What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

WR Tetairoa McMillan, CAR (3 Viewers)

I think Nabers is a cut above and I really like Rome and Harrison has the amazing pedigree and college production but I think McMillan is very close to the later two in talent. I saw I ridiculous video of a one handed catch the other day that was better than Beckham's
 
I'm glad this board helps me not feeling crazy in pumping the brakes on Tet a bit. Best WR of this class, sure I can get on board with that. But the Evans and AJ Green comps seem super optimistic/best case outcome for him (I won't even touch the JJ comp haha). Drake London seems the closest to me, and also makes sense because I didn't love London for many of the same reasons I don't love Tet, at least compared to their ADP price. The inability to separate is a worry for me and makes him more landing spot dependent than I'd want from a 1.02/1.03 or even 1.04 rookie pick. Even QBs who aggressively throw into coverage often take time to build that rapport/trust. If they have other receiving options, could be even longer.

Saying all that I do like Tet, and London did finally pay off his investors here in year 3. You'd like to think that will continue with what looks like a competent Penix throwing to him. But if Tet lands with some of the teams being mocked to take a WR like Jets, Cardinals, Steelers, or even the Ravens... I'm going to have a really hard time taking him over the top 3-5 RBs, especially looking at all the juicy landing spots for them and the fact fewer of them are scheme dependent. (Kaleb Johnson probably needing an outsize zone scheme to hit his ceiling being the only one jumping out at me rn).

If he maintains a 1.02/3 ADP through the NFL draft, and I'm holding one of those picks, I think the savvy move is to trade back a few picks and acquire a little extra juice while taking a RB with a higher chance to hit and hit sooner. Panthers may be the only landing spot that tempts me away from that as Young looked to take the next step and there is pretty much 0 competition there. Though Canales is still likely to continue favoring the run there.
 
I'm glad this board helps me not feeling crazy in pumping the brakes on Tet a bit. Best WR of this class, sure I can get on board with that. But the Evans and AJ Green comps seem super optimistic/best case outcome for him (I won't even touch the JJ comp haha). Drake London seems the closest to me, and also makes sense because I didn't love London for many of the same reasons I don't love Tet, at least compared to their ADP price. The inability to separate is a worry for me and makes him more landing spot dependent than I'd want from a 1.02/1.03 or even 1.04 rookie pick. Even QBs who aggressively throw into coverage often take time to build that rapport/trust. If they have other receiving options, could be even longer.

Saying all that I do like Tet, and London did finally pay off his investors here in year 3. You'd like to think that will continue with what looks like a competent Penix throwing to him. But if Tet lands with some of the teams being mocked to take a WR like Jets, Cardinals, Steelers, or even the Ravens... I'm going to have a really hard time taking him over the top 3-5 RBs, especially looking at all the juicy landing spots for them and the fact fewer of them are scheme dependent. (Kaleb Johnson probably needing an outsize zone scheme to hit his ceiling being the only one jumping out at me rn).

If he maintains a 1.02/3 ADP through the NFL draft, and I'm holding one of those picks, I think the savvy move is to trade back a few picks and acquire a little extra juice while taking a RB with a higher chance to hit and hit sooner. Panthers may be the only landing spot that tempts me away from that as Young looked to take the next step and there is pretty much 0 competition there. Though Canales is still likely to continue favoring the run there.

I would think the Pats would be the best spot for him...paired with Maye he would have a chance to shine right away...Pats could go a lot of different ways at 1.4 but I do think what they do in FA will provide a clue.
 
I'm glad this board helps me not feeling crazy in pumping the brakes on Tet a bit. Best WR of this class, sure I can get on board with that. But the Evans and AJ Green comps seem super optimistic/best case outcome for him (I won't even touch the JJ comp haha). Drake London seems the closest to me, and also makes sense because I didn't love London for many of the same reasons I don't love Tet, at least compared to their ADP price. The inability to separate is a worry for me and makes him more landing spot dependent than I'd want from a 1.02/1.03 or even 1.04 rookie pick. Even QBs who aggressively throw into coverage often take time to build that rapport/trust. If they have other receiving options, could be even longer.

Saying all that I do like Tet, and London did finally pay off his investors here in year 3. You'd like to think that will continue with what looks like a competent Penix throwing to him. But if Tet lands with some of the teams being mocked to take a WR like Jets, Cardinals, Steelers, or even the Ravens... I'm going to have a really hard time taking him over the top 3-5 RBs, especially looking at all the juicy landing spots for them and the fact fewer of them are scheme dependent. (Kaleb Johnson probably needing an outsize zone scheme to hit his ceiling being the only one jumping out at me rn).

