What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

WR Josh Gordon, KC (3 Viewers)

pattern of behavior, i suppose. maybe the guy's just a jerk. impossible to know exactly what their reasoning is until he's actually traded. that's when the dirty laundry is usually put out for everyone to see.
Interesting to note, heard interview with CLE beat writer. He says Gordon actually a bright, engaging guy. May be just a substance abuse issue. Addicts are often fun and gregarious personalities when not strung out or high out of their minds..
He smokes weed let's not go crazy with the addict talk.
The syrzzup can be an issue. Highly addictive and likely why failed the drug test for codeine.

 
pattern of behavior, i suppose. maybe the guy's just a jerk. impossible to know exactly what their reasoning is until he's actually traded. that's when the dirty laundry is usually put out for everyone to see.
Interesting to note, heard interview with CLE beat writer. He says Gordon actually a bright, engaging guy. May be just a substance abuse issue. Addicts are often fun and gregarious personalities when not strung out or high out of their minds..
He smokes weed let's not go crazy with the addict talk.
The syrzzup can be an issue. Highly addictive and likely why failed the drug test for codeine.
Absolutely, I got some codeine syrup for bronchitis. Not a care in the world when I was on it...

 
Talent hasn’t even been a question for Cleveland Browns wide receiver Josh Gordon.

With enough natural ability to be potentially a top ten wide receiver in the NFL, Gordon is an attractive piece to find on the trade market – but 0f course – there’s a reason such a talented product is allegedly available for trade.

Off field problems.

That hasn’t stopped at one team, who according to ESPN’s Adam Schefter has made an ‘attractive’ offer for Gordon, but he does say teams are ‘aware and leery’ of the talented though problematic offensive weapon:

At least one team — and I don’t know which one it is — has made an attractive offer for Gordon. A deal for him might not be far off, though if Cleveland were willing to take what was on the table, it would have already done so. The problem with Gordon is not his talent; rather, it’s that he is in the NFL’s program, already having served a two-game suspension this season. He’s a strike away from a lengthy NFL suspension, and teams around the league are both aware and leery.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Watch Gordon gets in trouble for popping "Mollys"

Young kids are too influenced by pop culture and think its cool to use all the same party drugs their idols aka Rappers

Stick to the natural stuff Gordo if you enjoy those NFL checks

 
Watch Gordon gets in trouble for popping "Mollys"

Young kids are too influenced by pop culture and think its cool to use all the same party drugs their idols aka Rappers

Stick to the natural stuff Gordo if you enjoy those NFL checks
Do you ever stand back and think about how what you post reads to other people? Between this and your post in the Terrelle Pryor thread I have to wonder about your view of the world.

 
Chaka said:
3optic said:
pattern of behavior, i suppose. maybe the guy's just a jerk.

impossible to know exactly what their reasoning is until he's actually traded. that's when the dirty laundry is usually put out for everyone to see.
Interesting to note, heard interview with CLE beat writer. He says Gordon actually a bright, engaging guy. May be just a substance abuse issue. Addicts are often fun and gregarious personalities when not strung out or high out of their minds..
He smokes weed let's not go crazy with the addict talk.
Is addict talk really so crazy? Pretty run of the mill affliction in my experience :banned:

 
Chaka said:
3optic said:
pattern of behavior, i suppose. maybe the guy's just a jerk. impossible to know exactly what their reasoning is until he's actually traded. that's when the dirty laundry is usually put out for everyone to see.
Interesting to note, heard interview with CLE beat writer. He says Gordon actually a bright, engaging guy. May be just a substance abuse issue. Addicts are often fun and gregarious personalities when not strung out or high out of their minds..
He smokes weed let's not go crazy with the addict talk.
Is addict talk really so crazy? :banned:
Yes, in fact it is.

 
3optic said:
pattern of behavior, i suppose. maybe the guy's just a jerk.

impossible to know exactly what their reasoning is until he's actually traded. that's when the dirty laundry is usually put out for everyone to see.
Interesting to note, heard interview with CLE beat writer. He says Gordon actually a bright, engaging guy. May be just a substance abuse issue. Addicts are often fun and gregarious personalities when not strung out or high out of their minds..
What you're describing here is more akin to heroin or cocaine addiction. Alcohol is a far more dangerous drug than marijuana.

