That play never gets old.The first thing that came to my mind.
JD Clowney
looks like the chain crew messed something up
Could you describe the ruckus?Sadly, I have seen that done before, and it did raise quite a ruckus.
Refs at the younger levels move the ball all the damn time. As was told to me by a ref when I was coaching (9th grade at the time) they like to have the football on a marked line whenever possible. Sometimes that means moving it forward a little...sometimes moving it back a little. I am not saying that is what they are doing here. This was messed up and blatant at a time when convenience would not be a good excuse.. But to be honest, from a pure measurement standpoint, the spotting of the ball, the placement of the chains, the accuracy of chain length, the movement of the chains from sidelines to location of the ball...all of it is ripe with uncertainty which makes the close measurements iffy to begin with. Tough to swallow in a game of inches.That was….bizarre. I’d love to hear his explanation for that
First time I saw this was when I was coaching 5th/6th grade youth football. We were playing a playoff game and the ref literally moved the ball about a foot to where the chain was pulled. This maneuver was to the benefit of the other team. The whole game actually seemed to be filled with phantom calls whenever we did something successful. Something seemed off...homer ref crew perhaps? We were playing on the other team's home field. Anyway, parents on our sideline were livid. Lot's of yelling and screaming at the refs throughout. After the ball move, one of our parents who was on the sidelines because he was also our "team doctor", charged out on the field and got in the refs face. There was a pretty heated exchange, nothing physical, but certainly not a great display in front of the kids. When doc came back to the sideline, he said that the ref was drunk and he reeked of alcohol. We lost a close game, and several parents then went after the ref when the game ended. Again nothing got physical, but a lot of commotion. I didn't see all the detail because I was huddled with the team for a few post game words. Parents took the issue to the league governing board and I heard that ref got banned. I never really followed up on it though, so not sure if that actually transpired or not.Could you describe the ruckus?Sadly, I have seen that done before, and it did raise quite a ruckus.
I was merely quoting The Breakfast Club, but that’s a crazy turn of events. Thanks for sharing - some people are nuts when it comes to youth/HS sports.First time I saw this was when I was coaching 5th/6th grade youth football. We were playing a playoff game and the ref literally moved the ball about a foot to where the chain was pulled. This maneuver was to the benefit of the other team. The whole game actually seemed to be filled with phantom calls whenever we did something successful. Something seemed off...homer ref crew perhaps? We were playing on the other team's home field. Anyway, parents on our sideline were livid. Lot's of yelling and screaming at the refs throughout. After the ball move, one of our parents who was on the sidelines because he was also our "team doctor", charged out on the field and got in the refs face. There was a pretty heated exchange, nothing physical, but certainly not a great display in front of the kids. When doc came back to the sideline, he said that the ref was drunk and he reeked of alcohol. We lost a close game, and several parents then went after the ref when the game ended. Again nothing got physical, but a lot of commotion. I didn't see all the detail because I was huddled with the team for a few post game words. Parents took the issue to the league governing board and I heard that ref got banned. I never really followed up on it though, so not sure if that actually transpired or not.Could you describe the ruckus?Sadly, I have seen that done before, and it did raise quite a ruckus.
I saw a similar move while I was an assistant high school coach. Again, the ball was literally moved to the benefit of the other team. Our head coach went nuts. He ended up getting an unsportsmanlike penalty and eventually ejected from the game. Fans in the stands were all fired up shouting pretty nasty stuff and continued riding the ref for a while. Eventually the commotion calmed, as we ended up winning that game.
:cough: :cough: :cough:Could you describe the ruckus?Sadly, I have seen that done before, and it did raise quite a ruckus.
Your team doctor should have been arrestedFirst time I saw this was when I was coaching 5th/6th grade youth football. We were playing a playoff game and the ref literally moved the ball about a foot to where the chain was pulled. This maneuver was to the benefit of the other team. The whole game actually seemed to be filled with phantom calls whenever we did something successful. Something seemed off...homer ref crew perhaps? We were playing on the other team's home field. Anyway, parents on our sideline were livid. Lot's of yelling and screaming at the refs throughout. After the ball move, one of our parents who was on the sidelines because he was also our "team doctor", charged out on the field and got in the refs face. There was a pretty heated exchange, nothing physical, but certainly not a great display in front of the kids. When doc came back to the sideline, he said that the ref was drunk and he reeked of alcohol. We lost a close game, and several parents then went after the ref when the game ended. Again nothing got physical, but a lot of commotion. I didn't see all the detail because I was huddled with the team for a few post game words. Parents took the issue to the league governing board and I heard that ref got banned. I never really followed up on it though, so not sure if that actually transpired or not.Could you describe the ruckus?Sadly, I have seen that done before, and it did raise quite a ruckus.