If he maintains a 1.02/3 ADP through the NFL draft, and I'm holding one of those picks, I think the savvy move is to trade back a few picks and acquire a little extra juice while taking a RB with a higher chance to hit and hit sooner. Panthers may be the only landing spot that tempts me away from that as Young looked to take the next step and there is pretty much 0 competition there. Though Canales is still likely to continue favoring the run there.

I would think the Pats would be the best spot for him...paired with Maye he would have a chance to shine right away...Pats could go a lot of different ways at 1.4 but I do think what they do in FA will provide a clue.
Pats aren't a bad one either. I kept figuring they'd add a FA WR. But I guess unless it was someone like Higgins, Devantae, or Godwin that Tet would still wind up being the 1 there and get fed.
 
If he lands anywhere that has a QB/offense that utlizes slants often, Tet will be money.
But again, not in my elite rookie prospect bracket.
 
If the Bucs sign Godwin Tampa definitely doesn't feel like the spot, but they'd probably have some trade partners if he did fall that far. And, he'd still be tempting with Mike in the last year of his deal.
 
NFL Draft Files
Tetairoa McMillan is a player I think will have a surprisingly good Combine performance.

I’ve said before that he reminds me of Drake London, but I think he’s an even better and more fluid athlete than London was at USC.

McMillan may not wow with his 40 time, but his ability to accelerate, decelerate, track the ball, and sink his hips in and out of his breaks are SPECIAL for a WR who stands 6’5”.

Scouts will see him move at the Combine and confirm their 1st round grade on him.

He’s my WR1 and I expect he’ll be off the board in the first 10 picks.
 
Pretty sure we'll have to draft him blind of any 40, he's going the Drake London route. He's not running at the combine and I got a feeling he'll find a way to not run as his pro day despite what he's saying. Heard some talk yesterday that he's really slow, like top 10 pick outlier kind of slow.

As we know that does not always matter, I'd still feel better if I knew he could break like a 4.6.
 
Am I misguided in getting some N'Keal Harry vibes on McMillan?

Harry at Arizona State: 6'4", 216 pounds, 213 catches, 22 TD. (Note that he added 10 pounds by the time he got to the combine.)
McMillian at Arizona: 6'5", 212 pounds, 213 catches, 26 TD.

Both played in 37 games. Harry had 9 games with 100+ yards and 3 games with 2+ TD. McMillian had 12 games with 100+ yards and 3 games with 2+ TD.
McMillan averaged more yards per catch, but in their final 2 seasons, they were only separated by around a yard or so.
Their size and numbers seem in the same ballpark. IIRC, Harry had a 40 time of 4.53 while I believe McMillan was 4.5. Lance Zierlein graded Harry at a 6.3 vs. McMillan at 6.4.

I don't watch enough college football to be able to truly compare the two. Are they a lot more different than they appear to me?
 
Am I misguided in getting some N'Keal Harry vibes on McMillan?

Harry at Arizona State: 6'4", 216 pounds, 213 catches, 22 TD. (Note that he added 10 pounds by the time he got to the combine.)
McMillian at Arizona: 6'5", 212 pounds, 213 catches, 26 TD.

Both played in 37 games. Harry had 9 games with 100+ yards and 3 games with 2+ TD. McMillian had 12 games with 100+ yards and 3 games with 2+ TD.
McMillan averaged more yards per catch, but in their final 2 seasons, they were only separated by around a yard or so.
Their size and numbers seem in the same ballpark. IIRC, Harry had a 40 time of 4.53 while I believe McMillan was 4.5. Lance Zierlein graded Harry at a 6.3 vs. McMillan at 6.4.

I don't watch enough college football to be able to truly compare the two. Are they a lot more different than they appear to me?
About the same as Drake London. Good luck figuring out which guy he will be. I'm leaning closer to London but no real good reasoning.
 
Am I misguided in getting some N'Keal Harry vibes on McMillan?

Harry at Arizona State: 6'4", 216 pounds, 213 catches, 22 TD. (Note that he added 10 pounds by the time he got to the combine.)
McMillian at Arizona: 6'5", 212 pounds, 213 catches, 26 TD.

Both played in 37 games. Harry had 9 games with 100+ yards and 3 games with 2+ TD. McMillian had 12 games with 100+ yards and 3 games with 2+ TD.
McMillan averaged more yards per catch, but in their final 2 seasons, they were only separated by around a yard or so.
Their size and numbers seem in the same ballpark. IIRC, Harry had a 40 time of 4.53 while I believe McMillan was 4.5. Lance Zierlein graded Harry at a 6.3 vs. McMillan at 6.4.

I don't watch enough college football to be able to truly compare the two. Are they a lot more different than they appear to me?
About the same as Drake London. Good luck figuring out which guy he will be. I'm leaning closer to London but no real good reasoning.
Harry was compared to Larry Fitzgerald, Dez Bryant, Allen Robinson, Devin Funchess, and Laquon Treadwell. Quite the range of players. I don't think many people expected Harry to end up with a third the career totals of Laquon Treadwell . . . but here we are.

