What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Mike Rowe Answers a Viewer's Questions (Vocational Trade Training) (1 Viewer)

Abraham

Footballguy
I knew we had undertrained people for vocational skills and I have agreed with him for a long time that the "prestige" of a 4 year degree has caused big damage to this country. My wife has a 2 year degree, trained for a specific job. As a result, she can get a job most anywhere in the country that would pay her well enough to provide for our entire family near the average household income level of the USA. Me? I have a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science from a small (expensive) liberal arts school. I work in sales, mainly because I'm not trained to do anything else.

Anyway...

CNN Viewer Has QuestionsDate: November 4, 2013 Category: Latest News,Mike's Take

Mike appeared on Piers Morgan’s show on October 30 and a viewer had some questions for Mike. Read his response here.

Today’s question comes from Jennifer Bailey. Jennifer posted over at CNN.com, but I’m answering here because … well, because I need more room.

JB: While Mike makes a valid point I have a few questions for him.

MR: Hi, Jennifer. I love questions. Fire away.

JB: How can the middle class send their kids to college for “four or more years” when the Republicans have made it far too expensive with raising interest rates on school loans and wanting to end federal grants?

MR: Your question implies that the middle class should be borrowing money to send their kids to an expensive four-year college. You also imply that college is far too expensive because interest rates on student loans are too high. Might I respectfully challenge both implications?

Since 1985, college tuition has increased at nearly 500 times the rate of inflation. (See: College tuition has jumped by 500% since 1985) Can you imagine the same jump in any other area? Food, housing, medicine, energy? If everything we need to live increased in price at the same rate as college tuition, there would be a national riot in about 10 minutes. So what really happened in the marketplace to allow college to get so expensive? Is it really all because Republicans want to raise the rates on student loans?

Think about it. Universities get to decide how much money to charge their students. Likewise, parents and students decide if they can afford to pay it. It’s a pretty simple proposition. But when the government suddenly makes hundreds of billions of dollars in student loans readily available — under the popular (and voter-friendly) theory that “everyone should go to college” — we see an unintended consequence. We see colleges suddenly motivated to charge more money. A lot more. And so they embark on their own PR campaigns to boost enrollment. They hire ad agencies and publicists and lobbyists and go about the business of persuading people to “invest in their future.” And most importantly, they provide an admissions department to help arrange for an affordable student loan. This is what’s been happening for the last 40 years.

If blame is your thing, there’s plenty to go around. Republicans and Democrats have both allowed a trillion dollars of public money to flow freely between students and colleges with no real accountability for the results. And millions of well-intended parents and guidance counselors are still pushing the idea that a four-year degree is the only viable path to happiness. This in spite of the fact that the vast majority of available jobs no longer require a diploma — they require the willingness to learn a useful skill. And that kind of training does not demand the type of massive borrowing that has put college graduates a trillion dollars in the hole.

To be clear, I’m not anti-college; I’m anti-debt. If you can afford it, by all means go for it. But I reject the idea that a four-year school is the best path for the most people. I went on Piers Morgan Live because I have a scholarship fund that trains people for jobs that actually exist, while rewarding the kind of work ethic I think we need to encourage. I want to spread the word.

JB: Vocational training has been taken out of most high schools. Would you not agree that they need to be brought back and kids be given the equivalent of a 2yr certification to apply to a trade school: Carpentry, welding, electrician….?

MR: Of course. The current skills gap has unfolded in part because vocational education vanished from high schools. I’m all for reinstating those programs, but I’m afraid that won’t be enough. There are hundreds of thousands of jobs available right now that people simply do not want. This is not because the jobs are “bad,” or the pay is lousy. It’s because we’ve raised an entire generation to view these opportunities as subordinate to a four-year degree. Good jobs are going begging because hard work and skilled labor are no longer valued in the same way as they were 50 years ago.

JB: Do you realize how many jobs would be available if the greedy corporations kept manufacturing and technical jobs here?

MR: Yes, I think I do. But what makes you think they would be filled?

Consider this: Right now, in the manufacturing sector alone, 600,000 jobs are currently available. That’s 600,000 open positions that American manufacturers can’t fill. You’re right — if all the American corporations moved all their manufacturing facilities and factories back to the United States we’d have a few million more openings. But then what? Do you really assume that millions of unemployed Americans would run to fill those positions? I’m afraid it’s not that simple. If it were, it would already be happening. We wouldn’t have a skills gap. But we do, and it’s getting wider every year. The fact is — according to the government’s own numbers — 3.7 million jobs are available right now. Doesn’t it make sense to fill those positions before we start demanding that companies create more opportunities that people don’t aspire to?