I saw a similar move while I was an assistant high school coach. Again, the ball was literally moved to the benefit of the other team. Our head coach went nuts. He ended up getting an unsportsmanlike penalty and eventually ejected from the game. Fans in the stands were all fired up shouting pretty nasty stuff and continued riding the ref for a while. Eventually the commotion calmed, as we ended up winning that game.
Also lawn darts.You know what they say. Close only counts in horseshoes, hand grenades, and pivotal fourth downs at the end of the game.
Definitely not appropriate...not sure it rose to level of criminal. I know some places do have laws on the books these days. This was back in mid 90's. Funny thing is that this guy was normally pretty mild mannered. Outside of this instance I don't recall him ever getting worked up about anything.Your team doctor should have been arrestedFirst time I saw this was when I was coaching 5th/6th grade youth football. We were playing a playoff game and the ref literally moved the ball about a foot to where the chain was pulled. This maneuver was to the benefit of the other team. The whole game actually seemed to be filled with phantom calls whenever we did something successful. Something seemed off...homer ref crew perhaps? We were playing on the other team's home field. Anyway, parents on our sideline were livid. Lot's of yelling and screaming at the refs throughout. After the ball move, one of our parents who was on the sidelines because he was also our "team doctor", charged out on the field and got in the refs face. There was a pretty heated exchange, nothing physical, but certainly not a great display in front of the kids. When doc came back to the sideline, he said that the ref was drunk and he reeked of alcohol. We lost a close game, and several parents then went after the ref when the game ended. Again nothing got physical, but a lot of commotion. I didn't see all the detail because I was huddled with the team for a few post game words. Parents took the issue to the league governing board and I heard that ref got banned. I never really followed up on it though, so not sure if that actually transpired or not.Could you describe the ruckus?Sadly, I have seen that done before, and it did raise quite a ruckus.
I saw a similar move while I was an assistant high school coach. Again, the ball was literally moved to the benefit of the other team. Our head coach went nuts. He ended up getting an unsportsmanlike penalty and eventually ejected from the game. Fans in the stands were all fired up shouting pretty nasty stuff and continued riding the ref for a while. Eventually the commotion calmed, as we ended up winning that game.
I'm a high school football and baseball official in Oregon. A local school board member and parent went after a crew from my same association after a JV football game this week. Apparently he actually laid hands on the referee in some manner. Pretty sure he's facing assault and harassment charges. These people all need to be locked up.Definitely not appropriate...not sure it rose to level of criminal. I know some places do have laws on the books these days. This was back in mid 90's. Funny thing is that this guy was normally pretty mild mannered. Outside of this instance I don't recall him ever getting worked up about anything.Your team doctor should have been arrestedFirst time I saw this was when I was coaching 5th/6th grade youth football. We were playing a playoff game and the ref literally moved the ball about a foot to where the chain was pulled. This maneuver was to the benefit of the other team. The whole game actually seemed to be filled with phantom calls whenever we did something successful. Something seemed off...homer ref crew perhaps? We were playing on the other team's home field. Anyway, parents on our sideline were livid. Lot's of yelling and screaming at the refs throughout. After the ball move, one of our parents who was on the sidelines because he was also our "team doctor", charged out on the field and got in the refs face. There was a pretty heated exchange, nothing physical, but certainly not a great display in front of the kids. When doc came back to the sideline, he said that the ref was drunk and he reeked of alcohol. We lost a close game, and several parents then went after the ref when the game ended. Again nothing got physical, but a lot of commotion. I didn't see all the detail because I was huddled with the team for a few post game words. Parents took the issue to the league governing board and I heard that ref got banned. I never really followed up on it though, so not sure if that actually transpired or not.Could you describe the ruckus?Sadly, I have seen that done before, and it did raise quite a ruckus.