In this draft, McMillan is ranked as T-17 in terms of overall prospect grade by Lane Zierlien (tied as the 3rd best WR prospect with Matthew Golden from Texas). I get it, it's only one man's opinion. With the same score, if McMillan had been in last year's draft class, Zierlien's grade would have McMillan as tied for the 5th best WR prospect (and likely an early 2nd round pick).

I've seen the Drake London comps as well . . . I just wonder if he's getting more attention and hyped because this draft isn't as deep and the WR class isn't as strong.
 
Lindsay Rhodes
4. I think Tet McMillan is a very interesting 1st round puzzle piece.

I talked to multiple people who bemoaned the WR class- specifically the lack of strong, #1, X receivers.

He's the only high end guy they think fits that profile.

(And the free agent class doesn't really have any either.)

Think of all the teams that need WRs. There are SO MANY.

I think positional scarcity helps him.
 
This WR class is awful overall. They are trying to hype up any solid prospect.

TM is good but in many classes he’d be the 4th/5th best prospect at WR
 
I have almost NEVER taken an RB very early in dynasty.... I have the 3 pick this year and am almost 100% going RB. I do expect Tet to go 2, but even if he doesnt...
 
This WR class is awful overall. They are trying to hype up any solid prospect.

TM is good but in many classes he’d be the 4th/5th best prospect at WR
Besides Tetairoa, WR and QB seem very weak... might be a return to form where 5 out of the 1st 7 picks are RBs
 
I have almost NEVER taken an RB very early in dynasty.... I have the 3 pick this year and am almost 100% going RB. I do expect Tet to go 2, but even if he doesnt...
If Tet goes at 2 then you obviously should pick RB at 3 this year unless your league scoring / lineup situation is jacked up.
 
As mentioned earlier . . . is McMillan considered as a top option based on this being a lukewarm draft class for WR.

Here are the WRs from the past 5 drafts (and the prospects from the one coming up) that NFL.com graded higher (ot the same) as McMillan.

DeVonta Smith 7.13
Ja’Marr Chase 7.12
Travis Hunter 6.89
Malik Nabers 6.86
Jaylen Waddle 6.86
Marvin Harrison 6.83
CeeDee Lamb 6.81
Jerry Jeudy 6.77
Rome Odunze 6.74
Henry Riggs 6.72
Garrett Wilson 6.50
Jalin Hyatt 6.50
Traylon Burkes 6.50
Jameson William 6.48
Brian Thomas 6.47
Luther Burden 6.47
Justin Jefferson 6.46
Jaxon Smith-Njigba 6.46
Zay Flowers 6.46
Josh Down 6.44
Chris Olave 6.43
Elijah Moore 6.43
Matthew Gordon 6.40
Ladd McConkey 6.40
Drake London 6.40
Teteroia McMillan 6.40

Most of those guys have done well. But it does appear that McMillan is in a draft without a lot of highly rated WRs,
 
Ray G
I don't think people remember how dominant Drake London's abbreviated final season at USC was.

Tetairoa McMillan is the WR1 in the class, but I do not think the London comps are appropriate. Tet is going to be a really really good #2 option for a team. #NFLDraft2025

Jesse Morse
What’s the best comp for him?

Ray G
Michael Pittman Jr. is more appropriate than London IMO.

I think he can be a 900-1100 yard WR which is what Higgins, Pittman, DeVonta Smith etc are. Really good #2 that can operate as a #1 if needed but complements a #1 better.
 
Dane Brugler
RE: T-Mac's 40-yard dash today.

I was told 4.55 and 4.55 from two different teams.

WaterBoys
Think it changes much on his draft projection?

Dane Brugler
Not one bit.

4.55 pretty much reflects McMillan's tape (and his tape is awesome). The time shouldn't change w/e opinion you had yesterday.
 
Gotta add about .05 to that time if they're hand-timing it. That puts him in a dangerous 4.6 range. Omario Hampton just moved up in dynasty rankings to the number two selection, IMO. I don't think that this is "overthinking" it. I think it's prudent to consider his splits and the measurement of his intermediate/longer speed. I'll wait to see what Matt Harmon has to say about his college tape. All of those things are a factor.
 
Daniel Jeremiah
From NFL research—

It’s been 20 years since a WR was picked in the top 15 after running 4.55+

2005 USC Mike Williams 4.56 then drafted 10th overall by Lions

Palangi Jake
Now do 4.46 and 4.48 since those times were reported by scouts as well

Daniel Jeremiah
Not from the scouts I talked to. I had these times from different teams - 4.52, 4.53, 4.56 & 4.63. The APT time (which is shared with the entire league) was 4.53.

