Arguments like this are so dumb...
You literally have to have a warped and insanely biased mind to even say something like this. These people act like the news reports that are out all the time say "Pit bull bites 4 year old, but child is unharmed" or "Pit bull bites neighbor, only minor puncture wounds occurred" or that reporters ignore stories where kids were killed by australian shepherds.
Or how about the owners that make a big deal about pits not having a physiological "locking jaw"? Who cares? Seriously why does the physiology matter? These animals were bred to hold onto a bull's snout for dear life. Whatever is at play, they are freaking great at holding a bite.
Or how about these arguments...
Again, who cares???? The point isn't that they are more likely to attack, it is the fact that when they attack they are more likely to inflict some serious damage. To even bring that up is nothing but deflection and ignores their breeding. I mean can you imagine if in addition to being as insane as they are when they do attack if they were also more likely to attack? I cant even fathom the kill numbers we would see.
How about this one?
WTF??? I mean somebody actually came up with this crap? Nut uh! They can't tolerate more pain, it is just less likely to affect them!