I saw a similar move while I was an assistant high school coach. Again, the ball was literally moved to the benefit of the other team. Our head coach went nuts. He ended up getting an unsportsmanlike penalty and eventually ejected from the game. Fans in the stands were all fired up shouting pretty nasty stuff and continued riding the ref for a while. Eventually the commotion calmed, as we ended up winning that game.
Sometimes the players try...Good thing this would never happen in an NFL game.
Terrible that anything like this happens at such a young age. Reffing is a ****ty job. Parents are the worstFirst time I saw this was when I was coaching 5th/6th grade youth football.
I'm a high school football official here in Michigan. Only been doing it for two years and luckily have not run into something like this. But have seen/heard a lot of crazy people.I'm a high school football and baseball official in Oregon. A local school board member and parent went after a crew from my same association after a JV football game this week. Apparently he actually laid hands on the referee in some manner. Pretty sure he's facing assault and harassment charges. These people all need to be locked up.Definitely not appropriate...not sure it rose to level of criminal. I know some places do have laws on the books these days. This was back in mid 90's. Funny thing is that this guy was normally pretty mild mannered. Outside of this instance I don't recall him ever getting worked up about anything.Your team doctor should have been arrestedFirst time I saw this was when I was coaching 5th/6th grade youth football. We were playing a playoff game and the ref literally moved the ball about a foot to where the chain was pulled. This maneuver was to the benefit of the other team. The whole game actually seemed to be filled with phantom calls whenever we did something successful. Something seemed off...homer ref crew perhaps? We were playing on the other team's home field. Anyway, parents on our sideline were livid. Lot's of yelling and screaming at the refs throughout. After the ball move, one of our parents who was on the sidelines because he was also our "team doctor", charged out on the field and got in the refs face. There was a pretty heated exchange, nothing physical, but certainly not a great display in front of the kids. When doc came back to the sideline, he said that the ref was drunk and he reeked of alcohol. We lost a close game, and several parents then went after the ref when the game ended. Again nothing got physical, but a lot of commotion. I didn't see all the detail because I was huddled with the team for a few post game words. Parents took the issue to the league governing board and I heard that ref got banned. I never really followed up on it though, so not sure if that actually transpired or not.Could you describe the ruckus?Sadly, I have seen that done before, and it did raise quite a ruckus.
I saw a similar move while I was an assistant high school coach. Again, the ball was literally moved to the benefit of the other team. Our head coach went nuts. He ended up getting an unsportsmanlike penalty and eventually ejected from the game. Fans in the stands were all fired up shouting pretty nasty stuff and continued riding the ref for a while. Eventually the commotion calmed, as we ended up winning that game.
That is crazy, With that having been caught on camera, hopefully that guy never officiates another game.
“NJSIAA has reviewed the video of the Vineland versus Eastern state playoff football game and, in agreement with the New Jersey Football Officials Association, has determined that the entire officiating crew -- pending a hearing next week with the South Chapter of the New Jersey Football Officials Association -- will not be assigned future post-season games.”
During a 1995 game at SF, New Orleans Saints DT Pig Goff "walked into" the football after the ref spotted it on a crucial Niners third down late in the game. The effect was that Goff kicked the ball a few feet away and the ref had to re-spot it. The re-spot was at least a football length short of the original spot, maybe more. In the end, the Saints got the ball back and held on for an 11-7 win.Sometimes the players try...Good thing this would never happen in an NFL game.
I work line of scrimmage (Line Judge) in college. We spot the ball on 80+% of the plays in a game (literally 100+ times a game). Sometimes I'll watch an entire game I've worked on film to see how accurate my spots were. Usually miss anywhere from 2-5 spots in every game (off a 1/2 to full yard... very rarely more than that). Had one earlier this year where I failed to give the team a 1st down when I should have twice in the same game. On one, the runner skipped over top of the tackler and I just thought he was down when they went to the ground initially, but no part of the runner was down until after they bounced across the 1st down line. On the second, a guy caught a 10 yard pass near the sideline and got spun around by the tackler. At one point the ball crossed the first down line, but I left them a 1/2 yard short. On both of those plays, they were around 10 yard gains so I'm moving to the spot as the play is happening. Those are the hardest because I'm behind the play trying to determine when the guy is down while I'm running. We don't have instant replay in D-2 games, so it is all on us on the field to get them right. Luckily that game was about a 20+ point win, but I hate getting anything wrong.Spotting the football has to be one of the most inexact things in sports.
