McGarnicle
Footballguy
It's kind of crazy to say this, but when I watch Beckham play, the first guy that comes to mind is Michael Jordan.
At first i though the comparison was ridiculous but the more he plays the more appropriate it is.It's kind of crazy to say this, but when I watch Beckham play, the first guy that comes to mind is Michael Jordan.
See, this is the hype I'm talking about (although I think/hope? this is sarcasm). Saying a rookie WRs FLOOR is a HOF WR is a bit over-the-top.Just want to point this out for my own selfish reasons . Although Marvin Harrison may be OBJ's floor nowThe guy screams Marvin Harrison to me. If he can develop his route running more and more that may be his ceiling (not exactly a low ceiling there).
forgot that Keenan had an extra 1/4 of a season to put those numbers upKeenan Allen - 104 targets, 71/1046/9 (14.7 YPR)
Beckham - 109 targets, 79/1120/11 (14.2 YPR)
He did most of that in 13 games (68/1016/9) compared to what Beckham has done in 11. No question Beckham has had an all-time great rookie year, just putting it in context.forgot that Keenan had an extra 1/4 of a season to put those numbers upKeenan Allen - 104 targets, 71/1046/9 (14.7 YPR)
Beckham - 109 targets, 79/1120/11 (14.2 YPR)
so beckham had better numbers across the board in two less games isnt really putting anything in contextHe did most of that in 13 games (68/1016/9) compared to what Beckham has done in 11. No question Beckham has had an all-time great rookie year, just putting it in context.forgot that Keenan had an extra 1/4 of a season to put those numbers upKeenan Allen - 104 targets, 71/1046/9 (14.7 YPR)
Beckham - 109 targets, 79/1120/11 (14.2 YPR)
Totally agree. "Guys don't forget....Allen did less than Beckham in more games! Context!"Also, if you use your two eyeballs to actually watch Beckham and KAllen play football, the difference in ability is evident.so beckham had better numbers across the board in two less games isnt really putting anything in contextHe did most of that in 13 games (68/1016/9) compared to what Beckham has done in 11. No question Beckham has had an all-time great rookie year, just putting it in context.forgot that Keenan had an extra 1/4 of a season to put those numbers upKeenan Allen - 104 targets, 71/1046/9 (14.7 YPR)
Beckham - 109 targets, 79/1120/11 (14.2 YPR)
well the fact that he couldn't play a full season healthy yet is also a factor as well. let's just ignore his hammy issues kept him sidelined for like 4 months.so beckham had better numbers across the board in two less games isnt really putting anything in contextHe did most of that in 13 games (68/1016/9) compared to what Beckham has done in 11. No question Beckham has had an all-time great rookie year, just putting it in context.forgot that Keenan had an extra 1/4 of a season to put those numbers upKeenan Allen - 104 targets, 71/1046/9 (14.7 YPR)
Beckham - 109 targets, 79/1120/11 (14.2 YPR)
Not Gordon-Drew Bennett, last 8 games of 2004.Jed said:Probably Gordon, but what's your point?Bayhawks said:ODB-last 8 games:
94 targets, 69 catches, 1014 yards, 127 yards/game, 14.7 YPR, 8 TD
???WR-8 game stretch:
79 targets, 47 catches, 859 yards, 107 yards/game, 18.3 YPR, 10 TD
Whose the mystery WR?
Bennett was not a rookie in 2004, but we get the point (although Beckham only being a rookie is a major factor in the hype he's getting).Not Gordon-Drew Bennett, last 8 games of 2004.The point is that a small sample size doesn't always extrapolate to season-long, or career-long numbers.Jed said:Probably Gordon, but what's your point?Bayhawks said:ODB-last 8 games:
94 targets, 69 catches, 1014 yards, 127 yards/game, 14.7 YPR, 8 TD
???WR-8 game stretch:
79 targets, 47 catches, 859 yards, 107 yards/game, 18.3 YPR, 10 TD
Whose the mystery WR?
ODB has been a stud over the last 8 games. That doesn't mean he will put up those same numbers over the rest of his career, or over an entire season.
numbers may be similar but players aren't close. I had Allen in a dynasty and traded him because I felt his value wouldn't be higher. He's not a special player, he was just the last man standing.Keenan Allen - 104 targets, 71/1046/9 (14.7 YPR)
Beckham - 109 targets, 79/1120/11 (14.2 YPR)
Absolutely agree. 100%. If we could find ADP data for Moss' sophomore season, I'd be willing to bet that he wasn't the 1.1 pick either. But I can't find any ADP data for 1999.Bennett was not a rookie in 2004, but we get the point (although Beckham only being a rookie is a major factor in the hype he's getting).Not Gordon-Drew Bennett, last 8 games of 2004.The point is that a small sample size doesn't always extrapolate to season-long, or career-long numbers.Jed said:Probably Gordon, but what's your point?Bayhawks said:ODB-last 8 games:
94 targets, 69 catches, 1014 yards, 127 yards/game, 14.7 YPR, 8 TD
???WR-8 game stretch:
79 targets, 47 catches, 859 yards, 107 yards/game, 18.3 YPR, 10 TD
Whose the mystery WR?
ODB has been a stud over the last 8 games. That doesn't mean he will put up those same numbers over the rest of his career, or over an entire season.
I certainly agree that Beckham will not have a 2000 yard rec. season next year, or ever.
However, i have not seen a rookie WR dominate like this since Randy Moss. Someone who is eye-poppingly and obviously the most dangerous weapon on the field. The Claytons/Boldins/Allens of the world had impressive, very good rookie seasons. None of them were on the level as OBJ.
the question is what Cruz's role will be not what Beckham's will be. The offense will be built around Beckham and the other pieces will fall where they fall.Allen's rookie year wasn't as impressive as ODB's.
Since Cruz got hurt, Beckham has been a stud. There's no debating that.
What will his role be when Cruz gets back?
Will he have a "sophomore" slump?
Will defenses adjust to him in his second year?
Those are questions that need to be asked.
Evans is absolute freak and a special all around talant... I love this guy immensely and hes always a safe bet for high TDs... and he played w absolute TRASH at QB, whereas Beckham had a luxury at that position in comparisonEvans deserves mention alongside Beckham in a more generic thread. Evans is also a special guy.
I keep seeing this but don't get it. Is Cobb an issue for Jordy, Holt an issue for Bruce, Wayne an issue for Harrison, is Jeffrey an issue for Marshall? It's not as if there's some static pie that they all have to take a slice from and if you add more weapons your slice gets smaller....when you add weapons to your offense the size of the pie tends to increase and instead of scoring 17 points a game you now score 27 points a game. Thus on a relative basis things can stay the same and in some cases improve for all involved.Only problem for ODB next draft would/will be a healthy Victor Cruz.
IF TB drafts Mariota, and if it's a non-PPR (TD-heavy) dynasty league, then I would take Evans. And I'm just about the biggest ODB fan there is. Anyway, this is an ODB thread but the subject of relative draft slots came up.Evans is absolute freak and a special all around talant... I love this guy immensely and hes always a safe bet for high TDs... and he played w absolute TRASH at QB, whereas Beckham had a luxury at that position in comparisonEvans deserves mention alongside Beckham in a more generic thread. Evans is also a special guy.
if you have either guy youre happier than a pig in ####... beckham is just unreal, but statistically speaking, Evans numbers dont tell the whole story either... anyone who watched TB games knows that his QBs left an EASY 400+ yards and 3-4tds MINIMUM on the field, that 90 percent of the leagues qbs couldve hit him for
if we redrafted now for a dynasty... no idea who id take first? but id happy as hell i had that choice and flip a coin
What are you basing this on? Real info, or your hope/belief that this will be the case? I would like to see them do this, but you saying it will happen doesn't actually make it true.the question is what Cruz's role will be not what Beckham's will be. The offense will be built around Beckham and the other pieces will fall where they fall.Allen's rookie year wasn't as impressive as ODB's.
Since Cruz got hurt, Beckham has been a stud. There's no debating that.
What will his role be when Cruz gets back?
Will he have a "sophomore" slump?
Will defenses adjust to him in his second year?
Those are questions that need to be asked.
It's not like defenses are taking it easy on him now or he's surprising anyone ...but a question I've asked several times in here that hasn't been answered...how do you stop him? what is his weakness? He's smart and can read defenses, they can move him all around their formations, can run all routes, lightning fast. Also, let's not forget that this isn't a one way street where only the defense can improve and slow him down...he is a rookie and most rookies tend to improve as they continue to learn player personnel and their tendencies, schemes and coverages and from everything I've heard this kids a film junkie so he's going to put in the time and work to continue to improve his game. All you have to do is listen to him and you'll know that. There's a reason he's reaching out to all time greats like Rice and Jordan and Lebron, he wants to be one of the best and wants to learn from the best what it takes. Very mature kid and that mixed with his talent is an amazing and scary combination.
ODB is on pace for 188 targets in a 16 game season. I understand the idea of a better offense leading to more opportunities, but if Cruz comes back, he isn't going to see 188 targets (won't see that anyway). That's the point. Whether he sees 150 targets or 100 targets due to Cruz' return (or some other number) is the idea of Cruz being a "problem."I keep seeing this but don't get it. Is Cobb an issue for Jordy, Holt an issue for Bruce, Wayne an issue for Harrison, is Jeffrey an issue for Marshall? It's not as if there's some static pie that they all have to take a slice from and if you add more weapons your slice gets smaller....when you add weapons to your offense the size of the pie tends to increase and instead of scoring 17 points a game you now score 27 points a game. Thus on a relative basis things can stay the same and in some cases improve for all involved.Only problem for ODB next draft would/will be a healthy Victor Cruz.
Well sure, the coaching staff could royally screw up and NOT do that.What are you basing this on? Real info, or your hope/belief that this will be the case? I would like to see them do this, but you saying it will happen doesn't actually make it true.
Of course he will regress some. If he didnt he would be a hall of famer with 3 years of stats.ODB is on pace for 188 targets in a 16 game season. I understand the idea of a better offense leading to more opportunities, but if Cruz comes back, he isn't going to see 188 targets (won't see that anyway). That's the point. Whether he sees 150 targets or 100 targets due to Cruz' return (or some other number) is the idea of Cruz being a "problem."I keep seeing this but don't get it. Is Cobb an issue for Jordy, Holt an issue for Bruce, Wayne an issue for Harrison, is Jeffrey an issue for Marshall? It's not as if there's some static pie that they all have to take a slice from and if you add more weapons your slice gets smaller....when you add weapons to your offense the size of the pie tends to increase and instead of scoring 17 points a game you now score 27 points a game. Thus on a relative basis things can stay the same and in some cases improve for all involved.Only problem for ODB next draft would/will be a healthy Victor Cruz.
Look up players that have suffered patellar tendon injuries. (cadillac williams, ryan williams). Cruz will be the one thats lucky to get 100 targets. I know the Giants have needs all over the field, but WR actually is probably on their wish list as well going into the offseason. Randle is still a bad route runner, and the Giants know very well that Cruz will likely never be the same. Hard to say what they think of Corey Washington at this point. Regardless, Beckham is a very good bet for an awful lot of targets next year.ODB is on pace for 188 targets in a 16 game season. I understand the idea of a better offense leading to more opportunities, but if Cruz comes back, he isn't going to see 188 targets (won't see that anyway). That's the point. Whether he sees 150 targets or 100 targets due to Cruz' return (or some other number) is the idea of Cruz being a "problem."I keep seeing this but don't get it. Is Cobb an issue for Jordy, Holt an issue for Bruce, Wayne an issue for Harrison, is Jeffrey an issue for Marshall? It's not as if there's some static pie that they all have to take a slice from and if you add more weapons your slice gets smaller....when you add weapons to your offense the size of the pie tends to increase and instead of scoring 17 points a game you now score 27 points a game. Thus on a relative basis things can stay the same and in some cases improve for all involved.Only problem for ODB next draft would/will be a healthy Victor Cruz.
Again, you believe that the coaching staff will say "let's re-build our offense around him," and maybe you're even right that they should. That doesn't mean that they will.Well sure, the coaching staff could royally screw up and NOT do that.What are you basing this on? Real info, or your hope/belief that this will be the case? I would like to see them do this, but you saying it will happen doesn't actually make it true.
Then this would fall under the qualifier of a "healthy" Cruz. Obviously, if Cruz isn't able to return to his top form, he will have a much smaller impact on ODB than if he were healthy.Look up players that have suffered patellar tendon injuries. (cadillac williams, ryan williams). Cruz will be the one thats lucky to get 100 targets. I know the Giants have needs all over the field, but WR actually is probably on their wish list as well going into the offseason. Randle is still a bad route runner, and the Giants know very well that Cruz will likely never be the same. Hard to say what they think of Corey Washington at this point. Regardless, Beckham is a very good bet for an awful lot of targets next year.ODB is on pace for 188 targets in a 16 game season. I understand the idea of a better offense leading to more opportunities, but if Cruz comes back, he isn't going to see 188 targets (won't see that anyway). That's the point. Whether he sees 150 targets or 100 targets due to Cruz' return (or some other number) is the idea of Cruz being a "problem."I keep seeing this but don't get it. Is Cobb an issue for Jordy, Holt an issue for Bruce, Wayne an issue for Harrison, is Jeffrey an issue for Marshall? It's not as if there's some static pie that they all have to take a slice from and if you add more weapons your slice gets smaller....when you add weapons to your offense the size of the pie tends to increase and instead of scoring 17 points a game you now score 27 points a game. Thus on a relative basis things can stay the same and in some cases improve for all involved.Only problem for ODB next draft would/will be a healthy Victor Cruz.
This is just silly. Of course nobody here has the "Giants 2015 Season Gameplan" at their disposal.Again, you believe that the coaching staff will say "let's re-build our offense around him," and maybe you're even right that they should. That doesn't mean that they will. I think the Broncos shouldn't have tried be a run-heavy team, but they did, and their offense suffered greatly.Well sure, the coaching staff could royally screw up and NOT do that.What are you basing this on? Real info, or your hope/belief that this will be the case? I would like to see them do this, but you saying it will happen doesn't actually make it true.
I think that the Colts shouldn't keep giving the ball to Trent Richardson, but they continued to do so until recently.
I think that the KC Chiefs (before Reid) should have featured Jamaal Charles more, but they didn't.
What we think should happen doesn't always happen. So forgive me if I try to determine whether information posted is actual information, or just the hopes of posters.
It's a strong belief based on listening to the team and watching him on the field. They are already building their offense around him like they never did for Cruz and Cruz coming off an injury I don't believe will change anything. It obviously remains to be seen what impact Cruz will have coming off a serious injury. When the team and guys around it are saying they haven't seen a player with his impact since Lawrence Taylor it speaks volumes that they see him as an impact player and as such will utilize him as such.What are you basing this on? Real info, or your hope/belief that this will be the case? I would like to see them do this, but you saying it will happen doesn't actually make it true.the question is what Cruz's role will be not what Beckham's will be. The offense will be built around Beckham and the other pieces will fall where they fall.Allen's rookie year wasn't as impressive as ODB's.
Since Cruz got hurt, Beckham has been a stud. There's no debating that.
What will his role be when Cruz gets back?
Will he have a "sophomore" slump?
Will defenses adjust to him in his second year?
Those are questions that need to be asked.
It's not like defenses are taking it easy on him now or he's surprising anyone ...but a question I've asked several times in here that hasn't been answered...how do you stop him? what is his weakness? He's smart and can read defenses, they can move him all around their formations, can run all routes, lightning fast. Also, let's not forget that this isn't a one way street where only the defense can improve and slow him down...he is a rookie and most rookies tend to improve as they continue to learn player personnel and their tendencies, schemes and coverages and from everything I've heard this kids a film junkie so he's going to put in the time and work to continue to improve his game. All you have to do is listen to him and you'll know that. There's a reason he's reaching out to all time greats like Rice and Jordan and Lebron, he wants to be one of the best and wants to learn from the best what it takes. Very mature kid and that mixed with his talent is an amazing and scary combination.
I don't know that you can assume that he won't. I think he's one of the best wr's in the league and will be targetted as such. Right now he's being targetted at 11.75/game...through 15 weeks A. Brown is at 11.4, Thomas is 10.9, Jones 10.5, Edelman, VJax, Nelson @ 9.6. He may have a slight down tick but he's going to be up there at the top of the list because they are going to throw it to him at the LOS as well as all over the field. With the impact that he has when the ball is in his hands why wouldn't they try as much as possible to put it there? They are running reverses with him, he's returning punts...they know he has game breaking explosiveness and as they've said you need to get the ball in his hands.ODB is on pace for 188 targets in a 16 game season. I understand the idea of a better offense leading to more opportunities, but if Cruz comes back, he isn't going to see 188 targets (won't see that anyway). That's the point. Whether he sees 150 targets or 100 targets due to Cruz' return (or some other number) is the idea of Cruz being a "problem."I keep seeing this but don't get it. Is Cobb an issue for Jordy, Holt an issue for Bruce, Wayne an issue for Harrison, is Jeffrey an issue for Marshall? It's not as if there's some static pie that they all have to take a slice from and if you add more weapons your slice gets smaller....when you add weapons to your offense the size of the pie tends to increase and instead of scoring 17 points a game you now score 27 points a game. Thus on a relative basis things can stay the same and in some cases improve for all involved.Only problem for ODB next draft would/will be a healthy Victor Cruz.
they've already done it. By building the offense around doesn't mean that only he will get the ball. Obviously they will still run the ball and throw the ball to others..but you can already see that they are building multiple plays into the offense to get him the ball in all spots..throwing the ball, running reverses, a few throws at the LOS each game and using him to draw coverage.Again, you believe that the coaching staff will say "let's re-build our offense around him," and maybe you're even right that they should. That doesn't mean that they will.Well sure, the coaching staff could royally screw up and NOT do that.What are you basing this on? Real info, or your hope/belief that this will be the case? I would like to see them do this, but you saying it will happen doesn't actually make it true.
I think the Broncos shouldn't have tried be a run-heavy team, but they did, and their offense suffered greatly.
I think that the Colts shouldn't keep giving the ball to Trent Richardson, but they continued to do so until recently.
I think that the KC Chiefs (before Reid) should have featured Jamaal Charles more, but they didn't.
What we think should happen doesn't always happen. So forgive me if I try to determine whether information posted is actual information, or just the hopes of posters.
I haven't predicted anything, other than he won't go pick 1.1, and that I think he will go in the 3rd round, maybe 2nd. Those thoughts are based on my FF experience and how RBs tend to be over-valued in the early rounds.This is just silly. Of course nobody here has the "Giants 2015 Season Gameplan" at their disposal.Again, you believe that the coaching staff will say "let's re-build our offense around him," and maybe you're even right that they should. That doesn't mean that they will. I think the Broncos shouldn't have tried be a run-heavy team, but they did, and their offense suffered greatly.Well sure, the coaching staff could royally screw up and NOT do that.What are you basing this on? Real info, or your hope/belief that this will be the case? I would like to see them do this, but you saying it will happen doesn't actually make it true.
I think that the Colts shouldn't keep giving the ball to Trent Richardson, but they continued to do so until recently.
I think that the KC Chiefs (before Reid) should have featured Jamaal Charles more, but they didn't.
What we think should happen doesn't always happen. So forgive me if I try to determine whether information posted is actual information, or just the hopes of posters.
So what "actual" information are you basing your take on? What actual information are you using to best project ODB moving forward?
Okay, listening to the team. What comments from the team have led you to this strong belief?It's a strong belief based on listening to the team and watching him on the field. They are already building their offense around him like they never did for Cruz and Cruz coming off an injury I don't believe will change anything. It obviously remains to be seen what impact Cruz will have coming off a serious injury. When the team and guys around it are saying they haven't seen a player with his impact since Lawrence Taylor it speaks volumes that they see him as an impact player and as such will utilize him as such.What are you basing this on? Real info, or your hope/belief that this will be the case? I would like to see them do this, but you saying it will happen doesn't actually make it true.the question is what Cruz's role will be not what Beckham's will be. The offense will be built around Beckham and the other pieces will fall where they fall.Allen's rookie year wasn't as impressive as ODB's.
Since Cruz got hurt, Beckham has been a stud. There's no debating that.
What will his role be when Cruz gets back?
Will he have a "sophomore" slump?
Will defenses adjust to him in his second year?
Those are questions that need to be asked.
It's not like defenses are taking it easy on him now or he's surprising anyone ...but a question I've asked several times in here that hasn't been answered...how do you stop him? what is his weakness? He's smart and can read defenses, they can move him all around their formations, can run all routes, lightning fast. Also, let's not forget that this isn't a one way street where only the defense can improve and slow him down...he is a rookie and most rookies tend to improve as they continue to learn player personnel and their tendencies, schemes and coverages and from everything I've heard this kids a film junkie so he's going to put in the time and work to continue to improve his game. All you have to do is listen to him and you'll know that. There's a reason he's reaching out to all time greats like Rice and Jordan and Lebron, he wants to be one of the best and wants to learn from the best what it takes. Very mature kid and that mixed with his talent is an amazing and scary combination.
Because it's an absurdly high number.I don't know that you can assume that he won't. I think he's one of the best wr's in the league and will be targetted as such. Right now he's being targetted at 11.75/game...through 15 weeks A. Brown is at 11.4, Thomas is 10.9, Jones 10.5, Edelman, VJax, Nelson @ 9.6. He may have a slight down tick but he's going to be up there at the top of the list because they are going to throw it to him at the LOS as well as all over the field. With the impact that he has when the ball is in his hands why wouldn't they try as much as possible to put it there? They are running reverses with him, he's returning punts...they know he has game breaking explosiveness and as they've said you need to get the ball in his hands.ODB is on pace for 188 targets in a 16 game season. I understand the idea of a better offense leading to more opportunities, but if Cruz comes back, he isn't going to see 188 targets (won't see that anyway). That's the point. Whether he sees 150 targets or 100 targets due to Cruz' return (or some other number) is the idea of Cruz being a "problem."I keep seeing this but don't get it. Is Cobb an issue for Jordy, Holt an issue for Bruce, Wayne an issue for Harrison, is Jeffrey an issue for Marshall? It's not as if there's some static pie that they all have to take a slice from and if you add more weapons your slice gets smaller....when you add weapons to your offense the size of the pie tends to increase and instead of scoring 17 points a game you now score 27 points a game. Thus on a relative basis things can stay the same and in some cases improve for all involved.Only problem for ODB next draft would/will be a healthy Victor Cruz.
Can't believe you left out Chuck Norris.IheartGuinness said:No one's "against him." I think everyone agrees he's having one hell of a season and he's terrifically talented.Kool-Aid Larry said:I was just skimming this thread, but is the case against him now basically just that he might not put up 180/2k/16 next year?
Some just aren't ready to anoint him the next coming of Jerry Rice/Randy Moss/ Jesus Christ/ Julius Caesar/ Alexander the Great/ Abraham Lincoln/ Martin Luther King, Jr./ George Washington/ the prophet Muhammad/ Thomas Jefferson/ Isaac Newton/ William Shakespeare/ Charlemagne/ Teddy Roosevelt/ Mozart/ Aristotle/ Leonardo da Vinci/ Benjamin Franklin/ Ptolemy/ King David/ Akhenaton/ Plato/ Saint Peter/ Genghis Khan/ Buddha/ Louis XIV/ Albert Einstein/ Augustus/ Winston Churchill/ Mohandas Gandhi/ Napoleon Bonaparte/ Nelson Mandela/ Descartes/ Saladin/ William the Conqueror/ Robert E. Lee/ Gandalf/ Darth Vader/ Mickey Mouse/ Charles V/ Bob Hope/ Michelangelo/ Sun Tzu/ Thomas Edison/ Galileo/ Bill Murray, or even the next Michael Irvin, Marvin Harrison, or Cris Carter.
The offense has been built around him because their RB has been hurt a lot this year, their WR1 is out for the season, their WR2 has been a huge dissappointment, and their D stinks, so they've been behind, a lot.they've already done it. By building the offense around doesn't mean that only he will get the ball. Obviously they will still run the ball and throw the ball to others..but you can already see that they are building multiple plays into the offense to get him the ball in all spots..throwing the ball, running reverses, a few throws at the LOS each game and using him to draw coverage.Again, you believe that the coaching staff will say "let's re-build our offense around him," and maybe you're even right that they should. That doesn't mean that they will.Well sure, the coaching staff could royally screw up and NOT do that.What are you basing this on? Real info, or your hope/belief that this will be the case? I would like to see them do this, but you saying it will happen doesn't actually make it true.
I think the Broncos shouldn't have tried be a run-heavy team, but they did, and their offense suffered greatly.
I think that the Colts shouldn't keep giving the ball to Trent Richardson, but they continued to do so until recently.
I think that the KC Chiefs (before Reid) should have featured Jamaal Charles more, but they didn't.
What we think should happen doesn't always happen. So forgive me if I try to determine whether information posted is actual information, or just the hopes of posters.
He's also been compared to Randy Moss, Jesus Christ, Buddha, and Marvin Harrison, so it all averages out just fine.Kool-Aid Larry said:and btw, when he's getting compared to trent richardson and mike clayton, yes, somebody's definitely "against him"IheartGuinness said:No one's "against him." I think everyone agrees he's having one hell of a season and he's terrifically talented.Kool-Aid Larry said:I was just skimming this thread, but is the case against him now basically just that he might not put up 180/2k/16 next year?
Too long. What can I say, it's the holidays. It's quiet at the office.BruceAlmighty said:Naw man. All in fun. Serious question though: how long did it take you to compile that list? The list was epic.Edit: Seriously, if that list were a football player, it'd be ODB!
quotes from Harry Carson and others that have been around the team for a long time comparing impact to LT. That's a shocking comparison and not one that people would make lightly quite frankly so when I hear things like that my ears perk up. Not that I think it's unjustified, more just what some people think of his talent and abilities...it doesn't get any higher than comparisons to LT with respect to the Giants.Okay, listening to the team. What comments from the team have led you to this strong belief?It's a strong belief based on listening to the team and watching him on the field. They are already building their offense around him like they never did for Cruz and Cruz coming off an injury I don't believe will change anything. It obviously remains to be seen what impact Cruz will have coming off a serious injury. When the team and guys around it are saying they haven't seen a player with his impact since Lawrence Taylor it speaks volumes that they see him as an impact player and as such will utilize him as such.What are you basing this on? Real info, or your hope/belief that this will be the case? I would like to see them do this, but you saying it will happen doesn't actually make it true.the question is what Cruz's role will be not what Beckham's will be. The offense will be built around Beckham and the other pieces will fall where they fall.Allen's rookie year wasn't as impressive as ODB's.
Since Cruz got hurt, Beckham has been a stud. There's no debating that.
What will his role be when Cruz gets back?
Will he have a "sophomore" slump?
Will defenses adjust to him in his second year?
Those are questions that need to be asked.
It's not like defenses are taking it easy on him now or he's surprising anyone ...but a question I've asked several times in here that hasn't been answered...how do you stop him? what is his weakness? He's smart and can read defenses, they can move him all around their formations, can run all routes, lightning fast. Also, let's not forget that this isn't a one way street where only the defense can improve and slow him down...he is a rookie and most rookies tend to improve as they continue to learn player personnel and their tendencies, schemes and coverages and from everything I've heard this kids a film junkie so he's going to put in the time and work to continue to improve his game. All you have to do is listen to him and you'll know that. There's a reason he's reaching out to all time greats like Rice and Jordan and Lebron, he wants to be one of the best and wants to learn from the best what it takes. Very mature kid and that mixed with his talent is an amazing and scary combination.
I'm not challenging you, just asking for more substance. If the Giants have made comments that indicate this, that is good for his FF stock, IMO.
I wouldn't project that many and I wouldn't project that he gets 2,000 yards and 16 tds. I do think he'll be in the top 5 or so in terms of targets though...10ish a game.Because it's an absurdly high number.I don't know that you can assume that he won't. I think he's one of the best wr's in the league and will be targetted as such. Right now he's being targetted at 11.75/game...through 15 weeks A. Brown is at 11.4, Thomas is 10.9, Jones 10.5, Edelman, VJax, Nelson @ 9.6. He may have a slight down tick but he's going to be up there at the top of the list because they are going to throw it to him at the LOS as well as all over the field. With the impact that he has when the ball is in his hands why wouldn't they try as much as possible to put it there? They are running reverses with him, he's returning punts...they know he has game breaking explosiveness and as they've said you need to get the ball in his hands.ODB is on pace for 188 targets in a 16 game season. I understand the idea of a better offense leading to more opportunities, but if Cruz comes back, he isn't going to see 188 targets (won't see that anyway). That's the point. Whether he sees 150 targets or 100 targets due to Cruz' return (or some other number) is the idea of Cruz being a "problem."I keep seeing this but don't get it. Is Cobb an issue for Jordy, Holt an issue for Bruce, Wayne an issue for Harrison, is Jeffrey an issue for Marshall? It's not as if there's some static pie that they all have to take a slice from and if you add more weapons your slice gets smaller....when you add weapons to your offense the size of the pie tends to increase and instead of scoring 17 points a game you now score 27 points a game. Thus on a relative basis things can stay the same and in some cases improve for all involved.Only problem for ODB next draft would/will be a healthy Victor Cruz.
In Harrison's record setting year, he had 205 targets. He never had another season with 188.
Is it possible that Beckham gets that many targets? Sure.
It it wise to predict, project, or expect that many? No.
"I'm the best there is, the best there was and the best there ever will be."What cant he do?
Reminds me of the old Mr. Perfect promos the WWF used to cut
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GzWTSzkYmxo
Right. Hell , tbey might give him 20 targets a game next year.This is just silly. Of course nobody here has the "Giants 2015 Season Gameplan" at their disposal.So what "actual" information are you basing your take on? What actual information are you using to best project ODB moving forward?Again, you believe that the coaching staff will say "let's re-build our offense around him," and maybe you're even right that they should. That doesn't mean that they will. I think the Broncos shouldn't have tried be a run-heavy team, but they did, and their offense suffered greatly.Well sure, the coaching staff could royally screw up and NOT do that.What are you basing this on? Real info, or your hope/belief that this will be the case? I would like to see them do this, but you saying it will happen doesn't actually make it true.
I think that the Colts shouldn't keep giving the ball to Trent Richardson, but they continued to do so until recently.
I think that the KC Chiefs (before Reid) should have featured Jamaal Charles more, but they didn't.
What we think should happen doesn't always happen. So forgive me if I try to determine whether information posted is actual information, or just the hopes of posters.
ThisCruz is a good WR but ODB if the best player on the team. They will find ways to get him the ball regardless of Cruz. Cruz will just eat into the other WR targets.
It really is appropriate.At first i though the comparison was ridiculous but the more he plays the more appropriate it is.It's kind of crazy to say this, but when I watch Beckham play, the first guy that comes to mind is Michael Jordan.
It really is appropriate.At first i though the comparison was ridiculous but the more he plays the more appropriate it is.It's kind of crazy to say this, but when I watch Beckham play, the first guy that comes to mind is Michael Jordan.
When Eli heaves the ball towards the young phenom, the anticipation from the crowd of seeing something memorable, something they will tell their children and grand-children about is palpable even through the television.
That, my friends is Jordan-esque.