Like it or not, we’re in a global economy, and it’s not the politicians or the corporations calling the shots. It’s us. What we do as consumers matters far more than what we say as citizens. Right now, for instance, I’ll wager you’re reading this on a device made in China. It’s not a criticism – just an observation. Every single thing in our world, from Honey Boo Boo to your iPhone to your local Congressperson is a reflection of the things we value and the choices we make. At the cash register and at the polls.

JB: The list goes on, but I would say to you that the GOP won’t even pass the Jobs Bill and does nothing to help the middle class and our active military or veterans.

MR: Yes, Jennifer, your list does go on. And on the other side of the aisle there is another American with a different list. And their list goes on as well. This is the problem. Everyone is so focused on making their own list and keeping track of how screwed up the other side is, they can’t acknowledge a good idea unless somebody on their side tells them how to feel about it. Funny thing is, most of the Republicans I know want the same basic things as most of the Democrats I know. They all want more jobs. They all want a healthy planet. They all support our veterans. And they all want to help people who are in genuine need of help. But they disagree on the method, and on the role of government. And because they can’t get past their methodology, they just keep adding more things onto their list. And so it goes.

JB: They talked JOBS,JOBS, JOBS and all they’ve done is help their rich cronies, obstruct job making bills, make higher education unaffordable for everyone BUT their rich supporters!!

MR: I get it. The Republicans are bad. (I know this because you have use both CAPS and exclamation points!!) You have identified the GOP and their rich friends as the cause of a great many problems. You are certainly not alone. But frankly, I don’t find your analysis to be all that persuasive. For one thing, millions of conservatives are far from rich. And millions of liberals are far from poor. Does the government have a huge role to play? Sure. But ultimately, the way out of this is not through D.C. The buck no longer stops there. It stops with us. It has to.

JB: Why don’t you look at THOSE facts and ask the GOP to get off their collective derrières, help create jobs and quit jeopardizing the future of the American people!

MR: Because honestly, Jennifer, I don’t believe that the GOP or the Dems or the president can actually “create” jobs. The best they can do is encourage an environment where people who might be willing to assume the risk of hiring other people are more inclined to do so. That’s what I’d like them to do. And to the extent that either party would ever listen to a guy that used to have a show on cable TV — that’s about all I would ask of them.

JB: Btw, people WILL work their butt off, Mike, if paid a fair living wage and have affordable healthcare.

MR: From what I’ve seen of the world, most people (including me), would rather work eight hours instead of 10, six hours instead of eight, four hours instead of six. Most people prefer more vacation time than less. Most people want their gratification as soon as possible. Given a choice, most people would rather be comfortable than uncomfortable.

Again, this is not a criticism — it’s just the human condition. As a society, we can either encourage or discourage this basic tendency. In a very general way, I think we’ve encouraged it. I think we’ve encouraged people to withhold their very best efforts and their very hardest work until certain conditions and expectations are met. And I think those conditions are both relative and ever-changing. So when you suggest that people won’t work their butts off unless or until they feel that they are fairly paid and provided with affordable health care, I think you’re absolutely right. That’s exactly where our expectations have brought us.

On Dirty Jobs with Mike Rowe, though, I got a chance to meet a different breed. I met hundreds of men and women who proved beyond all doubt that hard work didn’t necessarily have to be conditioned on anything other than a personal decision to bust your own ###. By and large, the workers I met on that show were happy and successful because they were willing to work harder than everyone else around them. And in doing so, they thrived. Not right away, perhaps, but over time, most of them prospered. They distinguished themselves on the job by outworking the competition. And they advanced. In fact, many of the Dirty Jobbers we featured were millionaires. You just wouldn’t know it because they were usually covered in grime or sludge or #### or something worse. During the show, I also spoke at length with employers in every state, and in every industry. And no matter where I went, the biggest challenge was always the same – finding people who were willing to learn a new skill and work hard. I hear the same thing today.