That being said this was wrong!
I work line of scrimmage (Line Judge) in college. We spot the ball on 80+% of the plays in a game (literally 100+ times a game). Sometimes I'll watch an entire game I've worked on film to see how accurate my spots were. Usually miss anywhere from 2-5 spots in every game (off a 1/2 to full yard... very rarely more than that). Had one earlier this year where I failed to give the team a 1st down when I should have twice in the same game. On one, the runner skipped over top of the tackler and I just thought he was down when they went to the ground initially, but no part of the runner was down until after they bounced across the 1st down line. On the second, a guy caught a 10 yard pass near the sideline and got spun around by the tackler. At one point the ball crossed the first down line, but I left them a 1/2 yard short. On both of those plays, they were around 10 yard gains so I'm moving to the spot as the play is happening. Those are the hardest because I'm behind the play trying to determine when the guy is down while I'm running. We don't have instant replay in D-2 games, so it is all on us on the field to get them right. Luckily that game was about a 20+ point win, but I hate getting anything wrong.Spotting the football has to be one of the most inexact things in sports.
That being said this was wrong!
Most guys at my level and above spend a lot of time reviewing their own performances and we are always evaluated. In the levels below me, you are happy someone is willing to show up and do it, so expectations of evaluations and getting better are really just up to the individual. The thing is NONE of the officials that work anything short of the NFL are just officials. Every single one of us have another job of some sort. Trying to travel to and from your games and work the game is a pretty big time commitment in itself and that is all we get paid for. Guys just don't have the ability or desire to do much else in a lot of cases and in order to really learn and get better takes extra time that frankly a lot of HS refs just aren't willing to do.
I concur that what he did was inexcusable.
In the Michigan-MSU game MSU went for it on 4th and about 1/2 yards. The ref spotted to ball for about a 2 yard gain and first down, the announcers kept saying the runner just got back to the line of scrimmage. Replay reversed it but I am sure the ref thought he had the correct spot.
but still what the HS ref did was inexcusable.
This stuff is just freaking hard to get right all of the time and coaches will push and manipulate everything they can to get an advantage. It can be exhausting at times.
Every first down (except first and goal) should be place at a marked line.they like to have the football on a marked line whenever possible.
I consider myself a very fair, calm guy who generally knows the rules better than most. In other words, I think I'd make a good ref/umpire/official.This stuff is just freaking hard to get right all of the time and coaches will push and manipulate everything they can to get an advantage. It can be exhausting at times.
I completely agree with all of this.This stuff is just freaking hard to get right all of the time and coaches will push and manipulate everything they can to get an advantage. It can be exhausting at times.
Thank you for being an official. All officials need to be told that more often....................especially at the youth level.
Youth officials would be perfect for older youths to do but since parents think 8/9 yr olds are playing for millions of dollars it really makes it difficult to have 16/17 year olds subject themselves to that abuse.
As a side note, both sides are to blame when things escalate. As part of coaching our disctrict made all coaches attend the umpire two day training session at the beginning of the year for the umpires in the area. It really opened my eyes as to how things get escalated so quickly. The overwhelming theme was that the umpires need "take control" and not let anybody question anything you do. Put them in their place and show your dominance. This was hammered into all the umpires for the two days. Don't let anybody question/doubt/talk/discuss anything with you. Put them in their place right from the start. To me this starts the game off badly as there is already a confrontational feel from the opening manager's meeting as that is where the umps were being told to set the tone. I really think that leads to a lot of tension before there really is anything to be tense about and I was shocked it was drilled in so heavily.
Don't get me wrong, I can completely understand how an ump should be in control and that because of unruly fans/coaches it is beneficial to stay in control. However, there are mutliple ways to do that and starting with a chip on your shoulder and being adversarial from the start only increases the tension.
