Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
WSL #4: Mockin' Is Rockin' (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Toads
- Start date
4.09 Kevin Smith, RB, DET
PM sent
PM sent
Yeah, Gamma sent me his list but I see he beat me here anyway.
glumpy
breeze
Got 'em
Road Warriors
Footballguy
abrecher selects:
4.11 Owen Daniels, TE, HOU
4.11 Owen Daniels, TE, HOU
Road Warriors
Footballguy
4.12 kellen Winslow, TE, CLE
Toads
Footballguy
I had originally just changed this one to read rounds #1-#5It's a lot easier to divide 20 by 5 and get 4 than it is to divide 20 by 4 and get 5. Five different threads are 20% more work than four different threads....a sixth including teams stand alone.glumpy said:I'm betting we blow through this round this weekend so the thread for rounds # 5-# 8 is already set up.
Toads--I think it would be worthwhile to set up a separate thread for the rosters--we always look for one towards the end of these drafts!
So: please change your's back to agree (four threads at five rounds each; your thread then reflects #6-#10) and let's keep it simple as possible.
In the meantime, I'll keep searching: is there a functional reason that this can't be split into threads with more content:
1) One thread for 20 rounds?
20 Two threads 10 rounds?
3) Three threads: 2 rounds at seven and one round at six?
Last edited by a moderator:
glumpy
breeze
All of these are tremendous ideas, Toad--but I'm not trying to reinvent the wheel here. These drafts have been set up this way for a few years now and everyone is used to working in this format. I didn't even notice your rounds #s in the title until after setting up the other thread--just working it on automatic.I had originally just changed this one to read rounds #1-#5It's a lot easier to divide 20 by 5 and get 4 than it is to divide 20 by 4 and get 5. Five different threads are 20% more work than four different threads....a sixth including teams stand alone.glumpy said:
So: please change your's back to agree (four threads at five rounds each; your thread then reflects #6-#10) and let's keep it simple as possible.
In the meantime, I'll keep searching: is there a functional reason that this can't be split into threads with more content:
1) One thread for 20 rounds?
20 Two threads 10 rounds?
3) Three threads: 2 rounds at seven and one round at six?
Toads
Footballguy
We're supposed to chatter in the chatter thread but that one's pretty good.
Last edited by a moderator:
