RandyDB 2 todisco1 2 The Flying Elvis 2 Yitbos69 2 yellowdog 2 Please See Mine 2 mbuehner 2 Baeddel Moon 2 Frenchy Fuqua 2 SengerCJ 2 parasaurolophus 2 bigums 2 David Dodds 2 Maurile Tremblay 2 Matt Waldman 2 football fan 2 munygon2 2 RC94 2 Jail 2 Rhythmdoctor 2 LionOfGosforth 2 UFGator0587 2 nobiz 2 Tool 2 Agent575 2 DeaLerZ 2 rubrink 2 Quez 2 Yenrub 2 Deamon 2 ImTheScientist 2 Xue 2 8ebok24 2 johnjohn 2 Gordang 2 Eminence 2 loose circuits 2 gbill2004 2 Mentos 2 Boomer1 2 RushHour 2 buddhacwru 2 Grizz875 2 jacobo_moses 2 boonesfarm4me 2 Quibbler 2 JAMES! 2 jackdubl 2 flapgreen 2 baconisgood 1 TwinTurbo 1 Black Sunshine 1 freejamaal25 1 thecardiackid 1 Hybrid 1 johnadams 1 Silver & Black 1 stbugs 1 Dan Lambskin 1 Ruffrodys05 1 bengalbuck 1 eNdblu 1 plasticman 1 GSDguy 1 Instinctive 1 dewmass 1 crowe1130 1 mikel2014 1 Smack Tripper 1 Bob Barker 1 Run It Up 1 skinsrule05 1 Eradicator 1 Eire32 1 lukinrats 1 H20g8 1 dcgangstas 1 HellToupee 1 TheGrimReaper 1 Biabreakable 1 shader 1 one time 1 solorca 1 Tolstoy 1 TeeDub 1 Denver724 1 fruity pebbles 1 LususV 1 Spin 1 Coupdegrace 1 smbkrypt24 1 Dreamer 1 LoneWolf 1 mphtrilogy 1 RenegadeGM 1 Purple_King 1 OU#1 1 Woogie Lee 1 cloppbeast 1 B-Deep 1 iamkoza 1 scothawk 1 therush 1 DLR 1 Saeniph 1 One More Rep 1 Twenty-Four Eighty-Four 1 BWill 1 Max Power 1 Heep 1 Vector 1 lakerstan 1 Papa Georgio 1 Gawain 1 Hu-Tang Clan 1 lsutigers 1 jwb 1 The Kuhn 1 BobbyLayne 1 EHRMAHGERD 1 jbird 1 Resident A 1 m_moose 1 Cripster 1 noneother 1 nyjsec314 1 Labrynth 1 Ryan Swope's Pro Career 1 Nickdi 1 Awful Waffle 1 Stinkin Ref 1 Norcalhoya 1 Porkchop Express 1 Mainevent 1 mrfrood 1 Fiddles 1 urbanhack 1 djmich 1 Dizzy 1 Squatch 1 Judge Smails 1 ffrookie 1 Ack88 1 BassNBrew 1 Hankmoody 1 joseph80 1 bonesman 1 Ashem 1 BigTex 1 Chasers Dawg 1 otb_lifer 1 One 1 citsalp 1 ODannyBoy 1 Chicago Hooligan 1 Sir Chadwick 1 humpback 1 Sigmund Bloom 1 The Claymaker 1 Craig_MiamiFL 1 voiceofunreason 1 FF Ninja 1 Ghost of Bill Walsh 1 andyk803 1 redjake 1 SayWhat? 1 peaces 1 4th&inches 1 MNTom 1 rocketsauce 1 Ebaker5 1 playoffs12 1 tjnc09 1 The Gator 1 maxwjom0 1 Mingooch 1 texasbirdfan 1 SofaKings 1 koreansteve 1 Dork Matter 1 rickyg 1 Kitrick Taylor 1 Uncle Leo 1 Abraham 1 Brownsfan 1 kcfflguy 1 imagroid 1 Lott's Fingertip 1 Phantom Knight 1 Riversco 1 LordHusker 1 32 Counter Pass 1 hooptd 1 GreatLakesMike 1 NYRAGE 1 EBF 1 leave a whisper 1 bumpman 1 Alluro 1 packer_junkie 1 kneeshooter 1 mr fancypants 1 lod001 1 Bossman 1 tomthumb33333 1

This was overdue

 
Can someone explain to me the purpose of showing the post count of a thread?