A year or two after that I decided to help out and ump for a couple seasons. This was 11/12 year old little league Major division to give you an idea of the age range/level. I started every game talking to the managers letting them know my approach. I had a wide strike zone (i wanted kids to swing the bat and put the ball in play) and I told the coaches ahead of time. I also joked with them in between innings and owned my mistakes (i definitely made quite a bit). I joked with the fans between innings about various calls and other things. It really helped to defuse the tenseness throughout the game. In the 2 years and 50+ games I officiated I had zero heated run-ins with fans or coaches. Games went smoothly and everyone stayed sane. This wasn't because I got everything right. I missed plenty of calls but I also owned up to them. Nothing defuses a coach when you sincerely agree that you missed a call (if I actually did). I didn't cave but I was just sincere with my approach and was honest with them while letting them tell their side.
It was actually a really fun experience, and it should be required for all coaches at a minimum to officiate a few games every year.
Yeah, I would imagine the "perfect" official is one who can acknowledge his mistakes openly but not let himself be influenced by a bad call and/or a particular player or coach. But that's obviously soooo much easier said than done.This stuff is just freaking hard to get right all of the time and coaches will push and manipulate everything they can to get an advantage. It can be exhausting at times.
Thank you for being an official. All officials need to be told that more often....................especially at the youth level.
Youth officials would be perfect for older youths to do but since parents think 8/9 yr olds are playing for millions of dollars it really makes it difficult to have 16/17 year olds subject themselves to that abuse.
As a side note, both sides are to blame when things escalate. As part of coaching our disctrict made all coaches attend the umpire two day training session at the beginning of the year for the umpires in the area. It really opened my eyes as to how things get escalated so quickly. The overwhelming theme was that the umpires need "take control" and not let anybody question anything you do. Put them in their place and show your dominance. This was hammered into all the umpires for the two days. Don't let anybody question/doubt/talk/discuss anything with you. Put them in their place right from the start. To me this starts the game off badly as there is already a confrontational feel from the opening manager's meeting as that is where the umps were being told to set the tone. I really think that leads to a lot of tension before there really is anything to be tense about and I was shocked it was drilled in so heavily.
Don't get me wrong, I can completely understand how an ump should be in control and that because of unruly fans/coaches it is beneficial to stay in control. However, there are mutliple ways to do that and starting with a chip on your shoulder and being adversarial from the start only increases the tension.
A year or two after that I decided to help out and ump for a couple seasons. This was 11/12 year old little league Major division to give you an idea of the age range/level. I started every game talking to the managers letting them know my approach. I had a wide strike zone (i wanted kids to swing the bat and put the ball in play) and I told the coaches ahead of time. I also joked with them in between innings and owned my mistakes (i definitely made quite a bit). I joked with the fans between innings about various calls and other things. It really helped to defuse the tenseness throughout the game. In the 2 years and 50+ games I officiated I had zero heated run-ins with fans or coaches. Games went smoothly and everyone stayed sane. This wasn't because I got everything right. I missed plenty of calls but I also owned up to them. Nothing defuses a coach when you sincerely agree that you missed a call (if I actually did). I didn't cave but I was just sincere with my approach and was honest with them while letting them tell their side.
It was actually a really fun experience, and it should be required for all coaches at a minimum to officiate a few games every year.
The problem is that not everyone has the personality for it. Some guys are naturally insecure/defensive or simply get overwhelmed by confrontation. I'd love it if officials could be psychologically profiled to see if they can handle it, but since we are already short officials, that just isn't feasible...so it is basically trial by fire. As a result, youth and HS sports are that testing ground and you will get a lot of tough confrontations.
One thing I've seen also, is that the tolerance levels among officials varies from sport to sport and from level to level.
As a player, I never respected the "don't even question me or I'll go from zero to 100" umpire/ref. I think it's natural for a player or a coach who is emotionally invested in the game (to a healthy extent) to question if there's a bad call. So, I do think it's appropriate for an official to give some leeway to a coach/player who voices an objection or simply asks a question about a call. There's obviously then a line that shouldn't be crossed (a player/coach should never get in an official's face, insults/name-calling shouldn't be tolerated, and perhaps questioning every call should be stopped) but in a perfect world an official should expect some healthy criticism and I'm not sure I like the training where officials are being taught to just maintain complete control and shut down any confrontation. But, I guess I get it.