Last week, I spent a few hours with the head of labor relations for one of the largest engineering firms in the world. He has thousands of positions open right now. Literally, thousands. After Katrina, his firm poured many millions of dollars into workforce development down in the Gulf. They trained — for free — hundreds of workers in a variety of positions that offered all kinds of opportunities to advance. The pay was fair. The benefits were solid. But the program ultimately failed. Why? Because virtually every single trainee decided it was just too damn hot. I’m not even kidding. They just didn’t want to work in the heat. And so … they didn’t.

In the next few years, this company anticipates 15,000 new openings for welders and pipe-fitters in the southeast. And the head of recruitment has absolutely no idea where the workers will come from. That should scare us all.

JB: Getting their hands dirty isn’t the problem. Being paid minimum wage with no Health Care IS the problem!

MR: But, Jennifer, how then do you explain the skills gap? These are not “minimum wage jobs.” These are not “jobs with no health care.” Again, you seem to assume that any time that a job becomes available that meets your criteria, a qualified and willing candidate will swoop in to fill it. But why do you think that? All the evidence suggests the opposite is true. Three and half million jobs are available right now. As in … today. What’s up with that?

If you tell me the pay is not sufficient, I’ll respectfully disagree. I’ve personally seen thousands of jobs go begging that start around $55,000, and offer a straight path to a six-figure salary. If you tell me it’s due to a lack of training, I’ll respectfully disagree some more. I haven’t seen one training program or trade school in the country that’s maxed out. Not one. I started mikeroweWORKS because I’ve personally met with dozens of employers who have hundreds of opportunities they can’t fill. Not only do these positions offer healthcare and fair pay, many offer free training. The catch? The work requires real, actual skill, and the conditions are often … uncomfortable. Sometimes it’s hot. Sometimes it’s cold. But the opportunities are there, and include the criteria you want. And yet, companies can’t fill them.

Every month, the trade schools I work with tell me about companies that are desperate for more welders. They simply can’t train them fast enough. Tulsa Welding School, Midwest Technical, The Refrigeration School, UTI … Believe me, there is no shortage of training. No, the skills gap reflects more than a lack of ability or a lack of opportunity — it reflects a disconnect between what we want, what we study, what we can afford, and what’s actually available.

Last point: Two weeks ago, I talked with a heavy equipment technician up in Butler, N.D. Jack’s 26 years old. Started welding part-time in high school. Got a job at the local CAT dealer working on big machines. Had a knack for it. Took a training program. Started around $65,000, with a 25% “Impact Signing Bonus.” Went to work in earnest. 60-hour weeks, mostly outside. Tough work, but he was good at it, and willing. Doubled his pay in a year. Met a girl. Got married. Bought a house. Had a kid. Got a raise. Paid off his house. Had another kid. Just quit his job to freelance. Why? Because he has a trade that’s in demand and real-world experience. He can work when he wants at $150 an hour anywhere on the High Plains. Jack is debt-free, highly trained, good at what he does, and absolutely thriving. Why? Because he combined a useful skill with a solid work ethic, and welcomed a chance to be uncomfortable.

A few months ago I wrote something called The S.W.E.A.T. Pledge. It stands for “Skills and Work Ethic Aren’t Taboo.” (So sue me — I like acronyms.) All mikeroweWORKS scholarships require the recipient to sign this pledge — among other things — before we spend $15,000 to $20,000 training them. If I we’re a betting man, Jennifer, I’d wager that you will not approve of this 12-point promise. But maybe I’m wrong? Give it a read: “The S.W.E.A.T. Pledge” (Skill & Work Ethic Aren’t Taboo)

Tell me what you think. And thanks for the questions.

Happy Sunday,

Mike
I was having lunch yesterday with the head of Business Development for the city I live in, population 99k. He told me a local machine shop has three HUNDRED openings right now for welders and metalwork and can't find anyone to fill them. They are working with the city to get grants to open a training facility at their own cost just so they can try and get people trained in the next 5 years. Floored me.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I agree with MR on this. We have turned being skilled labor, the very backbone of the middle class, into some kind of failure. It's ridiculous.

 
Big fan of Mike Rowe. In addition to this, he's also gone after the people who say things like "I'll never watch/support you again after going on that show hosted by [insert person with political ideology that differs from their own.]"

 
Its a shame really because when I was younger, doing things with your hands was always more fun than just watching TV right up until the point where open-ended access to TV became the norm. We were always outside, playing baseball and building forts. And if it was night time and we were inside, we were playing with legos and similar toys that more closely resemble engineering and trade work than sitting at a desk typing and generating reports.

