wrong forumcurrently starting him at flex in ppr....would gio be smarter you think? Already starting boykins at wr2.
I NEVER apply this to stud WR's. No matter what I play them and I think thats the case here with Gordon.Exactly, I don't have anyone better on my bench. I am not an "always play your studs" person, but in this case, knowing that several receivers have played very well against them, I am not scared of the matchup...I think this game might be more wide open than expected, 2 teams not familiar with each other (unless you count a slight overlap of Turner and Reid in 2000 I think?
Did anyone here see campbell's last real start in the NFL? When he was w/ CHI. it was absolutely brutal.I NEVER apply this to stud WR's. No matter what I play them and I think thats the case here with Gordon.Exactly, I don't have anyone better on my bench. I am not an "always play your studs" person, but in this case, knowing that several receivers have played very well against them, I am not scared of the matchup...I think this game might be more wide open than expected, 2 teams not familiar with each other (unless you count a slight overlap of Turner and Reid in 2000 I think?
How did Brandon Marshall do with Jason Campbell?I NEVER apply this to stud WR's. No matter what I play them and I think thats the case here with Gordon.Exactly, I don't have anyone better on my bench. I am not an "always play your studs" person, but in this case, knowing that several receivers have played very well against them, I am not scared of the matchup...I think this game might be more wide open than expected, 2 teams not familiar with each other (unless you count a slight overlap of Turner and Reid in 2000 I think?
So he's playing poorly in order lower the trading price and improve his chances of getting out of Cleveland?Rotoworld:
Browns OC Norval Turner believes trade rumors could be affecting Josh Gordon's play.
"I would hope not, but I’m realistic to know that it does," Turner said Thursday. "He’s a young guy. He’s not very experienced. He wasn’t the go-to guy as a young player, so this is all a new thing for him. I think when you add those things to it, it can affect him. Obviously, we’re doing our best to focus and let him understand that he’s our guy, and we want him to be as good as he can get." Gordon is coming off his first dud of the season, but Brandon Weeden's play was the culprit. The Browns' switch to Jason Campbell has fantasy owners nervous, but averaging 16.7 yards per catch and 90 yards per game, Gordon is still very much a WR2.
Source: Akron Beacon-Journal
ANYTHING is better than Campbell, I am really worriedWill never happen. Insulting offer.As a Gordon owner.... Yuck.Rumor
Jets are offering a 3rd and DB Kyle Wilson.
@nicbalottaNFL on twitter.
Gvindy said:Anyone selling Josh Gordon?
I tried a few offers but nothing came backGvindy said:Anyone selling Josh Gordon?
Campbell played a little over half a game against Houston, and Marshall ended up with 8 receptions for 107 yards. Campbell was the starter in the following game against San Francisco, and Marshall had two receptions for 21 yards plus a touchdown.SaintsInDome2006 said:How did Brandon Marshall do with Jason Campbell?Bigboy10182000 said:I NEVER apply this to stud WR's. No matter what I play them and I think thats the case here with Gordon.Gvindy said:Exactly, I don't have anyone better on my bench. I am not an "always play your studs" person, but in this case, knowing that several receivers have played very well against them, I am not scared of the matchup...I think this game might be more wide open than expected, 2 teams not familiar with each other (unless you count a slight overlap of Turner and Reid in 2000 I think?
I got offered TY Hilton and Powell for him. I declined.Gvindy said:Anyone selling Josh Gordon?
This is actually somewhat encouraging thanksCampbell played a little over half a game against Houston, and Marshall ended up with 8 receptions for 107 yards. Campbell was the starter in the following game against San Francisco, and Marshall had two receptions for 21 yards plus a touchdown.SaintsInDome2006 said:How did Brandon Marshall do with Jason Campbell?Bigboy10182000 said:I NEVER apply this to stud WR's. No matter what I play them and I think thats the case here with Gordon.Gvindy said:Exactly, I don't have anyone better on my bench. I am not an "always play your studs" person, but in this case, knowing that several receivers have played very well against them, I am not scared of the matchup...I think this game might be more wide open than expected, 2 teams not familiar with each other (unless you count a slight overlap of Turner and Reid in 2000 I think?
me too. Saw the writing on the wall. Tough schedule tooGvindy said:Anyone selling Josh Gordon?Thought his value was only going down: obvious dogging last week, ugly QB situation getting worse, Chiefs on tap, and the possibility of him being traded gone after Tuesday. This seemed like the time to get the most value for him, so I sent him packing.
Thank you, sir.Campbell played a little over half a game against Houston, and Marshall ended up with 8 receptions for 107 yards. Campbell was the starter in the following game against San Francisco, and Marshall had two receptions for 21 yards plus a touchdown.SaintsInDome2006 said:How did Brandon Marshall do with Jason Campbell?Bigboy10182000 said:I NEVER apply this to stud WR's. No matter what I play them and I think thats the case here with Gordon.Gvindy said:Exactly, I don't have anyone better on my bench. I am not an "always play your studs" person, but in this case, knowing that several receivers have played very well against them, I am not scared of the matchup...I think this game might be more wide open than expected, 2 teams not familiar with each other (unless you count a slight overlap of Turner and Reid in 2000 I think?
