So YOU'RE the guy that spent $800 in FABB on him...brutal. If it makes you feel any better, he was in everybody's lineup today, best matchup of the year for him.I ####img hate fantasy football. This is the last straw now. you ####### listen to podcasts, read Twitter, this trainwreck of a board, you think you're making shrewd moves and it's all a big random stupid cluster#### of futility. we might as well shoot dice or play scratch offs. I'm done. #### this ####. no more waivers, no more setting my lineups, eat my pasty white ###. #### #### #### ####ity ####
Dude "RELAX" Haven't you figured out none of theses guys are any more expert than us. They just have a better vocabulary. Fantasy Football is just like the weather, the best guess is right. You should come here to listen and hear other opinions but always make your own choices. But if your really done.I ####img hate fantasy football. This is the last straw now. you ####### listen to podcasts, read Twitter, this trainwreck of a board, you think you're making shrewd moves and it's all a big random stupid cluster#### of futility. we might as well shoot dice or play scratch offs. I'm done. #### this ####. no more waivers, no more setting my lineups, eat my pasty white ###. #### #### #### ####ity ####
Huh?He's hurt. Ugh.
SD is just targeting Crawley at CB over and over again and he is on Inman.Whatever the case I am not willing to put the blame for Ty's lack of production on Philip Rivers.
Makes far more sense then the notion that Rivers would ignore a player that is, allegedly, open on every play.SD is just targeting Crawley at CB over and over again and he is on Inman.
I "liked" your last post because I assumedyou were being hilariously sarcastic. Please don't ruin that.Great ####### catch Tyrell. Jerkoff.
fypChaka said:Blamingo e of the best QBsa slightly above average QB of this generation for some scrubs lack of production is seriously among the funniest things I have read this week. Thanks for that guys.
2 RZ targets now, caught both, just couldn't punch em in.Long Ball Larry said:Been getting plenty of action in the second half.
Thats been his m.o. Almost all of his action has been in the 4th quarterLong Ball Larry said:Been getting plenty of action in the second half.
Yeah, that was bad. Wouldn't have mattered in the grand scheme of things but he's got to go after the football there. He just sort of jumped and drifted back.Tyrell has to go after that ball. That was pretty bad. Still it's SD's fault that they keep trying to ride Gordon to protect a lead. He's terrible.
Would rather have Woods, but I'm holding on to Williams for one more week. The target volume is still too high to ignore even if the production isn't there yet.Was really hoping to see more from him over the past couple weeks. Was gonna start him this week due to byes but now not sure. Would you drop him for woods?
Same here. BUF pie is smaller, but Woods should be the #1 option. Rivers has always spread the ball around and uses his RBs in the passing game a lot, so Williams will likely be inconsistent week to week. Not sure I would throw him back to the wire....he's still a good WR4 or WR5. Just not an everyweek starter IMO.Would rather have Woods, but I'm holding on to Williams for one more week. The target volume is still too high to ignore even if the production isn't there yet.
If he flops again, then it's back to the waiver wire.
Im not dropping him, but I already have Hilton, E Sanders and Fitzgerald so Im letting him hang around for a bit longer.Was really hoping to see more from him over the past couple weeks. Was gonna start him this week due to byes but now not sure. Would you drop him for woods?
I need someone this Sunday. Woods seems like a stronger play for me don't you think? Tyrell would never crack my starting 3. Ar15, benjamin, maclin.Im not dropping him, but I already have Hilton, E Sanders and Fitzgerald so Im letting him hang around for a bit longer.
If you were ever going to play him its this week against the Raiders. They're just allowing too many points through the air to not play Williams IMOI need someone this Sunday. Woods seems like a stronger play for me don't you think? Tyrell would never crack my starting 3. Ar15, benjamin, maclin.
Good point. Probably not much difference than woods. Better shot at a tdIf you were ever going to play him its this week against the Raiders. They're just allowing too many points through the air to not play Williams IMO
He actually had 2 catches inside the 2 on 2 drives.
That doesnt matterHe is listed as 2nd string behind Inman, really tough for someone to hold as such.
You are not actually watching the games if you believe that.He is listed as 2nd string behind Inman, really tough for someone to hold as such.
I like him and his opportunity but who would I have kept him over? My WRs are Jordy, AJG, Evans, DT, Shepard and Corey Coleman. I needed more RB depth so I dropped him for Powell. I couldn't afford to drop any other player.This thread could be really interesting next week. We've got people bailing out already on a WR in his 2nd year in the NFL, yet he's had 17 targets the past two weeks with Rivers throwing him the football and now gets a horrendous pass D to go up against.
True, he is playing more then Travis.You are not actually watching the games if you believe that.