I did have a friend that sold components in the cube next to me a decade ago. Put himself through night school to learn to be a welder because he really enjoyed helping a friend who had a metal art business. Got a good job and left the sales world for good.

 
Its a shame really because when I was younger, doing things with your hands was always more fun than just watching TV right up until the point where open-ended access to TV became the norm. We were always outside, playing baseball and building forts. And if it was night time and we were inside, we were playing with legos and similar toys that more closely resemble engineering and trade work than sitting at a desk typing and generating reports.

I did have a friend that sold components in the cube next to me a decade ago. Put himself through night school to learn to be a welder because he really enjoyed helping a friend who had a metal art business. Got a good job and left the sales world for good.
I have seriously considered doing the welding thing. My stepfather taught me how to use acetylene and arc welders when I was a kid. Always enjoyed the work. Maybe it's time for a change.

 
We can't find enough people to work in production. The guys we do have are making Boatloads with overtime and bonuses.

 
Its a shame really because when I was younger, doing things with your hands was always more fun than just watching TV right up until the point where open-ended access to TV became the norm. We were always outside, playing baseball and building forts. And if it was night time and we were inside, we were playing with legos and similar toys that more closely resemble engineering and trade work than sitting at a desk typing and generating reports.

I did have a friend that sold components in the cube next to me a decade ago. Put himself through night school to learn to be a welder because he really enjoyed helping a friend who had a metal art business. Got a good job and left the sales world for good.
I have seriously considered doing the welding thing. My stepfather taught me how to use acetylene and arc welders when I was a kid. Always enjoyed the work. Maybe it's time for a change.
It's a very good trade to be in right now. You could probably earn some certification in < 6 months from a trade school. Someone with more experience would know better. All I know is that we can't find enough of them.

 
Is this actually real? JB sounds like studio audience plant.

JB: Getting their hands dirty isn’t the problem. Being paid minimum wage with no Health Care IS the problem!

JB: Do you realize how many jobs would be available if the greedy corporations kept manufacturing and technical jobs here?

 
I think we are starting to see the shift from everyone thinking they have to go to college. If my kids were old enough, I would advise then strongly to look at other options. I can't tell you how many old students I see who tell me they can't get a job and neither can any of their friends. These jobs they want are jobs they went to college for. Sure they could go back to a technical school but they wasted 4 years and a lot of money.

I have a good job so I'm not really looking. But if I didn't, I would definitely check out what he was offering.

And I agree, JB is made up.

 
Its a shame really because when I was younger, doing things with your hands was always more fun than just watching TV right up until the point where open-ended access to TV became the norm. We were always outside, playing baseball and building forts. And if it was night time and we were inside, we were playing with legos and similar toys that more closely resemble engineering and trade work than sitting at a desk typing and generating reports.

I did have a friend that sold components in the cube next to me a decade ago. Put himself through night school to learn to be a welder because he really enjoyed helping a friend who had a metal art business. Got a good job and left the sales world for good.
I am decently handy and know a little bit about many aspects but don't know enough to say I could be a carpenter, mechanic etc etc......

I looked into automotive repair school recently and they want like 10G. Just not sure how to go about being 42 and getting "certified" in a skill

 
MR: Yes, Jennifer, your list does go on. And on the other side of the aisle there is another American with a different list. And their list goes on as well. This is the problem. Everyone is so focused on making their own list and keeping track of how screwed up the other side is, they can’t acknowledge a good idea unless somebody on their side tells them how to feel about it.

:own3d: :lmao:

 
Its a shame really because when I was younger, doing things with your hands was always more fun than just watching TV right up until the point where open-ended access to TV became the norm. We were always outside, playing baseball and building forts. And if it was night time and we were inside, we were playing with legos and similar toys that more closely resemble engineering and trade work than sitting at a desk typing and generating reports.

I did have a friend that sold components in the cube next to me a decade ago. Put himself through night school to learn to be a welder because he really enjoyed helping a friend who had a metal art business. Got a good job and left the sales world for good.
I am decently handy and know a little bit about many aspects but don't know enough to say I could be a carpenter, mechanic etc etc......

I looked into automotive repair school recently and they want like 10G. Just not sure how to go about being 42 and getting "certified" in a skill
http://profoundlydisconnected.com/the-mikeroweworks-foundation-scholarship-opportunities/

 
I will be honest and tell you now, it would take a very very large paycheck for me to work in shi* like he did on Dirty jobs.