I'm going to roll with Gordon as my flex this week. I'm looking at Campbell as an upgrade over Weeden at this point; you could just tell that the entire offense had lost all confidence in their QB last week.Campbell played a little over half a game against Houston, and Marshall ended up with 8 receptions for 107 yards. Campbell was the starter in the following game against San Francisco, and Marshall had two receptions for 21 yards plus a touchdown.SaintsInDome2006 said:How did Brandon Marshall do with Jason Campbell?Bigboy10182000 said:I NEVER apply this to stud WR's. No matter what I play them and I think thats the case here with Gordon.Gvindy said:Exactly, I don't have anyone better on my bench. I am not an "always play your studs" person, but in this case, knowing that several receivers have played very well against them, I am not scared of the matchup...I think this game might be more wide open than expected, 2 teams not familiar with each other (unless you count a slight overlap of Turner and Reid in 2000 I think?
Brutal against HOU and SF?Campbell was brutal last year:
2012 Gamelog StatsFF Today Default Scoring: Review Scoring Passing Rushing FantasyWeek Opp Result Cmp Att Cmp% Yard TD INT Att Yard Avg TD FFPts7 DET W 13-7 1 1 100.0 0 0 0 1 5 5.0 0 0.59 at TEN W 51-20 0 0 - 0 0 0 3 -3 -1.0 0 -0.310 HOU L 6-13 11 19 57.9 94 0 0 1 5 5.0 0 5.211 at SF L 7-32 14 22 63.6 107 1 2 1 13 13.0 0 10.714 at MIN L 14-21 6 9 66.7 64 1 0 1 8 8.0 0 8.0http://www.fftoday.com/stats/players/2481/Jason_Campbell?LeagueID=
Especially a guy like Gordon. He only needs 1 play to have a good week and he proved it this week. Glad I stuck with himThis is what happens when you NEGLECT FACT, try to get cute, and bench your studs...
Hate to say I told ya so.... but, ya
Who'd you get in return?Gvindy said:Anyone selling Josh Gordon?![]()
Thought his value was only going down: obvious dogging last week, ugly QB situation getting worse, Chiefs on tap, and the possibility of him being traded gone after Tuesday. This seemed like the time to get the most value for him, so I sent him packing.
FACTS pointed to a big day against the Packers last week too, but he laid a turd. Someone following that same line of thought to not bench him last week would have been wrong. Talent doesn't always win out, and there were certainly enough factors going against him this week to be gunshy again. Talent came out ahead this week, unlike last week, and it could have gone either way. That's why this is a game of chance.This is what happens when you NEGLECT FACT, try to get cute, and bench your studs...
Hate to say I told ya so.... but, ya
Calvin put up a few stinkers too. So has Dez... Demariyus... etc etcFACTS pointed to a big day against the Packers last week too, but he laid a turd. Someone following that same line of thought to not bench him last week would have been wrong. Talent doesn't always win out, and there were certainly enough factors going against him this week to be gunshy again. Talent came out ahead this week, unlike last week, and it could have gone either way. That's why this is a game of chance.This is what happens when you NEGLECT FACT, try to get cute, and bench your studs...
Hate to say I told ya so.... but, ya
Anyone can be right after the fact.
Hopefully he'll have more of these games than last week's games going forward, but obviously from last week's results, nothing is ever a guarantee.
Me? No. You're mistaken. *I* wasn't going to play him over AJ or Welker anyway. I just wanted to point out the flaw in your FACTS that supposedly are infallible.Calvin put up a few stinkers too. So has Dez... Demariyus... etc etcFACTS pointed to a big day against the Packers last week too, but he laid a turd. Someone following that same line of thought to not bench him last week would have been wrong. Talent doesn't always win out, and there were certainly enough factors going against him this week to be gunshy again. Talent came out ahead this week, unlike last week, and it could have gone either way. That's why this is a game of chance.Anyone can be right after the fact.This is what happens when you NEGLECT FACT, try to get cute, and bench your studs...
Hate to say I told ya so.... but, ya
Hopefully he'll have more of these games than last week's games going forward, but obviously from last week's results, nothing is ever a guarantee.
what's you point?
you benched a stud and got burned.
end of story
22, 7, 14, 12, 2, 19 in nonPPRMe? No. You're mistaken. *I* wasn't going to play him over AJ or Welker anyway. I just wanted to point out the flaw in your FACTS that supposedly are infallible.Calvin put up a few stinkers too. So has Dez... Demariyus... etc etcFACTS pointed to a big day against the Packers last week too, but he laid a turd. Someone following that same line of thought to not bench him last week would have been wrong. Talent doesn't always win out, and there were certainly enough factors going against him this week to be gunshy again. Talent came out ahead this week, unlike last week, and it could have gone either way. That's why this is a game of chance.Anyone can be right after the fact.This is what happens when you NEGLECT FACT, try to get cute, and bench your studs...
Hate to say I told ya so.... but, ya
Hopefully he'll have more of these games than last week's games going forward, but obviously from last week's results, nothing is ever a guarantee.
what's you point?
you benched a stud and got burned.
end of story
The high horse is a very easy ride when you actually see how things have already played out.
You said it yourself...even studs have bad days. I don't see Gordon quite at that level yet. Part of that is due to my team makeup and part of it is uncertainty about his QB situation and heart (after last week).
Point being:There was plenty of logical rationale for owners to go a different direction if they chose to do so today. Painting it as a no-brainer to keep him in is just ignoring the FACTS you seem so high on.
That is all. Thanks.
I think you roll with him - Hopkins got loose last week vs KC