 
I just acquired Gordon for McGahee. LOL! Now I own him all 3 of my leagues. :hifive:
Can't believe you would do that to your grandmother.
my grandmother woulda rejected this trade and laughed
I just pushed a trade acquiring Gordon for Snelling and BAL D. Hurting bad at WR wiht VJAX and TY Hilton as only viable options, Snelling was a WW acquisition who loses value as soon as Steven Jackson is healthy. I have the KC D who I feel confident will be similar to BAL over the long haul.

Owner I'm trading to has Steven Jackson so he's getting a quality backup. I also own Rodgers, who I see has about an equal shot at getting time if SJAX goes down for long haul.

While there are a lot of qs in Gordon -- off field issues, team is in overhaul, might be traded into an unknown situation, etc. -- think it's good value for me, great upside and allows me to play Gordon as a viable WR 2 every game.

 
Stompin said:
tsarc888 said:
I just acquired Gordon for McGahee. LOL! Now I own him all 3 of my leagues. :hifive:
Can't believe you would do that to your grandmother.
my grandmother woulda rejected this trade and laughed
I just pushed a trade acquiring Gordon for Snelling and BAL D. Hurting bad at WR wiht VJAX and TY Hilton as only viable options, Snelling was a WW acquisition who loses value as soon as Steven Jackson is healthy. I have the KC D who I feel confident will be similar to BAL over the long haul.

Owner I'm trading to has Steven Jackson so he's getting a quality backup. I also own Rodgers, who I see has about an equal shot at getting time if SJAX goes down for long haul.

While there are a lot of qs in Gordon -- off field issues, team is in overhaul, might be traded into an unknown situation, etc. -- think it's good value for me, great upside and allows me to play Gordon as a viable WR 2 every game.
I don't get why people try to rationalize trades when they absolutely rape another team. Gordon for a mediocre D and a short term, limited upside RB?

 
Stompin said:
tsarc888 said:
I just acquired Gordon for McGahee. LOL! Now I own him all 3 of my leagues. :hifive:
Can't believe you would do that to your grandmother.
my grandmother woulda rejected this trade and laughed
I just pushed a trade acquiring Gordon for Snelling and BAL D. Hurting bad at WR wiht VJAX and TY Hilton as only viable options, Snelling was a WW acquisition who loses value as soon as Steven Jackson is healthy. I have the KC D who I feel confident will be similar to BAL over the long haul.

Owner I'm trading to has Steven Jackson so he's getting a quality backup. I also own Rodgers, who I see has about an equal shot at getting time if SJAX goes down for long haul.

While there are a lot of qs in Gordon -- off field issues, team is in overhaul, might be traded into an unknown situation, etc. -- think it's good value for me, great upside and allows me to play Gordon as a viable WR 2 every game.
I don't get why people try to rationalize trades when they absolutely rape another team. Gordon for a mediocre D and a short term, limited upside RB?
Maybe I don't see it the same black and white way you do -- I don't think Gordon is an automatic top 15 WR and still a lot of uncertainty that surrounds him and his team. One game does not a season make.

But certainly happy to hear you think this way.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Stompin said:
tsarc888 said:
I just acquired Gordon for McGahee. LOL! Now I own him all 3 of my leagues. :hifive:
Can't believe you would do that to your grandmother.
my grandmother woulda rejected this trade and laughed
I just pushed a trade acquiring Gordon for Snelling and BAL D. Hurting bad at WR wiht VJAX and TY Hilton as only viable options, Snelling was a WW acquisition who loses value as soon as Steven Jackson is healthy. I have the KC D who I feel confident will be similar to BAL over the long haul.

Owner I'm trading to has Steven Jackson so he's getting a quality backup. I also own Rodgers, who I see has about an equal shot at getting time if SJAX goes down for long haul.

While there are a lot of qs in Gordon -- off field issues, team is in overhaul, might be traded into an unknown situation, etc. -- think it's good value for me, great upside and allows me to play Gordon as a viable WR 2 every game.
I don't get why people try to rationalize trades when they absolutely rape another team. Gordon for a mediocre D and a short term, limited upside RB?
Maybe I don't see it the same black and white way you do -- I don't think Gordon is an automatic top 15 WR and still a lot of uncertainty that surrounds him and his team. One game does not a season make.