Palangi Jake
That's fair. Does 4.53 still line up with your original point?

Daniel Jeremiah
Yes. Mike Evans was the last WR to run 4.50+ to be drafted in top 15. That was 2014
 
@JVillainsPod
When Steve Smith doesn’t like a WR, my ears perk up

He’s not high on TMac 😬

Ray G
now I said this a few days ago and was killed for it…Tet is dope. Tet is the WR1 in this class imo. I do NOT see a #1 at the next level. And that’s ok. #NFLDraft2025

@MikeForcella
To me, the perception of a WR1 is someone who can play on the perimeter, is 6’+, and win 50/50 balls which I think is completely false. In the modern NFL someone like Amon Ra St. Brown completely breaks that mold and no one would argue if he is a WR1. Tet, like Tee will be an elite WR2.
 

At first I was thinking that this was going to be an article that pumped me up on McMillan, but by the end the prognosis didn't sound good. Check this.

"My biggest concern with Tetairoa McMillan is his inability to beat press coverage. He lacks the burst off the line of scrimmage to stack his opponent within the first few steps and he rarely ends up creating vertical separation. Most of his targets down the sideline were tightly contested, and even though he won those at a relatively high rate in college, he’ll have much less of a physical advantage over NFL defenders. Because he lacks the vertical push to win with a linear release, he’s forced to take wide departure angles off the line of scrimmage and he frequently gets blanketed and walled off to the sideline. He reportedly ran somewhere in the mid-4.5s at his pro day, which lines up with the tape.

His mediocre speed and explosiveness also prevents him from using the threat of a deep route to create intermediate separation. Since defenders aren’t worried about getting beat vertically, many of his release fakes aren’t plausible and they have the freedom to play him top-down and squat on underneath routes."

I italicized the above quote. That's pretty damning. He's going to need to beat press coverage in the pros and if they don't respect him deep, it's going to be tough to get separation at all. Teams don't want to play him as a "big slot," as the article suggests. Those roles aren't just getting fewer and fewer to come by—he might be too "big" for even a "big slot." Do you want your first round pick in the draft playing big slot most of the time? I don't think you do.

Tetairoa might wind up being an excellent receiver, but if I had the number two pick in a dynasty draft, I do not think I'd use it on him even though he's more athletic than his naysayers say (I think).

eta 3/29**** but see the next page of this thread where I post some of Matt Harmon’s comments about charting McMillan
 
Last edited:

At first I was thinking that this was going to be an article that pumped me up on McMillan, but by the end the prognosis didn't sound good. Check this.

"My biggest concern with Tetairoa McMillan is his inability to beat press coverage. He lacks the burst off the line of scrimmage to stack his opponent within the first few steps and he rarely ends up creating vertical separation. Most of his targets down the sideline were tightly contested, and even though he won those at a relatively high rate in college, he’ll have much less of a physical advantage over NFL defenders. Because he lacks the vertical push to win with a linear release, he’s forced to take wide departure angles off the line of scrimmage and he frequently gets blanketed and walled off to the sideline. He reportedly ran somewhere in the mid-4.5s at his pro day, which lines up with the tape.

His mediocre speed and explosiveness also prevents him from using the threat of a deep route to create intermediate separation. Since defenders aren’t worried about getting beat vertically, many of his release fakes aren’t plausible and they have the freedom to play him top-down and squat on underneath routes."

I italicized the above quote. That's pretty damning. He's going to need to beat press coverage in the pros and if they don't respect him deep, it's going to be tough to get separation at all. Teams don't want to play him as a "big slot," as the article suggests. Those roles aren't just getting fewer and fewer to come by—he might be too "big" for even a "big slot." Do you want your first round pick in the draft playing big slot most of the time? I don't think you do.

Tetairoa might wing up being an excellent receiver, but if I had the number two pick in a dynasty draft, I do not think I'd use it on him even though he's more athletic than his naysayers say (I think).
I think Hampton is the clear cut 1.02, predraft of course.
 
Did no one learn anything from Marvin Harrison Jr?
🎙️ "and now I'd like to Pass the Mic to my brother DirtyWord and say anything you like"

-I want to hear more because I felt like he was a flop especially Redraft where he went pretty high, like one of the first 10-12 WRs off the board
 
Did no one learn anything from Marvin Harrison Jr?
🎙️ "and now I'd like to Pass the Mic to my brother DirtyWord and say anything you like"

-I want to hear more because I felt like he was a flop especially Redraft where he went pretty high, like one of the first 10-12 WRs off the board

I was "lower" than most on MHJ, and thought Nabers was the better prospect.... But comparing MHJ to Tet is a bit of an insult...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top