Then that's just a bad association. That is not AT ALL how our associations have trained us. Yes, you need to be in control. But it's always to be polite and courteous and respectful first, try to diffuse all situations and only exert control and authority when you must.This stuff is just freaking hard to get right all of the time and coaches will push and manipulate everything they can to get an advantage. It can be exhausting at times.
Thank you for being an official. All officials need to be told that more often....................especially at the youth level.
Youth officials would be perfect for older youths to do but since parents think 8/9 yr olds are playing for millions of dollars it really makes it difficult to have 16/17 year olds subject themselves to that abuse.
As a side note, both sides are to blame when things escalate. As part of coaching our disctrict made all coaches attend the umpire two day training session at the beginning of the year for the umpires in the area. It really opened my eyes as to how things get escalated so quickly. The overwhelming theme was that the umpires need "take control" and not let anybody question anything you do. Put them in their place and show your dominance. This was hammered into all the umpires for the two days. Don't let anybody question/doubt/talk/discuss anything with you. Put them in their place right from the start. To me this starts the game off badly as there is already a confrontational feel from the opening manager's meeting as that is where the umps were being told to set the tone. I really think that leads to a lot of tension before there really is anything to be tense about and I was shocked it was drilled in so heavily.
Don't get me wrong, I can completely understand how an ump should be in control and that because of unruly fans/coaches it is beneficial to stay in control. However, there are mutliple ways to do that and starting with a chip on your shoulder and being adversarial from the start only increases the tension.
A year or two after that I decided to help out and ump for a couple seasons. This was 11/12 year old little league Major division to give you an idea of the age range/level. I started every game talking to the managers letting them know my approach. I had a wide strike zone (i wanted kids to swing the bat and put the ball in play) and I told the coaches ahead of time. I also joked with them in between innings and owned my mistakes (i definitely made quite a bit). I joked with the fans between innings about various calls and other things. It really helped to defuse the tenseness throughout the game. In the 2 years and 50+ games I officiated I had zero heated run-ins with fans or coaches. Games went smoothly and everyone stayed sane. This wasn't because I got everything right. I missed plenty of calls but I also owned up to them. Nothing defuses a coach when you sincerely agree that you missed a call (if I actually did). I didn't cave but I was just sincere with my approach and was honest with them while letting them tell their side.
It was actually a really fun experience, and it should be required for all coaches at a minimum to officiate a few games every year.
NFHS has changed their policies regarding football coaches now to be more in line with other sports. It's "one voice" only allowed on the sideline, and in order to hammer that home and change the culture to be more reflective of other sports, they have told us to throw flags early and often to shut up assistant coaches that think they can constantly complain to officials.One thing I've seen also, is that the tolerance levels among officials varies from sport to sport and from level to level.
As a player, I never respected the "don't even question me or I'll go from zero to 100" umpire/ref. I think it's natural for a player or a coach who is emotionally invested in the game (to a healthy extent) to question if there's a bad call. So, I do think it's appropriate for an official to give some leeway to a coach/player who voices an objection or simply asks a question about a call. There's obviously then a line that shouldn't be crossed (a player/coach should never get in an official's face, insults/name-calling shouldn't be tolerated, and perhaps questioning every call should be stopped) but in a perfect world an official should expect some healthy criticism and I'm not sure I like the training where officials are being taught to just maintain complete control and shut down any confrontation. But, I guess I get it.
I know baseball umpires that do other sports and as a general rule, they are the quickest to flag coaches/players and hand out technicals. There is just more of a zero tolerance policy in baseball it seems and those guys carry it over into their other sports. Whereas the basketball guys are a more lenient and the football officials let coaches have too much of a leash I believe. The NCAA literally has to tell the officials to give football coaches MORE unsportsmanlike penalties because we have been trained to almost never do it in football. Ever since the 2019 Alabama-Clemson national championship where Sweeney and Saban were constantly out of the field yelling at the officials, the directors/trainers have told us to be LESS tolerant of angry coaches out on the field to the point that it is supposed to be an automatic UNS if a coach is on the green part of the field yelling at the officials.
NFHS has changed their policies regarding football coaches now to be more in line with other sports. It's "one voice" only allowed on the sideline, and in order to hammer that home and change the culture to be more reflective of other sports, they have told us to throw flags early and often to shut up assistant coaches that think they can constantly complain to officials.
