Dez
Footballguy
Only have 20 roster spots in the FFPC. I waited on Pead all last year and said I wouldn't make the same mistake...still sucksWhy?Drafted him at 1.11 and waived him the week before he become starter......![]()
Only have 20 roster spots in the FFPC. I waited on Pead all last year and said I wouldn't make the same mistake...still sucksWhy?Drafted him at 1.11 and waived him the week before he become starter......![]()
RB1 was bad enough - now someone has him at #5.Fake Football are as usual the most progressive of the bunch, ranking him as #7 with Chad Scott having him as high as #5.
They should beHow much of a threat is the third round pick (Mason) to the fifth round pick (Stacy) ?
I would assume that Stacy has the edge in terms of size, experience, and blocking skills, but are Stacy owners concerned at all?
Agreed. Stacy was in right place at right time and took advantage of opp last year but definite cause for concern. Someone's been trying to trade him to me all offseason and my interest is pretty much toast now.They should beHow much of a threat is the third round pick (Mason) to the fifth round pick (Stacy) ?
I would assume that Stacy has the edge in terms of size, experience, and blocking skills, but are Stacy owners concerned at all?
Mason is a good player but so is Stacy.How much of a threat is the third round pick (Mason) to the fifth round pick (Stacy) ?
I would assume that Stacy has the edge in terms of size, experience, and blocking skills, but are Stacy owners concerned at all?
Greg Cosell loves him, so I like him.I still like Stacy to have a good year this year, the rookie needs to be seasoned before he is ready to challenge, IMO. Longer term we are looking at RBBC in St Louis, I imagine. Zac is good, better than his message board detractors seem willing to accept, and Tre is not exactly elite, so I don't think the Rams are drafting their bell cow here.
This.Nice upgrade for STL. Stacy's value =.
He's now the less talented half of a committee.
This x 2This.Nice upgrade for STL. Stacy's value =.
He's now the less talented half of a committee.
By some NFL team called the Rams.Stacy being written off way too early.
He played D. Richardson over Steven Jackson at times in 2012. That decision lost the Rams a playoff spot then IMO. Playing Mason over Stacy wouldn't be as much of a crime. Who know what he wants.This is the most interesting fantasy landing so far. The Rams want to run the ball and they are building the oline to maul. Does Fisher really want a committee?
The pick makes so much sense for STL. They are going to run a ton. Pead/Cunningham don't cut it as #2 and certainly not #1 if Stacy goes down. Mason brings a different element from Stacy, and will complement Stacy. As in every situation, performance may change things but at this point no reason to not think Stacy gets the majority of carries and GL work. Which in this offense is gold.This is by far the most interesting RB controversy. Tre Mason has a lot of hype here and some quite good college tape, but after the draft you gotta wonder how good is he really if he becomes only the 4th RB in a supposedly underwhelming class. Fischer has also openly admitted to not liking committee, but that might have changed. Surely, Stacey value takes a hit, but I am not convinced he is done. I am gonna go throw out some offers to see how panicked are Stacey owners.
the "gold" part is stretching. The Rams didn't score that much last year, and Bradford (for the most part) is still unproven.The pick makes so much sense for STL. They are going to run a ton. Pead/Cunningham don't cut it as #2 and certainly not #1 if Stacy goes down. Mason brings a different element from Stacy, and will complement Stacy. As in every situation, performance may change things but at this point no reason to not think Stacy gets the majority of carries and GL work. Which in this offense is gold.This is by far the most interesting RB controversy. Tre Mason has a lot of hype here and some quite good college tape, but after the draft you gotta wonder how good is he really if he becomes only the 4th RB in a supposedly underwhelming class. Fischer has also openly admitted to not liking committee, but that might have changed. Surely, Stacey value takes a hit, but I am not convinced he is done. I am gonna go throw out some offers to see how panicked are Stacey owners.
IIRC there was only one season where RB split carries somewhat evenly. This was in the transition period between George and Johnson.I don't Recall Fisher ever going with the committee approach. He pretty much uses one guy, no?