 
Amen Mike Rowe. I grew up in a small town where lots of the adults in town were in the trades. Many of my classmates went into welding, electric, pipefitting, or farming. 10 years out those that worked hard are making 60-150k a year living in a relatively cheap region of the country.

 
I’m the director of a high school career center (formerly called vo-tech school). Our enrollment numbers have steadily dropped over the last decade and a half. State graduation requirements (more math and science credits, leaving no time for elective classes), and the inability to accept the fact that all students don’t need a bachelor’s degree is the blame. Guidance counselors refuse to believe that bright students would be better served with a trade.

Here’s what we have at my school:

Welding

Machine Tool

Automotive

Building Trades

Graphic Arts

Health Occupations

Electricity and Power Transmission (We have a wind turbine on campus WDIK!)

Early Childhood Development

 
This is another subject where we see broad consensus in the FFA. Always has been a cross aisle winner here. When will we put enough pressure on the powers that be to make something happen? When will we not vote for the person who doesn't support skills education? When will we start telling our kids that there is dignity in all jobs and that you aren't a failure if you don't get a four year degree as long as you have a trained skill? That's when something will change.

 
This is another subject where we see broad consensus in the FFA. Always has been a cross aisle winner here. When will we put enough pressure on the powers that be to make something happen? When will we not vote for the person who doesn't support skills education? When will we start telling our kids that there is dignity in all jobs and that you aren't a failure if you don't get a four year degree as long as you have a trained skill? That's when something will change.
When I was growing up the idea that "everyone should go to college!" was already taking hold. I went to a private K-12 and one of their banner things was that everyone who graduated went to college, as if that was some big accomplishment in well-off-white-suburbia.

I should ask my friends who still work there if that is still a big rallying point at the school.

 
This is another subject where we see broad consensus in the FFA. Always has been a cross aisle winner here. When will we put enough pressure on the powers that be to make something happen? When will we not vote for the person who doesn't support skills education? When will we start telling our kids that there is dignity in all jobs and that you aren't a failure if you don't get a four year degree as long as you have a trained skill? That's when something will change.
I've said it before and got hammered for it, but I believe an 18 month trade program should be a requirement before moving on to a 4 year college. :shrug:

 
This is another subject where we see broad consensus in the FFA. Always has been a cross aisle winner here. When will we put enough pressure on the powers that be to make something happen? When will we not vote for the person who doesn't support skills education? When will we start telling our kids that there is dignity in all jobs and that you aren't a failure if you don't get a four year degree as long as you have a trained skill? That's when something will change.
It's kind of funny because I would tend to believe many of us have 4 year degrees, work in office environments, sales, IT, law etc. And the generation most represented here (30-50) was really the first to be told that a 4 year degree was necessary.
 
This is another subject where we see broad consensus in the FFA. Always has been a cross aisle winner here. When will we put enough pressure on the powers that be to make something happen? When will we not vote for the person who doesn't support skills education? When will we start telling our kids that there is dignity in all jobs and that you aren't a failure if you don't get a four year degree as long as you have a trained skill? That's when something will change.
I've said it before and got hammered for it, but I believe an 18 month trade program should be a requirement before moving on to a 4 year college. :shrug:
Completely down with that. Pretty much the way it is in Germany right now. Every kid graduates with some basic skills in a skilled trade.

 
Different educational tracks starting in junior year of HS. Tech/engineering/vocational for one crowd and liberal arts for another.

 
This is another subject where we see broad consensus in the FFA. Always has been a cross aisle winner here. When will we put enough pressure on the powers that be to make something happen? When will we not vote for the person who doesn't support skills education? When will we start telling our kids that there is dignity in all jobs and that you aren't a failure if you don't get a four year degree as long as you have a trained skill? That's when something will change.
When I was growing up the idea that "everyone should go to college!" was already taking hold. I went to a private K-12 and one of their banner things was that everyone who graduated went to college, as if that was some big accomplishment in well-off-white-suburbia.

I should ask my friends who still work there if that is still a big rallying point at the school.
Yeah that was the big mantra just as I was coming up in the early 70's.