Who cares? Honestly.

Mods come in and blast ppl for off topic discussion, and then we gotta see the most off topic post ever for some odd reason

 
DISCUSSION

What are the chances that Rosenhaus and the NFLPA are, or will be shortly, arguing the length of time the decision on the appeal is taking?

Straight from the NFL agreement:

Within a reasonable period of time, following the hearing, the Commissioner will issue a written decision which will constitute a full, final, and complete disposition of the appeal and which will be binding on all parties.
We have NO idea what a "reasonable period" is... But I bet my balls that the NFLPA does, based on precedent.

--------------

This is for discussion only. I am not implying this is happening, but it's obviously an avenue they would take for an increased chance at success at some point.
In my opinion, a reasonable amount of time has already passed. The Browns need to know, because it affects their plan, prep, and outlook for the preseason and regular season.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The longer this goes on the more I think theres a chance of a reduced suspension. Just my thoughts and a hunch no fact involved. Might be a good thing for us drafting this weekend that a decision is not expected until next week. if you an grab him at pick 9 lets say you will make out if he gets no ban or 6-8 games.and if its 10-12 games ban then you break even I guess and just wait and if he is suspended the year you drop him. Hes your #3 wr so not a big issue that should cause major distress to your team in the long run. I draft monday and if no decision i am targeting round 9.
Even though I expect him to still get 16 games every day that goes by increasing his chances. It may be though that the judge doesn't want to make any mistakes in such a high profile case.

 
Can someone explain to me the purpose of showing the post count of a thread?

Who cares? Honestly.

Mods come in and blast ppl for off topic discussion, and then we gotta see the most off topic post ever for some odd reason
It indicates who has been the most active in the thread, perhaps disproportionately driving the discussion, perhaps indicating an agenda or bias regarding the thread topic. :2cents:

 
Can someone explain to me the purpose of showing the post count of a thread?

Who cares? Honestly.

Mods come in and blast ppl for off topic discussion, and then we gotta see the most off topic post ever for some odd reason
Like anything, if you don't want to read it, don't. I find it interesting that you have posted more than twice as many comments as anyone else and 3 or 4 times as many as guys like Bracie, Ojaays, Bayhawks and Chaka, who have themselves been relentless Gordon posters. It also says something about having lots and lots of opinions, since we still know virtually nothing more about Gordon's situation than we did when the thread started. I also like the graphic presentation of the sheer number of opinions and comments this issue has generated.

From my experience with arbitrations, where the arbitrator is required to submit a written decision that addresses a long list of exhibits and several diverse arguments (including those which challenge the system itself) a couple or three weeks is well with in a 'reasonable period'. I would think that where that written decision is high profile and likely to be read in the national press, the arbitrator would have substantially more leeway in how quick is reasonable. Challenges to his choice of words in that decision will form the basis of any further legal action by Gordon and his attorneys. There are huge shortcuts to typing up a a transcript, but not so many for a guy reviewing and commenting on all the evidence presented and writing a watertight decision based on and addressing a complex set of issues.

 
Can someone explain to me the purpose of showing the post count of a thread?

Who cares? Honestly.

Mods come in and blast ppl for off topic discussion, and then we gotta see the most off topic post ever for some odd reason
It indicates who has been the most active in the thread, perhaps disproportionately driving the discussion, perhaps indicating an agenda or bias regarding the thread topic. :2cents:
So, you're confirming it has nothing to do with Josh Gordon, which the mods have explicitly asked we refrain from in this thread?

Thanks.

 
1 game for Bowe? Didn't he have a 4-game substance abuse suspension earlier in his career? Now only 1-game?

