I wasn't aware that having the opinion that those weren't great picks constituted trolling. I guess this thread is just for celebrating the many brilliant decisions of the Browns.
Maybe I'm wrong, it wouldn't be first time and won't be the last.
As I think about it, the Weeden pick isn't completely terrible. If he's a really good QB for the next 7-10 years, his age won't matter. I wouldn't have done it, but it's justifiable.
I just don't see any good reason for the Richardson pick.
I got bashed for criticizing the Titans for giving CJ that contract. My reasons for that apply here too.
Investing limited resources, be it cap space or valuable draft picks, to try and secure one elite RB is a terrible idea.
Listen, your point of view is certainly valid. Couple things though.1.
Poor timing to come in here criticizing the 1st round for us. It's the round we are most excited for and worried about, especially with the Weeden pick.
2. The amount of money we'll be paying Richardson is severely mitigated by the rookie salary structure. When he wants a new contract, if he's put up big numbers then he will have earned it. Either we pay him or we don't. 4-5 season of Pro Bowl running back is WAY more than we've EVER had. So don't expect to see Browns fans crying about wasting a pick on an RB. We need skill position playmakers. Who would you have had us pick? Blackmon? More questions marks with him as a PLAYER than Richardson.
3. None of us are completely sold on Weeden. Age will be a problem if he takes time to develop obviously. But we need a new QB. AT LEAST this one has excellent tools, can't say that about the many many QBs that have gone through Cleveland. Couch was probably the last guy here with the right skillset. We'll see how he turns out on gameday...