 
This is another subject where we see broad consensus in the FFA. Always has been a cross aisle winner here. When will we put enough pressure on the powers that be to make something happen? When will we not vote for the person who doesn't support skills education? When will we start telling our kids that there is dignity in all jobs and that you aren't a failure if you don't get a four year degree as long as you have a trained skill? That's when something will change.
It's kind of funny because I would tend to believe many of us have 4 year degrees, work in office environments, sales, IT, law etc. And the generation most represented here (30-50) was really the first to be told that a 4 year degree was necessary.
While I am in IT I am actually a tech school guy. 2 year AAS. Of course right now people want a 4 year bachelors to do what I did with a 2 year degree 25 years ago. I see this for level 1 help desk types and it is mind boggling to me.

 
This is another subject where we see broad consensus in the FFA. Always has been a cross aisle winner here. When will we put enough pressure on the powers that be to make something happen? When will we not vote for the person who doesn't support skills education? When will we start telling our kids that there is dignity in all jobs and that you aren't a failure if you don't get a four year degree as long as you have a trained skill? That's when something will change.
I've said it before and got hammered for it, but I believe an 18 month trade program should be a requirement before moving on to a 4 year college. :shrug:
Would you consider "18 month trade program or military service"?

 
I’m the director of a high school career center (formerly called vo-tech school). Our enrollment numbers have steadily dropped over the last decade and a half. State graduation requirements (more math and science credits, leaving no time for elective classes), and the inability to accept the fact that all students don’t need a bachelor’s degree is the blame. Guidance counselors refuse to believe that bright students would be better served with a trade.

Here’s what we have at my school:

Welding

Machine Tool

Automotive

Building Trades

Graphic Arts

Health Occupations

Electricity and Power Transmission (We have a wind turbine on campus WDIK!)

Early Childhood Development
I remember back when I was in Jr. High, they had this whole week career fair thing where we could learn all about the different career paths (military, Dental/medical, law enforcement, landscaping, etc.) Part of the whole week long thing was we had to take this vocational job aptitude test (JOB-O. Don't ask me what it stood for) to see what non-4 year degree job we would be best at. (I got Dental assistant.) My mom, along with others, flipped out when we brought home the packet because they assumed it was the school telling us we weren't good enough for college. Over the years, vocational classes in Montgomery County would slowly disappear, because no parent wants to send their child to a school that's just going to tell their kid they should be a plumber or a mechanic.
 
Different educational tracks starting in junior year of HS. Tech/engineering/vocational for one crowd and liberal arts for another.
I like this as well. Tracking is a very controversial topic but European countries do this with great success. You could have different sets of achievement standards, etc.

 
Here is the ironic part in all this.

My grandparents were laborers but my grandfather moved is way up in the phone company. Both living off of pensions and grandmother still does.

My parents same path - although my dad tried college he didn't care for it. He is a "blue collar" guy.

All I heard growing up was I AM GOING TO COLLEGE, you will not be following my footsteps, etc etc etc.... My parents struggled when I was young.

Now it appears to almost come full circle.

ETA: We had vocational path at my school, although most of those kids I don't think were going to make it regardless of what they chose

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is another subject where we see broad consensus in the FFA. Always has been a cross aisle winner here. When will we put enough pressure on the powers that be to make something happen? When will we not vote for the person who doesn't support skills education? When will we start telling our kids that there is dignity in all jobs and that you aren't a failure if you don't get a four year degree as long as you have a trained skill? That's when something will change.
I've said it before and got hammered for it, but I believe an 18 month trade program should be a requirement before moving on to a 4 year college. :shrug:
Would you consider "18 month trade program or military service"?
only if they learn a trade in the military (you'd be surprised how many don't)
 
Agree with Mike on almost all of that. And I'll plead guilty -- I'm soft. I'd absolutely avoid a job that came with working in 100 degree heat if I could. Hell, any heat.

We were just talking about this at Thanksgiving. My dad got hired at DuPont and returned there after he finished a tour in the Navy. In his first 18 months he did three six-month rotations -- carpentry, electrical and machine. They trained him for the job they needed him to do and he spent about 15 years with them as an electrician before getting into computers.

And my BIL's father ran a glass plant in Pennsyltucky for about a decade. He said they used to recruit guys out of H.S. and train them as well.

How many companies still do this?

 
This is another subject where we see broad consensus in the FFA. Always has been a cross aisle winner here. When will we put enough pressure on the powers that be to make something happen? When will we not vote for the person who doesn't support skills education? When will we start telling our kids that there is dignity in all jobs and that you aren't a failure if you don't get a four year degree as long as you have a trained skill? That's when something will change.
I've said it before and got hammered for it, but I believe an 18 month trade program should be a requirement before moving on to a 4 year college. :shrug:
Completely down with that. Pretty much the way it is in Germany right now. Every kid graduates with some basic skills in a skilled trade.
They still do that?