Interesting. This is about how I recall historical Fisher's RB usage as well (was it CJ and Lendale though?). -And I agree that the two STL backs are close. That said, I guess I see things solidly in Stacy's favor as the incumbent (and basically for only this reason).IIRC there was only one season where RB split carries somewhat evenly. This was in the transition period between George and Johnson.I don't Recall Fisher ever going with the committee approach. He pretty much uses one guy, no?
For the most part he plays the best guy.
It is pretty amusing reading people twist every angle they can to make one Rb look better than the other, when the way I see it Mason and Stacy are very similar players.
Skill set probably would have been a better choice of terms by me.By talent do you mean athleticism? Because they are very similar players in almost every measurable way.
Like I said above. Post #683Interesting. This is about how I recall historical Fisher's RB usage as well (was it CJ and Lendale though?). -And I agree that the two STL backs are close. That said, I guess I see things solidly in Stacy's favor as the incumbent (and basically for only this reason).IIRC there was only one season where RB split carries somewhat evenly. This was in the transition period between George and Johnson.I don't Recall Fisher ever going with the committee approach. He pretty much uses one guy, no?
For the most part he plays the best guy.
It is pretty amusing reading people twist every angle they can to make one Rb look better than the other, when the way I see it Mason and Stacy are very similar players.
However, I will admit that I am not a big fan of Stacy's talent... so I can understand those that like Mason's skill set thinking the rook will carve out a significant role soon enough.
the 65-70% is a big assumption, since several have Mason rated as a better overall talent than Stacy.Anybody who is hoping to get consistent top-10 RB stats from Stacy should abandon this hope after the Tre Mason pick.
That said, almost every NFL team is headed towards RBBC. If Stacy indeed keeps 65-70% of the touches (and there seems to be no reason to think otherwise, given Mason's subpar receiving skills to-date), then he is borderline RB1. Can someone name 12 RBs they would prefer over him?
is he equally or more talented at pass blocking?the 65-70% is a big assumption, since several have Mason rated as a better overall talent than Stacy.Anybody who is hoping to get consistent top-10 RB stats from Stacy should abandon this hope after the Tre Mason pick.
That said, almost every NFL team is headed towards RBBC. If Stacy indeed keeps 65-70% of the touches (and there seems to be no reason to think otherwise, given Mason's subpar receiving skills to-date), then he is borderline RB1. Can someone name 12 RBs they would prefer over him?
1. McCoyAnybody who is hoping to get consistent top-10 RB stats from Stacy should abandon this hope after the Tre Mason pick.
That said, almost every NFL team is headed towards RBBC. If Stacy indeed keeps 65-70% of the touches (and there seems to be no reason to think otherwise, given Mason's subpar receiving skills to-date), then he is borderline RB1. Can someone name 12 RBs they would prefer over him?
even if he stinks at pass blocking, that's not really the crux of the argument. If he's a better runner, he will get more carries. Ray Rice is horrible at pass blocking, but he was a FF force for years. The Rams got Robinson (who is a run blocking force) and drafted no WRs. Obviously, we have to wait for the season to start, but Fisher may elect to use the run game as his foundation.is he equally or more talented at pass blocking?the 65-70% is a big assumption, since several have Mason rated as a better overall talent than Stacy.Anybody who is hoping to get consistent top-10 RB stats from Stacy should abandon this hope after the Tre Mason pick.
That said, almost every NFL team is headed towards RBBC. If Stacy indeed keeps 65-70% of the touches (and there seems to be no reason to think otherwise, given Mason's subpar receiving skills to-date), then he is borderline RB1. Can someone name 12 RBs they would prefer over him?
I got exactly 12 and that was pushing it.1. McCoy - yes
2. Charles - yes
3. Foster - maybe
4. ADP - yes
5. Forte - yes
6. Murray - yes
7. Lynch - no
8. Martin - yes
9. CJ - definitely no
10. Matthews - maybe
11. Spiller - yes
12. Sankey - yes
13. Lacy - yes
14. Bell - yes
15. Gerhart - no
16. Tate - no