I am probably missing something here.

 
Can someone explain to me the purpose of showing the post count of a thread?

Who cares? Honestly.

Mods come in and blast ppl for off topic discussion, and then we gotta see the most off topic post ever for some odd reason
It indicates who has been the most active in the thread, perhaps disproportionately driving the discussion, perhaps indicating an agenda or bias regarding the thread topic. :2cents:
So, you're confirming it has nothing to do with Josh Gordon, which the mods have explicitly asked we refrain from in this thread?

Thanks.
No need to be so defensive. You've relentlessly hammered away in here with a pretty deliberately extreme position. I'm sure the pushback reactions are neither a surprise nor unwanted given your body of work in this thread.

 
I think trying to read too much out of the timing is probably over reaction. Other than maybe noting the longer it goes, the more time for talks between the NFL and Gordon on a settlement somewhere in between which is probably good for Gordon and good for the Browns.

Every team dealing with a suspension this time of year has been in the same situation. We the fans just don't usually know about it, know the exact timeline, or pay close attention to it if we do. The Dwayne Bowe situation is a perfect example.

Teams deal with worse uncertainty than this all the time in dealing with injuries let alone their own suspensions. Where it would be an impact to me is if it's not resolved before the start of the year as then it would span seasons if it is a 16 game suspension. I think the ruling will come before then. I don't think it will impact training camp next year for Gordon... the NFL can allow him to practice while handling his reinstatement, and I would expect that would be the case. Without digging up examples, I think that's been pretty much standard procedure for previous situations like that.

 
Can someone explain to me the purpose of showing the post count of a thread?

Who cares? Honestly.

Mods come in and blast ppl for off topic discussion, and then we gotta see the most off topic post ever for some odd reason
It indicates who has been the most active in the thread, perhaps disproportionately driving the discussion, perhaps indicating an agenda or bias regarding the thread topic. :2cents:
So, you're confirming it has nothing to do with Josh Gordon, which the mods have explicitly asked we refrain from in this thread?

Thanks.
No need to be so defensive. You've relentlessly hammered away in here with a pretty deliberately extreme position. I'm sure the pushback reactions are neither a surprise nor unwanted given your body of work in this thread.
I'm not being defensive at all. Simply making a claim.

Posting something relating to post counts is NOT what the mods have asked for, over and over.

Ive learned the hard way to stay on topic.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Can someone explain to me the purpose of showing the post count of a thread?

Who cares? Honestly.

Mods come in and blast ppl for off topic discussion, and then we gotta see the most off topic post ever for some odd reason
It indicates who has been the most active in the thread, perhaps disproportionately driving the discussion, perhaps indicating an agenda or bias regarding the thread topic. :2cents:
So, you're confirming it has nothing to do with Josh Gordon, which the mods have explicitly asked we refrain from in this thread?

Thanks.
No need to be so defensive. You've relentlessly hammered away in here with a pretty deliberately extreme position. I'm sure the pushback reactions are neither a surprise nor unwanted given your body of work in this thread.
I'm not being defensive at all. Simply making a claim.

Posting something relating to post counts is NOT what the mods have asked for, over and over.

Ive learned the hard way to stay on topic.
Hey soulfly it would be interesting to see you over in the FFA wading into some of those topics.....Why don't you start in the They are looting in Missouri one.

 
DISCUSSION

What are the chances that Rosenhaus and the NFLPA are, or will be shortly, arguing the length of time the decision on the appeal is taking?

Straight from the NFL agreement:

Within a reasonable period of time, following the hearing, the Commissioner will issue a written decision which will constitute a full, final, and complete disposition of the appeal and which will be binding on all parties.
We have NO idea what a "reasonable period" is... But I bet my balls that the NFLPA does, based on precedent.

--------------

This is for discussion only. I am not implying this is happening, but it's obviously an avenue they would take for an increased chance at success at some point.
I think this would be a reasonable cause to "appeal the appeal." However, I don't know how winnable it would be, as "reasonable period of time" isn't all that specific.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top