Whan my father graduated HS (or whatever it was called) in Germany he was asked "what do you want to be, plumber, painter or electrician?" He chose painter and they sent him to training. When he came to this country, that's what he did for a living.

I never graduated college and went from being a plumber to a machinist to an AV tech now (and voiceovers) among a few other jobs sprinkled in. Busted my ### at every stop.

 
Agree with Mike on almost all of that. And I'll plead guilty -- I'm soft. I'd absolutely avoid a job that came with working in 100 degree heat if I could. Hell, any heat.

We were just talking about this at Thanksgiving. My dad got hired at DuPont and returned there after he finished a tour in the Navy. In his first 18 months he did three six-month rotations -- carpentry, electrical and machine. They trained him for the job they needed him to do and he spent about 15 years with them as an electrician before getting into computers.

And my BIL's father ran a glass plant in Pennsyltucky for about a decade. He said they used to recruit guys out of H.S. and train them as well.

How many companies still do this?
I'd say very few. And that's not entirely the fault of the company. There was a time where people would spend their entire career working for one company. Nowadays, people are very likely to hop from one job to the next (I'm on my 7th since I left college 20 years ago) and companies aren't willing to put the time and energy into training a person if they're going to leave a few months/years later.

 
Agree with Mike on almost all of that. And I'll plead guilty -- I'm soft. I'd absolutely avoid a job that came with working in 100 degree heat if I could. Hell, any heat.

We were just talking about this at Thanksgiving. My dad got hired at DuPont and returned there after he finished a tour in the Navy. In his first 18 months he did three six-month rotations -- carpentry, electrical and machine. They trained him for the job they needed him to do and he spent about 15 years with them as an electrician before getting into computers.

And my BIL's father ran a glass plant in Pennsyltucky for about a decade. He said they used to recruit guys out of H.S. and train them as well.

How many companies still do this?
I'd say very few. And that's not entirely the fault of the company. There was a time where people would spend their entire career working for one company. Nowadays, people are very likely to hop from one job to the next (I'm on my 7th since I left college 20 years ago) and companies aren't willing to put the time and energy into training a person if they're going to leave a few months/years later.
I would think that job hopping is much more prevalent in white collar positions. Trade guys usually stay longer.
 
This is another subject where we see broad consensus in the FFA. Always has been a cross aisle winner here. When will we put enough pressure on the powers that be to make something happen? When will we not vote for the person who doesn't support skills education? When will we start telling our kids that there is dignity in all jobs and that you aren't a failure if you don't get a four year degree as long as you have a trained skill? That's when something will change.
I've said it before and got hammered for it, but I believe an 18 month trade program should be a requirement before moving on to a 4 year college. :shrug:
Completely down with that. Pretty much the way it is in Germany right now. Every kid graduates with some basic skills in a skilled trade.
They still do that?

Whan my father graduated HS (or whatever it was called) in Germany he was asked "what do you want to be, plumber, painter or electrician?" He chose painter and they sent him to training. When he came to this country, that's what he did for a living.

I never graduated college and went from being a plumber to a machinist to an AV tech now (and voiceovers) among a few other jobs sprinkled in. Busted my ### at every stop.
As far as I know they do some version of it still.

 
Agree with Mike on almost all of that. And I'll plead guilty -- I'm soft. I'd absolutely avoid a job that came with working in 100 degree heat if I could. Hell, any heat.

We were just talking about this at Thanksgiving. My dad got hired at DuPont and returned there after he finished a tour in the Navy. In his first 18 months he did three six-month rotations -- carpentry, electrical and machine. They trained him for the job they needed him to do and he spent about 15 years with them as an electrician before getting into computers.

And my BIL's father ran a glass plant in Pennsyltucky for about a decade. He said they used to recruit guys out of H.S. and train them as well.

How many companies still do this?
I'd say very few. And that's not entirely the fault of the company. There was a time where people would spend their entire career working for one company. Nowadays, people are very likely to hop from one job to the next (I'm on my 7th since I left college 20 years ago) and companies aren't willing to put the time and energy into training a person if they're going to leave a few months/years later.
I would think that job hopping is much more prevalent in white collar positions. Trade guys usually stay longer.
It happens in the trades too. With the exception of my current position, all my jobs post college were trade jobs.

