What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

WR Michael Pittman, IND (1 Viewer)

Who would you rather have for the rest of the year. Pittman or Evans (missing the next 3 games at least). Currently filling the Evans hole with waiver wire pickups.
 
At this point, he might be a sabotage drop candidate.

I benched him and Waddle for Tillman in what should have been solid match-ups because I just couldn't bare to see them underperform in my lineup again.

I can forgive this one a little because the Vikings D really just put the lock down on the whole offense.

But it's not going to get much easier. Remaining schedule......BUF, NYJ, DET, NE, BYE, DEN, TEN, NYG. The JAX game is too late for most (Week 18). Some garbage time opps, but only 2 games left where the offense should have smooth sailing.

He's in the no man's land where you can't trust him to start, and can't trade him.
 
Also, between Buf, NYJ, and Detroit up next. If some combination or all of them make Flacco look as bad as Minny just did, we're going to be right back where we started with Richardson pretty soon.
 
Michael Pittman Jr. played through 2024 season with fractured back

While Pittman first noticed something was off during training camp in August, the fracture was discovered following the Colts’ Week 3 victory over the Bears. But Pittman still elected to play through the pain. “We were doing it every four weeks, but then I just got to a point I’m like, ‘I don’t really care what the scan says, I’m going to play either way,’” Pittman said.

Pittman, who signed a three-year contract extension with the Colts last March, caught 69 passes for 808 yards with three touchdowns. While his numbers were down in 2024, he doesn’t seem to regret his decision to play. “That’s just what you have to do for the guys,” Pittman said.
 
Michael Pittman Jr. played through 2024 season with fractured back

While Pittman first noticed something was off during training camp in August, the fracture was discovered following the Colts’ Week 3 victory over the Bears. But Pittman still elected to play through the pain. “We were doing it every four weeks, but then I just got to a point I’m like, ‘I don’t really care what the scan says, I’m going to play either way,’” Pittman said.

Pittman, who signed a three-year contract extension with the Colts last March, caught 69 passes for 808 yards with three touchdowns. While his numbers were down in 2024, he doesn’t seem to regret his decision to play. “That’s just what you have to do for the guys,” Pittman said.
Wow - we knew the guy was tough, but that goes above and beyond.
 
Michael Pittman Jr. played through 2024 season with fractured back

While Pittman first noticed something was off during training camp in August, the fracture was discovered following the Colts’ Week 3 victory over the Bears. But Pittman still elected to play through the pain. “We were doing it every four weeks, but then I just got to a point I’m like, ‘I don’t really care what the scan says, I’m going to play either way,’” Pittman said.

Pittman, who signed a three-year contract extension with the Colts last March, caught 69 passes for 808 yards with three touchdowns. While his numbers were down in 2024, he doesn’t seem to regret his decision to play. “That’s just what you have to do for the guys,” Pittman said.
Wish I’d known this. Also glad I didn’t sell low - had a few offers, but nothing that really helped me.

Has to be considered good news for those of us who roster him.
 
Michael Pittman Jr. played through 2024 season with fractured back

While Pittman first noticed something was off during training camp in August, the fracture was discovered following the Colts’ Week 3 victory over the Bears. But Pittman still elected to play through the pain. “We were doing it every four weeks, but then I just got to a point I’m like, ‘I don’t really care what the scan says, I’m going to play either way,’” Pittman said.

Pittman, who signed a three-year contract extension with the Colts last March, caught 69 passes for 808 yards with three touchdowns. While his numbers were down in 2024, he doesn’t seem to regret his decision to play. “That’s just what you have to do for the guys,” Pittman said.
Wish I’d known this. Also glad I didn’t sell low - had a few offers, but nothing that really helped me.

Has to be considered good news for those of us who roster him.
I’ma big fan of Pittman . His QB is what worries me
 
Indianapolis Colts wide receiver Michael Pittman Jr. (groin) tweaked his groin at training camp practice on Tuesday and had an ice pack on it while still in pads, according to Nate Atkins of the Indianapolis Star. Until we know more about Pittman's injury, we will consider him day-to-day. While Pittman will remain a key contributor in the passing attack for the Colts in 2025 if he's healthy, we saw last year that the emergence of Josh Downs definitely hurt his ceiling. The 27-year-old former second-rounder caught 69 of 111 targets for 808 yards and only three touchdowns in 16 games (14 starts). The less-than-stellar quarterback play from Anthony Richardson Sr. and Joe Flacco didn't help matters. Pittman also played through a back injury for much of the year. Better health would certainly help Pittman, but it's no secret that his fantasy stock has taken a hit as more of a WR4/flex heading into the 2025 season.--Keith Hernandez
 
2025 if he's healthy, we saw last year that the emergence of Josh Downs definitely hurt his ceiling
Bad take IMO.
Seems like QB play hurt his ceiling more than anything.
That and a back injury that at one point had everyone thinking he was heading to IR.
Whatever the reason, he's a fade IMO. I've said it before. I do think Downs is the preferred target in Indy and with the drafting of Tyler Warren, he may very well earn that for himself. I believe both Warren and Downs earn more targets than Pittman this year, assuming health. I could be wrong, but that is my gut feeling.
 
2025 if he's healthy, we saw last year that the emergence of Josh Downs definitely hurt his ceiling
Bad take IMO.
Seems like QB play hurt his ceiling more than anything.
That and a back injury that at one point had everyone thinking he was heading to IR.
Whatever the reason, he's a fade IMO. I've said it before. I do think Downs is the preferred target in Indy and with the drafting of Tyler Warren, he may very well earn that for himself. I believe both Warren and Downs earn more targets than Pittman this year, assuming health. I could be wrong, but that is my gut feeling.
Yeah, not in agreement.

Downs is this teams Jayden Reed, off the field if not in 11 personnel.

I think they’ll all be fairly close but fully expect Pittman to lead the team in targets.
 
2025 if he's healthy, we saw last year that the emergence of Josh Downs definitely hurt his ceiling
Bad take IMO.
Seems like QB play hurt his ceiling more than anything.
That and a back injury that at one point had everyone thinking he was heading to IR.
Whatever the reason, he's a fade IMO. I've said it before. I do think Downs is the preferred target in Indy and with the drafting of Tyler Warren, he may very well earn that for himself. I believe both Warren and Downs earn more targets than Pittman this year, assuming health. I could be wrong, but that is my gut feeling.
I agree with this, and I wouldn't be shocked if Indy starts really slow, if both Taylor and Pittman were trade deadline guys.

I think Downs is a lot better than a Jayden Reed type. I think he's more of a Tyler Lockett type, who is more of a route runner than Reed, who is more of a RAC guy.

Ideally, Tyler Warren is quickly this team's go-to guy (otherwise he was drafted too high) and then Downs is the #2 and Pittman the #3. I also think the ADOT should be much lower this year, regardless of who the QB is, though I'd bet heavily on Jones.
 
2025 if he's healthy, we saw last year that the emergence of Josh Downs definitely hurt his ceiling
Bad take IMO.
Seems like QB play hurt his ceiling more than anything.
That and a back injury that at one point had everyone thinking he was heading to IR.
Whatever the reason, he's a fade IMO. I've said it before. I do think Downs is the preferred target in Indy and with the drafting of Tyler Warren, he may very well earn that for himself. I believe both Warren and Downs earn more targets than Pittman this year, assuming health. I could be wrong, but that is my gut feeling.
I agree with this, and I wouldn't be shocked if Indy starts really slow, if both Taylor and Pittman were trade deadline guys.

I think Downs is a lot better than a Jayden Reed type. I think he's more of a Tyler Lockett type, who is more of a route runner than Reed, who is more of a RAC guy.

Ideally, Tyler Warren is quickly this team's go-to guy (otherwise he was drafted too high) and then Downs is the #2 and Pittman the #3. I also think the ADOT should be much lower this year, regardless of who the QB is, though I'd bet heavily on Jones.
I'm saying this as a Colts fan. I don't have any of the players mentioned on any of my fantasy teams. That includes, Downs, Warren, or Pittman.
 
I think Downs is a lot better than a Jayden Reed type. I think he's more of a Tyler Lockett type, who is more of a route runner than Reed, who is more of a RAC guy
My comp of Downs to Reed was not based on style but on the fact neither play when they only line up 2 WR's.

But beyond that Reed is also nothing like what you are describing, he's actually an elite deep threat.
 
Last edited:
I'm saying this as a Colts fan. I don't have any of the players mentioned on any of my fantasy teams. That includes, Downs, Warren, or Pittman.
And I'm saying this as someone who the only player among these 3 I own in dynasty is Downs, though just one team.

I just simply view PIttman as a guy they are paying $23M to be their every down possession receiver, an arch-type tailor made for a large target share.

I got them close enough in target share I don't think it's really worth spending a lot of energy over, I just could not disagree more that Downs is any more reason to fade Pittman then vice versa.
 
I'm saying this as a Colts fan. I don't have any of the players mentioned on any of my fantasy teams. That includes, Downs, Warren, or Pittman.
And I'm saying this as someone who the only player among these 3 I own in dynasty is Downs, though just one team.

I just simply view PIttman as a guy they are paying $23M to be their every down possession receiver, an arch-type tailor made for a large target share.

I got them close enough in target share I don't think it's really worth spending a lot of energy over, I just could not disagree more that Downs is any more reason to fade Pittman then vice versa.
You seem to be forgetting someone.
 
I'm saying this as a Colts fan. I don't have any of the players mentioned on any of my fantasy teams. That includes, Downs, Warren, or Pittman.
And I'm saying this as someone who the only player among these 3 I own in dynasty is Downs, though just one team.

I just simply view PIttman as a guy they are paying $23M to be their every down possession receiver, an arch-type tailor made for a large target share.

I got them close enough in target share I don't think it's really worth spending a lot of energy over, I just could not disagree more that Downs is any more reason to fade Pittman then vice versa.
You seem to be forgetting someone.
I think you know Warren did not slip my mind, this convo emanated from the notion that Downs was a reason to fade Pittman or kill his upside.If Warren is a threat, he's a threat to both of them.
 
I'm saying this as a Colts fan. I don't have any of the players mentioned on any of my fantasy teams. That includes, Downs, Warren, or Pittman.
And I'm saying this as someone who the only player among these 3 I own in dynasty is Downs, though just one team.

I just simply view PIttman as a guy they are paying $23M to be their every down possession receiver, an arch-type tailor made for a large target share.

I got them close enough in target share I don't think it's really worth spending a lot of energy over, I just could not disagree more that Downs is any more reason to fade Pittman then vice versa.
You seem to be forgetting someone.
I think you know Warren did not slip my mind, this convo emanated from the notion that Downs was a reason to fade Pittman or kill his upside.If Warren is a threat, he's a threat to both of them.
Not from my post 673. I gave Warren just as much love as Downs. With both together, fade Pittman.
 
I'm saying this as a Colts fan. I don't have any of the players mentioned on any of my fantasy teams. That includes, Downs, Warren, or Pittman.
And I'm saying this as someone who the only player among these 3 I own in dynasty is Downs, though just one team.

I just simply view PIttman as a guy they are paying $23M to be their every down possession receiver, an arch-type tailor made for a large target share.

I got them close enough in target share I don't think it's really worth spending a lot of energy over, I just could not disagree more that Downs is any more reason to fade Pittman then vice versa.
You seem to be forgetting someone.
I think you know Warren did not slip my mind, this convo emanated from the notion that Downs was a reason to fade Pittman or kill his upside.If Warren is a threat, he's a threat to both of them.
Not from my post 673. I gave Warren just as much love as Downs. With both together, fade Pittman.
Yes, this is what I'm saying I think is wrong and am not agreeing with, will say no more on it.
 
I'm saying this as a Colts fan. I don't have any of the players mentioned on any of my fantasy teams. That includes, Downs, Warren, or Pittman.
And I'm saying this as someone who the only player among these 3 I own in dynasty is Downs, though just one team.

I just simply view PIttman as a guy they are paying $23M to be their every down possession receiver, an arch-type tailor made for a large target share.

I got them close enough in target share I don't think it's really worth spending a lot of energy over, I just could not disagree more that Downs is any more reason to fade Pittman then vice versa.
You seem to be forgetting someone.
I think you know Warren did not slip my mind, this convo emanated from the notion that Downs was a reason to fade Pittman or kill his upside.If Warren is a threat, he's a threat to both of them.
Not from my post 673. I gave Warren just as much love as Downs. With both together, fade Pittman.
Yes, this is what I'm saying I think is wrong and am not agreeing with, will say no more on it.
Cool.
 
I saw some rankings that had Downs ahead of Pittman. Really?
Not terribly hard to believe, Downs avg around 15 ppg with Flacco last year. If Jones can settle in close to Flacco, Downs could have a great year.
Downs on a per snap basis and just the way he runs, he gets open pretty easily has some separation/route running prowess. The overall passing game won't be great this year and the guys that run downfield in order will be hurt the most Pierce, then Pittman and it might increase Downs' and Warren's value now that Jones is the starter. He is notoriously ranked one of the lowest ADOT starting QBs since he has come into the league, he is super risk averse.
 
I saw some rankings that had Downs ahead of Pittman. Really?
Not terribly hard to believe, Downs avg around 15 ppg with Flacco last year. If Jones can settle in close to Flacco, Downs could have a great year.
Downs on a per snap basis and just the way he runs, he gets open pretty easily has some separation/route running prowess. The overall passing game won't be great this year and the guys that run downfield in order will be hurt the most Pierce, then Pittman and it might increase Downs' and Warren's value now that Jones is the starter. He is notoriously ranked one of the lowest ADOT starting QBs since he has come into the league, he is super risk averse.
Not sure I'd have him ahead of Pittman, but I'd probably have them so close it's almost inconsequential. If we believe the story they are selling, Pittman played through most of last season with a busted back that would have kept most players on the sidelines the whole year. As an owner who watches all his games; I can at least say his skill level on the field seemed to take a pretty big dip from where it was the previous 3 years. I hope for a return to form; I mean this guy was mid to high end WR2 numbers on a dumpster fire of an offense.

But I'm also all in on Downs as your traditional 3rd year breakout. His metrics are undeniable. Very similar to Jayden Reed in that when he's given opportunities, he's smashing them. And then compounding that with Harmons RP data on how he tracks vs man/zone/press... I think people could easily make the case Downs should be a top 15-20WR based on talent and age alone. He's just unfortunately in a crap situation there on the Colts.

I'd say they both get a boost from Daniels starting over AR like others have noted. And Downs might get the slight edge as Terpman pointed out Danny two-nickels being a check down charlie at this point in his career. Really, if their line play is poor, he won't have much time for stuff to develop deep even if he DID want to air it out.

I'd say they are both good targets starting in the 9th round or so, and at this point would gladly take the "whoever is left" price discount as a tie breaker between the two of them.
 
This is my least favorite WR group to target.
Pittman is good but not great
Downs is a darling of Harmon
Warren could be cannibalizing both of them in the short area
Pierce and Mitchell are both deep threats for AR who likes to throw deep but there's two of them.
Low passing completion percentage.
Just seems like the whole room is an avoid

I feel like Warren is the play but that's all strictly just upside. Projection hates all these guys.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top