This is another subject where we see broad consensus in the FFA. Always has been a cross aisle winner here. When will we put enough pressure on the powers that be to make something happen? When will we not vote for the person who doesn't support skills education? When will we start telling our kids that there is dignity in all jobs and that you aren't a failure if you don't get a four year degree as long as you have a trained skill? That's when something will change.
I've said it before and got hammered for it, but I believe
an 18 month trade program should be a requirement before moving on to a 4 year college.
Completely down with that.
Pretty much the way it is in Germany right now. Every kid graduates with some basic skills in a skilled trade.
They still do that?
Whan my father graduated HS (or whatever it was called) in Germany he was asked "what do you want to be, plumber, painter or electrician?" He chose painter and they sent him to training. When he came to this country, that's what he did for a living.
I never graduated college and went from being a plumber to a machinist to an AV tech now (and voiceovers) among a few other jobs sprinkled in. Busted my ### at every stop.
They have a tracking system that starts pretty young (while the kids are still in elementary). They do all kinds of testing and evaluations of where to place the kids.
The top track is groomed for university. In fact, you have to go through the top track to go to college.
The middle track is a year shorter and trains the kids for more vocational roles. What we would view as two-year associate degree type of work.
The bottom track is training for factory jobs and service jobs.
There are problems with the system as it is today though. There is very little opportunity to move up if you get placed in the lower tracks initially. Also, poor kids end up in the bottom track at really high rates. As my friend put it, you tend to know which kids will end up in which track once you see their parents.