If you read part of my post you would have deduced my argument for Rice immediatelly, its clear you value the most inconsistent statistic in football more than I do, I on the other hand value ANY consistency in football, Mighty Mouse and MJD are two of the MOST consistent backs in football, cant blame a player for a team decision. If I wanted to waste your and my time all I would have to do is qualify Jamaal Charles success by saying "Yeah hes really good, against the worst teams they played in '09 and the softest schedule in the NFL in '10" but im not a jackass, oh wait.You guys are too funny. The man love for Ray Rice is hilarious. I guess I hit a nerve with the "fat" comment. Sorry, but he looks fat to me. He certainly doesn't look like any classical ideal of an athlete. If he's not your husband, why would you become so outraged? If someone called a player I admire- say DeAngelo Williams- fat, I surely wouldn't be offended. No one's calling youfat.
As for the decidedly non-fat Ray Rice, he has managed 14 CAREER TDs, or one more than the "bust" Hillis had in his first season as a starter. Again, you guys go ahead and draft Rice as the #5 RB, or whatever he is in ADP at this point. That's a joke- he has not been, is not now, and will never be in the same category with the true top backs. And I will expect the bold poster who proclaimed that Rice will have a better season than Jamal Charles to come back to this forum at the end of the season and post both their stats. Barring injury, and the further head-scratching lunacy of Todd Haley, this will never happen. Charles is the most talented back in the league, bar none, and will outproduce Rice even with far fewer touches.
This is your opinion, many including myself would disagree. Every teams composition is similar but different in that they all are comprised of a few studs and a lot of chaff.As I noted, fantasy football, at least in terms of winning championships, is largely luck. Those week 16 and 17 games simply are a crap shoot, because the best players often don't play, and you need the best players in order to get there. I feel confident, for instance, that if we'd had our championship games in wee 14, say, in all the leagues I've been in, that I would have won twice as many championships.
No one has said Hillis will not produce, the closest thing ive ever even heard similar to that was "he had such a good season, its a safe bet that he wouldnt be able to put up such large numbers again" which im more inclined to agree with than "herp durr Gore is consistantly top 10, thats clearly not as impressive as one season of good procution". Its like saying RIGHT NOW that Foster is a safer bet than ADP.I'll address a few points. Yes, Frank Gore is overrated. I value TDs more than the rest of you, I guess. Let's look at two players- Gore and Peyton Hillis. Last season, in his first as a starter, Hillis had more rushing yards than Gore has EVER had, except for one season- 2006. Hillis had 13 total TDs, a figure Gore has matched ONE time in his illustrious career. He had one huge yardage season, but only scored 9 total TDs that year. He has had ONE double digit TD season in his career. If you think this is the work of a top back, then go ahead and draft him ahead of mulitple backs who will perform better than him. If Hillis is given the opportunity, he will outproduce Gore by a good margin this year. Yet, the "experts," and thus most on this forum, feel Hillis is going to slide. Why? In his only season as a starter, he produced better overall numbers (yards and TDs) than Gore-who you claim is not overrated- ever has. How does this kind of thinking work? Gore- not overrated, Hillis- will not produce.
We get it, you think differently. Consistency will beat out explosiveness over an extended period of time, everytime.If you don't think Dwayne Bowe is underrated, then how do you explain why the top TD producer last season is not even in the top 5 WRs (and I've seen him ranked at #20 or worse in some lists)? I would take him over non-TD machine Andre Johnson any day. If he isn't being undervalued, I don't know what the meaning of the word is.
Thats not what it reads like at all, it sounds like your calling out everyone on this board and everyone at FBG because they dont think similarly to you, you havent made a single counter point in this entire thread instead when faced with a counterpoint of someone else you change the subject.This is a forum, and I wanted to produce some food for thought. I don't take this stuff seriously, because so much of it is beyond my control, or the control of any fantasy owner. I can't make John Fox wake up and give DeAngelo Williams more touches (and geez, now he'll be under his wing again in Denver!) I can't make the Colts bench (or cut) the horrific Garcon and put Austin Collie outside, where he will instantly be one of the NFL's top WRs. I can't make the Bengals do the same thing with Jordan Shipley.
I agree with this, there is a luck factor, but the only way to reduce the variance is by increasing your edge, the most popular way of doing this is by following trends. You can think outside the box all you want, but what your proposing is gambling./longest post ever.We can, however, make regular free agent moves, realize most rookie fantasy draft picks are wildly overvalued, not be afraid to trade and use our own judgment when watching thees players, instead of unquestionably following the advice of Matthew Berry and co. Again, no harm meant here, and I am sorry for using the word "stupidity' in the title of this thread. I posted my real record in real leagues- I could have claimed I've won at least one league all 21 years. I think I've done well going against the grain. All any of us can do is make the playoffs, and put our teams in a position to win. After that, it's largely luck.
Last edited by a moderator: