What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

WR Rashee Rice, KC (1 Viewer)

Doing an FFPC startup and 1 pick away from my 3.06. Rice still on the board and really tempting. But probably chicken out and grab HIggins and hope Rice falls into the 4th.
I got him at 4.09 in a 12-team start-up, and that was when we knew nothing about the legal process.

He should be there at 4.07

Should. That’s a lot of picks.
ETA: FFPC drafts the last 3 days have his ADP at 43 overall. Hasn’t changed a bit, surprisingly. That is exactly 4.07, btw.
I have 4.04 from a trade and my own 4.07. Hoping for Rice and Chase Brown. Would be a nice start.

Jeanty 1.09 (traded 1.06 and 5.06 for 1.09 and 4.04)
Nico 2.07
Higgins 3.06
Not that anyone gives a rats assssssss, but Rice fell to 4.04.

Chase Brown however went 3.11, so he's moving up. Went 4.06 and 4.07 in the last 2 I did. Unfortunate
 
Doing an FFPC startup and 1 pick away from my 3.06. Rice still on the board and really tempting. But probably chicken out and grab HIggins and hope Rice falls into the 4th.
I got him at 4.09 in a 12-team start-up, and that was when we knew nothing about the legal process.

He should be there at 4.07

Should. That’s a lot of picks.
ETA: FFPC drafts the last 3 days have his ADP at 43 overall. Hasn’t changed a bit, surprisingly. That is exactly 4.07, btw.
I have 4.04 from a trade and my own 4.07. Hoping for Rice and Chase Brown. Would be a nice start.

Jeanty 1.09 (traded 1.06 and 5.06 for 1.09 and 4.04)
Nico 2.07
Higgins 3.06
Not that anyone gives a rats assssssss, but Rice fell to 4.04.

Chase Brown however went 3.11, so he's moving up. Went 4.06 and 4.07 in the last 2 I did. Unfortunate
Yeah, based on ADP it was a long shot he’d make it back to you.

Who’d you end up taking at 4.09?
 
Doing an FFPC startup and 1 pick away from my 3.06. Rice still on the board and really tempting. But probably chicken out and grab HIggins and hope Rice falls into the 4th.
I got him at 4.09 in a 12-team start-up, and that was when we knew nothing about the legal process.

He should be there at 4.07

Should. That’s a lot of picks.
ETA: FFPC drafts the last 3 days have his ADP at 43 overall. Hasn’t changed a bit, surprisingly. That is exactly 4.07, btw.
I have 4.04 from a trade and my own 4.07. Hoping for Rice and Chase Brown. Would be a nice start.

Jeanty 1.09 (traded 1.06 and 5.06 for 1.09 and 4.04)
Nico 2.07
Higgins 3.06
Not that anyone gives a rats assssssss, but Rice fell to 4.04.

Chase Brown however went 3.11, so he's moving up. Went 4.06 and 4.07 in the last 2 I did. Unfortunate
Yeah, based on ADP it was a long shot he’d make it back to you.

Who’d you end up taking at 4.09?
I have 4.08 but the Rice pick just happened so not there yet. Kyren, Walker, Kaleb and Harvey still on the board, along with the old guys, CMC, Henry and Jacobs. Don’t pick again until 6.07 barring a trade so RB probably. Also talking to a guy about getting my original 5.06 back for my 2026 1st. He made a couple questionable trades and I think he is already looking forward to 2026. We will see.
 
Doing an FFPC startup and 1 pick away from my 3.06. Rice still on the board and really tempting. But probably chicken out and grab HIggins and hope Rice falls into the 4th.
I got him at 4.09 in a 12-team start-up, and that was when we knew nothing about the legal process.

He should be there at 4.07

Should. That’s a lot of picks.
ETA: FFPC drafts the last 3 days have his ADP at 43 overall. Hasn’t changed a bit, surprisingly. That is exactly 4.07, btw.
I have 4.04 from a trade and my own 4.07. Hoping for Rice and Chase Brown. Would be a nice start.

Jeanty 1.09 (traded 1.06 and 5.06 for 1.09 and 4.04)
Nico 2.07
Higgins 3.06
Not that anyone gives a rats assssssss, but Rice fell to 4.04.

Chase Brown however went 3.11, so he's moving up. Went 4.06 and 4.07 in the last 2 I did. Unfortunate
Yeah, based on ADP it was a long shot he’d make it back to you.

Who’d you end up taking at 4.09?
I have 4.08 but the Rice pick just happened so not there yet. Kyren, Walker, Kaleb and Harvey still on the board, along with the old guys, CMC, Henry and Jacobs. Don’t pick again until 6.07 barring a trade so RB probably. Also talking to a guy about getting my original 5.06 back for my 2026 1st. He made a couple questionable trades and I think he is already looking forward to 2026. We will see.
man I love SF. Got Jacobs at 7.04

His ADP for 1 QB start up is like 38 (4.02) 😬

If you can get that 5th for a single future 1st you have to do it. Start-up value so much higher.
 
Doing an FFPC startup and 1 pick away from my 3.06. Rice still on the board and really tempting. But probably chicken out and grab HIggins and hope Rice falls into the 4th.
I got him at 4.09 in a 12-team start-up, and that was when we knew nothing about the legal process.

He should be there at 4.07

Should. That’s a lot of picks.
ETA: FFPC drafts the last 3 days have his ADP at 43 overall. Hasn’t changed a bit, surprisingly. That is exactly 4.07, btw.
I have 4.04 from a trade and my own 4.07. Hoping for Rice and Chase Brown. Would be a nice start.

Jeanty 1.09 (traded 1.06 and 5.06 for 1.09 and 4.04)
Nico 2.07
Higgins 3.06
Not that anyone gives a rats assssssss, but Rice fell to 4.04.

Chase Brown however went 3.11, so he's moving up. Went 4.06 and 4.07 in the last 2 I did. Unfortunate
Yeah, based on ADP it was a long shot he’d make it back to you.

Who’d you end up taking at 4.09?
I have 4.08 but the Rice pick just happened so not there yet. Kyren, Walker, Kaleb and Harvey still on the board, along with the old guys, CMC, Henry and Jacobs. Don’t pick again until 6.07 barring a trade so RB probably. Also talking to a guy about getting my original 5.06 back for my 2026 1st. He made a couple questionable trades and I think he is already looking forward to 2026. We will see.
man I love SF. Got Jacobs at 7.04

His ADP for 1 QB start up is like 38 (4.02) 😬
That's really good value, even for superflex. No threats to carries on the roster. Should have another big season in that offense.
 
That's really good value, even for superflex. No threats to carries on the roster. Should have another big season in that offense.
Hoping for a couple seasons, but yeah - love the value. Went Jacobs RB1 at 7.04 then Chuba 8.09 on the way back.

Really happy with that build. Hopefully can draft a RB by the time I need one.
 
That's really good value, even for superflex. No threats to carries on the roster. Should have another big season in that offense.
Hoping for a couple seasons, but yeah - love the value. Went Jacobs RB1 at 7.04 then Chuba 8.09 on the way back.

Really happy with that build. Hopefully can draft a RB by the time I need one.
Out of curiosity, where did CMC go? I just took him over Jacobs at 4.08. Rolling the dice for 2025. Sometimes I need my head examined.
 
That's really good value, even for superflex. No threats to carries on the roster. Should have another big season in that offense.
Hoping for a couple seasons, but yeah - love the value. Went Jacobs RB1 at 7.04 then Chuba 8.09 on the way back.

Really happy with that build. Hopefully can draft a RB by the time I need one.
Out of curiosity, where did CMC go? I just took him over Jacobs at 4.08. Rolling the dice for 2025. Sometimes I need my head examined.
5.11, but again it’s SF. So pretty much equivalent considering literally every QB was gone by then.

You are a very brave man. lol
 
His plea deal was on July 17th, it's been a grand total of one week since the news broke folks.
I understand, but they weren't prepared with an estimate of games after 14 whole months since the incident either?
probably waiting to see what the actual results of plea/sentencing were and need some time to try and align and adjust accordingly....while the league can do whatever they want....what the court actually lays out provides a little framework....ie: if they go heavy then maybe Rog needs to go a little heavier then what they were maybe thinking initially so to speak....
 
So if the feeling is Addison is getting roughly 3 games for a DUI; I would imagine Rice is getting a lot more

ESPN’s Jeremy Fowler reports “the Vikings are bracing for roughly a three-game suspension” for Jordan Addison.
It may or may not be a three-game suspension for Addison, but it sounds like the Vikings have a good sense of what will be handed down to the third-year receiver. Addison pleaded no contest to resolve a 2024 DUI citation he received, and could learn his fate at any time between now and the start of the season. Assuming he does miss time, Jalen Nailor, who has been “getting a lot of love at camp,” per Fowler, could be in line to serve as the Vikings’ WR2 in Addison’s absence.
 
I am starting to wonder if this isn't uncommon from the league to ensure there isn't any surprises that come up for Rice. It sucks as dynasty fantasy team managers, but hope it comes soon.
 
So if the feeling is Addison is getting roughly 3 games for a DUI; I would imagine Rice is getting a lot more
I’m not sure a relationship between the two is this straightforward. DUI has a pretty standard 3-game punishment & lots of precedent for how the league handles it.

We’re still very much in wait and see mode here. I’ve heard everything from no suspension (rec’d 30 day jail sentence, league could say that’s punishment enough) to 3-6 games.

Everyone is just guessing. Not saying Rice doesn’t deserve a longer suspension - his actions were inarguably worse. But we won’t know until we know. Ya know?
 
So if the feeling is Addison is getting roughly 3 games for a DUI; I would imagine Rice is getting a lot more
I’m not sure a relationship between the two is this straightforward. DUI has a pretty standard 3-game punishment & lots of precedent for how the league handles it.

We’re still very much in wait and see mode here. I’ve heard everything from no suspension (rec’d 30 day jail sentence, league could say that’s punishment enough) to 3-6 games.

Everyone is just guessing. Not saying Rice doesn’t deserve a longer suspension - his actions were inarguably worse. But we won’t know until we know. Ya know?
id be shocked if it was zero - as a Rice owner im expecting 3-6 and hoping on the shorter side - discount is already baked in.
 
So if the feeling is Addison is getting roughly 3 games for a DUI; I would imagine Rice is getting a lot more
I’m not sure a relationship between the two is this straightforward. DUI has a pretty standard 3-game punishment & lots of precedent for how the league handles it.

We’re still very much in wait and see mode here. I’ve heard everything from no suspension (rec’d 30 day jail sentence, league could say that’s punishment enough) to 3-6 games.

Everyone is just guessing. Not saying Rice doesn’t deserve a longer suspension - his actions were inarguably worse. But we won’t know until we know. Ya know?
Good post HSG and exactly right. We really have no comparison here. I think he has to be suspended. Have no idea how many games. Dont even know for sure if that suspension is this year or next. We just don't know. Hard to put a value on him in redraft leagues
 
id be shocked if it was zero - as a Rice owner im expecting 3-6 and hoping on the shorter side - discount is already baked in.
I would be as well, but the Chiefs, and their beat writer IIRC have both suggested that as a likely outcome.

They may be wishcasting, but I read (can’t remember where, sorry) an analyst say it was possible because of the penalties already imposed by the courts.

Like you, I’m expecting 3-6, maybe reduced on appeal if Rice does the off-field stuff right (completes his settlement with injured party, follows probation stuff to the letter, etc)

With the NFLPA chaos, it’s possibly a bad time to be a player needing representation.
 
Dont even know for sure if that suspension is this year or next
That’s an excellent point - when does the NFL consider “the legal process to have been completed”?

Is it upon sentencing? Or is it once he’s served his 30 days (any time over the next 5 years was it?), or once his probation has been completed without issue?

Any legal-minded NFL-knowledgeable type folks want to weigh in on the NFL’s definition of “completed”?

FWIW it doesn’t seem to be effecting his dynasty stock - went 4.09 in one start-up (to me) and 4.06 in another (to not me) over the last ~8 weeks. The suspension seems built-in to that pricing. If he had no legal issues he’s probably an early 2nd round start-up asset.

@rockaction - any insight/opinion on the question above re: definition of “completed”?
 
Dont even know for sure if that suspension is this year or next
That’s an excellent point - when does the NFL consider “the legal process to have been completed”?

Is it upon sentencing? Or is it once he’s served his 30 days (any time over the next 5 years was it?), or once his probation has been completed without issue?

Any legal-minded NFL-knowledgeable type folks want to weigh in on the NFL’s definition of “completed”?

FWIW it doesn’t seem to be effecting his dynasty stock - went 4.09 in one start-up (to me) and 4.06 in another (to not me) over the last ~8 weeks. The suspension seems built-in to that pricing. If he had no legal issues he’s probably an early 2nd round start-up asset.

@rockaction - any insight/opinion on the question above re: definition of “completed”?

I would not venture a guess. I. Do. Not. Get. NFL. Suspensions. I drafted Zeke in the 2nd that year because I never thought he’d get that many games. Or did I know? Either way, I never in my wildest dreams thought Zeke would get suspended after the female in charge of his hearing found a sexual battery “victim” not credible.

After Zeke, I gave up. I still can’t believe they could circumvent the CBA like that, so I quit thinking about it. I wait for the announcements. It really should be unconstitutional. It’s arbitrary and capricious, which is the threshold when it comes to CBAs. Or at least it was.

I roster Rice in one of my two dynasty leagues so I’m interested, too.
 
Last edited:
So if the feeling is Addison is getting roughly 3 games for a DUI; I would imagine Rice is getting a lot more
I’m not sure a relationship between the two is this straightforward. DUI has a pretty standard 3-game punishment & lots of precedent for how the league handles it.

We’re still very much in wait and see mode here. I’ve heard everything from no suspension (rec’d 30 day jail sentence, league could say that’s punishment enough) to 3-6 games.

Everyone is just guessing. Not saying Rice doesn’t deserve a longer suspension - his actions were inarguably worse. But we won’t know until we know. Ya know?
I'd make an argument his actions weren't worse. But having immediate family killed by a drunk driver does that to you. I think a DUI is among the worst offenses one can commit and is FAR too lightly punished in America. It's easily avoided and far more likely to kill someone than reckless driving.
 

Homey don’t play dat

While this standard originates in judicial review of federal agency actions, the term "arbitrary and capricious" is also used in labor and employment law, including in the context of collective bargaining agreements (CBAs), such as those governing professional sports leagues like the National Football League (NFL).

In the context of the NFL Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA), the term is applied during grievance and arbitration proceedings. Under the NFL CBA, disciplinary actions—such as player suspensions—are typically reviewed to determine whether they were “arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to the collective bargaining agreement.” This standard is used by impartial arbitrators when resolving disputes between the league, teams, and the NFL Players Association (NFLPA).

For example, in player discipline cases (e.g., suspensions for conduct detrimental to the league), an arbitrator will not simply substitute their judgment for that of the Commissioner, but will assess whether the punishment:

  • Has a rational basis in the facts;
  • Is consistent with past precedent (i.e., comparably serious penalties for similar conduct);
  • Follows procedures outlined in the CBA;
  • Is grossly disproportionate or unsupported by evidence.
Notable cases, such as those involving players like Ray Rice or Ezekiel Elliott, have involved challenges to NFL discipline on grounds that the penalties were arbitrary and capricious under the CBA framework. In such cases, arbitrators have sometimes overturned or modified suspensions when they found inconsistencies in the league’s application of discipline or a lack of due process.

Thus, while the arbitrary and capricious standard in the NFL CBA context is derived from administrative law principles, it is adapted to private contractual governance. It ensures that the Commissioner’s broad disciplinary authority is exercised fairly, consistently, and in accordance with the agreed-upon rules between the league and the players’ union.
 

Homey don’t play dat

While this standard originates in judicial review of federal agency actions, the term "arbitrary and capricious" is also used in labor and employment law, including in the context of collective bargaining agreements (CBAs), such as those governing professional sports leagues like the National Football League (NFL).

In the context of the NFL Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA), the term is applied during grievance and arbitration proceedings. Under the NFL CBA, disciplinary actions—such as player suspensions—are typically reviewed to determine whether they were “arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to the collective bargaining agreement.” This standard is used by impartial arbitrators when resolving disputes between the league, teams, and the NFL Players Association (NFLPA).

For example, in player discipline cases (e.g., suspensions for conduct detrimental to the league), an arbitrator will not simply substitute their judgment for that of the Commissioner, but will assess whether the punishment:

  • Has a rational basis in the facts;
  • Is consistent with past precedent (i.e., comparably serious penalties for similar conduct);
  • Follows procedures outlined in the CBA;
  • Is grossly disproportionate or unsupported by evidence.
Notable cases, such as those involving players like Ray Rice or Ezekiel Elliott, have involved challenges to NFL discipline on grounds that the penalties were arbitrary and capricious under the CBA framework. In such cases, arbitrators have sometimes overturned or modified suspensions when they found inconsistencies in the league’s application of discipline or a lack of due process.

Thus, while the arbitrary and capricious standard in the NFL CBA context is derived from administrative law principles, it is adapted to private contractual governance. It ensures that the Commissioner’s broad disciplinary authority is exercised fairly, consistently, and in accordance with the agreed-upon rules between the league and the players’ union.
Well played my friend.

I actually know what it means but whenever I spot professional jargon I can’t help but think of Oswald Bates.
 

Homey don’t play dat

While this standard originates in judicial review of federal agency actions, the term "arbitrary and capricious" is also used in labor and employment law, including in the context of collective bargaining agreements (CBAs), such as those governing professional sports leagues like the National Football League (NFL).

In the context of the NFL Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA), the term is applied during grievance and arbitration proceedings. Under the NFL CBA, disciplinary actions—such as player suspensions—are typically reviewed to determine whether they were “arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to the collective bargaining agreement.” This standard is used by impartial arbitrators when resolving disputes between the league, teams, and the NFL Players Association (NFLPA).

For example, in player discipline cases (e.g., suspensions for conduct detrimental to the league), an arbitrator will not simply substitute their judgment for that of the Commissioner, but will assess whether the punishment:

  • Has a rational basis in the facts;
  • Is consistent with past precedent (i.e., comparably serious penalties for similar conduct);
  • Follows procedures outlined in the CBA;
  • Is grossly disproportionate or unsupported by evidence.
Notable cases, such as those involving players like Ray Rice or Ezekiel Elliott, have involved challenges to NFL discipline on grounds that the penalties were arbitrary and capricious under the CBA framework. In such cases, arbitrators have sometimes overturned or modified suspensions when they found inconsistencies in the league’s application of discipline or a lack of due process.

Thus, while the arbitrary and capricious standard in the NFL CBA context is derived from administrative law principles, it is adapted to private contractual governance. It ensures that the Commissioner’s broad disciplinary authority is exercised fairly, consistently, and in accordance with the agreed-upon rules between the league and the players’ union.
Well played my friend.

I actually know what it means but whenever I spot professional jargon I can’t help but think of Oswald Bates.

Every so often I remember ****. I took classes where we covered it but it never sticks. I just know the buzzwords to look for so if I’m doing FF and I want to know, I just look for the legal language and I never (well, almost) trust the reports in the news. They always **** it up. Go to the source.

Anyway, I love the Black nationalist who keeps talking about his bowels. I thought that’s what you were getting at so I spent literally ten seconds with AI. Bravo browser. It’s getting better and it is coming. Past time to adopt it.
 

Homey don’t play dat

While this standard originates in judicial review of federal agency actions, the term "arbitrary and capricious" is also used in labor and employment law, including in the context of collective bargaining agreements (CBAs), such as those governing professional sports leagues like the National Football League (NFL).

In the context of the NFL Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA), the term is applied during grievance and arbitration proceedings. Under the NFL CBA, disciplinary actions—such as player suspensions—are typically reviewed to determine whether they were “arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to the collective bargaining agreement.” This standard is used by impartial arbitrators when resolving disputes between the league, teams, and the NFL Players Association (NFLPA).

For example, in player discipline cases (e.g., suspensions for conduct detrimental to the league), an arbitrator will not simply substitute their judgment for that of the Commissioner, but will assess whether the punishment:

  • Has a rational basis in the facts;
  • Is consistent with past precedent (i.e., comparably serious penalties for similar conduct);
  • Follows procedures outlined in the CBA;
  • Is grossly disproportionate or unsupported by evidence.
Notable cases, such as those involving players like Ray Rice or Ezekiel Elliott, have involved challenges to NFL discipline on grounds that the penalties were arbitrary and capricious under the CBA framework. In such cases, arbitrators have sometimes overturned or modified suspensions when they found inconsistencies in the league’s application of discipline or a lack of due process.

Thus, while the arbitrary and capricious standard in the NFL CBA context is derived from administrative law principles, it is adapted to private contractual governance. It ensures that the Commissioner’s broad disciplinary authority is exercised fairly, consistently, and in accordance with the agreed-upon rules between the league and the players’ union.
Well played my friend.

I actually know what it means but whenever I spot professional jargon I can’t help but think of Oswald Bates.

Every so often I remember ****. I took classes where we covered it but it never sticks. I just know the buzzwords to look for so if I’m doing FF and I want to know, I just look for the legal language and I never (well, almost) trust the reports in the news. They always **** it up. Go to the source.

Anyway, I love the Black nationalist who keeps talking about his bowels. I thought that’s what you were getting at so I spent literally ten seconds with AI. Bravo browser. It’s getting better and it is coming. Past time to adopt it.
I'm assuming the NFL is like MLB too in that the standards that make up the case law actually evolve within the league. When we were doing an actual injury grievance arbitration during my time there everyone was excited because it was only the 8th ever to go before an arbitrator. One of my assignments was to do the full case law memo based on the prior 7. It was just like my first amendment conlaw stuff in execution, but instead of Shelby and all that jazz it was the prior seven cases and that's it.

So I'm assuming any NFL punishment scenario would be:
1. They mete out a punishment
2. The Union files a grievance
3. Both sides will look at every opinion from every prior grievance about a punishment and what factors were used and how it was changed

The NFL will assume there will be a grievance and do #3 in advance before deciding on how many games to hopefully not have to do steps 2 and 3 publicly.
 

Homey don’t play dat

While this standard originates in judicial review of federal agency actions, the term "arbitrary and capricious" is also used in labor and employment law, including in the context of collective bargaining agreements (CBAs), such as those governing professional sports leagues like the National Football League (NFL).

In the context of the NFL Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA), the term is applied during grievance and arbitration proceedings. Under the NFL CBA, disciplinary actions—such as player suspensions—are typically reviewed to determine whether they were “arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to the collective bargaining agreement.” This standard is used by impartial arbitrators when resolving disputes between the league, teams, and the NFL Players Association (NFLPA).

For example, in player discipline cases (e.g., suspensions for conduct detrimental to the league), an arbitrator will not simply substitute their judgment for that of the Commissioner, but will assess whether the punishment:

  • Has a rational basis in the facts;
  • Is consistent with past precedent (i.e., comparably serious penalties for similar conduct);
  • Follows procedures outlined in the CBA;
  • Is grossly disproportionate or unsupported by evidence.
Notable cases, such as those involving players like Ray Rice or Ezekiel Elliott, have involved challenges to NFL discipline on grounds that the penalties were arbitrary and capricious under the CBA framework. In such cases, arbitrators have sometimes overturned or modified suspensions when they found inconsistencies in the league’s application of discipline or a lack of due process.

Thus, while the arbitrary and capricious standard in the NFL CBA context is derived from administrative law principles, it is adapted to private contractual governance. It ensures that the Commissioner’s broad disciplinary authority is exercised fairly, consistently, and in accordance with the agreed-upon rules between the league and the players’ union.
Well played my friend.

I actually know what it means but whenever I spot professional jargon I can’t help but think of Oswald Bates.

Every so often I remember ****. I took classes where we covered it but it never sticks. I just know the buzzwords to look for so if I’m doing FF and I want to know, I just look for the legal language and I never (well, almost) trust the reports in the news. They always **** it up. Go to the source.

Anyway, I love the Black nationalist who keeps talking about his bowels. I thought that’s what you were getting at so I spent literally ten seconds with AI. Bravo browser. It’s getting better and it is coming. Past time to adopt it.
I'm assuming the NFL is like MLB too in that the standards that make up the case law actually evolve within the league. When we were doing an actual injury grievance arbitration during my time there everyone was excited because it was only the 8th ever to go before an arbitrator. One of my assignments was to do the full case law memo based on the prior 7. It was just like my first amendment conlaw stuff in execution, but instead of Shelby and all that jazz it was the prior seven cases and that's it.

So I'm assuming any NFL punishment scenario would be:
1. They mete out a punishment
2. The Union files a grievance
3. Both sides will look at every opinion from every prior grievance about a punishment and what factors were used and how it was changed

The NFL will assume there will be a grievance and do #3 in advance before deciding on how many games to hopefully not have to do steps 2 and 3 publicly.

Wow. That is really cool to know. So it’s their own disciplinary standards and practices they’re judged by, huh? That is actually the only thing that makes sense now that I think about it. What, would they judge arbitrary & capricious like they judge a steelworker’s arbitrary & capricious?

The NFL is so chaotic, though. Goodell is the embodiment of a & c with his “list.” The arbitrariness is almost inherent.
 

Homey don’t play dat

While this standard originates in judicial review of federal agency actions, the term "arbitrary and capricious" is also used in labor and employment law, including in the context of collective bargaining agreements (CBAs), such as those governing professional sports leagues like the National Football League (NFL).

In the context of the NFL Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA), the term is applied during grievance and arbitration proceedings. Under the NFL CBA, disciplinary actions—such as player suspensions—are typically reviewed to determine whether they were “arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to the collective bargaining agreement.” This standard is used by impartial arbitrators when resolving disputes between the league, teams, and the NFL Players Association (NFLPA).

For example, in player discipline cases (e.g., suspensions for conduct detrimental to the league), an arbitrator will not simply substitute their judgment for that of the Commissioner, but will assess whether the punishment:

  • Has a rational basis in the facts;
  • Is consistent with past precedent (i.e., comparably serious penalties for similar conduct);
  • Follows procedures outlined in the CBA;
  • Is grossly disproportionate or unsupported by evidence.
Notable cases, such as those involving players like Ray Rice or Ezekiel Elliott, have involved challenges to NFL discipline on grounds that the penalties were arbitrary and capricious under the CBA framework. In such cases, arbitrators have sometimes overturned or modified suspensions when they found inconsistencies in the league’s application of discipline or a lack of due process.

Thus, while the arbitrary and capricious standard in the NFL CBA context is derived from administrative law principles, it is adapted to private contractual governance. It ensures that the Commissioner’s broad disciplinary authority is exercised fairly, consistently, and in accordance with the agreed-upon rules between the league and the players’ union.
Well played my friend.

I actually know what it means but whenever I spot professional jargon I can’t help but think of Oswald Bates.

Every so often I remember ****. I took classes where we covered it but it never sticks. I just know the buzzwords to look for so if I’m doing FF and I want to know, I just look for the legal language and I never (well, almost) trust the reports in the news. They always **** it up. Go to the source.

Anyway, I love the Black nationalist who keeps talking about his bowels. I thought that’s what you were getting at so I spent literally ten seconds with AI. Bravo browser. It’s getting better and it is coming. Past time to adopt it.
I'm assuming the NFL is like MLB too in that the standards that make up the case law actually evolve within the league. When we were doing an actual injury grievance arbitration during my time there everyone was excited because it was only the 8th ever to go before an arbitrator. One of my assignments was to do the full case law memo based on the prior 7. It was just like my first amendment conlaw stuff in execution, but instead of Shelby and all that jazz it was the prior seven cases and that's it.

So I'm assuming any NFL punishment scenario would be:
1. They mete out a punishment
2. The Union files a grievance
3. Both sides will look at every opinion from every prior grievance about a punishment and what factors were used and how it was changed

The NFL will assume there will be a grievance and do #3 in advance before deciding on how many games to hopefully not have to do steps 2 and 3 publicly.

Wow. That is really cool to know. So it’s their own disciplinary standards and practices they’re judged by, huh? That is actually the only thing that makes sense now that I think about it. What, would they judge arbitrary & capricious like they judge a steelworker’s arbitrary & capricious?

The NFL is so chaotic, though. Goodell is the embodiment of a & c with his “list.” The arbitrariness is almost inherent.
As I understand it, the standard was set in the CBA, and then the first ever grievance became the first case law within the CBA. And every grievance after would defer to that somewhat, in its evidence of what kind of action is capricious or not.