The problem is that not everyone has the personality for it. Some guys are naturally insecure/defensive or simply get overwhelmed by confrontation. I'd love it if officials could be psychologically profiled to see if they can handle it, but since we are already short officials, that just isn't feasible...so it is basically trial by fire. As a result, youth and HS sports are that testing ground and you will get a lot of tough confrontations.
Yeah, I don't like it but this thread (and the input from some of our board members who are actual officials) kind of has swayed me that a no tolerance policy may just be the most prudent.NFHS has changed their policies regarding football coaches now to be more in line with other sports. It's "one voice" only allowed on the sideline, and in order to hammer that home and change the culture to be more reflective of other sports, they have told us to throw flags early and often to shut up assistant coaches that think they can constantly complain to officials.
I don't understand (especially at a football game where there is constant noise/yelling) why officials even bother to acknowledge people yelling at them. I can understand if they end up crossing a line/getting personal/using profanities to an extreme/etc but in general just bitching at the call is fine.
I have always thought officials that listen to the complaining (crowds/coaching/etc) too much takes away from them actually doing their job. I never paid attention to what the crowd was saying or what coaches were saying during the game unless we were in direct conversation. I had no problem with them yelling whatever as I didn't really pay attention. I had other things to worry about.
I guess due to the escalations and general bad reactions that are happening these days nipping it in the bud is likely the prudent thing to do. Things escalate too quickly these days to get out of control.
Then that's just a bad association. That is not AT ALL how our associations have trained us. Yes, you need to be in control. But it's always to be polite and courteous and respectful first, try to diffuse all situations and only exert control and authority when you must.
Of course you've seen it before. Your avatar looks exactly like the ref.Sadly, I have seen that done before, and it did raise quite a ruckus.
Our little league "requires" all of the managers to umpire at least one game during the season in an effort to help the managers see things from the umpire's perspective. In reality a lot of them manage to weasel out of the requirement, but the ones who actually follow through have told me it really does change how they manage their players, their stands and even the game.This stuff is just freaking hard to get right all of the time and coaches will push and manipulate everything they can to get an advantage. It can be exhausting at times.
Thank you for being an official. All officials need to be told that more often....................especially at the youth level.
Youth officials would be perfect for older youths to do but since parents think 8/9 yr olds are playing for millions of dollars it really makes it difficult to have 16/17 year olds subject themselves to that abuse.
As a side note, both sides are to blame when things escalate. As part of coaching our disctrict made all coaches attend the umpire two day training session at the beginning of the year for the umpires in the area. It really opened my eyes as to how things get escalated so quickly. The overwhelming theme was that the umpires need "take control" and not let anybody question anything you do. Put them in their place and show your dominance. This was hammered into all the umpires for the two days. Don't let anybody question/doubt/talk/discuss anything with you. Put them in their place right from the start. To me this starts the game off badly as there is already a confrontational feel from the opening manager's meeting as that is where the umps were being told to set the tone. I really think that leads to a lot of tension before there really is anything to be tense about and I was shocked it was drilled in so heavily.
Don't get me wrong, I can completely understand how an ump should be in control and that because of unruly fans/coaches it is beneficial to stay in control. However, there are mutliple ways to do that and starting with a chip on your shoulder and being adversarial from the start only increases the tension.
A year or two after that I decided to help out and ump for a couple seasons. This was 11/12 year old little league Major division to give you an idea of the age range/level. I started every game talking to the managers letting them know my approach. I had a wide strike zone (i wanted kids to swing the bat and put the ball in play) and I told the coaches ahead of time. I also joked with them in between innings and owned my mistakes (i definitely made quite a bit). I joked with the fans between innings about various calls and other things. It really helped to defuse the tenseness throughout the game. In the 2 years and 50+ games I officiated I had zero heated run-ins with fans or coaches. Games went smoothly and everyone stayed sane. This wasn't because I got everything right. I missed plenty of calls but I also owned up to them. Nothing defuses a coach when you sincerely agree that you missed a call (if I actually did). I didn't cave but I was just sincere with my approach and was honest with them while letting them tell their side.
It was actually a really fun experience, and it should be required for all coaches at a minimum to officiate a few games every year.