Long Ball Larry
Footballguy
How confident are we in him today? Feels like a trap
So confident that I’m starting Quentin Johnson over him. :(How confident are we in him today? Feels like a trap
Not confident.How confident are we in him today? Feels like a trap
His problem is that ARich is not very accurate. If Flacco is playing then he’s WR2.What's the low down on Michael Pittman this year?
Or not!bump Pittman![]()
He also hurt a finger. Not sure how serious it was, but believe they said they had to pop it back into place.Or not!bump Pittman![]()
![]()
While Pittman first noticed something was off during training camp in August, the fracture was discovered following the Colts’ Week 3 victory over the Bears. But Pittman still elected to play through the pain. “We were doing it every four weeks, but then I just got to a point I’m like, ‘I don’t really care what the scan says, I’m going to play either way,’” Pittman said.
Pittman, who signed a three-year contract extension with the Colts last March, caught 69 passes for 808 yards with three touchdowns. While his numbers were down in 2024, he doesn’t seem to regret his decision to play. “That’s just what you have to do for the guys,” Pittman said.
Wow - we knew the guy was tough, but that goes above and beyond.Michael Pittman Jr. played through 2024 season with fractured back
While Pittman first noticed something was off during training camp in August, the fracture was discovered following the Colts’ Week 3 victory over the Bears. But Pittman still elected to play through the pain. “We were doing it every four weeks, but then I just got to a point I’m like, ‘I don’t really care what the scan says, I’m going to play either way,’” Pittman said.
Pittman, who signed a three-year contract extension with the Colts last March, caught 69 passes for 808 yards with three touchdowns. While his numbers were down in 2024, he doesn’t seem to regret his decision to play. “That’s just what you have to do for the guys,” Pittman said.
Wish I’d known this. Also glad I didn’t sell low - had a few offers, but nothing that really helped me.Michael Pittman Jr. played through 2024 season with fractured back
While Pittman first noticed something was off during training camp in August, the fracture was discovered following the Colts’ Week 3 victory over the Bears. But Pittman still elected to play through the pain. “We were doing it every four weeks, but then I just got to a point I’m like, ‘I don’t really care what the scan says, I’m going to play either way,’” Pittman said.
Pittman, who signed a three-year contract extension with the Colts last March, caught 69 passes for 808 yards with three touchdowns. While his numbers were down in 2024, he doesn’t seem to regret his decision to play. “That’s just what you have to do for the guys,” Pittman said.
I’ma big fan of Pittman . His QB is what worries meWish I’d known this. Also glad I didn’t sell low - had a few offers, but nothing that really helped me.Michael Pittman Jr. played through 2024 season with fractured back
While Pittman first noticed something was off during training camp in August, the fracture was discovered following the Colts’ Week 3 victory over the Bears. But Pittman still elected to play through the pain. “We were doing it every four weeks, but then I just got to a point I’m like, ‘I don’t really care what the scan says, I’m going to play either way,’” Pittman said.
Pittman, who signed a three-year contract extension with the Colts last March, caught 69 passes for 808 yards with three touchdowns. While his numbers were down in 2024, he doesn’t seem to regret his decision to play. “That’s just what you have to do for the guys,” Pittman said.
Has to be considered good news for those of us who roster him.
Bad take IMO.2025 if he's healthy, we saw last year that the emergence of Josh Downs definitely hurt his ceiling
Seems like QB play hurt his ceiling more than anything.Bad take IMO.2025 if he's healthy, we saw last year that the emergence of Josh Downs definitely hurt his ceiling
That and a back injury that at one point had everyone thinking he was heading to IR.Seems like QB play hurt his ceiling more than anything.Bad take IMO.2025 if he's healthy, we saw last year that the emergence of Josh Downs definitely hurt his ceiling
Whatever the reason, he's a fade IMO. I've said it before. I do think Downs is the preferred target in Indy and with the drafting of Tyler Warren, he may very well earn that for himself. I believe both Warren and Downs earn more targets than Pittman this year, assuming health. I could be wrong, but that is my gut feeling.That and a back injury that at one point had everyone thinking he was heading to IR.Seems like QB play hurt his ceiling more than anything.Bad take IMO.2025 if he's healthy, we saw last year that the emergence of Josh Downs definitely hurt his ceiling
Yeah, not in agreement.Whatever the reason, he's a fade IMO. I've said it before. I do think Downs is the preferred target in Indy and with the drafting of Tyler Warren, he may very well earn that for himself. I believe both Warren and Downs earn more targets than Pittman this year, assuming health. I could be wrong, but that is my gut feeling.That and a back injury that at one point had everyone thinking he was heading to IR.Seems like QB play hurt his ceiling more than anything.Bad take IMO.2025 if he's healthy, we saw last year that the emergence of Josh Downs definitely hurt his ceiling
I agree with this, and I wouldn't be shocked if Indy starts really slow, if both Taylor and Pittman were trade deadline guys.Whatever the reason, he's a fade IMO. I've said it before. I do think Downs is the preferred target in Indy and with the drafting of Tyler Warren, he may very well earn that for himself. I believe both Warren and Downs earn more targets than Pittman this year, assuming health. I could be wrong, but that is my gut feeling.That and a back injury that at one point had everyone thinking he was heading to IR.Seems like QB play hurt his ceiling more than anything.Bad take IMO.2025 if he's healthy, we saw last year that the emergence of Josh Downs definitely hurt his ceiling
I'm saying this as a Colts fan. I don't have any of the players mentioned on any of my fantasy teams. That includes, Downs, Warren, or Pittman.I agree with this, and I wouldn't be shocked if Indy starts really slow, if both Taylor and Pittman were trade deadline guys.Whatever the reason, he's a fade IMO. I've said it before. I do think Downs is the preferred target in Indy and with the drafting of Tyler Warren, he may very well earn that for himself. I believe both Warren and Downs earn more targets than Pittman this year, assuming health. I could be wrong, but that is my gut feeling.That and a back injury that at one point had everyone thinking he was heading to IR.Seems like QB play hurt his ceiling more than anything.Bad take IMO.2025 if he's healthy, we saw last year that the emergence of Josh Downs definitely hurt his ceiling
I think Downs is a lot better than a Jayden Reed type. I think he's more of a Tyler Lockett type, who is more of a route runner than Reed, who is more of a RAC guy.
Ideally, Tyler Warren is quickly this team's go-to guy (otherwise he was drafted too high) and then Downs is the #2 and Pittman the #3. I also think the ADOT should be much lower this year, regardless of who the QB is, though I'd bet heavily on Jones.
My comp of Downs to Reed was not based on style but on the fact neither play when they only line up 2 WR's.I think Downs is a lot better than a Jayden Reed type. I think he's more of a Tyler Lockett type, who is more of a route runner than Reed, who is more of a RAC guy
And I'm saying this as someone who the only player among these 3 I own in dynasty is Downs, though just one team.I'm saying this as a Colts fan. I don't have any of the players mentioned on any of my fantasy teams. That includes, Downs, Warren, or Pittman.
You seem to be forgetting someone.And I'm saying this as someone who the only player among these 3 I own in dynasty is Downs, though just one team.I'm saying this as a Colts fan. I don't have any of the players mentioned on any of my fantasy teams. That includes, Downs, Warren, or Pittman.
I just simply view PIttman as a guy they are paying $23M to be their every down possession receiver, an arch-type tailor made for a large target share.
I got them close enough in target share I don't think it's really worth spending a lot of energy over, I just could not disagree more that Downs is any more reason to fade Pittman then vice versa.
I think you know Warren did not slip my mind, this convo emanated from the notion that Downs was a reason to fade Pittman or kill his upside.If Warren is a threat, he's a threat to both of them.You seem to be forgetting someone.And I'm saying this as someone who the only player among these 3 I own in dynasty is Downs, though just one team.I'm saying this as a Colts fan. I don't have any of the players mentioned on any of my fantasy teams. That includes, Downs, Warren, or Pittman.
I just simply view PIttman as a guy they are paying $23M to be their every down possession receiver, an arch-type tailor made for a large target share.
I got them close enough in target share I don't think it's really worth spending a lot of energy over, I just could not disagree more that Downs is any more reason to fade Pittman then vice versa.
Not from my post 673. I gave Warren just as much love as Downs. With both together, fade Pittman.I think you know Warren did not slip my mind, this convo emanated from the notion that Downs was a reason to fade Pittman or kill his upside.If Warren is a threat, he's a threat to both of them.You seem to be forgetting someone.And I'm saying this as someone who the only player among these 3 I own in dynasty is Downs, though just one team.I'm saying this as a Colts fan. I don't have any of the players mentioned on any of my fantasy teams. That includes, Downs, Warren, or Pittman.
I just simply view PIttman as a guy they are paying $23M to be their every down possession receiver, an arch-type tailor made for a large target share.
I got them close enough in target share I don't think it's really worth spending a lot of energy over, I just could not disagree more that Downs is any more reason to fade Pittman then vice versa.
Yes, this is what I'm saying I think is wrong and am not agreeing with, will say no more on it.Not from my post 673. I gave Warren just as much love as Downs. With both together, fade Pittman.I think you know Warren did not slip my mind, this convo emanated from the notion that Downs was a reason to fade Pittman or kill his upside.If Warren is a threat, he's a threat to both of them.You seem to be forgetting someone.And I'm saying this as someone who the only player among these 3 I own in dynasty is Downs, though just one team.I'm saying this as a Colts fan. I don't have any of the players mentioned on any of my fantasy teams. That includes, Downs, Warren, or Pittman.
I just simply view PIttman as a guy they are paying $23M to be their every down possession receiver, an arch-type tailor made for a large target share.
I got them close enough in target share I don't think it's really worth spending a lot of energy over, I just could not disagree more that Downs is any more reason to fade Pittman then vice versa.
Cool.Yes, this is what I'm saying I think is wrong and am not agreeing with, will say no more on it.Not from my post 673. I gave Warren just as much love as Downs. With both together, fade Pittman.I think you know Warren did not slip my mind, this convo emanated from the notion that Downs was a reason to fade Pittman or kill his upside.If Warren is a threat, he's a threat to both of them.You seem to be forgetting someone.And I'm saying this as someone who the only player among these 3 I own in dynasty is Downs, though just one team.I'm saying this as a Colts fan. I don't have any of the players mentioned on any of my fantasy teams. That includes, Downs, Warren, or Pittman.
I just simply view PIttman as a guy they are paying $23M to be their every down possession receiver, an arch-type tailor made for a large target share.
I got them close enough in target share I don't think it's really worth spending a lot of energy over, I just could not disagree more that Downs is any more reason to fade Pittman then vice versa.
Traded him 2 years ago after they drafted AR in 2 leagues, sell high. Hoping Dimes as the starter I bought low this offseason, low risk with a possible high reward.Danny Dimes named the starter, Pittman is viable again.
Not terribly hard to believe, Downs avg around 15 ppg with Flacco last year. If Jones can settle in close to Flacco, Downs could have a great year.I saw some rankings that had Downs ahead of Pittman. Really?
Downs on a per snap basis and just the way he runs, he gets open pretty easily has some separation/route running prowess. The overall passing game won't be great this year and the guys that run downfield in order will be hurt the most Pierce, then Pittman and it might increase Downs' and Warren's value now that Jones is the starter. He is notoriously ranked one of the lowest ADOT starting QBs since he has come into the league, he is super risk averse.Not terribly hard to believe, Downs avg around 15 ppg with Flacco last year. If Jones can settle in close to Flacco, Downs could have a great year.I saw some rankings that had Downs ahead of Pittman. Really?
Not sure I'd have him ahead of Pittman, but I'd probably have them so close it's almost inconsequential. If we believe the story they are selling, Pittman played through most of last season with a busted back that would have kept most players on the sidelines the whole year. As an owner who watches all his games; I can at least say his skill level on the field seemed to take a pretty big dip from where it was the previous 3 years. I hope for a return to form; I mean this guy was mid to high end WR2 numbers on a dumpster fire of an offense.Downs on a per snap basis and just the way he runs, he gets open pretty easily has some separation/route running prowess. The overall passing game won't be great this year and the guys that run downfield in order will be hurt the most Pierce, then Pittman and it might increase Downs' and Warren's value now that Jones is the starter. He is notoriously ranked one of the lowest ADOT starting QBs since he has come into the league, he is super risk averse.Not terribly hard to believe, Downs avg around 15 ppg with Flacco last year. If Jones can settle in close to Flacco, Downs could have a great year.I saw some rankings that had Downs ahead of Pittman. Really?