Just like real law, you could overturn something, but it always seemed less likely to me.

Your real complexity and threat comes into position if someone wants to blow it up and go outside the CBA, to a federal court, and then it becomes a huge mess.
 
🎱 Says “4 games”
Common sense says 8 games or more, but since when does the NFL show common sense.
I love FF and I just drafted Rice in a startup, but I hope the NFL hammers him. At least 8 games and the whole season wouldn't make me shed any tears.
Is there a database anywhere of all the prior acts and resulting suspensions, even just limited to Goodells tenure?
 
Sports Illustrated's Albert Breer has word that the Chiefs are expecting the total to land at the midpoint of those predictions: between four to six games.

I'm pretty sure the NFL has these people/or is very alert too what these people float; similar to the Addison game amount being floated out to get a pulse on how fans react.
Since no one is is in an uproar I'm guessing we'll get the official number soon.

 
This guys is staring at me in round 6 of every mock I do and I never know if a six game suspension is worth it at that price.
 
🎱 Says “4 games”
Common sense says 8 games or more, but since when does the NFL show common sense.
I love FF and I just drafted Rice in a startup, but I hope the NFL hammers him. At least 8 games and the whole season wouldn't make me shed any tears.
Is there a database anywhere of all the prior acts and resulting suspensions, even just limited to Goodells tenure?
Was actually perusing this earlier today(in relation to Judkins:

 
Maybe. Hear me out. I'm a Rice guy. This looming suspension is tough to navigate. Say you spend a 5th or 6th round pick on a guy and go 0-4 before you get to start him. Rough start. Now say you spend a 5th or 6th round pick and can put him in week one. Suspenion happens week 6 thru 10. Your 3-1 and now you just gotta stay afloat till he returns. Obviously if the suspension happens during the fantasy playoffs, obviously that changes everything. All my opinion of course. Could be my Rice blinders trying to stay positive
 
Maybe. Hear me out. I'm a Rice guy. This looming suspension is tough to navigate. Say you spend a 5th or 6th round pick on a guy and go 0-4 before you get to start him. Rough start. Now say you spend a 5th or 6th round pick and can put him in week one. Suspenion happens week 6 thru 10. Your 3-1 and now you just gotta stay afloat till he returns. Obviously if the suspension happens during the fantasy playoffs, obviously that changes everything. All my opinion of course. Could be my Rice blinders trying to stay positive
I’m out for redraft.

This is absolutely worse than missing games 1-6 (latest sounded like 6 games was where this would land)

This could mean 7 including the BYE.

It could also mean missing FF playoffs as you suggested. All bad.
 
Maybe. Hear me out. I'm a Rice guy. This looming suspension is tough to navigate. Say you spend a 5th or 6th round pick on a guy and go 0-4 before you get to start him. Rough start. Now say you spend a 5th or 6th round pick and can put him in week one. Suspenion happens week 6 thru 10. Your 3-1 and now you just gotta stay afloat till he returns. Obviously if the suspension happens during the fantasy playoffs, obviously that changes everything. All my opinion of course. Could be my Rice blinders trying to stay positive
Why are you better off going 3-1 and then 0-4 vs 0-4 and then 3-1? I'm not sure the record thing is useful. If he misses the first four weeks, don't you "just gotta stay afloat till he returns" anyway?


I'm more focused on the last bit. Here's why I think it is worse to be a midseason decision:
1. There's now more uncertainty and it could be in the playoffs which is brutal
2. Now the presumed missing games are during bye weeks, when production is harder to replace
3. Now I cannot plan as effectively, for instance taking a guy who is a real life WR2 or 3 but has a great looking schedule for a starting couple weeks

Now, the uncertainty could cut both ways. Now I've got a higher chance it gets appealed and delayed until 2026. So maybe he plays every game and is a huge value.
 
This is pure speculation, but it's from legal people I trust. We're thinking 4-6 games and leaning toward 4 a bit. But it could be at tough times like weeks 7-11.

This is just a guess on our part. But that's where we are.
Yeah while other players on your roster are out for BYE or injury, that’s a rough time of year to lose a dude to suspension.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top