 
I've worked in sales and marketing almost my whole career after going to college. Took a detour and worked about 5 years as a contractor. Worked in heat, bitter cold, and everything in between. Learned how to do electrical, plumbing, framing, tile, kitchens, baths, all of it.

If I had to do it all over again, I'd join a trade in a heartbeat. My kids are young, and I will definitely be talking about this as they get older. As it is now, I have them playing in the dirt and building things as much or more than playing on a computer.

 
If you think about it, many if the trade jobs can't be outsourced. Sure, manufacturing could. But plumbing, electrical, engineering, mechanical repair, welding etc all need local presence.

 
Is this actually real? JB sounds like studio audience plant.

JB: Getting their hands dirty isn’t the problem. Being paid minimum wage with no Health Care IS the problem!

JB: Do you realize how many jobs would be available if the greedy corporations kept manufacturing and technical jobs here?
Typical idiot who has been politically brainwashed and spewing out talking points from the left.

The right wing version of this same person #####es about socialism and the entitled poor.

In both cases they are caught up in what the world appears to be doing to them instead of making their own way.

 
This is another subject where we see broad consensus in the FFA. Always has been a cross aisle winner here. When will we put enough pressure on the powers that be to make something happen? When will we not vote for the person who doesn't support skills education? When will we start telling our kids that there is dignity in all jobs and that you aren't a failure if you don't get a four year degree as long as you have a trained skill? That's when something will change.
I've said it before and got hammered for it, but I believe an 18 month trade program should be a requirement before moving on to a 4 year college. :shrug:
Completely down with that. Pretty much the way it is in Germany right now. Every kid graduates with some basic skills in a skilled trade.
They still do that?

Whan my father graduated HS (or whatever it was called) in Germany he was asked "what do you want to be, plumber, painter or electrician?" He chose painter and they sent him to training. When he came to this country, that's what he did for a living.

I never graduated college and went from being a plumber to a machinist to an AV tech now (and voiceovers) among a few other jobs sprinkled in. Busted my ### at every stop.
They have a tracking system that starts pretty young (while the kids are still in elementary). They do all kinds of testing and evaluations of where to place the kids.

The top track is groomed for university. In fact, you have to go through the top track to go to college.

The middle track is a year shorter and trains the kids for more vocational roles. What we would view as two-year associate degree type of work.

The bottom track is training for factory jobs and service jobs.

There are problems with the system as it is today though. There is very little opportunity to move up if you get placed in the lower tracks initially. Also, poor kids end up in the bottom track at really high rates. As my friend put it, you tend to know which kids will end up in which track once you see their parents.

 
I knew we had undertrained people for vocational skills and I have agreed with him for a long time that the "prestige" of a 4 year degree has caused big damage to this country. My wife has a 2 year degree, trained for a specific job. As a result, she can get a job most anywhere in the country that would pay her well enough to provide for our entire family near the average household income level of the USA. Me? I have a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science from a small (expensive) liberal arts school. I work in sales, mainly because I'm not trained to do anything else.
I'm going to dissent a little bit here based on the bold. There are plenty of four year degrees that teach employable skills and train you for a career. Choosing to go into debt without getting a marketable degree is always a bad idea. It is just a luxury for rich kids planning on grad school.

Tuition keeps rising but so does the gap in employment and salaries between those with a 4 year degree and those without.

 
Agree with Mike on almost all of that. And I'll plead guilty -- I'm soft. I'd absolutely avoid a job that came with working in 100 degree heat if I could. Hell, any heat.
I'm with you. I agree with Mike as well, but if you have the mind to get a job with comfortable working conditions why subject yourself to working in extreme environments? If that's what you enjoy but if you are capable to getting a STEM degree then college is a wiser decision that becoming, say, a welder.

 
This is another subject where we see broad consensus in the FFA. Always has been a cross aisle winner here. When will we put enough pressure on the powers that be to make something happen? When will we not vote for the person who doesn't support skills education? When will we start telling our kids that there is dignity in all jobs and that you aren't a failure if you don't get a four year degree as long as you have a trained skill? That's when something will change.
I've said it before and got hammered for it, but I believe an 18 month trade program should be a requirement before moving on to a 4 year college. :shrug:
Would you consider "18 month trade program or military service"?
Absolutely.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top