But certainly happy to hear you think this way.
Even if he's not top 15 you still raped the other guy. Snelling is a end-of-the-bench/waiver player. You got Josh Gordon (who we can debate is a top 15 WR to top 30 WR) for a good defense

 
Not that anybody cares, but I am starting Gordon over Antonio Brown at a PPR flex spot this week. Neither are in the wr spot where AJ Green and Demaryius Thomas are both starting.

That has me going against the wisdom of the community, who rank Brown 10 v. the Vikings and Gordon 14 v. the Eagles.

:banned:

 
38 passes for Cle, 9 targets for Gordon (23.7%), 4 catches (44.4%), 71 yards (17.8 ypc).

Cameron seems to be the clear #1 target for Cle but Gordon looks to be getting plenty of looks and, IMO, is a high end WR #2 for the rest of the season.

 
Just throw it up to him and he'll go get it. He's got it all. Hope he can keep it together off the field.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
a couple things stood out on his TD catch...

getting off the line and past williams, watching his feet, he moves like a much smaller player (shared by long WR counterparts like julio jones, dez bryant and demaryius thomas)...

tracked the ball well in mid-air, and had an extra gear right before the ball got there to go get it and creating a little more separation (makes you wonder how much separation he could get if he ran that extra gear speed more of the route than just the very end)...

also, nice field awareness, boundary sense and body control (not to mention concentration), to make sure and tap his feet a few times in end zone after regaining control and possession, initially bobbling the catch...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
...but then he loses focus on a WR screen that was set up to go to the house.

He's frustrating at times, but so damn talented.

 
Call me crazy - but I say he outdoes Julio and Dez over the span of a career

if he doesnt get booted
Not that crazy. He appears to be in the same tier of talent, and he has the measurables necessary. Knuckleheadedness and being held back by a subpar team/QB play of the Browns seem like his main hindrances.

 
Does josh Gordon actually have poor hands or were the drops tonight uncharacteristic? He seemed disinterested today and he even made that TD more tough than it should have been

 
Does josh Gordon actually have poor hands or were the drops tonight uncharacteristic? He seemed disinterested today and he even made that TD more tough than it should have been
First, I totally disagree with the bolded. The DB nearly broke up the pass. I thought he showed great concentration hauling it in (eventually).

As for his hands, I don't recall them being an issue. And certainly not an issue like his teammate, Greg Little.

Waldman had a great writeup on Gordon's skill set prior to the '12 Supp draft.

Here.

 
Does josh Gordon actually have poor hands or were the drops tonight uncharacteristic? He seemed disinterested today and he even made that TD more tough than it should have been
They were uncharacteristic. He actually has the reputation of having soft hands.

 
I just realized that link is in the first post of this thread. :lmao:

The subtitle used to say "Hands are for more than catching the football"

You know.... when we used to HAVE subtitles. <_<

 
a couple things stood out on his TD catch...

getting off the line and past williams, watching his feet, he moves like a much smaller player (shared by long WR counterparts like julio jones, dez bryant and demaryius thomas)...

tracked the ball well in mid-air, and had an extra gear right before the ball got there to go get it and creating a little more separation (makes you wonder how much separation he could get if he ran that extra gear speed more of the route than just the very end)...

also, nice field awareness, boundary sense and body control (not to mention concentration), to make sure and tap his feet a few times in end zone after regaining control and possession, initially bobbling the catch...
It seemed like the coverage was pretty decent, but Gordon willed the ball in. I like how Gordon positions to get to the ball - it's fluid.

 
a couple things stood out on his TD catch...

getting off the line and past williams, watching his feet, he moves like a much smaller player (shared by long WR counterparts like julio jones, dez bryant and demaryius thomas)...

tracked the ball well in mid-air, and had an extra gear right before the ball got there to go get it and creating a little more separation (makes you wonder how much separation he could get if he ran that extra gear speed more of the route than just the very end)...

also, nice field awareness, boundary sense and body control (not to mention concentration), to make sure and tap his feet a few times in end zone after regaining control and possession, initially bobbling the catch...
It seemed like the coverage was pretty decent, but Gordon willed the ball in. I like how Gordon positions to get to the ball - it's fluid.
ya, the coverage was good but like AJ Green if he's one on one he's going to go up, high point the ball, and get the ball 80% of the time.

 
His body type, speed, and freakish natural ability are pretty uncommon...

he's seriously in the elite tier of WRs and he's still very raw. watching this guy play is a joy

 
Love his physical ability but it really seems like he doesn't give complete effort from snap-to-snap. I saw him dog a couple blocking assignments, and there were a few times where he seemed to be jogging on his routes.

 
Love his physical ability but it really seems like he doesn't give complete effort from snap-to-snap. I saw him dog a couple blocking assignments, and there were a few times where he seemed to be jogging on his routes.
I saw it too. I'm in the minority according to the downgrade Browns thread, but I consider the drop off from Hoyer to Weeden to be significant. Add to that the knucklehead factor and you could easily see Gordon exacerbating Weeden's ineffectiveness by giving up too soon when Weeden inevitably struggles during a game. This whole situation could go from bad to horrible if Gordon mentally gives up on Weeden. I think it's a distinct possibility and one I'm keeping a close eye on. Maybe Weeden will surprise me, but I'm not optimistic about him at all.

 
Love his physical ability but it really seems like he doesn't give complete effort from snap-to-snap. I saw him dog a couple blocking assignments, and there were a few times where he seemed to be jogging on his routes.
I saw it too. I'm in the minority according to the downgrade Browns thread, but I consider the drop off from Hoyer to Weeden to be significant. Add to that the knucklehead factor and you could easily see Gordon exacerbating Weeden's ineffectiveness by giving up too soon when Weeden inevitably struggles during a game. This whole situation could go from bad to horrible if Gordon mentally gives up on Weeden. I think it's a distinct possibility and one I'm keeping a close eye on. Maybe Weeden will surprise me, but I'm not optimistic about him at all.
Respectfully disagree but you make some valid points. Gordon has a two cent head an is one strike away from being gone for a year. I still thinking he's got immense talent though and Weeden for his limitations can obviously get him the ball.

 
I still thinking he's got immense talent though and Weeden for his limitations can obviously get him the ball.
I don't disagree at all with this statement. I never said Weeden wouldn't get him the ball, just less effectively than Hoyer. And if Chaka's observation proves to be a harbinger, then color me even more concerned. If Gordon is a quitter, he's going to have multiple days upcoming where he's going to be tempted to quit on Weeden, IMO.

 
Love his physical ability but it really seems like he doesn't give complete effort from snap-to-snap. I saw him dog a couple blocking assignments, and there were a few times where he seemed to be jogging on his routes.
I saw it too. I'm in the minority according to the downgrade Browns thread, but I consider the drop off from Hoyer to Weeden to be significant. Add to that the knucklehead factor and you could easily see Gordon exacerbating Weeden's ineffectiveness by giving up too soon when Weeden inevitably struggles during a game. This whole situation could go from bad to horrible if Gordon mentally gives up on Weeden. I think it's a distinct possibility and one I'm keeping a close eye on. Maybe Weeden will surprise me, but I'm not optimistic about him at all.
Respectfully disagree but you make some valid points. Gordon has a two cent head an is one strike away from being gone for a year. I still thinking he's got immense talent though and Weeden for his limitations can obviously get him the ball.
I disagree too. I think Gordon produces as a high WR#2 low WR#1 the rest of the way. I just think it's a shame that he isn't yet a maximum effort guy because if he was I think he could be in the conversation with guys like Dez, Calvin and AJ. And maybe he already is, in my league he has outproduced those three since his return so maybe I'm wrong.

 
The Niners were one of the teams inquiring about Gordon:

ESPN's Adam Schefter reports the Browns and 49ers have "discussed" a Josh Gordon trade, but that a deal is "unlikely."
Per Schefter, a deal is unlikely because Mario Manningham (knee) and Michael Crabtree (Achilles) are getting closer to returning, but we seriously doubt that would stand in the way of a trade if the 49ers were serious about acquiring one of the game's best young receivers. Cleveland's asking price and Gordon's off-the-field issues are the likely stumbling blocks. Gordon's talent is worth a first-round pick, but that's not all that goes into the equation. If it were, the odds would be extremely low the Niners could find a player as good in the first round of next May's draft.
http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/8282/josh-gordon

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top